Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2024; 15(11): 1109-1111
Published online Nov 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1109
Insights and implications from the study on meniscus reconstruction using tendon autograft
Phi Duong Nguyen, Department of Orthopaedic - Burn - Plastic Surgery, City Children's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 71815, Viet Nam
Thanh Kien Lam, The Faculty of Medical Technology, Van Lang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam
ORCID number: Phi Duong Nguyen (0000-0002-9556-4049); Thanh Kien Lam (0009-0003-5878-9278).
Author contributions: Nguyen PD and Lam TK conceived the idea, drafted the manuscript, critically revised it, and approved the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Nguyen PD and Lam TK declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript. The authors have not received any fees for serving as speakers, consultants, or advisory board members. They have not received any research funding from organizations related to this work. Neither author is an employee of any organization that may have an interest in this research. The authors do not own stocks, shares, or patents related to the subject matter of this manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Thanh Kien Lam, MD, Lecturer, Researcher, The Faculty of Medical Technology, Van Lang University, 69/68 Dang Thuy Tram Street, Ward 13, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Viet Nam. [email protected]
Received: September 17, 2024
Revised: October 9, 2024
Accepted: November 12, 2024
Published online: November 18, 2024
Processing time: 59 Days and 6.8 Hours

Abstract

This letter addresses the recent study by Zhu et al on the predictive factors for coronal and sagittal graft extrusion length following medial meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts. The study provides valuable insights into the importance of preoperative joint space width and tunnel positioning as predictors of graft extrusion. Specifically, it found strong correlations between preoperative joint space width and medial, posterior, and mean graft extrusion at both 1 week and 8 months post-operation. Additionally, tunnel edge distance at 1 week post-operation correlated with anterior and posterior graft extrusion. These findings offer critical guidance for improving surgical outcomes. However, the letter highlights the need for further research with larger sample sizes and comparative studies involving different graft types to strengthen these findings and broaden their applicability in clinical settings. The study's contributions to understanding meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts are acknowledged, along with suggestions for future research directions

Key Words: Meniscus reconstruction; Tendon autograft; Graft extrusion; Joint space width; Tunnel positioning; Surgical outcomes

Core Tip: Zhu et al's study on meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts reveals crucial predictive factors for graft extrusion, notably preoperative joint space width and tunnel positioning. These findings have significant implications for patient selection and surgical technique refinement. The study's strengths lie in its longitudinal design and comprehensive approach, while its main limitation is the small sample size. Future research should focus on larger cohorts, comparative graft studies, and long-term clinical outcomes. This work represents a significant advancement in personalizing meniscus reconstruction procedures, potentially leading to improved patient outcomes in orthopedic surgery.



TO THE EDITOR

A recent study by Zhu et al[1] in the World Journal of Orthopedics examined predictive factors for graft extrusion in medial meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts. This retrospective study, conducted at Dalian University Affiliated Xinhua Hospital, analyzed data from 10 patients who underwent the procedure between July 2021 and February 2023. The researchers found correlations between preoperative joint space width and postoperative graft extrusion at 1 week and 8 months, as well as between tunnel edge distance and extrusion. They developed predictive models based on these findings. Despite its small sample size, this study is significant as it addresses a knowledge gap in orthopedic surgery, provides quantitative data for surgical planning, and has potential implications for improving patient outcomes in tendon autograft meniscus reconstruction.

Key findings and their significance

Zhu et al's study on medial meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts revealed key predictive factors for graft extrusion, providing valuable insights that both align with and diverge from previous research in the field[1]. The study found that preoperative joint space width strongly correlated with graft extrusion at 1 week and 8 months post-operation, a finding that differs from some meniscus allograft studies[1]. This discrepancy may be attributed to the unique biomechanical properties of tendon autografts, which are softer than allografts and potentially more susceptible to factors like joint space width[2].

Consistent with earlier research on meniscus allograft transplantation, tunnel position, particularly anterior tunnel edge distance, significantly influenced graft extrusion[3]. This finding underscores the critical importance of precise surgical technique across different graft types. Preoperative factors such as Kellgren-Lawrence grade and hip-knee-ankle angle difference also showed correlations with extrusion, echoing findings from studies on natural meniscus extrusion[4]. These similarities suggest that certain factors remain crucial in meniscus positioning, regardless of whether the meniscus is natural or reconstructed.

