Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/19

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive February 19^th, 2019

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TW PHW63-2.png

原檔案上傳者請求刪除重定向顏嘉佑 (talk) 06:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rafale Logo.jpg

Missing essential information, possible copyright violation. JackStrong12 (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 10:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Um44k.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Voice of Clam as no permission (No permission since) There is a free license at source. Yann (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - either I missed the licence, or it was added to source subseqeuntly. However, the image is in scope (as it's used on pt.wikipedia) and I can see no reason to delete. O Still Small Voice of Clam 10:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and block uploader and Flickr accounts, uploader is using them to inappropriately pepper pages in multiple projects and is extorting money from mistaken reusers. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are more files that are derivatives of the images deleted first time round that show up in this search e.g. File:Happy_Nadacha_Mchelenje_(Marathon_Finale)_bei_den_IAAF_Leichtathletik-Weltmeisterschaften_2017_in_London_(36278103412)_(cropped).jpg. These should be included here as well. I'm not sure how to generate a list effectively. Smartse (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per Serbari, to protect our reusers. We only accept photos under a free license, full stop. Licenses are one thing on Commons that is to be defended. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. Also consider instructing the bot to reject requests to review licences by this uploader so that more files aren't uploaded. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not for license reasons, but all of those pics are just stock pictures outside of COM:SCOPE, optimized for SEO, transferred from flickr, not used and most of them not useful for our projects. Most of them have no description. Some of them are duplicates, uploaded with a German and again with an English filename. --Stepro (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are two open DRs on this page. Please express your opinions on both. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The closing admin must obviously close both requests in the same way as anything else would be inconsistent, considering that there's no difference between the two requests. It's a bit confusing that the discussion is split into two different sections. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. --Geolina ^{mente et malleo} ✎ 17:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question What kind of a scam exactly? Palosirkka (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 2

As per previous nomination : Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for both lists (and undelete those already deleted on this basis). There is no problem with these files' licenses. They are under perfectly free licenses. The licenses are apparently being very strictly enforced, but going down any route of "we only host files whose copyright holders are not too strict about enforcing their copyright" would be a very fundamental redefinition of what Commons does and does not host. We regularly (and rightly) keep hosting files whose copyright holder is no longer distributing them under a free license (e.g. changing the license on Flickr to "all rights reserved"). It is likely that many such copyright holders, since they no longer want their files to be reused, will also very strictly enforce their licenses. It's the whole point of accepting only irrevocable licenses that we don't care about how nice the copyright holder might (now or at a future point) want to be about enforcement. So either we should delete all of these files if we worry about copyright holders not being nice about enforcement, or we should keep these files too. Tokfo (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasoning, but this is in no way a typical case, because it appears that the uploader explicitly uploaded the images here in order to encourage misuse of them by innocent parties, in order to extort money from them using their own website http://www.plaghunter.com/en/. The way that after being blocked, the user has seemingly paid editors to add photos to high-trafficked WP articles e.g. [1] [2] makes this especially clear. How can we stand by and let them use the project in this way? Smartse (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and block ~~uploader and~~ Flickr accounts, Flickr uploader is using them to inappropriately pepper pages in multiple projects and is extorting money from mistaken reusers. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 21:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. Also consider instructing the bot to reject requests to review licences by this uploader so that more files aren't uploaded. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect the project and to protect the reusers... see also: Category:Photographs by Marco Verch --1971markus (^{⇒ Laberkasten ...}) 17:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not for license reasons, but all of those pics are just stock pictures outside of COM:SCOPE, optimized for SEO, transferred from flickr, not used and most of them not useful for our projects. Most of them have no description. Some of them are duplicates, uploaded with a German and again with an English filename. --Stepro (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. Raymond 22:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are two open DRs on this page. Please express your opinions on both. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The closing admin must obviously close both requests in the same way as anything else would be inconsistent, considering that there's no difference between the two requests. It's a bit confusing that the discussion is split into two different sections. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to protect our reusers. --Geolina ^{mente et malleo} ✎ 16:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 3

Same reason as the above RfD's + Commons:Deletion requests/Remaining files uploaded by Wuestenigel + Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch: indefblocked user, many copyvios, lots of out-of-scope stuff, and heavy misuse of Free licensing. This are the remaining search results for "Marco Verch" and (hopefully) the last portion of his uploads on Commons.

A.Savin 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, PRP. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 17:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 4

Same reason as in the previous deletion requests for this Flickr account: indefblocked Commons user, notorious licence laundering and prone to copyright extortion. Flickr account is blacklisted at Commons:Questionable Flickr images.

De728631 (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I consider this a form of recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus as the community decided about all content from this author. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted per Alexis Jazz. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 5

New Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/people/160866001@N07.

Can also be speedied. I made a DR because it's a new account.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and previous DRs above. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should be deleted by speedy, his content is blocked indef by reasons --Stepro (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz and Stepro: Which of the COM:CSD criteria would these files meet? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: See the fourth DR, G4. But I already mentioned this DR on COM:AN#Another Marco Verch account. I think adding speedy tags only creates more work, not less. If you want this DR to be deleted faster, poke an admin. I don't oppose speedy closing of this DR, I created the DR because it's a new account and this allows us to keep track of the history. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Your attempted ex post facto ping didn't notify me, did you use tildes? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 19:38, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I did. See. Timestamp was updated, I didn't update the time by hand. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Thanks, you may want to use {{Pinging}} in a new post for that purpose. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 20:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

General reasons #4 + #10 --Stepro (talk) 20:56, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Stepro: G10 doesn't really apply. G10 would be for images that absolutely lack COM:EDUSE. But if something was created with a goal of promotion but it happens to have EDUSE, we'll keep it. Sometimes manufacturers of goods register here and upload properly licensed product photos. Promotion is likely also a goal of that, but it is educationally useful. So we keep it. G4 applies here though. The community already decided it doesn't want any work from this photographer. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
to be honest: This user is blocked indef because of his misuse of our project and sueing other users and reusers with high amounts just because of very little attribution faults. Do we really need to discuss, if his poisened pictures should be deleted asap or not? --Stepro (talk) 22:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Stepro: They should be deleted, and as far as I'm concerned an admin can close this speedy (admins can do that you know!). This DR is linked on COM:AN so there is nothing holding them back. My concern with your comment was the rationale. G10 does not apply to these files, G4 does. But adding speedy tags only creates more work. As I said, poke an admin (they already know because of COM:AN, but well) if you want this to be closed faster. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree with you. --Stepro (talk) 14:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- Banned user. --A.Savin 16:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 6

Only nominating so they can be deleted as "Per (link to this DR)". Speedy please. A.Savin?

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom & previous DRs Abzeronow (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't there actually a possibility to prevent Marcho Verch's transfers in general for the future? Abuse filter or sth.? @Steinsplitter: Maybe you can help? --A.Savin 20:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: one of these was uploaded before the bad-author list was updated with his new Flickr account, the other was uploaded using UploadWizard with self-review which doesn't check the bad-author list. (another reason UploadWizard should insert {{Flickrreview}}) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: @Alexis Jazz: @Abzeronow: I don't upload images to WP (/Commons) often, but i don't get it. The images came with the proper license as far as i could tell. What did i do wrong? What does "link to this DR" mean? PizzaMan (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 68#Out of process deletion of files by User:Hystrix

Long story short, if you as much as misspell Marco Verch's name in the attribution, he'll threaten you with a lawsuit. Link to this DR (Deletion Request) is a link to the page you are reading right now. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't the whole deal of CC licenses to be redistributed in a manner specified by the author? For all legal purposes these images are all irrevocably released under free licenses so why delete them? I don't want any re-users to ever be harmed by anything they wish to use from Wikimedia Commons, but can Marco actually win any lawsuit? You can't claim that the images you legally stated are free are suddenly unfree, is there any evidence that it was in fact the person of Marco Verch and not an impersonator making all these threats? I can see someone claiming to be a photographer and demanding money and then banning the photographer would ban an additional victim. I'm not advocating undeletion, but I don't see the benefit of deleting free educational content. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining, @Alexis Jazz: . Still sounds a bit odd to me that Flickr does allow his images to stay online, with open license, but a good faith usage of such a picture on this site would be met with legal action. I wonder: who would he sue? Me? Wikimedia? Did he ever actually sue someone? Under what law does he think he would stand a chance? Would he really risk having to pay the legal fees of Wikimedia as a defending party? Please understand that people put quite some effort into finding an acceptable picture and uploading it with all details filled in properly, which is cumbersome enough, and that it's quite disappointing to suddenly see it deleted even when you've done everything right. I feel WP/wikimedia editors should be protected from such disappointment. Me, I'll think twice before trying to cheer up a marginal WP entry with a picture again.PizzaMan (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: I don't really feel like going over all these discussions, much of which is in German.. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan: if you had used Flickr2Commons you would have been warned. Marco Verch is really an exception. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PizzaMan: I just read these discussions and apparently in Germany and Austria you could threaten someone out of court with a kind of "cease and desist" scheme where a person has to pay around 400 (four-hundred) Euro's or be taken to court, German and Austrian copyright laws are crazy stupid and breed copyright trolls, this is really sad for the re-users, too many that we lost over 10.000 (ten-thousand) useful educational images simply because someone likes to abuse the law, maybe one day when the physical person behind Marco Verch dies ☠ we could see an undeletion request for those images but as long as this person keeps misusing the German legal system I don't see much chance at that. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well if that's the German law and discussions on the German site led to the conclusion that nothing can be done about it, i guess we'll have to accept this situation. At least now it's clear what's going on for anyone who lands on this page. I didn't use the flickr tool, because i didn't know of it's existence. Again i don't have experience. Next time, I'll just try to make a picture myself and hope that process goes smoother. And may i be struck with a horrible disease if i threat legal action against anyone who wants to reuse a picture i upload here, for something as trivial as a typo.PizzaMan (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 7

