Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 6th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this. This should have been a newer version of this file : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Explanation_on_creating_a_task.webm Subins2000 (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. Duplicate of File:Explanation on creating a task.webm. --Dereckson (talk) 05:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: Not a duplicate.
Subins2000: Commons is an autonomous media library proving images, videos, etc.
As such when you see somewhere (for example on a wiki) a file and you wish to update it, there are two possibilities:
  • what you do is a tiny fix (e.g. spelling error in a SVG): overwrite the file with your new version
  • what you do is another interpretation of the work (e.g. adjust the angle of a photo): upload a new file
  • what you do is a new file to supersede the old (e.g. like here): upload a new file, change URLs in the pages you wish
We do so because each file is valuable. For example, in this case, that allows to see how Phabricator evolved in 3 years.
--Dereckson (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

O título do ficheiro foi criado errado. 187.59.233.180 03:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 07:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. MiddayCoffee (talk) 12:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. MiddayCoffee (talk) 12:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.haber7.com/guncel/haber/2241534-fethi-sekin-aslen-nereli yabancım 05:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 12:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. There is an AFD discussion about the supposed "Central Saharan Republic" on enwp, in case anyone is curious. Keφr (keep talk here) 10:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- User:Kephir has had it explained to him on numerous occasions that his approach to the "special and fictional flags" issue is problematic and mostly unproductive (including on his personal user talk page and twice being referred to "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems"). After the message left on his user talk page -- warning him that if he refused to engage in the current "User problems" noticeboard discussion, and instead started in with a whole new round of deletion nominations against inoffensive (i.e. non-hoaxing non-hatemongering) special or fictional flags, it would be unlikely to be interpreted as evidence of good faith on his part -- he then chose to engage in exactly that problematic course of action. Therefore User:Kephir's action in nominating this file for deletion would appear to contain a significant malicious or spiteful component, and I would strongly recommend that all Kephir's post-August-25th "special or fictional flags" deletion proposals be automatically rejected until some of the underlying issues are settled, and Kephir's behavior can be adjusted so that it does not appear to have a goal of stirring up turbulence and turmoil among the Commons community. AnonMoos (talk) 17:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

edits. If you want 117.24.17.33 14:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

edit without logging 117.24.17.33 14:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your IP be recorded in 117.24.17.33 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 14:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

check messages 117.24.17.33 14:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 14:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://mapio.net/pic/p-65691856/ Yann (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is original source: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/73123846 , copyrighted photo from panoramio.com --Smooth O (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism file used by blocked sock on pt.wiki, same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Milhada.jpg. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 21:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Vandalism file used by blocked sock on pt.wiki, same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Milhada.jpg.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source of the pictures in this collage should be properly detailed. I doubt these are all own work. BrightRaven (talk) 07:52, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is true of all my work is also my course with the permission of the owner of the opposite side Tsvyra

Deleted: speedy deleted, at least one copyvio https://twitter.com/boustanicorp/status/731806610352447488. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mususe of Creator namespace. Should be moved to User. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Had been moved from User: to Creator:, I moved it back. --Achim (talk) 20:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Tout droits réservés" sur Flickr Benoît Prieur (d) 20:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (COM:ADVERT). jdx Re: 21:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was previously published on Twitter and elsewhere online. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio from http://files.petrpaulu.webnode.cz/200000248-33f3e35a2e-public/Petr%20Paul%C5%AF%20guitar.JPG — Draceane talkcontrib. 22:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional photo from the official page [1] and EXIF — Draceane talkcontrib. 23:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional photo from the official page [2] and EXIF — Draceane talkcontrib. 23:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:D2:1BC1:7CAE:90A9:E52E:9AE9:8542 11:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC) same for File:Shaun (German Mascots - American Football).png, File:Tack (German Mascots - American Football).png and File:Spike (German Mascots - American Football).png[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: " 6 January 2017 Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Louie (German Mascots - American Football).png (Mass deletion of copyrighted or other inappropriate content (copyvios from the web) https://www.facebook.com/GERMascotsAF/ - Using VisualFileChange.)". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarkarsanju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion of non important music artist, wikipedia is not a personal album and of course, out of scope

The Photographer 12:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and the additional note that "Sanjib Sarkar" was in all the images and thus could have created none of them. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 00:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khuram Waqas Rana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining file, FB size, no EXIF, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timothe21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work, see File:Dr-map.gif. Jos1950 (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La solución es sencilla, cambiar la licencia y poner la plantilla PD-USGov-CIA-WF.--Jualve (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mimados Py (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commercial/promotional material used on self-promotion article. See es:Usuario_discusión:Mimados_Py

Andycyca (talk) 05:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 15:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karrimski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos/covers/posters. Probably false authorship claims. No permission.

