Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 12

< June 11	June 13 >

June 12

Template:Bold dark red

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bold dark red (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is used in some phonetics articles, as well as what is essentially the substitution of it (e.g. Alveolar consonant#Alveolar consonants in IPA). I don't even consider myself color-blind, but AFAIC the difference from usual bold text is hardly if not entirely noticeable. Goes directly against WP:Accessibility, what should be used in those instances is something like {{highlight}}. Nardog (talk) 20:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, seems no worse than any of the others in Category:Text color templates. however, I do agree that the use in phonetics articles is problematic. you don't need to delete the template to fix the articles. you just fix the articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Denominations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Denominations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Just hardcodes a bunch of other templates. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Fwiw, the template doesn't hardcode, it transcludes the other templates. – Uanfala 20:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or make subst only per nom. Ppp ery 16:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cutting-edge science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutting-edge science (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and overly specific. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:16, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current severe outbreak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current severe outbreak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific "current" template. Thunderstorm outbreaks rarely are notable enough to have articles. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tom Ford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tom Ford (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dimmed namespace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dimmed namespace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No foreseeable use. Just dims the article name. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

comment, it seems to dim the namespace (not the article name), hence the name of the template. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep It does its job. It's for design purposes on some portals and other special pages. We had similar case with Template:Hidden title. --Rezonansowy_akaRezy (talk | contribs) 23:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Rezonansowy. I'm actually surprised it's unused. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Solicit then inform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Solicit then inform (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Solicited then inform (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused templates from the olden days that say the same thing. No longer used. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Processing units

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Processing units (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned and vague, talkpage from 2007 indicates that this template didn't have much use anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, seems to generally duplicate navigation found in Template:CPU technologies. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ELNO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ELNO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diffneeded

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diffneeded (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:D&D-char-stub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D&D-char-stub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to {{D&D-stub}} Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and what else? it adds the article to two categories. Frietjes (talk) 13:36, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Frietjes: The other category is served by {{Fict-char-stub}}. – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 12:32, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Books of the Hebrew Bible

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Books of the Hebrew Bible (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and very long sidebar. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Black Power movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Black Power movement (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bill Evans Trio Chronology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bill Evans Trio Chronology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused chronology table. We can do this without templates now Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GMA Anchors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:GMA Anchors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As a list of cast/crew of a TV program, it fails WP:PERFNAV. Rob Sinden (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bibliography maker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bibliography maker (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated article template; most articles are discouraged from beginning with "This is a" anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Subst: only. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 07:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@Rich Farmbrough: even though articles aren't supposed to begin with "This is a"? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Aren't supposed to"? If you think that's the wrong way to start a bibliography you can change it to something better. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

@Rich Farmbrough: can you provide an example where it has been used? when I performed this search, I only found this template. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably related to this. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 14:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]

okay, so possibly in 2010, but nothing since that time. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not used since 2010, and possibly never used. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bengali language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bengali language (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, mostly redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, duplicates navigation in Template:Culture of Bengal. Frietjes (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The template can be easily expanded to include all the relevant articles in Category:Bengali language, in which case it will no longer duplicate Template:Culture of Bengal. – Uanfala 20:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BH Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BH Entertainment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused from 2013; also inexplicably tagged as an unreviewed article. No foreseeable use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unref-talk-old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unref-talk-old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Ancient warning template from 2005 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USGov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. feel free to redirect if you wish Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and deprecated Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to {{PD-USGov}}. – Train2104 (t • c) 16:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tropfest finalist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tropfest finalist (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox , seems redundant to other film boxes Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Trails, Hamilton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Trails, Hamilton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, only has one link anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TodayNewsreaders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TodayNewsreaders (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, seems to be a WP:PERFNAV Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tfut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:05, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tfut (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, doesn't seem like something that would happen. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:14, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to user space. Go ahead and delete. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 04:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Terminology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Terminology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear purpose Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Technical communication

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Technical communication (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unclear navigational purpose Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:J. K. Amalou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:J. K. Amalou (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish communists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swedish communists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused thing from 2008 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, Communist Party of Sweden does a better job showing the lineage. Frietjes (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sord

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 20. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sord (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Comma swap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).