Another two.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: can be speedied. This was the easiest way to explain the problem to the uploaders. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 8

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extortion scam. Pinging @A.Savin.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 11:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the the above DRs. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 12:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please blacklist the name to prevent future uploads?--Roy17 (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Roy17: these files were uploaded manually. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AbuseFilter. Source code includes [Mm]arco [Vv]erch? Blocked.--Roy17 (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Roy17: AF won't be deployed for at most a couple of files a month. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 17:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 9

Boo

File:Kräcker.jpg

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my upload, I did not know about it. Bencemac (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Velogorod Leihräder in Russland.jpg

I'm not quite understand this particular case. At the source page the author states:

The image Velogorod bikes in Russia by Marco Verch can under Creative Commons license be used.

The image itself is rather important for the w:ru:Система совместного использования велосипедов as it's the only free image found so far of the Velogorod bike sharing system in Saint-Petersburg, Russia.--Vаdiм (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vadim, our problem is not with this special image, but with the Flickr-user in general. So, per former community-decision it cannot stay on Commons. Feel free to upload it locally, if your project allows that. But, if you do, mark it clearly with "do not move to Commons". Otherwise, might File:Sezamki Halo.JPG be a suitable replacement? --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: Probably not, because that shows a cracker instead of a bike. Neither were deleted. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and based on former community-decision. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 10

MarcoMarcoMarcoMarcoMarco

File:Wilson american football ball.jpg

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedied, as there are enough replacements: Category:Wilson American football balls. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 11

Our favorite greedy author has a new Flickr account!

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted for known reasons. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 12

Missed one I guess. Thanks BevinKacon for alerting me. Pinging @Srittau.

File:Twitter Trends 2019, Bret Hart, April 7.jpg

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 13

Adding these newly uploaded images to the list - from a blacklisted Flickr account. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the uploads, I didn't know about this situation. Should've paid attention to the blacklisted users list. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Pitke 2020-06-26 --Achim (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch 14

Files from a blacklisted Flickr user accused of copyright trolling. See other examples above.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. I would support even speedy deletion for such cases. --Off-shell (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Community have decided to ban Marco Verch per this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch. --MGA73 (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom and the the above DRs. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 01:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per previous DRs. I have placed Category:Images by Marco Verch as a subcategory for speedy deletion requests, hopefully there will be no need for further DRs on this matter. --Pitke (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minorax^talk 07:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mesilat iasharim1.jpg

File:Mesilat Yesharim.jpg Jonund (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --matanya • talk 18:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naslovnica Križ s križi.jpg

Not uploaded right Ulam2756 (talk) 08:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:18, 19 Februar 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Kriz s krizi.jpg --Krdbot 01:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Giorgia Villa 2018.png

Suspicious Flickr account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Flickr acount with 2 uploads, one of which was shown to be copyvio, this one in the wrong format (PNG) without EXIF. Photo from the 2018 Youth Olympics, unlikely to be own work. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 23:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted. License laundering. --Majora (talk) 04:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kasravi peyman 1312.png

There's no way to prove the pictures were published more than 30 years ago and hence are in PD-Iran. Mhhossein ^talk 18:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Interesting.. [3] --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This photo features on page 2 of File:PEYMAN 1 1.pdf, a book published in 1312 (Iranian solar calendar I assume, which corresponds to AD 1933/1934) according to its front cover. The publication date of the photo would thus have been over 85 years ago, hence PD-Iran obviously applies. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Hypergaruda's souce showing it was first published back in 1312. --Mhhossein ^talk 07:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red Triumph Spitfire MkIV front 2.jpg

Bonjour cette voiture m’appartient et je m'oppose a la diffusion des plaques immatriculation 90.102.163.225 10:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this car belongs to me and I’m opposed to the public display of the license plate.

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avis de l’auteur de l’image : je ne pense pas que cette demande repose sur une quelconque base légale, que ce soit en droit français ou américain. Néanmoins, il est possible de téléverser une nouvelle version de l’image dont les caractères de la plaque d’immatriculation auront été masqués ou changés d’une quelconque manière. Akela NDE (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion of the file author: I don’t think there is any legal basis for that demand, in either French or US legislations. However, it is possible to upload a new version of the image with the license plate characters masked or changed otherwise.

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 10:56, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - plate has been masked. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red Triumph Spitfire MkIV front 2.jpg

Bonjour, Je suis propriétaire de cette voiture et je m’oppose à la diffusion de ma plaque immatriculation. Merci de retirer cette photo ou de masquer la plaque. 90.102.163.225 14:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m the owner of this car and I’m opposed to the public display of my license plate. Thank you for removing this picture or for hiding the plate.

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Même remarque que précédemment. Le numéro central de la plaque a été changé par courtoisie, mais cette demande ne repose sur aucune base légale ; par ailleurs, rien ne permet d’affirmer que l’IP 90.102.163.225 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • abusefilter • tools • guc • stalktoy • block user • block log) est véritablement le propriétaire de cette auto. Akela NDE (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same comment as previously. The central number on the plate has been changed as a courtesy, but this request has no legal basis and nothing proves IP 90.102.163.225 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • abusefilter • tools • guc • stalktoy • block user • block log) actually is the owner of that car.

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion plate has been masked. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red Triumph Spitfire MkIV front 2.jpg

merci de masquer ou de supprimer cette photo , je suis propriétaire de cette voiture et refuse la diffusion de mes plaques immatriculation 90.102.163.225 10:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for hiding or deleting this picture, I’m the owner of that car and I’m opposed to the public display of my licence plates.

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a wee bit repetitive, so I put a message on that IP’s talk page, telling them that 1) there is no need to make 3 successive deletion requests in 2 days, and 2) that they have no right to oppose to a public display of a picture of their car, and 3) that the license plate has actually been changed to please them. Akela NDE (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red Triumph Spitfire MkIV front 2.jpg

cette image m’appartiens et je refuse ça diffusion 90.102.163.225 16:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image belongs to me and I refuse it’s publication

translator: Akela NDE (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which is a plain lie since I took the picture myself back in 2012. This is starting to be annoying. Akela NDE (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - image taken in a public place. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alice Sheldon aka James Tiptree, Jr. with Kikuyu people (cropped).jpg

A derivative of a deleted file. Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not experienced with these discussions. But what I've found out: The (uncropped) photo was (certainly for the first time) published in the book "On the gorilla trail" by Mary Hastings Bradley in 1922 (see https://archive.org/details/ongorillatrail00bradgoog/page/n344). The Bradleys made the trip to Africa in 1921. I don't know whether this makes a difference. Best wishes, --Leserättin (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC) P.S.: Mary Hastings Bradley died in 1976 (not in 1986 as it is stated in the deletion request for the uncropped photo). The father Herbert Bradley died in 1961. --Leserättin (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Leserättin seems to have established that {{PD-US-expired}} applies. I've updated the copyright tag on the file and asked Ymblanter to undelete the original. --bjh21 (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... The undeletion request for the original is now on Commons:Undeletion requests. --bjh21 (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per [4]. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SCANDAL at House of Blues Anaheim - SCANDAL from Japan US & Mexico Tour 2018 Special Thanks.jpg

Photo: Jade Lew, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source for this picture is on my Flickr and is under the Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license. With this, I give permission for this picture to be used on Wikipedia. Thoseguiltyeyes (talk) 07:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thoseguiltyeyes: This image has been put on Flickr after this deletion request so it's unvalid. Besides Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike is not a valid license. So as explained in your Wikipedia Talk page please send permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket:2019022010008513 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

वन्दे भारत और किसान सम्मान योजना का हताशा लोग मजाक बना रखे है। — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram prakash upadhyay (talk • contribs) 03:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ram prakash upadhyay (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors; see COM:SELFIE (F10). --1989 (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Delmi-alvarez-nea-vyssa.png

(c) WIKTOR DABKOWSKI, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to use this one. I explained that the photographer is my colleague. If you need contact him I can provide the email. Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delmi (talk • contribs) 23:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Delmi: ‬ WIKTOR DABKOWSKI must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he is in China, I will write him. If you wish delete the picture, I already told you that I am learning many things how to work with wiki. Please, can you let me know how to delete any image by myself when I upload to wiki? I can't find how to do it. Thank you --Delmi (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 10:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MSpot.jpg

L'ho caricata per errore Albe Albe460 (talk) 08:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --Ju Ta 19:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

Personal images, out of project scope. Commons is not your free web host.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

Personal files, not in use. Please read this,

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 17:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 17:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 14:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

personal photos - have been deleted several times in the past.