--XXN, 15:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saurav 72000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saurav 72000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gardmanahay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is not enough source information to prove the license.

http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25463/19796/thumbs/vb030212_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25453/19786/thumbs/vb030202_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25466/19799/thumbs/vb030215_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25470/19803/thumbs/vb030219_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25470/19803/thumbs/vb030219_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25465/19798/thumbs/vb030214_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/25468/19801/thumbs/vb030217_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16504/10867/thumbs/gs009584_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/11002/5365/thumbs/vs001046_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16000/10363/thumbs/gs009081_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/5744/117/thumbs/vb000909_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo3/109500/102843/thumbs/vs136809_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/15974/10337/thumbs/gs009055_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/5770/143/thumbs/vb000937_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo0/16504/10867/thumbs/gs009584_med.jpg
http://www.armeniaca.am http://www.armeniaca.am/armeniaca/thumb_repo1/47870/41653/thumbs/hb069333_med.jpg

Elisfkc (talk) 22:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The director of RAA said that we can use any photo of their archive free, if we will mention the source. He said that there is no problem. I will ask him to send you a letter such as here is... (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS).--Gardmanahay (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The director of RAA archive said that he will send a message ((https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS)). Please, don't delete these photos.--Gardmanahay (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To Closing Admin: please also see User talk:Elisfkc#About photoes. Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gardmanahay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of maps, decorations and other content grabbed from the net with no evidence of freedom.

VLu (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I get these maps from? Can you show the source? As far as I can remember, I made them myself․
Gardmanahay, I don't have to look for sources, you must give them (see COM:EVID). People who use free maps for making their derivatives, show their sources at the Information box. You are massive copyvio uploader, "your" maps differ one from another and don't look like derivatives of well-known free maps. There's a significant doubt that you are the author, so files are to be deleted (see COM:PRP). --VLu (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
VLu Ok, I wont do it again.--Gardmanahay (talk) 11:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matthuujudok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apart from the two oldest files (not nominated here) they are all likely copyvio. No EXIF, no proof of permission.

Trijnsteltalk 22:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author, wrong date, wrong license. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 02:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work of the uploader on Flickr Didym (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial/promotional material Andycyca (talk) 04:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 07:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope due to bad quality (blurry). Taivo (talk) 09:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 10:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This book is not PD in US due to URAA: published in Poland in 1946, the translator died in 1946 (his works were not PD in Poland on 1.1.1996), it will be PD in US in 2042 Ankry (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: non USA work. --Jcb (talk) 22:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miltosmanetas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader is User:Miltosmanetas. These are works by the artist Miltos Manetas. There is no evidence that the two are the same person, so this could be simply a fan. Commons Username Policy requires that persons using the name of a well known person must prove their identity via OTRS.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified person; low resolution photo, no EXIF - questionable authorship. --XXN, 15:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amir malik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just a mask with no available content. not useful and not used... suitable png is available DerFussi 12:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: vacation shot without location info and encyclopaedic value Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown child, thinks this is something like Facebook. Paulbe (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant child. Paulbe (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harrybrew113 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

+non-free original poster:

--XXN, 14:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; no description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 18:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "CC BY-NC 4.0" in the filename contradicts the licensing template. If the uploader's intent is to impose {{noncommercial}} restrictions, the file must be deleted. If not, the file should be renamed so as not to deter reuse. LX (talk, contribs) 20:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, unusable. Granada (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Er Mohammad ikram Ansari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures - out of scope.

--XXN, 21:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, COM:ADVERT (compare with uploader's username). --XXN, 22:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hemanth2230 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably images from the company official website. Uploader was already blocked for copyright violations.

--XXN, 22:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 22:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariqmar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free content. Avatars of game characters and game icons are copyrighted by the developing company.