The study introduced novel findings, including the correlation between the medial edge incline angle and graft extrusion, and the observation that general extrusion increases from 1 week to 8 months post-operation. These unique aspects highlight the dynamic nature of tendon autograft remodeling over time, a process that may not be as pronounced in allograft studies.

These findings have important implications for patient selection and surgical planning. The study suggests using preoperative joint space width as a screening tool and emphasizes the importance of precise tunnel placement. The persistence of correlations at 8 months highlights the long-term impact of these factors on graft positioning, underscoring the need for comprehensive preoperative assessment and personalized surgical plans based on individual patient characteristics.

While the small sample size (n = 10) necessitates further research, possibly through larger, multicenter studies, this study provides valuable insights for improving surgical outcomes in medial meniscus reconstruction with tendon autografts. The contrasting results with meniscus allograft studies suggest that tendon autografts may behave differently, warranting specific research in this area[5].

Strengths of the study

Zhu et al's study on meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts fills a crucial knowledge gap by examining predictive factors for graft extrusion[1]. Its longitudinal design, measuring outcomes at 1 week and 8 months post-operation, provides insights into short-term and medium-term results. The comprehensive approach, analyzing multiple preoperative factors and their correlations with graft extrusion, offers a nuanced understanding of the procedure's outcomes. These findings have practical implications for improving surgical outcomes, potentially enhancing patient selection and surgical techniques based on individual factors.

Limitations and areas for further research

The study's primary limitation is its small sample size of 10 patients, which, while significant for this specific procedure, limits statistical power and generalizability[1]. This small cohort makes it challenging to perform meaningful subgroup analyses, capture rare complications, and may increase the risk of type II errors. These limitations underscore the urgent need for larger, multi-center studies to validate and expand the findings. Future research directions should include comparative studies with different graft types, investigations into correlations between predictive factors and clinical outcomes, long-term follow-up studies on graft durability and osteoarthritis progression, exploration of preoperative interventions to improve surgical outcomes, and development of advanced imaging techniques or machine learning algorithms for more accurate prediction of graft extrusion. These research areas could significantly enhance surgical planning, patient selection, and long-term outcomes in meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts, addressing the limitations of the current study and advancing the field of orthopedic surgery.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Zhu et al's study significantly advances our understanding of meniscus reconstruction using tendon autografts by identifying key predictive factors for graft extrusion[1]. The findings on preoperative joint space width and tunnel positioning provide a foundation for more personalized surgical approaches. While larger studies are needed to validate these results, the research highlights the importance of comprehensive preoperative assessment and precise surgical technique. This could lead to improved patient selection, better surgical planning, and ultimately enhanced outcomes. The study's impact on clinical practice in orthopedic surgery could be substantial, contributing to the ongoing evolution of meniscus reconstruction techniques and improving patient care.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Orthopedics

Country of origin: Viet Nam

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Li XM S-Editor: Lin C L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Zhu TW, Xiang XX, Li CH, Li RX, Zhang N. Predictive factors for coronal and sagittal graft extrusion length after using tendon autograft for medial meniscus reconstruction. World J Orthop. 2024;15:1036-1046.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lee SM, Bin SI, Kim JM, Lee BS, Lee CR, Son DW, Park JG. Long-term Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With and Without Extrusion: Mean 12.3-Year Follow-up Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:815-821.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Li C, Hu X, Meng Q, Zhang X, Zhu J, Dai L, Cheng J, Zhong M, Shi W, Ren B, Zhang J, Fu X, Duan X, Ao Y. The potential of using semitendinosus tendon as autograft in rabbit meniscus reconstruction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7033.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Lee DH. Incidence and Extent of Graft Extrusion following Meniscus Allograft Transplantation. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:5251910.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Lee DH, Lee BS, Kim JM, Yang KS, Cha EJ, Park JH, Bin SI. Predictors of degenerative medial meniscus extrusion: radial component and knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:222-229.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 116]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]