Frood (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (see also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#C raju kumar). --DMacks (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CNMP.jpg

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Levalbert (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مقایسه سختی تفلن و کاربید سیلیس.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pierre Sébastien Bellegarde (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FraaieEgelNeusKaboutEr.jpeg

I created this image (10 years ago) but it was only used on an inactive wikipedia user page and has since also been deleted from there, I don't think it is needed on this website anymore and I would rather not have it on the internet. Mariannerd (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:FraaieEgelNeusKaboutEr.jpeg

I created this image (10 years ago) but it was only used on an inactive wikipedia user page and has since also been deleted from there, I don't think it is needed on this website anymore and I would rather not have it on the internet. 146.50.150.205 19:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author requests deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FWJochemsen-piraat.jpeg

I created this image (10 years ago) but it was only used on an inactive wikipedia user page and has since also been deleted from there, I don't think it is needed on this website anymore and I would rather not have it on the internet. Mariannerd (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:FWJochemsen-piraat.jpeg

I created this image (10 years ago) but it was only used on an inactive wikipedia user page and has since also been deleted from there, I don't think it is needed on this website anymore and I would rather not have it on the internet. Mariannerd (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Author requests deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matt Lampson.jpg

Unlikely to be own work, a publicity photo, uncropped version here: https://www.kisspng.com/png-matt-lampson-chicago-fire-soccer-club-2017-major-l-5488684/ Ytoyoda (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matthew Lampson headshot - Chicago Fire - 2017.png

Appears to be publicity photo, also used at https://www.mnufc.com/post/2018/01/19/goalkeeper-lampson-joins-mnufc-chicago-fire Ytoyoda (talk) 01:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penny Yellow Riding Rainhood 198.jpg

This is a a product image: https://www.endource.com/product/urban-outfitters-rains-jacket-in-yellow/VKw6peSwBG9Et2ax 24.90.141.208 02:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheriv92 (talk · contribs)

Small files without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ActivaUPD.jpg

Bigger version at https://www.upyd.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Cristiano-Brown-portavoz-nacional-de-UPYD.jpg Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arno2.jpg

Out of scope / Not educationally useful / Selfpromotion Mel22 (talk) 08:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ali.bk1.jpg

Unused user signature, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:景子写真.jpg

著作権を侵害している。 Keruby (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chris ellis sucking his Masters cock.jpg

part of the blocked user's uploads (see discussion) – having no realistic value Cherkash (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:History of Cinema - Four Questions.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:மகிமை.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OccidentalTucancunOverlook.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fsdfswyfhb wefbasd (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Royd Audio logo.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RuslanBogGOd.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rusbell Madrigal.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rubi Acuña.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rubendarioortizpereyra.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ROYALHEMANT.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Conceptosmartlife.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:S.K. BHARTI.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RamidAgha (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RZheadshot.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RyanKellyYoung.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pigelf (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saf.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saeed Shahryar.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sabd1982.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sabbir Chowdhury.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:37, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SABB000.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SaadAyubPic.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sahil Patel.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sahil Bashir Bhat.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sahid Ahmed At Dhaka.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sahibzada Ahmad Saeed.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Safari Nkurunziza.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RONY.jpg

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Agostinho Patrus Filho.png

Seems from https://gazetanortemineira.com.br/uploads/01-12-18/completo.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:שוקי (יהושע) אוחנה.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Mingle Limited.jpg

Unused logo for non-notable entity. JPG format with low-resolution, unlikely to be used for encyclopedic purposes. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 18:23, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chagantinaveen (talk · contribs)

Personal files, out of project scope. Not in use.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 19:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GamingLaptop.jpg

Out of scope, limited utility, arguable spam. Appears to be (physical) photo of screen showing logo of some random gaming blog. Ubcule (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pc ware shop sas. (talk · contribs)

Spam, uselessly low resolution.

Ubcule (talk) 22:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M.Karthikraja KD.jpg

Selfie of random person, out of scope, not in personal use. Ubcule (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kieuthomellow.jpg

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adrian Hood - Actor.jpg

(c) Callum Arnott, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Леонид Винцкевич.tif

(c) Eugene Sharikov "/Seastudio, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Daniel Yataco Pauyac.jpg

Personal unused file out of project scope ·×ald·^es 23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67^T★C 05:40, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Covenant university stadium.jpg

not properly tagged Testimony N (talk) 05:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality image. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Newly completed stadium in covenant university.jpg

not properly tagged and described Testimony N (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; We don't have many photos of this university. If the name is wrong please rename it. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nigerian Girl with a merry heart.jpg

Not properly tagged and described Testimony N (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality personal photo. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Playtime Fun.jpg

Not properly tagged and described Testimony N (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Low quality, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natzybawzpeak.jpg

Out of project scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 05:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Team event group pic.jpg

I did not know that it is gonna be public Melkarim (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:On journey.jpg

selfies are off-topic Syced (talk) 08:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iamalibutt music.jpg

Probably just a personal photo. The description (given by the uploader of the image) is a strange mixture of (alleged) private information and insults. If we would keep the image, we would have to delete the description, but probably it is easier and wiser to delete the file completely. Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete – Commons:CSD #F10 (personal photos by non-contributors), the uploader is not a real Wikipedian or alike. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Philippe Claudel 2013.jpg

La photographie n'a pas été validé par Philippe Claudel. Le photographe n'a pas eu l'autorisation de Philippe Claudel pour l'utiliser à des fins publiques Penelope ulysse (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If there are personal issues, Philippe Claudel has to write to COM:OTRS, explaining what the issue is. --Ruthven (msg) 11:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep From the description, it seems like it was taken at a public event so I don't see why we would need Mr Claudel's permission to use this image. Tabercil (talk) 06:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Placeholder couple superhero.png

User’s request — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.145.180.137 (talk • contribs) 2017-12-12T05:29:53‎ (UTC)

Keep "User’s request" given by an anonymous editor is not a valid reason for deletion. For me it looks like vandalism. --jdx ^Re: 13:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

kept, no reason for deletion.--Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Placeholder couple superhero.png

May be found elsewhere. 2001:E68:4424:554E:5CEF:789F:4329:63 11:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ce n’est pas une raison valable pour supprimer. And,by the way, it’s not true on Commons. I don’t think it can be found elsewhere on commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivier Tanguy (talk • contribs) 12:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per previous discussion, looks like vandalism. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Streetsbeatz (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Streetsbeatz (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 06:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Enclosed two Story Courtyard and Snackbar at UGA Law School.jpeg

Delete Scaled version of the image foudn on this page (direct link). Scale the image, and it's pixel for pixel an identical match. Hammersoft (talk) 15:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite the uploader's claims to the contrary being made at en:WP:MCQ#File:Lawschoolseal.jpeg,File:UGA_Law_School_Courtroom.jpg File:UGA One Reading Room.jpeg, File:One Courtroom the Hatton Courtroom UGA.jpeg, & File:Enclosed two Story Courtyard and Snackbar at UGA Law School.jpeg, it does not seem plausible that two identical pictures of the same scene were taken by two persons; one by the uploader and one by the person who uploaded the photo to the website given above. I mean the photos look to be exactly the same in every way. Now, it might be possible that the uploader did take the original photo and then uploaded it his/herself to some website which someone else then took and uploaded to the website cited above, but in that case OTRS verification would be needed per COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. The photo on the above website is attributed to someone named Cindy Rice and dated July 25, 2012. Even if that attribution is wrong, I don't think there's any way this image should be kept per COM:PCP unless copyright ownership is verified by OTRS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:One Courtroom the Hatton Courtroom UGA.jpeg

Delete Scaled and cropped version of the image found here (direct link). Uploaded has tried to claim the image is theirs, but can't explain a variety of issues regarding the image. See discussion. Hammersoft (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite the uploader's claims to the contrary being made at en:WP:MCQ#File:Lawschoolseal.jpeg,File:UGA_Law_School_Courtroom.jpg File:UGA One Reading Room.jpeg, File:One Courtroom the Hatton Courtroom UGA.jpeg, & File:Enclosed two Story Courtyard and Snackbar at UGA Law School.jpeg, it does not seem plausible that two identical pictures of the same scene were taken by two persons; one by the uploader and one by the person who uploaded the photo to the website given above. I mean the photos look to be exactly the same in every way. Now, it might be possible that the uploader did take the original photo and then uploaded it to some website which someone else then took and uploaded to the website cited above, but in that case OTRS verification would be needed per COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. The photo on the above website is attributed to someone named Cindy Rice and dated July 25, 2012. Even if that attribution is wrong, I don't think there's any way this image should be kept per COM:PCP unless copyright ownership is verified by OTRS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UGA One Reading Room.jpeg