--XXN, 22:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 22:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danish Iqbal is not mentioned in en.wiki. He is a non-notable person. The file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 22:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content. Copyrighted by the developing company. --XXN, 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art. But maybe the drawing/painting is very old? Who is the artist and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hary Cleverson (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in fr.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painting by living French artist, Partick Moya. No evidence of permission from the artist. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jean-no (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works by living French artist, Partick Moya. No evidence of permission from the artist.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's a public event and it shows the person more than his work. Jean-no (talk) 00:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The fact that it is a public event is irrelevant -- the work is copyrighted and requires a license. As for de minimis, in one case the only thing in the image besides the artist is a large painting and in the other the artist is show actually working on one of his paintings. Neither can possibly be de minimis. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And should not be better to crop them instead of nominating for deletion? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not DM even when cropped, if the artist Partick Moya send permission to OTRS the images can be restored. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photo, uploaded for a spam draft on enwiki, no EXIF and uploader's other upload is a copyvio so this probably is as well. BethNaught (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing, no evidence that has been published before 2003. Sealle (talk) 05:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The license is certainly not correct and with a known author, it must be proven that he died before 1947. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original license:

Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0)

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

--Frze > talk 06:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Tagged {{flickrreview|File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)|2013-04-26}}. If we trust the bot the license on flickr must have been changed later. --Achim (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The original CC-BY license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover, should be uploaded locally under fair use. — Yerpo Eh? 06:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Jorge Andrado https://flickr.com/photos/85213921@N04/28720407536. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
Jorge Andrado https://flickr.com/photos/85213921@N04/28720407536 grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

--KSK (talk) 07:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. KSK, the template above, {{PD-Author}}, can be used only with a file that is CC-0. As noted above, this file has the PDM on Flicker, so {{PD-Author}} cannot be used. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Leoboudv (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Public domain This work has been released into the public domain by its author, Jorge Andrado https://flickr.com/photos/85213921@N04/28136750203. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
Jorge Andrado https://flickr.com/photos/85213921@N04/28136750203 grants anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

--KSK (talk) 07:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did the creator of this 1947 poster die 70 years ago? I think he/she just created it 70 years ago. Leoboudv (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It doesn't matter, because works from that period are under the old law, which called for 80 years, not 70. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing author/permission for the depicted portrait A.Savin 07:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Kosovo.. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please do not undelete even if Kosovo established FoP: this is a temporarily shown artwork. --A.Savin 15:26, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Скульптура создана в 1980 году вместе с памятником Первопоселенцу. Dogad75 (talk) 07:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the Swedish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted several times for various reasons, most recently in August 2014. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 07:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, this is a copyright-protected character. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 09:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted character. COM:DW. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 09:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently a cropped version of File:Schuster Pune.png Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photo contains private birth-and-death dates, please delete it Nikos Andronikos (talk) 10:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Does this mean that we need to delete any image of any gravestone which contains birth-and-death dates? Even, maybe, when the person has died 500 years ago? Where are the limits? And can birth-and-death dates be “private” at all? Really? They are just numbers. Most death dates are published in newspapers anyway ...
So, in general: We do delete files if they are copyright violations. We delete files if they are spam. And there are some more reasons for deleting files. But is it really a common practice to delete files just because they contain some (questionably!) “private dates”? Maybe I have just missed this, but this is new to me. Please point me to some documentation about privacy of simple numbers as a reasonable rationale for deleting files on Commons.
No offence, just wondering. --Aristeas (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- As noted above, B&D ates are public information. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising or self-promotion: Picture of not notable actress, article was deleted from both german and english wikipedia 88.70.161.233 10:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be TV screenshot. Al-Douri (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oktoih (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; no useful description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; poor description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; suspected 'out of scope' since Aug.2016 Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; suspected 'out of scope' since Aug.2016 Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie; suspected 'out of scope' since Aug.2016 Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Los Santos is a fictional place, where Grand Theft Auto series happens. I think, that this is copyrighted screenshot from the series. Taivo (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Content in the main MediaWiki.org mainspace is under the CC BY-SA 3.0 and as such may not be relicensed under the CC0.    FDMS  4    19:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:FDMS4, the content of that page was uploaded to mw.org under my guidance (in person). The user agreed to give it under CC0, hence i moved it to CC0 space once it became available. I will try to reach out to the editor to get him to comment to this point, but the intent was clearly stated during my discussion with him. And thanks for keeping tabs on it! :) --Yurik (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: Your point is?    FDMS  4    11:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
MediaWiki wiki uses the same license as Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA) but Commons files hace their own licenses (you already know that but I should mentioned this). So, your deletion rationale does not make sense; applying your rationale, you should nominate for deletion every file used exclusively in MediaWiki site.
This non-media file, strictly talking, is not part of MediaWiki wiki, but a file from Commons and used there, just like any Commons file used in any MediaWiki (Wikimedia ir not) website.
Finally, data is not copyrightable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:27, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: Ahem, did you take a look at the content being discussed here (specifically, the source stated on the content page)?    FDMS  4    13:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I did, so, I ask you again, why you think that data (latitude and longitude) is copyrightable? --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Amitie 10g: For that new aspect you brought to the discussion please see COM:CSM#Maps & satellite imagery. While a single pair of lat and long coordinates (≙ pixel) doesn't meet the TOO a complex set of them (≙ image) certainly does.    FDMS  4    16:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Also a set of coordinates and elevation values cannot be copyrighted if the license of the base maps are public domain. Usually these data were produced by machines (GPS devices) or by simple copying of outlines. They lack of any originality/creativity. Both for CC-by-sa and CC0 you need “creative human activities” (see for instance File:Macaca nigra self-portrait large.jpg, too). So, OpenStreetMap performed also a relicensing from CC-by-sa to ODbL. But in contrast to the plain data published here many of theses OSM data contain human activities like additions of descriptions. Unfortunately article-like data at Commons and its sisters could not and cannot be marked as “public domain” of CC0 because it is not possible in the current state of the Mediawiki software. --RolandUnger (talk) 06:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1944 book covers are still protected with copyright. Who is the cover artist and when (s)he died? 178.197.227.71 20:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Ghetyasar27.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Согласно обсуждению на странице файла. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Source site has explicit copyright notice. To keep it on Commons we need a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

