Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/12/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 12th, 2022


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kakar 2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW - screenshots

Эlcobbola talk 17:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nevermind, source videos found here; Screenshot of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kakar 2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More screenshots, see watermarks, etc.

Эlcobbola talk 18:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nevermind, source videos found here; Screenshot of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-jacquesdifoum.jpg

[edit]

Out of com:scope self promo Vera (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jacques François Difoum Ngokobi. Vera (talk) 21:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noli - SV.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:52, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eschweiler Bereich Innenstadt.svg

[edit]

By mistake, i included in the first svg version (the big one) a layer without permission of the owner. Conform Re-Upload as second revision will follow Grunpfnul (talk) 22:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept file, deleted first version as requested. --Rosenzweig τ 08:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sanad Elsherif.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, used on spam item on Wikidata. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jaqen (talk) 17:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voibon.png

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE and possibly copyvio, used on spam item on Wikidata. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jaqen (talk) 17:13, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted —capmo (talk) 04:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloucester Cathedral Exterior (49215519166).jpg

[edit]

exact duplicate of File:Gloucester Cathedral Exterior.jpg —capmo (talk) 16:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Template:Duplicate -Killarnee (C•T•U) 18:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Killarnee, I used the Nominate for deletion tool (from the AjaxQuickDelete gadget), which doesn't allow me to select the proper template, unfortunately. It would be great if the gadget had a tool specifically for duplicates. —capmo (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Best motivational speaker in Ahmedabad (Zaid).pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: advertising Headlock0225 (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sonal Joshi.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope: advertising Headlock0225 (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kamal Ahmed (1985).jpg

[edit]

Can not get copyright release for this image. It is from a school yearbook that has not been located. Brantzmyers (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 17:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mural @ La Clusaz (49955310641).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:31, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LO MAS LINDO DE NUESTRA COMUNIDAD.jpg

[edit]

Tiny and no EXIF. If this is not copyright violation, the uploader should go through the COM:VRT process. There is also no identification of what city we are looking at. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:31, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sahara maroc.jpg

[edit]

Really tiny and without EXIF, so likely copyright violation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Terbuvc 5.jpg

[edit]

Small and unsharp, not EXIF, and the description is merely "t." Should be deleted as possible copyright violation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ultrahack Main Stage.jpg

[edit]

Very small and no useful EXIF. Probable copyright violation. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wednesday.jpgg.jpg

[edit]

copyvio|1=O criador original é a Netflix. Kongs (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JOHNSON RASHID-web-hires.jpg

[edit]

Non-free content - copyrighted photograph used as identification of the artist, there are free images of this artist available. 19h00s (talk) 02:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Swensen's in Hollywood.png

[edit]

Obvious copyright violation. Still from the movie Death Wish 2. The misleading nature of the description and claim of ownership is egregious enough that the uploader's other files probably need scrutiny. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ArnoldSwensen.png

[edit]

Obvious copyright violation. Still from the movie Commando. The misleading nature of the description and claim of ownership is egregious enough that the uploader's other files probably need scrutiny. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KFYN Logo 2020.png

[edit]

No evidence of Creative Commons licensing. This was a radio station logo and exceeds COM:TOO. It seems doubtful that the station or their ownership would have released their logo under a CC license. BigrTex (talk) 02:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Erect white penis.jpg

[edit]

Horrible quality Dronebogus (talk) 02:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Metablocker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Exhibitionist garbage

Dronebogus (talk) 02:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunrise@visakhapatnam.jpg

[edit]

Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Sayed2910 (talk) 03:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep If you think so, don't add it to an encyclopedia article, but I disagree. A geolocated sunrise picture over an interesting coastal landscape is surely not devoid of interest or possible uses. But you are wrong to think of Commons as an encyclopedia. For a non-encyclopedic example of a site in the Wikimedia family that uses thumbnails of Commons files, consider Wikivoyage, the Wikimedia travel guide. If you still think there's no imaginable use for this file, we'll have to agree to disagree, and thanks for initially uploading it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TSMY Portal Welcome.png

[edit]

COM:DW: Sources of the logo and Muhyiddin Yassin is needed A1Cafel (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brickworld VID 20170617 134903 (34527935604).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a non-free artwork using lego A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Brickworld VID 20170617 135218 (35331485486).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a non-free artwork using lego A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Martha Avila Ventura.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of the stated free license at the linked source czar 05:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panache088 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The watermarked photographs are taken from <https://panacheaesthetics.com/liposuction/> and/or <https://panacheaesthetics.com/blepharoplasty/>. Neither of these pages have a free license at source. As such, these should be deleted for lacking evidence of a free license.

