Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 October 8

< October 7	October 9 >

October 8

Template:Tomb Raider music tables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tomb Raider music tables (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use template, should be re-merged with the article Frietjes (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Music table interferes with the article. It should be linked to or have its own article. The table being in the middle of the aricle interferes with readability, it has no introduction, and to be honest is very confusing. On first glance it looks like a history of Tomb Raider video games, not just the Main Themes. Clarify or delete. Psydude (talk) 01:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pinoy Big Brother contestants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pinoy Big Brother contestants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:PBBNA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Pinoy Big Brother contestants with Template:PBBNA.
The following request moved from Wikipedia:Proposed merger noticeboard to here: "Template talk:Pinoy Big Brother contestants" [should be] merged to "Template talk:PBBNA." Both templates are similar in nature so better merge them. Or delete the other. Merge or delete, depends on which is much better.-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

merge Frietjes (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jessica Lange sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:50, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jessica Lange sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{Jessica Lange}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sadly, there has been a lot of hard work by an over-zealous editor that has made the topics relating to Jessica Lange a bit of a mess. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite doi/10.1002.2Fange.201203515.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Mark Arsten (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite doi/10.1002.2Fange.201203515. (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just a stray . (dot) at the end of the doi. Minus the dot, you can see that Template:Cite doi/10.1002.2Fange.201203515 works fine. LudicrousTripe (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dyosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:51, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dyosa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This only contains one actual article, and it is unlikely any of them have the potential to become articles other than the character list. TTN (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete no need for a navbox here, just list the characters in the article. Frietjes (talk) 14:51, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uganda Heads of State

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uganda Heads of State (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Nigeria Heads of State (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

empty templates. Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Graffiti on the Train

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Graffiti on the Train (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation to and from the articles in this navbox is sufficiently satisfied with the {{Stereophonics}} navbox, already in the same articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LT90001 (talk) 22:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, I'm currently working on making articles for all the songs from Graffiti on the Train, if not all then most of them. I've already published "Violins and Tambourines" which isn't present in the {{Stereophonics}} template but how many more articles related to {{Graffiti on the Train}} would I, or other users, have to publish to keep the template? Ultra Violet Light 11:29, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It seems it would just be best to incorporate such articles in the navbox for the artist. In time, maybe split that into a separate singles/songs navbox. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think it unlikely that every song on the album would meet notability. Ones that do can be included in the {{Stereophonics}} navbox. --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mosques_in_the_European_Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mosques_in_the_European_Union (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Moving from AFD. Original nomination by Indiasummer95 (talk · contribs):

As the European Union is an organisation more than a geographic mass, surely it should be 'Mosques in Europe', or for countries such as the United Kingdom where there are disproportionate articles to other countries, split by country.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete templates are not designed to have thousands of entries in them. Better suited in sub categories.--Loomspicker (talk) 14:08, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.