articulo falso Philip Guerrero (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo for a company(?) with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. (Also: the filename and "Creative Commons BY-NC-SA" statements contradict the licensing templates, and {{noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing.) LX (talk, contribs) 20:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 178.197.225.150 20:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GunsHolstersAndGear (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The description states: "You may use this photo on your website or blog as long as you include a 'do follow', clickable hyperlink to GunsHolstersAndGear.com" - I find it doubtful to have such a restriction within a CC license, but at least at Wikimedia Commons we cannot fulfill this requirement. All external links placed at any Wikimedia project are forced 'no follow'.

List of 334 Files
* File:Yankee Hill Machine (YHM) 9mm Pistol - Left Side.jpg

Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The restriction also does not allow use in print, on tee-shirts, etc. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.1/jp/ contradict the licensing template. If the copyright holder intended to impose {{noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions, this should not have been uploaded to Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 22:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mathanagopal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/in/ contradict the licensing templates. If the copyright holder intended to impose {{noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions, these should not have been uploaded to Commons.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC) Restored per discussion today at User_talk:Mathanagopal#Notification_about_possible_deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The links to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ contradict the licensing template. {{Noncommercial}} and {{nonderivative}} restrictions are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. Unfortunately, we do not have an entry on India at Commons:Threshold of originality to determine whether the logotype might be below the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. Given the legal heritage from the British, the threshold might be quite low. LX (talk, contribs) 22:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope 178.197.234.6 22:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windy Day Killarney 1979.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Josh Silburt 1914-1991.jpg, the file may not be own work. The original file may also be copyrighted, since Josh Silburt has died in 1991 [3]. Here the same painting. Harlock81 (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio from the official page — Draceane talkcontrib. 23:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We are promoter of the event, owner of registered trademark and photos were taking and edited for us as promotional material. Therefore we are willing to provide some of these images under CC. Ondhrd (talk) 12:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ondhrd: You have to send permisson through OTRS system. Thank you for cooperation. — Draceane talkcontrib. 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not good cropped, my mistake Leonprimer (talk) 10:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: self-nomination of recent upload. P 1 9 9   17:52, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many better ones at Category:Kleve. P 1 9 9   17:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

