Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 23

< March 22	March 24 >

March 23

Template:Cass City Public School District

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cass City Public School District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one article listed (aside from the primary school district article) are likely to meet notability) Varnent (talk)^(COI) 20:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seven of 9 links are to non-existent articles. Does not serve the basic function of a navbox, i.e., to facilitate reader navigation among existing articles. Two links does not cut it; could be better served with "see also" articles. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Template:Footer US NC Indoor 60m Men

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted per WP:G7. Sam Walton (talk) 10:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Template:Footer US NC Indoor 60m Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

either delete or history merge with Template:Footer US NC Indoor 60m Men or move back. Frietjes (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Please note this occasion because I do not say this word often. This is duplicate content to the other template mentioned. I merged any missing information to the other template then blanked this unnecessary template. NOM restored the template and is now asking for its deletion. Maybe that procedure makes sense somewhere in wiki world. Trackinfo (talk) 19:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with delete. As an author of one of the duplicate entries, I see no reason why the redundant item cannot be removed. All the information is in the one remaining. It was an accident of timing that led to the duplication. Dnd25 (talk) 20:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per WP:G6 and/or WP:G7 -- creation of duplicate template was a mistake, and the template creator concurs. Let's not dally with this one. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of Turkıc Peoples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:19, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Turkıc Peoples (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates Template:History of the Turkic peoples pre-14th century. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:List of Community episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of Community episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Community (TV series) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:List of Community episodes with Template:Community (TV series).
{{Community (TV series)}} only has a few links, only three of which are not repeated here. Might make sense to merge the two. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete {{List of Community episodes}} as unwieldy - the episodes are better served by the list article and prev/next links in the infobox. Alakzi (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Alakzi: Episode navboxes are very common. I'm neither for nor against them, but agree they can get a bit too big. Look at {{The Office US Episodes}} or {{Navbox Chuck episodes}} for just a couple of the larger examples. Should we look to find consensus for all of them? --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment regarding notice - @Robsinden: Please do not forget to notify the creator of the second template. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I had Twinkled it - didn't realise this wasn't automated. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up, Rob. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator's rationale. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the list template to the series template, per nom. --Izno (talk) 01:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peter Landesman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 31. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Josh Boone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Josh Boone (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, only two films listed. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are notable films by notable directors. Two film are enough. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep for now, the director is still active. Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jason Bateman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jason Bateman (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only three links. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are enough links for a notable director's template. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep for now, the director is still active. Frietjes (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Scott Mann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scott Mann (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only three links. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are enough links for a notable director's template. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep for now, the director is still active. Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ryan Coogler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ryan Coogler (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Only includes three links. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those are enough links for a notable director's template. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 15:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep for now, the director is still active. Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fran Walsh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fran Walsh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The relevant Wikiproject advises against any filmography navboxes except director navboxes in order to avoid navbox creep. In any case, this is mostly redundant to {{Peter Jackson}}. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:David Hirschfelder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:David Hirschfelder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The relevant Wikiproject advises against any filmography navboxes except director navboxes in order to avoid navbox creep. Even John Williams and Lalo Schifrin don't get navboxes. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Polly Draper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 31. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:25, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rosemary Blight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rosemary Blight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Producer navboxes are uncommon, and should be reserved for really notable producers where there is some kind of established creative vision or coherent body of work, rather than a loose list of production credits, otherwise we'll end up with navbox creep. The relevant Wikiproject advises against any filmography navboxes except director navboxes. Rob Sinden (talk) 10:07, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete Frietjes (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uw-agf4

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Luk (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-agf4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not assuming good faith is not, in and of itself, a blockable offense. Per WP:AGF, we shouldn't even be citing WP:AGF when warning, we should use {{subst:uw-npa4}} or {{subst:uw-harass4}}. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 03:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as well-explained above. Neutrality^talk 05:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as Ahecht points out Not assuming good faith isn't in the slightest a blockable offence, I'm seeing no point whatsoever to this template/warning..... –Davey2010^Talk 05:56, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is really not appropriate. On seeing this I'm tempted to nominate the others in the agf series too, on the basis that addressing AGF issues with a template instead of an actual human conversation is almost guaranteed to make things worse. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.