Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 29
July 29
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Highly doubt claim of being self-made, based on image quality, lack of camera data, and statement on uploader's userpage which would indicate that s/he was −1 years old when the picture was taken, assuming the image was taken the same year that the subject died. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Highly doubt claim of being self-made, based on image quality, lack of camera data, and statement on uploader's userpage which would indicate that s/he was 0 years old when the picture was taken, assuming the image was taken the same year that the subject died. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: original Flickr image has a Creative Commons non-commercial licence that is incompatible with this wiki and the uploader's licence is not the same. ww2censor (talk) 03:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Its the same image as this one which has also been listed here. The user who uploaded it states that its self work, but the image is to high quality and it doesn't look that its from a camera. Black'nRed 03:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
source is not verifiable and up loader claim this is his work - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 07:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted per WP:CSD#F9. Mikaey, Devil's advocate 10:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely to have been created by author. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 10:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find the orginal picture on the web. If anyone finds this picture on the web please paste the link on my User talk page. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 10:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have found the image here. Could another admin please delete as a copyright infringement? \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 10:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A standard publicity shot, credited to Trevor Leighton (a well-known professional photographer), who is highly unlikely to be the uploader who claims it is self-made. The photo has no Metadata and appears to be taken directly from http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio3/lunchtimeconcerts/pip/9ng1z/ Voceditenore (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: obviously a non-free image per nom. ww2censor (talk) 14:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. This page is for deleting images that are marked as free where there is a dispute as to whether they are free or not. See AnomieBOT's instructions for information on how to deal with non-free images that may not meet the criteria. Stifle (talk) 11:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image is uploaded under fair-use rationale. The fair use rationale may be used for a poster "to provide critical commentary on the film, event, etc. in question or of the poster itself, not solely for illustration." However, the fair use rationale provided is, "To illustrate the advertisements used for the event." otherlleft 17:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong page. ViperSnake151 Talk 22:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The image quality is too high, the user states that its self work. The image came from a website since it came from this article. Black'nRed 19:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2 Tineye matches to an education establishment in .my - Skeptical user owns rights to logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Image likely sourced from a website:Small size & no metadata. Polly (Parrot) 22:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
HELLO POLLY PARROT.
THE PHOTO IS SOURCED FROM MY COMPUTER . . . AND I'M THE SCARY GUY, AND HOLD ALL COPYRIGHTS TO ALL OF MY IMAGES.
THIS IMAGE WAS UPLOADED BY JREFEREE A WIKIPEDIA ADMIN ABOUT 2 YEARS AGO AS HE ASKED ME TO E MAIL AN IMAGE TO HIM AND HE WOULD HELP ME BY PUTTING IT UP.
I ATTEMPTED TO UPDATE THE IMAGE YESTERDAY, HOWEVER I WAS UNCLEAR ABOUT HOW TO GO ABOUT IT.
SO THEN . . . MAYBE I LEFT SOMETHING OUT.
I COULD USE YOUR HELP . . . IF SOMETHING IS NOW INCORRECT ABOUT IT.
THANKS, thescary1
SCARY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thescary1 (talk • contribs) 10:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
POLLY HERE IS THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE AND UPLOAD DATA FROM JREFEREE A WIKI ADMIN: Hi Scary. I already was one step ahead of you in that I had already uploaded Image:Teachers TV cover.jpg before you uploaded Image:TVCOVER.jpg. Image:Teachers TV cover.jpg is in the Teachers' TV. I requested that Image:TVCOVER.jpg be deleted as being a duplicate image. It wouldn't have lasted long anyways since it had no license. As Wikipedia edicutation, you might want to see how I added Source, License, and Detalied Fair Use information for Image:Teachers TV cover.jpg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thescary1 (talk • contribs) 11:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC) thescary1--Scary Guy 11:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- not deleted - user has previously confirmed his identity to an admin --B (talk) 03:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional image for a band, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 22:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Montage image contains one fair use image (The Simpsons), therefore cannot be public domain. Polly (Parrot) 22:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious delete. Multiple attempts have been made to help this uploader understand, but he continues to infringe on copyrights and go well beyond fair use and our non-free policies. (ESkog)(Talk) 11:04, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3 tineye matches - No licence on image Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot of a copyrighted web page. I doubt this is released under a free license. J Milburn (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Initally tagged CSd for no source - Source provided claims - "Copyright © 2009 Param Shakti Peeth, India. All right reserved." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