partial photo of face with no identification Malcolma (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non notable sports pitch at unknown location Malcolma (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Better use file:20161229 003609 - OTHONI FLAG.jpg. Taivo (talk) 13:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензионный статус неясен, источника нет Dogad75 (talk) 13:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   18:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very strange depiction without border - we have a better one Antemister (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   18:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown boy, minor age, likes music and think this is Facebook. Paulbe (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:01, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of unknown person. Paulbe (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non notable dog photo Malcolma (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's request 維基小霸王 (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   18:03, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of not relevant person. Paulbe (talk) 14:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not-relevant person. Paulbe (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photograph, Out of scope. (possible image from facebook without permission, see EXIF-data) Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a general question about the complete Panoramio upload project, not just about this single image, right? So we should not discuss it here, at some random image, but, if at all, in an appropriate place; at least at User talk:Shizhao. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 11:03, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of panoramio streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks more like product promotion rather than anything that is educational in scope. Not being used to support articles.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a company with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Even if it were within scope, verification of the uploader's claim that the copyright holder of the logo has actually released it into the public domain using the specific wording of the CC zero dedication would be required. LX (talk, contribs) 12:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request : It is not allowed copyright or the author can't prove this picture is copyrighted by him or her.-Lkkpmo (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This pic is the one of my pictures from conference of Wonder Girls live in Bangkok in 2009 File:2_PM_Korean_band.jpg, File:2PM_on_stage.jpg, File:Wooyoung.jpg, File:Nichkhun 2PM.jpg--Sry85 (talk) 04:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this pictures didn't have any imformation about this picture. Like canon or sony...etc, Please named by you in the description field.--Lkkpmo (talk) 06:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And this pictures didn't be the same source in your File File:2_PM_Korean_band.jpg, File:2PM_on_stage.jpg。--Lkkpmo (talk) 06:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
EXIF lost by cropping process by Photoshop. But this pic is from the same camara (Canon IXY DIGITAL 910 IS) and the date is 27 February 2009. I was looking for the original file, But seem It lost since I used the new PC.--Sry85 (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:29, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of [[:File:Karte Dominikanische Republik.png Jos1950 (talk) 00:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate of File:Dominican republic sm03.jpg Jos1950 (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not duplicate at all, it's the same map in 2 different languages. Ruthven (msg) 20:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a duplicate of File:US Navy 080129-N-0696M-033 Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates attend a meeting of military combatant commanders with President George W. Bush.jpg. Please delete and recreate as a redirect to prevent it from being reimported later accidentally. Reguyla (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, but please @Reguyla: , use the template {{duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 20:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an exact duplicate of File:From left, U.S. Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Army Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III participate in the U.S. Central Command change of command ceremony March 22, 2013, at MacDill 130322-D-BW835-063.jpg. Recommend deletion and keeping the one with the VIRIN (130322-D-BW835-063) in the title. Reguyla (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is still alive: en:Sunil Padwal, no permission. Yann (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is still alive: en:Sunil Padwal, no permission. Is this allowed under COM:FOP#India? Yann (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Icon has nothing to do with canvas done by Aloise Bové. Please delete. Raoul.ulrich (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no reason for deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing (shown here & here) Elisfkc (talk) 15:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NO NO NO! There's no washing whatsoever. The photo comes from Daniele Luttazzi's Flickr portfolio: https://flickr.com/photos/147503650@N04/31330480163 Luttazzi is the owner of the rights to use this photo. Luttazzi clearly states this photo can be used under a Creative Commons License 2.0 The wiki bot reviewer tracked it correctly: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luttazzi_denim.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groucho 2 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 January 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