Delete Blown up / slightly cropped version of this image taken from this page. Hammersoft (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite the uploader's claims to the contrary being made at en:WP:MCQ#File:Lawschoolseal.jpeg,File:UGA_Law_School_Courtroom.jpg File:UGA One Reading Room.jpeg, File:One Courtroom the Hatton Courtroom UGA.jpeg, & File:Enclosed two Story Courtyard and Snackbar at UGA Law School.jpeg, it does not seem plausible that two identical pictures of the same scene were taken by two persons; one by the uploader and one by the person who uploaded the photo to the website given above. I mean the photos look to be exactly the same in every way (i.e. same time of day, same people sitting in the same chairs doing exactly the same things, etc.). Now, it might be possible that the uploader did take the original photo and then uploaded it his/herself to some website which someone else then took and uploaded to the website cited above, but in that case OTRS verification would be needed per COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. Without at least OTRS verification, I don't think there's any way this image should be kept per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Southwest View Zell Learning Center.png

Delete Image is clearly marked at the top as coming from photo.alumni.uga.edu. That site has been replaced, and this image is no longer available on their public archive. Thus, no direct source to prove copyright. But, given the tagging at the top and given this editor's other problematic uploads (screenshots taken of copyrighted works), this image is very likely violating copyright as well. Hammersoft (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless OTRS can verify that the copyright owner has agreed to release this as licensed. File looks to clearly be a screenshot from a smartphone or tablet. The uploader is claiming at File talk:Southwest View Zell Learning Center.png#File: Southwest View Zell Learning Center.png that they've received permission to uploaded the file from the copyright holder. Verbal permission is not acceptable per COM:L because it cannot be verified. So, what the uploader needs to do is follow COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder and get the copyright holder (i.e. Rick O'Quinn, Digital Asset Manager, Division of Marketing & Communications, University of Georgia) to either (1) email an explicit declaration of consent to Wikimedia OTRS, or (2) re-upload the image (not a screenshot) with its original Exif data to Commons and use the "Interactive Release Generator" to verify copyright ownership; otherwise, this file shouldn't be kpet per COM:PCP.

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:West Side Zell Center.png

Delete Image is clearly marked at the top as coming from photo.alumni.uga.edu. That site has been replaced, and this image is no longer available on their public archive. Thus, no direct source to prove copyright. But, given the tagging at the top and given this editor's other problematic uploads (screenshots taken of copyrighted works), this image is very likely violating copyright as well. Hammersoft (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless OTRS can verify that the copyright owner has agreed to release this as licensed. File looks to clearly be a screenshot from a smartphone or tablet. The uploader is claiming at File talk:West Side Zell Center.png#File: West Side Zell Center.png & other Zell Center Photo that they've received permission to uploaded the file from the copyright holder. Verbal permission is not acceptable per COM:L because it cannot be verified. So, what the uploader needs to do is follow COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder and get the copyright holder (i.e. Rick O'Quinn, Digital Asset Manager, Division of Marketing & Communications, University of Georgia) to either (1) email an explicit declaration of consent to Wikimedia OTRS, or (2) re-upload the image (not a screenshot) with its original Exif data to Commons and use the "Interactive Release Generator" to verify copyright ownership; otherwise, this file shouldn't be kpet per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion, permission needed at OTS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UGA Grady School.jpg

Delete Zoomed and slightly modified version of this image taken from here. Hammersoft (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite the uploader's claims to the contrary being made at en:WP:MCQ#File:Lawschoolseal.jpeg,File:UGA_Law_School_Courtroom.jpg File:UGA One Reading Room.jpeg, File:One Courtroom the Hatton Courtroom UGA.jpeg, & File:Enclosed two Story Courtyard and Snackbar at UGA Law School.jpeg, it does not seem plausible that two identical pictures of the same scene were taken by two persons; one by the uploader and one by the person who uploaded the photo to the website given above. I mean the photos look to be exactly the same in every way. Now, it might be possible that the uploader did take the original photo and then uploaded it his/herself to some website which someone else then took and uploaded to the website cited above, but in that case OTRS verification would be needed per COM:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?. The photo on the above website is dated January 2014 and this archived version of the webpage shows it being used on March 13, 2014. So, I don't think there's any way this image should be kept per COM:PCP unless copyright ownership is verified by OTRS. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maqbool ahmed sifu (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maqbool ahmed sifu (talk · contribs)

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not for educational use. --Migebert (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sentorino (talk · contribs)

All images are copyright violations from two sources. Images #1, #2, and #3 have metadata attesting to the copyright holder being "alle bonicalzi - photography through blue eyes", which tracks to http://www.allebonicalzi.com/, a photography studio with a vested commercial interest in the images. Images #4 and #5 are taken from evemilano.com, specifically here for image #4, and here for image #5. That site is clearly marked as copyrighted and displays no licensing compatible with Commons. In all five images, there is no demonstrated reason to believe the uploader is the owner of the images nor is a designated copyright agent of either the photography studio nor the web site. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the rights owner of the pictures and is ok to upload it to wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sentorino (talk • contribs) 16:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: above note copied from talk page.
Given the metadata on the first three images, I think we would need specific release statements from that photography studio. Given the lack of metadata on the last two images, and their existence on a website, I think we would need specific release from the owner of the website. Point of information; in the case of all five images, they were uploaded to support w:Giovanni Sacheli which is currently undergoing an AfD that looks likely to close as delete. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Photographers must confirm licenses by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sentorino (talk · contribs)

(c) alle bonicalzi - photography through blue eyes

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wijeratne 2018.jpg

per source http://yudhanjaya.com/, this image is licensed Copyright CC BY-ND and incompatible with Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses Vycl1994 (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; incompatible license. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RoseGold Apparel .jpg

corrupted file ProfessorX (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RoseGold Apparel, LLC.jpg

corrupted file ProfessorX (talk) 19:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio too. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saqib110 (talk · contribs)

Personal images out of project scope. Please see this.

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pszczyna Polska zagroda żubrów - panoramio (8).jpg

Low quality. Paterm (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ingrida Simonyte.jpg

Does not appear to be "own work", but simply taken from here. Number 57 (talk) 21:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tomasevski.jpg

Does not appear to be 'own work', but rather taken from here. Number 57 (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; author info clearly visible in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puteikis.jpg

Does not appear to be 'own work', but rather taken from here. Number 57 (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dinesh zala shweta rohira.jpg

Unused personal photos. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: One in use kept, rest deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wahyu Nur Latif.jpg

Someone whos has been born sometime, somewhere; self-promotion. Picture has no educational value. Paulbe (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Laptop on chair.JPG

Poor quality, limited potential utility. Countless better photos of random laptops on Commons. Ubcule (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oliver Marquardt - 2018.jpg

(c) Manuela Clemens, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20180905 Olli Marquardt von manuelaclemens.de (26 von 41) 2.jpg

(c) Manuela Clemens, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Touca Inglesa.jpg

(c) Kevin Gibson Photography Ltd, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Touca inglesa.png

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Touca Inglesa.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: (c) Kevin Gibson Photography Ltd, missing permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Delmi Alvarez.jpg

(c) WIKTOR DABKOWSKI, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please you can delete this picture, I am not using it. I already explained in a message

Best regards, --Delmi (talk) 23:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC) --Delmi (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mialinu (talk · contribs)

Promo photos and sound recording. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RelynSerano (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by محمود عادل حسين سيد احمد (talk · contribs)

Small images, without EXIF data, some are copyvios. Unlikely Own work

— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 20:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hopea114y (talk · contribs)

Small files without EXIF data, insignias, and old images, unlikely to be own works. Some may be public domain for some reason, but proper license, source and rationale must be provided.

Yann (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:خیال پرداز نویسنده وبلاگذنویس سرگرمی ساز.jpg

اشتباه کردم Sanazbazzii (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Gregoire Boonzaier

The claim that these artworks are in the public domain doesn't seem valid. The artist died in 2005 according to Wikipedia.

--ghouston (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This work was first published in South Africa and is now in the public domain because its copyright protection has expired by virtue of the Copyright Act No. 98 of 1978, amended 2002. The work meets one of the following criteria:

It is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication.
It is a broadcast or sound recording and 50 years have passed since the year the programme was published.
It is a cinematographic or photographic work and 50 years have passed since the date of its creation.
It is an artistic, literary or musical work created under the direction of the state or an international organization and 50 years have passed since the year the work was published.
It is another kind of work, and 50 years have passed since the year of death of the author (or last-surviving author).

A South African work that is in the public domain in South Africa according to this rule is in the public domain in the U.S. only if it was in the public domain in South Africa in 1996, e.g. if it was published before 1946 and no copyright was registered in the U.S. (This is the effect of 17 USC 104A with its critical date of January 1, 1996.)

