Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pappin76

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pappin76}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
  • Code letter: G

Background: Great Irish Famine is currently the subject of an ArmCom case involving the above editors. As part of the ArbCom, it was agreed as a temporary injunction that not to edit the page (and previously here) in order to prevent edit warring. A substantial edit was made (diff) by one of the participants in the ArbCom after it was opened. This led to a revert war (diff), which left the party that had made the substantial edits unhappy (diff).

Request: Pappin76 made a suspcious revert (diff) - suspicious because Pappin is a first time editor and made made a relative advanced edit (reversion, advanced use of reference tags, misleading edit summary). This was reverted by another new account (10 minutes, 4 edits), SeaOfTranquility, which then engaged in an edit war with the editor that had made the substantial edit (diff). Please check if Pappin76 and SeaOfTranquility are sock puppets of Sony-youth, SirFozzie,MarkThomas, Domer48, or Sarah777.

Note: It should be noted that Sarah777 is currently on holidays. I believe somewhere in Italy (her user page indicates Venice). sony-youthpléigh 13:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment: The User pages of Pappin76 and BigDunc are almost identical and I suspect both of being sockpuppets for that reason. Both have posted on the Irish Famine Talk page (diffs: (posted on July 20) [1] and (posted on July 21) [2]).

The two User pages in question are: Pappin76 and BigDunc.--Major Bonkers (talk) 20:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: moved discussion to talk. This includes several comments from the accused.. Kwsn(Ni!) 22:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated. All of it. Go forth and resolve your dispute. Mackensen (talk) 02:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.