@Groucho 2: A: Daniele Luttazzi is the subject, not the photographer. The photographer owns the copyright, unless it is expressed otherwise. B: The account looks like it was set up by someone else to look like it was from Mr. Luttazzi, providing stock and publicity photos of him under a license which the license was not originally under, i.e. Commons:Flickr washing. Elisfkc (talk) 16:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A: No, Luttazzi is both the subject AND the copyright owner of those photos. As expressed in the Flickr account. Luttazzi owns the copyright of those photos thru his company, Krassner Entertainment srl. He decides what to do with them, not the photographers. That's why you see that photo in the Feltrinelli's website (and others): Luttazzi gave it to them. B: The account was recently set up by Luttazzi himself. I asked him at his mail address: info@danieleluttazzi.it and he said so. You can ask him too. Case closed, I guess. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groucho 2 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 6 January 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
@Groucho 2: Great, forward that conversation with Mr. Luttazzi to the OTRS team by following the OTRS procedures. Also, sign your name after your comments by putting ~~~~. The unsigned template is placed by others when the person who commented does not sign their own comment. Elisfkc (talk) 17:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you. (Sorry, but I can't find the ~~~~ anywhere in this page. How come?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Groucho 2 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Groucho 2: It's in the edittools. It's just the four tildes (squiggle) that you need. The <code><nowiki> part was so that the system does not insert my signature there (the no wiki part is so that the system ignores anything it is supposed to do and just displays the characters. The code part is so that it displays it in a better format). Elisfkc (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All's well that ends well. Look below. :-) Thanks for the kind advice. And I found out the signature tildes, too! --Groucho 2 (talk) 13:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permission verified. --Krd 12:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS ticket and, BTW, it was clearly a work for hire. Ruthven (msg) 20:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ho caricato una nuova foto della sala controllo, questa può essere cancellata Stefano.1991 (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ho sbagliato le impostazioni della praivaci Stefano.1991 (talk) 21:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Ci teniamo entrambi le foto, dato che entrambi possono essere usate a scopi educativi. Ruthven (msg) 20:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad JPEG, unused, superseded by PNG and SVG – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 05:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We do not generally delete raster images aftrer an svg is created, but this is own work with a PD-USGov license -- either it needs a CC-BY license or it's not own work. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW. The Mona Lisa may be out of copyright, but the fresh rendition of it in this picture is most likely modern and protected by copyright. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 10:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A painting in an antique store may be on public display, but it is not permanent. Also, it's poor quality. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DW, derivative work of Pinocchio. This is also purposely created by the store owner and not sprayed on by a vandal, leaving it bereft of the (shaky) protections of graffiti exceptions. In other words it's a derivative work depicting a second derivative work. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 10:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Une version de meilleure qualité a été proposée: File:Esr2.jpg Gnotype (talk) 10:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: This is odd. As you say, no WP:EN article, but he has several books and a 500 word biography at Amazon. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, after more than 3years no better version Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In use at en.wikiversity; normally that would be enough to automatically keep it, but the usage is as part of draft article in userspace. Technically, then, the fact it's in userspace might(?) exclude it from automatic protection; however, as an integral part of potential article content, and as part of a set, I'd be disinclined to delete it on its own.
OTOH, the would-be article hasn't been updated in almost four years. So... can anyone suggest if this situation is covered by pre-existing policy or guidelines? Ubcule (talk) 15:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is a terrible image, but I cannot find another image showing insulators on the leads of a power transistor. I moved it from Cat:Components to Cat:Power transistors where it may get more usage. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Incompatible PDM (PD Mark) flickr license. From this flickr license table, Commons can only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. With this PDM license, the copyright owner still owns full rights over the image. Yann (talk) 12:36, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:32, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cplakidas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is labelled as own work, which is very dubious; it is clearly a scanned sketch from a medieval illuminated manuscript. Without a source it is even impossible to verify whether the event depicted is the correct one Yann (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Could be old, could be 1920s-1940s and still under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The dropshadow border and its low resolution makes me suspect that this picture was pulled from another website back in the day when that was all the rage on the internet Vera (talk) 14:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SkamidaZoltar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Inferior, low-resolution versions of several already existent .svg files on Commons. Most of them (if not all) are unused and have indicated wrong/false authorship: uploader is not their author.