This artist painted under the pseudonym 'Gregoire' and I feel that all his work prior to 1969 meets the first criterion "It is an anonymous work or pseudonymous work and 50 years have passed since the date of its publication." Paul venter (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing en:Gregoire Boonzaier says about that is: In 1923 his first two oil paintings were shown at Ashbey's Gallery in Cape Town, simply signed "GREGOIRE". His first one-man exhibition followed two years later – he was to hold more than 100 one-man exhibitions during his painting career. It doesn't imply to me that his career was anonymous, except for the first exhibition, or that the real identity of the artist was unknown during his career. --ghouston (talk) 10:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Applications ODP.jpg

Seems to be copyrighted. Not sure if the screenshot meets {{Attribution-Eur-Lex}}, though "Legal notice" said:

(c) European Union, 1995-2018
Reuse is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. The Commission's reuse policy is implemented by the Decision of 12 December 2011 - reuse of Commission documents [PDF, 728 KB].

However, Decision above (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU) said,

1. This Decision applies to public documents produced bythe Commission or by public and private entities on its behalf:
(a) which have been published by the Commission or by the Publications Office on its behalf through publications, websites or dissemination tools; or [...]

I wonder if this image is not in the scope of "public documents". --WQL (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also think that https://ec.europa.eu/info/legal-notice_en#copyright-notice is about hosted data, not the website interface. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 16:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The European Commission decision is about all public documents of the Commission (excluding third party copyrighted content), also electronic documents. So also webpages, and screenshots of wepages. --Hannolans (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 04:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Standard tube line-up for 5-tube radios, miniature series, 1945.gif

Copyright not clear PRR (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 11:42, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skyline von New York.jpg

This image has no online source. Leoboudv (talk) 01:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amir Temur Statue.jpg

Uzbekistan has no Freedom of Panorama for modern statues, only currency. Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Treasure of Monte Cristo.jpg

No Treasure of Monte Cristo CejeroC (talk) 08:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb at 16:13, 6 März 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by CejeroC --Krdbot 19:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg

porn isnt allowe on commons Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep not pornographic. Illustrative in-use photograph of naked adult man at a nudist beach. @Alexis Jazz: Abzeronow (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep @Buckaroo bob 91: COM:NOTCENSORED - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per both "COM:NOTCENSORED" and "COM:INUSE". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion and INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg 2

Incorrect license 71.175.84.215 03:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What should be the correct one? --E4024 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File has metadata, and I don't see any reason to doubt the uploader was the photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It’s copyrighted under a different publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snh999 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not currently in mainspace use. The collection already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 04:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If the above statement is true. I try to avoid looking at exhibitionist images. If someone wishes to keep this kind of images in their personal space, we have (I have been told :) too many of them. --E4024 (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In mainspace use again. However, the file should still be deleted since there are better examples available. AshFriday (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Snh999: if you can point out where it was published prior to upload to Commons, then the image should be deleted speedily as copyvio. Otherwise Keep while it is used. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nothing has changed since the last request. There should be a policy that discourages people from nominating the same files depicting nudity again and again for deletion, this is not the first time and this won't be the last. Also no reason has been presented why this file is incorrectly licensed. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:30, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: An otherwise unacceptable file does not become "in use" if the uploader simply inserts it into an article. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UnDR.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg 3

My photo, should be deleted 65.202.39.131 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not used. One of too many. --E4024 (talk) 15:26, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the last 2 DRs and Undel. SPA & 2 IPs, raises an eyebrow. --Fæ (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

North American IPs, anybody can say this person could be an American? (Maybe judging by his eyebrows? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the previous DR. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Survived DR's and was undeleted and kept. No valid reason - depicts nudity at a nudist beach so could be used. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg 4

It's mine and I want it down Snh999 (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per creator's request. Not currently in mainspace use and Commons already contains a large number of nude male images. AshFriday (talk) 22:18, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Free licenses are irrevocable. The file is big and has EXIF data; it has educational value. Especially good is "entering clothed area" sign. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Free licenses may be irrevocable, but we allow for courtesy deletions. In this case, we should honor the author's wishes. Doing otherwise could discourage photographers from contributing their work for fear that their requests will be dismissed out of hand. AshFriday (talk) 23:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of course such requests should be generally dismissed, that's the idea of free licenses. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, as I said, we allow for courtesy deletions. We don't want to drive away our contributors by appearing too pedantic. AshFriday (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Keep This is a good depiction of nudism or naturism. Why take it down? It should be on a nudist mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.244.215.196 (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Commons already contains a large number of nude male images, and this one is not in use on any mainspace. AshFriday (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Taivo and the above sections 1 and 3. 68.194.210.136 11:11, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per creator's request as AshFriday mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5editorph (talk • contribs) 19:46, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per multiple previous discussions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OP requests it 5editorph (talk) 00:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and AshFriday. Actually not a selfie, so permission from photographer is needed. --Yann (talk) 10:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg 5

not educational Alek01913 (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alek01913: ..that begs the question why you uploaded it in the first place. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 06:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Gbawden. Reason for deletion: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naked male.jpg 6

Out of scope nude person (dressed up would still be out of scope). E4024 (talk) 03:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If my memory serves me correctly, this is the same image as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 03:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd: It appears the uploader of both mistakenly assumed they couldn't fix their licensing mistake. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing, this file was (or maybe several different-but-same-name files were) nominated several times and successfully deleted as per above, however in 2019 an undeletion request of this file was also successful, maybe @Jeff G., De728631, Ankry, Yann, and Fæ: should explain why their undeletion rationales are still valid for keeping this file, otherwise I would {{Vd}} this per COM:NOPENIS. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: At least one of the discussions refers to a different-but-same-name file, as it refers to a sign that is not shown in this file. What about the others? It’s too hard to read through all these discussions without knowing what they are referring to. Brianjd (talk) 04:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liuxinyu970226: What undeletion rationales? This appears to be a different photo than the ones discussed in DRs 1-5 above, and should be considered on it's own merits. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 09:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unless there are clear copyvio reasons to delete, this is deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity. In the Beach nudity category, there are just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera, this is one. Therefore COM:NUDE does not apply because we don't have loads of existing alternatives. For exactly the same reasons this photograph is in scope --Fæ (talk) 10:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Fæ. OTOH, the uploader's willingness to ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved." is suspect. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:53, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. "this is not deletion just because someone doesn't like nudity" nor it should be keep "because someone does like nudity". It is a DR asking the deletion of the image of an out-of-scope person, nude or dressed up, just like those hundreds of young men and women smiling at a camera that I proposed for deletion. Most, or almost none of those previous DRs have not attracted any keep votes; therefore I would be right in suspecting that these votes are because some people like nude images, IOW exactly the same subjectivity (personal PoV) that has been tried to accuse me of. Best regards. E4024 (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are applications for this photo including on the nudity page for simple English. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.90.167.143 (talk) 12:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Question to the anonymous:) Who are you? The uploader? The photographed? Wife, girl friend, any friend of him? Why do we need this exact pic and not use the other hundreds we already have? E4024 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: The anonymous has every right to remain anonymous. You should not be asking them who they are or how they are related to the subject. @Fæ has explained why this image is in scope and you have not responded. Brianjd (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: I am the photographer. I own the original files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 02:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  @E4024 and Brianjd: The anonymous user may be uploader Rumblerumble33 per this edit. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  @Jeff G.: Hopefully not, since the uploader has since voted under their new name. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- simple:Nudity already has plenty of photos, and there are even more photos available that probably do a better job of demonstrating nudity, like File:Both together fully nude.jpg, File:Cambridge WNBR 2016 (27847182306).jpg or File:Nudes a Poppin 2014 (14535427688).jpg. Although a crop of this photo could do a good job too. Brianjd (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Please strike your question. Hassling folx in public, in order to out their identities is not just uncivil, it's against the terms of use of this website. Refer to "violation of privacy" at wmf:Terms of use. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes: 1. I wrote my previous comment above the last one, because although that argument sounds like "delete" it could be seen as a part of the "keep" by an IP. 2. It is not necessary nor correct to add a "number" to the DR pages, because they are not related to the same file, they simply use a "previous file name". 3. An occasional visitor comes and adds an image of an out-of-scope person and we make a fuss around it. They must be happy for this welcome. My suggestion: Let us change our guidelines and not delete anything from now on, on scope basis. Everybody has a right to want to see his/her image on the internet; not only those that dare to expose their genitals in public... --E4024 (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with number 3. We waste too much time arguing over what is in scope or not. Brianjd (talk) 13:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Re 2: It is necessary and correct to add a "number" to the DR sections because they are on the same page with each other and browsers will only see the first one if they all have the same exact name. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WRT guidelines; this is a pointless straw man argument. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any user whose name I hear from time to time as probable candidates to adminship may strike (bolded my consent to make life easier) whatever I have done that deserves being censured in this DR. I do not care. What I am most curious about is, when and if they are elected to the said post, how will they be able to close any deletion request regarding naked people images as I see they -IMHO of course- have a favourable approach to almost all of these without paying attention to the considerations of regular users like myself.