--XXN, 17:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SkamidaZoltar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant, inferior, recently uploaded PNG versions of some SVGs.

--XXN, 15:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship. --XXN, 15:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. The image was only used in an attack article on nlwiki, so I also doubt any claim of authorship. It's also out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 05:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentially, quotation "Previously published: Fb", Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could certainly be true, this is not a professional photograph. The reflections in the glasses give it away. B) Rhinestone shades or cheap sunglasses --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YOTA UK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The "cc by-nc" in the filenames contradict the stated licensing templates. If the uploaders intent is to impose {{noncommercial}} restrictions, the files must be deleted. If not, they should be renamed so as not to deter reuse.

LX (talk, contribs) 20:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:36, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement derivate work. Not covered by Spanish Freedom of Panorama, which requires permanent exhibition Discasto talk 20:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "CC BY NC SA" in the filename contradicts the licensing template. If the uploader's intent is to impose {{noncommercial}} restrictions, the file must be deleted. If not, the file should be renamed so as not to deter reuse. LX (talk, contribs) 20:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a work prepared by an official employee of the United States, give this work is a copyrighted work by Michigan Attorney General; The State of MI does not release its governmental works to the public domain or with Commons-eligible licenses. 64.114.222.113 20:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work doubtful. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:35, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешение фотографа на публикацию фото трёхмерного произведения, находящегося в общественном достоянии. Источник, скорее здесь: http://uza.uz/ru/society/28-avgusta-den-uchrezhdeniya-ordena-el-yurt-khurmati-i-pochetnogo-zvaniya-uzbekiston-iftikhori-27.08.2012-20433?month=08&year=2014&sphrase_id=6277&ELEMENT_CODE=28-avgusta-den-uchrezhdeniya-ordena-el-yurt-khurmati-i-pochetnogo-zvaniya-uzbekiston-iftikhori-27.08.2012-20433&SECTION_CODE=society. Dogad75 (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like this is not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from copyright holder Volhonsky87 is needed. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was uploaded into Commons on 11th of October, but previous day into http://www.xtratime.org/forum/281-cska-moscow/216243-cska-new-stadium-30-000-a-9.html#post19049465 OTRS-permission from photographer is needed that case. Taivo (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторсвте и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Ghetyasar26.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Согласно обсуждению на странице файла. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@CorvusCorax: для восстановления удалённых файлов необходимо разрешение фотографа в OTRS, подробнее см. на Викискладе — COM:OTRS/ru или в русскоязычном разделе Википедии — ВП:ДОБРО. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 06:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that the uploader is the author. --Sealle (talk) 18:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор и дата создания картины неизвестны. Невозможно установить лицензионный статус Dogad75 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:John-Erskine-11th.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, файл размещён в Рувике в 2006 году https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Johnerskine.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 22:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamild1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos probably above Com:TOO .

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scaled down duplicate of File:100811-D-7203C-008 (4886099878).jpg. Recommend deleting and recreating as a redirect to prevent it from being pulled back in later due to the standardized naming convention used. Reguyla (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Processed as duplicate. @Reguyla: It's easier for the closing admin and faster if you use {{Duplicate}} in cases like this. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scaled down duplicate of File:Defense.gov photo essay 100901-N-0696M-147.jpg. Recommend deleting and recreating as a redirect to prevent it from being reimported later due to the standard naming convention used. Reguyla (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Processed as duplicate. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a scaled down duplicate of File:Defense.gov photo essay 100901-N-0696M-288.jpg. Recommend deletion and recreation as a redirect to prevent it from being reimported later due to the standardized naming convention used. Reguyla (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Processed as duplicate. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source given out yet. Also, might have been ripped from Fanpop, or the other way around. Also, it's not used as free to share via Flickr. I can assumed that it is a work of a photo agency unless I'm proven wrong. George Ho (talk) 07:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No EXIF, small size, found widely around the net. Obvious copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это не может быть собственной работой - это не фотография Barbariandeagle (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Эти изображения были сделаны лично мною с использованием двух графических фоторедакторов о чем и указано в дополнительных данных. Antonantoska (User talk:Antonantoska) 15:52 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это не может быть собственной работой - это не фотография Barbariandeagle (talk) 10:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Эти изображения были сделаны лично мною с использованием двух графических фоторедакторов о чем и указано в дополнительных данных. Antonantoska (User talk:Antonantoska) 15:52 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal gallery content Lordtobi () 12:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on WP:PL -- cannot be deleted for this reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope (personal gallery content). ed: Image has no relevance to the topic in question, Grand Theft Auto Online, and does not seem to refer to an existing crew. Assisting editor on Polish Wikipedia identified the image as hoax or personal promotion, removing the image's only usage. Lordtobi () 12:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC) Lordtobi () 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File is in use in a good way. This is a repetitive DR with no new information or reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reason has been updated. Lordtobi () 16:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Lordtobi, you removed the logo from Wikipedia addeed by Jameslwoodward (a Commons Admin). That removal violates WP:POINT, as you removed contents from Wikipedia just to keep your point (where at least two users disagree). I reverted your edition at Wikipedia, so  Keep, as the file is still in use. If you revert my edition again, this will be considered an Edit war (since you removed it several times), and I'll consider that as vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I had discussed the issue with the editor who originally added the image to the Polish Wikipedia, and he agreed with he and remove it again himself. Jim, who apparently disagrees with the editor who made him close my DR in the first place, and added it again (edit warring), to stand his point. I was aware of WP:POINT (even if it is not a Commons guideline), and so I can't figure why he is allowed to make his opinion correct but I am blamed for clearing up the violation. Makes no sense to me, and invalidates your reasoning. Lordtobi () 22:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Lordtobi and Amitie 10g's. There are two main issues with regard to the logo: first of all, permission. If that's really one of the teams' logo, proper permission must be provided. Exactly in the same way as any other image uploaded to commons from other place. The second one relates to Amitie's. What's actually pointy is to use a personal logo to illustrate a wikipedia article. It fails to meet relevance and secondary source policies. To sum up, the image lacks proper permission and cannot be used to illustrate wikipedia articles. Best regards --Discasto talk 17:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Since this purports to be the logo of a "team", which is almost certainly not formally organized in the sense that a football club or other organization is, I am perfectly willing to assume good faith on the claim of "own work". Since teams are apparently an important aspect of the subject game, I also think that the logo is an appropriate illustration for a WP article.
Bender claims that the logo is bogus. That may be, but given his point of view here, I am reluctant to simply accept his assertion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope, personal logo, unused at this point. Adding this logo to the game's page is a bit like adding the logo of a small, non-notable sports team to the article "Football". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Автор и точная дата создания неизвестны, дата обнародования неизвестна, установить лицензионный статус невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 12:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siachin Glacier123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both of these files are sourced to this Flickr photo, uploaded to Flickr on September 12, 2016. However, this photo appears on the web much earlier (see [4], [5], [6], [7],etc.). As a work previously published on the web without a free license, at the very least we'd need permission via COM:OTRS. However, as the uploader has been indefinitely blocked, I suspect this is Flickr washing.

RP88 (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploads by a know vandal sock. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A PNG version of this file is now available JoKalliauer (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in use, no objections. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightangaben sind falsch, wird nach Löschung neu hochgeladen Hewiha (talk) 16:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request: @Hewiha: Zukünftig überschreibst du das Bild am besten einfach mit der neuen Version und beantragst dann hier oder auf COM:AN eine Versionslöschung. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrightangabne in den Exifdaten ist falsch, wird nach löschung neu hochgeladen Hewiha (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's requst for reupload. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyvio: Low-resolution historical photograph, claimed “own work”, but found elsewhere on the web. (Admittedly, this exact webpage is newer than this upload, but the picture is in larger resolution.) Mormegil (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image with libellous and incorrect description: pornography, dildo, and condom were known long before 1990 Jochen Burghardt (talk) 16:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

дубль File:Николаевъ. Адмиральская улица.jpg Alexandronikos (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Different version of that postcard. See the differing spelling of Nicolajeff/Nikolajew. It's possible that one is the black and white original, while the other is obviously colored. Therefore it's useful to keep both. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector file available, File:Cnn.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, missing EXIF data, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Quite possible, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vector file available, File:MUTCD W4-1L.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не перешло в общественное достояние, художник скончался в 1966 году Dogad75 (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe the author died less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to assume that is not the case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe the photographer died less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to assume that is not the case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe the photographer died less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to assume that is not the case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the photographer died probably less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Image from the 1930s is too for pma 70 assumption. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD W7-6.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe the photographer died less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to assume that is not the case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD W5-1.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD D9-13dP.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD D9-1.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD W7-6.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:Speed Limit 65 sign.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:Speed Limit 45 sign.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available, File:MUTCD CW3-4.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe the photographer died less than 70 years ago 178.197.228.183 21:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old enough to assume that is not the case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it below the threshold of originality, or, is it copyrighted and needs an COM:OTRS or a deletion? Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe that the illustration of a building in the center of the page is ineligible for copyright protection, as claimed by Yann, or that it is the uploader's own work, as claimed by the uploader. LX (talk, contribs) 14:51, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is de minimis here. Yann (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is nothing incidental about its inclusion. It is the central illustration of this cover. LX (talk, contribs) 18:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Published in Ungvar/Uzhgorod in 1941, drawing made by unknown author, so {{PD-Hungary}} #2 applies. --Яй (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - not DM and no evidence of PD-Hungary. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: What else evidence do you need? Can you see Ungvar 1941 dateline at the page? Are you in doubt that the town of Ungvar was a part of Hungary in 1941? --Яй (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that the author is unknown, author name is probably somewhere in the book. Jcb (talk) 14:39, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: It is very unlikely that the publishing house would name the author of their logo in this particular book. --Яй (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't double post your discussion. Keep it at COM:UDR instead. Jcb (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 11:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What do we do with this selfie? Is it out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If Denise Bidot selfie is uploaded by Mandy, maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I personally took that picute so it is not a copyright violation- Mandy

This one is hard to judge. Potentially in scope as there is a an article on en-wiki by the uploader, although that was kind of contested. Googling her name shows some evidence for being in-scope, though. What is confusing me is that this image is described as a selfie (which is consistent with the photo made with an iPhone), but on the other hand it is not very large and uploaded by User:Mandy375, who claims to have taken it. @Mandy375: Please have a look at COM:OTRS for a confidential process to verify that you have indeed taken this photo. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]