(BTW bravo, newcomer; you have been received as a hero. You even made me repent having opened this discussion, although I still believe your valuable contribution must be deleted.) E4024 (talk) 15:13, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Strike your own question. If you are writing about me, I cite policies and guidelines directly or indirectly. To be clear, this is 1 of just 2 photographs of solo nudist men facing the camera on this project, and thus is in scope. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image's potential in-scope usefulness would be improved if there was more information. Eg what country/place is this? Is this a beach or park where clothing is optional or nudity is the norm? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My memory was almost correct: This appears to be a retouched copy of the image in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. I know this because I saved the latter image at the time. There was more information available on the latter image’s description and talk page, but I did not save this. @Infrogmation: As an admin, you can see this; is it useful? Brianjd (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd: I can fill it in if you give me access to see the info. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rumblerumble33: Signatures in discussions should include timestamps. I have added timestamps to your signatures. Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically include a timestamp. Brianjd (talk) 08:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rumblerumble33: If you are referring to the info in the deleted file File:Naked man on the beach.jpg, I cannot give you access as I do not have access myself. This is why I asked an admin to check. Brianjd (talk) 08:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Photo coordinates are (40.4585670, -73.9925572), I just don’t know how to list them. I also have the original unedited photo if that helps with EXIF. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rumblerumble33: Thanks, I added the location for you. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Thank you! Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rumblerumble33: You're welcome! What's the name of that beach or area, and what did you retouch? Also, please do not ignore "Warning: A file by that name has been deleted or moved" again. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: It’s Gunnison Beach in Sandy Hook, NJ. That particular area is a service road and he wasn’t supposed to be there :*) ... I made the photo brighter and colorful as it came out dark due to limited exposure. I’ll make sure to rename if I get that warning again. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: I have other photos of him from that same day. Is it valuable to post them and should I post them raw and unedited? Also should I rename the file given your original message and if so how do I do that? Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rumblerumble33: Please consider how the photos fit into COM:PS before doing so. If you do so, please post the highest resolution raw and unedited version with metadata per COM:HR, and then the edited version with overwrite or a separate name. What new name would you choose for this file? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: I am not very creative with names. Perhaps “male nakedness on beach?” Or should it be more precise? I am open to suggestions.

@Jeff G.: I suggested “File:Naked and barefoot man on Gunnison Beach.jpg” as a file name replacement.

@Jeff G.: @Brianjd: @Infrogmation: Rename request rejected because this is still up for deletion nomination. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Should this be in Category:Beaches at Sandy Hook, New Jersey? This seems like a surprising result (which we are told to avoid, though I cannot find a relevant policy). Brianjd (talk) 10:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd: Would you prefer Category:Sandy Hook, New Jersey or Category:Gateway National Recreation Area, as the location isn't exactly on Gunnison Beach? Perhaps we need a Gunnison Beach cat that isn't surprising? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 16:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianjd: @Jeff G.: You need a Gunnison Beach cat. There are about 12 separate beaches in the Gateway National Recreation Area. Gunnison is the only nude beach of the 12. It’s the furthest from the old military equipment and will be the only one where you will find nudist people and signs about nudity. It has a life and aura of its own. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 01:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: I was using the phrase "surprising result" in the same sense as User talk:Etsidun#Avoid surprising results, that is, nudity in a non-nudity category. Apparently you are not supposed to do this. Brianjd (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: @Brianjd: I agree we should create the Gunnison Beach cat. How can I help do that? NudistPhotographer (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NudistPhotographer: See Commons:Categories. This page contains a quick guide to categorisation, followed by details. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unobjectionable, potentially useful. Location identified as Beach at Sandy Hook New Jersey - seems to be the only media of beach nudity in that state. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: @Infrogmation: EXIF data for the photo. I don’t know how to transfer it. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<Exif Metadata> Aperture: f/6.3

Aperture (APEX): 5.375

Aspect Ratio: 3 × 2

Camera Maker: Canon

Camera Model: Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III

Camera Lens Model: 8.8-36.8 mm

Color Model: RGB

Color Space: sRGB

Components Configuration: 1, 2, 3, 0

Custom Rendered: Normal

Date Taken: Jun 7, 2020 02:50:33 PM

Depth: 8

Digital Zoom: 1

DPI Width: 72

DPI Height: 72

EXIF Version: 2.3.1

Exposure Bias Value: 0 ev

Exposure Mode: Auto

Exposure Program: Program AE

Exposure Time: 1/1600s

File Name: IMG_0011.JPG

File Size: 9.9 MB

Flash: No Flash

Flash Pix Version: 1.0

FNumber: f/6.3

Focal Length: 8.800000000000001 mm

ISO: 125

Metering Mode: Multi-segment

Orientation: Normal

Profile Name: sRGB IEC61966-2.1

Resolution: 20 MegaPixels

Scene Capture Type: Standard

Shutter Speed Value: 1/1579s

White Balance: Auto

Author: Emily Claire Braston

Comment Hoping we can vote on this soon. If we aim to keep I want to change the name and then upload the other raw files. Rumblerumble33 (talk) 12:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @NudistPhotographer: It is not actually a vote. The “votes” (sometimes people call them “!votes”) are just there to make the discussion easier to read. The person who closes the discussion uses their own judgement, guided by the entire discussion. Brianjd (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep I never got to vote on my own deletion request. I vote to keep of course. NudistPhotographer (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ə XPLICIT 10:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file discussed in this section was renamed to File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg 11:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) and then deleted 12:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC) per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude and barefoot man on beach.jpg. The filename was salted 14:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC). — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 14:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dror Israel uniforms.jpg

אחת המצולמות ביקשה את מחיקת התמונה Nizzan Cohen (talk) 08:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One of the subjects asked for the picture to be erased Nizzan Cohen (talk) 22:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One of the subjects asked for the picture to be erased Nizzan Cohen (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We rarely remove an image at the request of a subject and never at the request of a third party, who might be an enemy or a vandal. A request may be made by the actual person using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dror Israel uniforms.jpg

Courtesy deletion requested. In the previous DR and ticket:2019052210009932, the uploader says that the women depicted do not wish the pictures to be kept in association with the uniforms. Since a redacted version has been uploaded (File:Dror Israel and Hanoar Haoved Ve'Halomed uniforms.png), we will lose little by accepting the wish. whym (talk) 11:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much, whym. Nizzan Cohen (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Long-term Abuse Mitigation — Slide deck — Community Health Initiative, February 2019.pdf

Several typos, not used on any pages. TBolliger (WMF) (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zoe Lilly.png

https://ninjaoutreach.com/zoelilly Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Achievers Award Presented By ‘We Love India’.jpg

No Bollywood Hungama watermarks, https://ru.kinorium.com/name/1061692/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arthur Jerry San Juan.jpg

Subject's life was 1918–1960; the photo appears to be a studio shot taken during the 1950s, when he was active in Hollywood, rather than by the uploader. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Targalski 2017-02-17.jpg

zawiera mój wizerunek bez mojej zgody 77.79.199.163 09:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zgłaszający to p. Targalski? Proszę udowodnić interes prawny. Anonimowa wypowiedź nie jest na to dowodem. Andros64 (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Chodzi o drugiego pana. W sumie Targalski jest ukazany niezbyt korzystnie, więc byłby to drugi powód za usunięciem. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
generalnie można drugiego pana wykadrować i problem przestaje istnieć. Andros64 (talk) 12:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Zresztą widzę, że już zrobione ;) Andros64 (talk) 12:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Osoba powrzechnie znana, historyk, zdjęcie wykonano w czytelni IPN (publicznie dostępnej, jak mniemam), więc bez wątpienia przebywał tam w celach zawodowych i moim zdaniem zgodnie z art. 81 pkt. 2 prawa autorskiego zgoda na rozpowszechnianie wizerunku p. Targalskiego w tym przypadku nie jest wymagana. Jeśli chodzi o osobę postronną, to wersja zdjęcia z jej wizerunkiem została ukryta. --jdx ^Re: 11:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx ^Re: 11:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:איגוד החברות הפרטיות בישראל.png

logo; there is no real approval Euro know (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, this image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2). -- Geagea (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Official sign Miffy.jpg

Nijntje is een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk van Dick Bruna (1927 - 2017). Zie ook Categorie:Deletion requests/File:Miffy Cafe sign,Kamaishi.jpg. --トトト (talk) 13:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

日本語: 看板自体に公共性があり、新聞で取り上げられた事実があったとしても、コモンズは完全に著作権上パブリックドメインに属するものしかアップロードできない決まりになっています。申し訳ありませんがルールなので従って頂くしかありません。
--トトト (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of COM:FOP#Japan. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Fotíme Česko 2018

Unused, merged with Template:Fotíme Česko, can be removed now. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK for me --Vojtěch Veselý (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused, author agrees. --Achim (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Totenåsen blå.jpg

made a better version Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. No reason to delete (no linked file or whatsoever). 大诺史 (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KN Freunde.jpg

speedydelete/ accidentally uploaded Vision x film- und fernsehproduktion (talk) 10:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:30, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rino Foschi 20190218 (1).jpg

screen cap thus very possibly a copyvio Matthew hk (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rino Foschi 20190218 (2).jpg

screen cap thus very possibly a copyvio Matthew hk (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Protest Rutgers New Brunswick.jpg

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. OTRS-permission from photographer Christopher Kulfan is needed. No evidence, that uploader Next2hector is the same person. Taivo (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gitanas Nauseda.jpg

Does not appear to be 'own work', but rather taken from here: here. Number 57 (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:李孟諺之肖像.jpg

image not found in source shizhao (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

改版了[5]--北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 04:48, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: also found at http://www2.tainan.gov.tw/tainan/mayor.asp?nsub=M1A000 . Licence is OK.--Roy17 (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Isle-ettes Change of Watch 2015 (16917763501).jpg

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Themightyquill: please elaborate. How is this out of scope? clpo13_(talk) 16:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, in my opinion in scope. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bbeepf (talk · contribs)

Out of scope

Mitte27 (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Worthless, low quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 07:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bbeepf (talk · contribs) 2

Out of Commons:Project scope: what is still missing in existing collection of explicit materials? Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 04:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What is still missing? Well, for example, we will have only one depiction of how to put on a condom, which seems to be clearly within scope and allowable by COM:PENIS. Madness ^Darkness 17:30, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Worthy, quality, unique, and in scope for articles about condoms and their uses. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 21:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep most files – instructional. Not sure only about Unshaved_penis_in_condon.gif which has to poor quality to understand what is it about. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Horned Lark at Carrizo Plains-yellowbackground.jpg

Cropped duplicate of File:Horned Lark at Carrizo Plains.jpg but edited with non-natural colour; not in use, and no educational value due to incorrect colours. Also incorrect license attribution. MPF (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flower on the water for Mena (45723844421).webm

Copyrighted soundtrack. Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:38, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mehmed Nedjati Bey.jpg

Source is 404. We have a 120-year old assumption. Therefore before 1920 does not always mean PD. E4024 (talk) 03:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-Ottoman}}. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Running back from school.jpg

Not properly tagged and described Testimony N (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: description was corrected. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sounders tifo at Whitecaps 2011.jpg

No FoP for posters in Canada B dash (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Canada has FoP for public interiors.Cptnono (talk) 03:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: graphic works are not included in Canadian FOP. Ruthven (msg) 17:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saligazz Force (talk · contribs)

Wrong license. May be PD-USgov, but evidence is needed.

Yann (talk) 07:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:موزه اسکناس.png

تکراری می باشد Fatemehzahra110 (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 17:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Åsa fra Tømmerholshøgda blue morning.jpg

the former version was better Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 17:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User talk:PRR

Copyright not clear PRR (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1924 - NSU Motorrad Werbung.jpg

This 1924 ad drawing is said to be from an unknown author ("N.N.") and to be in the PD. However, it's clearly signed "Krahn", which is most likely the German painter and commercial illustrator Hans-Kurt Krahn, who is listed in the Vollmer biographical dictionary of artists as born in 1888 and living in Stuttgart, not far from Neckarsulm where the motorcycles featured in the ad were produced. Krahn was apparently still alive in the years after WW II [6], so he might well have lived beyond 1948, which would mean the drawing is still protected by copyright. Therefore the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD Illustration of Österreichischer Motor 1920-1937. --Ju Ta 11:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD Illustration of Österreichischer Motor 1920-1937

This tag, created a few days ago by User:Metilsteiner, claims, without any explanation or rationale, that the copyrights for images from this particular Austrian magazine from 1920–1937 have all expired and that the images are in the public domain.

I don't see why that should be the case. The author of a 1920 or 1937 image might well have live beyond 1948, which would mean that contrary to the claim that particular image would still be protected by coypright. Instead of creating such a blanket tag, images from that magazine should only be uploaded on a case by case basis when a review has shown that they actually are in the public domain.

This obviously misleading and incorrect tag should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 19:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for Template:PD Illustration of Helios 1894-1944. --Rosenzweig τ 19:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination including all images using these templates except 2 which are PD-text. --Ju Ta 11:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Concert-Amedee-III-Prouvost (320x200).jpg

historical photo. Very unlikely own work as claimed. Would need a proper source. Ju Ta 07:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:SysMusDes

The files are images of sculpture in memory of the aircraft crash happened in Yaroslavl, 2011, and the sculpture itself is situated in Yekaterinburg, Russia. As the sculpture is constructed after 2011, the sculpture is unlikely in Russian public domain. Meanwhile, there is no FOP in Russia for sculptures. The files are therefore likely to be copyrighted and unfree.--廣九直通車 (talk) 09:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, see Commons:Производные произведения. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibertiogamgbandeira.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibertiogamgbrasao.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gurinhatãmgbandeira.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 10:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibiracimgbandeira.png

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 10:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:39, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iapumgbandeira.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 10:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:15, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ibiracimgbrasao.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think this image is in the public domain, see Commons:Coats of arms#Countries where official Coats of Arms are within the public domain. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Burj Dubai (3337137245).jpg

No FoP in UAE, the tower already showing most of the permanent exterior architecture, which is subject to copyright B dash (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Still in construction. Ruthven (msg) 07:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Burj Dubai (3337137245).jpg

UAE's FOP only includes brocasting programme 219.78.190.136 16:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ماك برج خليفه در دبي مال 2013-12-16 23-04.jpg

No Freedom of paronama in United Arab Emirates, needs permission from the artist B dash (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бурдж-Халифа 2019 01.jpg

No FoP in UAE, needs permission from the architect B dash (talk) 13:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Бурдж-Халифа 2019 02.jpg

No FoP in UAE, needs permission from the architect B dash (talk) 13:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Burj Khalifa Spire.jpg

No FoP in UAE, needs permission from the architect B dash (talk) 13:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Burj alarab.jpg

No FoP in UAE, needs permission from the architect B dash (talk) 13:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SAB Badge.png

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination + maybe out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 07:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Inaugurare Monumentul Eroilor Cavaleristi Oituz.png

No FOP Romania (artist died in 1966). Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Inaugurare Monumentul Eroilor Cavaleristi Oituz public.png

No FOP Romania (artist died in 1966). Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Medalia Jubiliara Oituz - 600.jpg

No FOP Romania (artist of sculpture from left died in 1966). See Inaugurare Monumentul Eroilor Cavaleristi Oituz.png Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 16:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-RO-exempt}}. Ruthven (msg) 07:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DoublebassExample.PNG

Ich habe meine Meinung geändert. Ich möchte nicht mehr, dass es öffentlich sichtbar ist. Ein Nutzer mit einem langen Namen (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 07:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jesse Klaver 2017.jpg

Not sure permission ("rechtenvrij") is sufficient for Commons. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The license has changed, it's now CC-BY 2.0. Current version of the website mentioned as source is archived as https://archive.is/iwwdz. Mbch331 (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Licensereview passed. Ruthven (msg) 07:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alessandro mendini per alchimia, la poltrona di proust, 1978 (riedizione 2003).JPG

We are far from the 70 years since author's death, the creator of this work Alessandro Mendini died just today, his works are still copyrighted 151.54.204.129 19:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter, it is an utilitarian object, see Commons:UA. We have lots of more chairs by living designers. --Sailko (talk) 19:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-03 about the File:Ettore sottsass, libreria casablanca, 1981.JPG --Sailko (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+1 and Mendini would have loved it to let everybody have a look at the Proust chair. R.I.P Sandro!--JeanPersil (talk) 21:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: An armchair is an utilitarian object. Ruthven (msg) 07:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ZawaZawa.png

Delete out of scope. It should be too simple and ineligible for Japanese copyright though.--Roy17 (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:Roy17, out of scope image. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Okhotny Ryad Old Wall Fragment.jpg

Another user have uploaded a better same photo. Voltmetro 10:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request, redundant image. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Placeholder female superhero c.png

user’s request — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.145.180.137 (talk • contribs) 2017-12-12T05:31:35‎ (UTC)

Keep "User’s request" given by an anonymous editor is not a valid reason for deletion. For me it looks like vandalism. --jdx ^Re: 13:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

kept: per jdx.--Wdwd (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Placeholder female superhero c.png

Its not an own work, may be found elsehwere. Same thing should goes to File:Placeholder male superhero c.png 2001:E68:4424:554E:5CEF:789F:4329:63 11:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: "Elsewhere" is too vague. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, lack of concrete points. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Audrey Tcherkoff.jpg

Used on various pages and press articles: [7], [8], [9], [10]. Probable work of a professional photographer. User:Ilovemito is under investigation on Wikipedia in French as being posibly commercially linked to Audrey Tcherkoff, or being Audrey Tcherkoff herself. Akela NDE (talk) 11:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is available on many websites and is the most commonly used to portray Audrey Tcherkoff. It is copyright free and therefore should not be an issue. --Ilovemito (talk) 19:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that a picture is available on many websites doesn’t make it a "copyright free" picture. It’s up to the original author to decide whether it it’s freely reusable or not: are you them? If so, please see COM:OTRS. If you are not the original photographer, then the image will have to be deleted, as displaying it here on Commons with a free license is a clear breach of copyright. Note that simply buying an image made by a photographer doesn’t entitle you to release it under a free license.

If the person here claims to be the author, then they are very dedicated to their client, as the same account is used on the French Wikipedia for the single purpose of working on the Audrey Tcherkoff page. Weird for a photographer. Akela NDE (talk) 17:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:12-SylvaFund.jpg

Not own work, author info clearly visible in exif Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Linköping - 1963.jpg

The artist Pär Thorell died in 1969 so this images is not free to use AHA (talk) 14:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, see Commons:Derivative works. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El Chapulín.jpg

por duplicado en la subida ArturoWikilover (talk) 15:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Updated file, if deleted the image will go away. --E4024 (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:E4024, If you want to revert to the old image please upload it again. --Y.haruo (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:River City Rockfest Overview (2017-05-27) (34831272622).jpg

Artist asked the photo to be removed, it's no longer available on the original source (Flickr). 192.208.58.220 15:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Even if the Flickr user deletes the image, the license can not be cancelled at that time. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:River City Rockfest Overview (2017-05-27) (34831272622).jpg

I took this photo and the singer in the photo asked for the file to be removed. The license on the Flickr page was Attribution-NonCommercial before it was removed. Can you please remove the photo? Thanks. 24.245.65.126 13:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not that it really matters, but I just wanted to say that it's fine by me if the file is removed. I uploaded it here, but it's not being used. Unfortunately it's not up to me, it's up to the admins.--SilverBullitt (talk) 13:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo If you say so, IP address. Brianjd (talk) 13:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:River City Rockfest Overview (2017-05-27) (34831275742).jpg. Brianjd (talk) 13:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also this file survived a previous DR with the same rationale. Brianjd (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely take down images at the request of the subject and never at the request of anonymous IP users who might be enemies or vandals. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tuankiet65.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Tuankiet65 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10|As the author of this photo I request that this photo be removed
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for speedy-deletion. However, a courtesy-deletion might be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletions, personal user photograph. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eva y peron.JPG

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Argentina for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Valentinas Mazuronis.jpg

Does not appear to be own work, but rather taken from somewhere like here. The photos uploaded by the user in question also have different authors in the metadata. Number 57 (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo simil MET Art.jpg

This is a fake not validated logo of MetArt.com Gery.Kaf-Yad (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from talk page by bjh21 (talk) 23:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC): Hello, as a MetArt employee I can confirm this logo does not belong to us and can be deleted. Thanks! -Gery-~~Feb19~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gery.Kaf-Yad (talk • contribs) 21:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment isn't it an old one instead of a "fake" one ?... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~: This file is in use on es:MET Art and fr:MET ART. Under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV, if a file is in use on another project, we should treat it as being useful for an educational purpose. If it's good enough for Spanish and French Wikipedias, it's good enough for us. --bjh21 (talk) 23:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Well, since it's confirmed it's a fake logo, it's used for "wrong" reasons, in fact... Now that we have real logos, we don't need it... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, since those two projects have stopped using it. --bjh21 (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, not educationally useful. --Y.haruo (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MBTA map in the style of New York.jpeg

Utterly incorrect map with no educational value. It is also heavily derivative of this map from 2017. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My rebuttal: You are misinterpreting the purpose of this tmap. It is an alternative tmap just like many others on this wiki, perfectly valid in its (apparently controversial) design choices. It is not "utterly incorrect" with "no educational value" and actually can be used for navigation of the T system. I will admit that it actually was based on the other map, with which I was a bit dissatisfied, for example some graphic errors (Revere Beach lacks a station dot, what the heck is going on with that commuter rail?) the Green Line stations downtown are all wrong (It goes "Copley-Arlington-Boylston-Haymarket-North-GC" and skips Park entirely, and has the E stopping at Hynes, which it doesn't) and a missed pun (Forest Hills doesn't line up with Forest Hills.) My tmap is useable as a tmap, therefore it is a tmap. In conclusion: even though it is a bit silly and not geographically accurate, it is still a good tmap. Thank you. *applause* — Preceding unsigned comment added by World Metro (talk • contribs) 16:27, 25 February 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Wait, was it that I left out the Silver Line? It's just a glorified bus, I mean, does it really need to be on the Rapid Transit diagram? Yeah, it's definitely that I left out the Silver Line. I'm very sorry that I left out the Silver Line. *slightly less applause* — Preceding unsigned comment added by World Metro (talk • contribs) 18:16, 11 March 2019‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Owl 3.jpg

by mistake uploaded Raj2590 (talk) 12:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teksoy6327 (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- I have some objections: "Unused" - at least one file is used. "Permission" - why need a permission for truck images (Please look at File:Antep.jpg for example, two of these images do not even carry the company name, nothing that can be considered DW and less advertisement). Packing material has only letters on them (some even do not) therefore they are below ToO. We can rename files that "smell" advert and delete the original name links. Why lose a truck or packing material photo? They can always be needed and used (i.e. "scope"). I don't know if there is any copyright issue that I cannot see. --E4024 (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Only File:Teksoy evden eve taşımacılık.jpg (and a similar with another title) can be considered, IMHO, as advert (because of the phone number) and deleted. --E4024 (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And all inconsistent sizes and qualities which indicate that they were likely taken from a website. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Constance Steinkuehler at the 2015 Game Developers Conference's 1ReasonToBe panel.jpg

Subject did not consent to this photo being taken and published 169.234.58.155 20:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photographs of identifiable people

re: consent, the subject is a speaker at a conference event in the United States, so there was no reasonable expectation of privacy.

If the issue is subject request, the protocol is here.

czar 23:02, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Rawhide Years Poster.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Syced as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: probably not "Own work" May be PD for some reason: notice, renewal, etc. Yann (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it might be PD, but then the uploader should mention it explicitly, not let us guess. Please note that the same uploader uploaded many other movie posters, and I just tagged one of them. Syced (talk) 01:10, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diego barbosa silva (talk · contribs)

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: The person depicted is a former director of the Brazilian National Archives. As I was writing on the GLAM-Wiki initiative we hold with this cultural institution, I realized pictures were nominated for deletion [11]. They are on scope. Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rainforest Cafe Atlas San Francisco.jpg

Derivative work of a copyrighted artwork. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 06:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Autor en compañía de su tutor.jpg

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no source (No source since 11 February 2019). It is possible this might be own work so it might be worth giving the uploader another week or so to provide some evidence. Green Giant (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unknownn (unnamed) people -> out of scope. --Ju Ta 06:42, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:US-officer-training-Montagnard-troops 1964.jpg

Wrong license, may be PS-USgov, but evidence is needed. Yann (talk) 07:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 07:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Segundo icono de guail..jpg

This file was initially tagged by Arfraguail as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: pertenece a http://guail.es/ User not informed. Yann (talk) 09:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 07:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fireworks at Columbia.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Magnolia677 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This sculpture was installed after March 1989, per COM:PACUSA. See [12]. FoP issues require a proper DR. Yann (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 06:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GrcesImpério do Cambuci.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 10:04, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This image may not meet originality in Brazil. I think this is a difficult problem, see COM:TOO Brazil.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 06:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hubert Humphrey, half-length portrait, facing front cropped.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Walk Like an Egyptian as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: don't need; unused file No reason for speedy. Yann (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is file has been superseded by File:Hubert Humphrey crop.jpg. In the past, I've successfully tagged many of my other files for speedy deletion using the same rationale as this one, so I don't see why this file has to go through a regular deletion process. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 23:56, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Walk Like an Egyptian: Because that is our policy. There is certainly no ground for a speedy deletion here. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and no reason to delete it at all. --Ju Ta 06:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hubert Humphrey, half-length portrait, facing front cropped.jpg

Author requesting useless crop for deletion, per COM:GCSD. Hasn't been used since it was nominated for deletion in February. Other crops like File:Hubert Humphrey vice presidential portrait (cropped).jpg and File:Hubert Humphrey crop.jpg are available and in use. Wow (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BT Group logo.png

UK logo, unlikely to be free per COM:TOO UK AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COM:TOO UK has a low threshold, and this is almost certainly above it. -- Begoon 21:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 06:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kecskeri puszta Madárkavalkád.jpg

The photo is from huwiki: hu:Fájl:Madárkavalkád.jpg. There is no valid license tag given by the author. Regasterios (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture taken by one Hungarian wiki user 11 years ago, licensed by rules that time. The user are long time not active, so impossible ask him about the picture. Texaner (talk) 08:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: but you cant invent a license for it. --Ju Ta 06:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahomet - Paix et bénédiction sur lui.jpg

Not Own work, derivative work from this graphic — D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 21:09, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ju Ta 06:57, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kevin Barwich.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCo0EvNvp7wlZfKLHis67unA Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: cant find it at source link, but vvery likely out of scope. --Ju Ta 06:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:کتابخانه تخصصی.jpg

تکراری است Fatemehzahra110 (talk) 08:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely a copyright violation. --Ju Ta 07:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]