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Teal Squishmallow with rainbow belly and stain on the nose.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS, there exist some countries, such as the United States, however, do not consider toys to be utilitarian objects. Accordingly, paintings, statues and toys are all works subject to copyright whose photographs would require permission of the original creator to be hosted on the Commons (see also: this court case). Since squishmallows are produced by a U.S. company and that company would be the copyright holder, we would require a free license from the copyright holder of the squishmallow, but I do not see evidence of this, so we should delete this as presumptively lacking a free license on the underlying three-dimensional stuffed toy (that is eligible for copyright protection in the United States) of which this photograph is a derivative work. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adriendebizemont.png

[edit]

copied from https://webmuseo.com/ws/musees-regioncentre/app/collection/record/13927 Ske (talk) 06:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atwngirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These dorney-related items appear to all have been published after 1989 in the United States. Per COM:HIRTLE, the items depicted in these photographs/scans would be copyrighted in the United States by virtue of their publication at that time. We would need a free license from the copyright holder of the underlying works depicted in the photos, but we do not appear to have that. As such, these should be deleted for lacking evidence of a free license of the underlying works produced by Dorney.

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atwngirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are photographs of the covers of yearbooks from a high school in Allentown, Pennsylvania that are known to have been published after January 1, 1989. Each of these covers is above the threshold of originality in the United States, and there is no Freedom of Panorama in the United States that would exempt the covers of these yearbooks from copyright protection when photos are taken of them. There is no evidence that the copyright holder of these yearbooks has released these under a free license, even if the photos themselves contain a free license from the photographer. As such, these should be deleted as lacking evidence of a free license from the copyright holder of the yearbook cover design.

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atwngirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader indicates that these postcards were published in 1995. As these are postcards published in the United States after 1989, these are copyrighted in the United States and we would need a valid free license from the copyright holder to host them on Commons. However, while there is evidence that the individual who scanned these postcards has agreed to release their scan under a free license, we don't appear to have evidence that the copyright holder of the postcards has released them under a free license. And, for that reason, we should delete these postcards.

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atwngirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  1. File:2022 - Dr. Alfred J. Yost - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1907)
  2. File:2022 - Werner Knauss Rhue - Allentown (A.jpg (died in 1904)
  3. File:2022 - Harry G. Stiles .- Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1908)
  4. File:2022 - Colonel Frank R. Fischl, Jr.- Allentown PA.jpg no notice, we have the photographers signature and the year, but no copyright symbol
  5. File:2022 - Malcom W. Gross - Allentown PA.jpg 1935 image, no renewal by photographer or Allentown
  6. File:2022 - John T. Gross - Allentown (A.jpg published in 1960 in The Morning Call, no renewal
  7. File:2022 - F. Willard Harper - Allentown (A.jpg no copyright notice
  8. File:2022 - Dr. Theodore Conrad. Yeager - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1874)
  9. File:2022 - Donald V. Hock - Allentown (A.jpg no copyright notice
  10. File:2022 - Charles O. Hunsicker - Allentown PA.jpg circa 1910
  11. File:2022 - Samuel Milton McHose - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1893)
  12. File:2022 - Raymond B. Bracy - Allentown (A.jpg no copyright notice
  13. File:2022 - Herman Schuon - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1912)
  14. File:2022 - Henry Willard Allison - Allentown (A.jpg (died in 1913)
  15. File:2022 - George F. Erich - Allentown PA.jpg
  16. File:2022 - Edwin S. Shimer - Allentown (A.jpg (died in 1902)
  17. File:2022 - Dr. Henry Herbert Herbst - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1911)
  18. File:2022 - Dr. Edwin G. Martin - Allentown (A.jpg (died in 1893)
  19. File:2022 - Colonel Tilghman H. Good - Allentown (A.jpg (died in 1887)
  20. File:2022 - Clifford S. J. Bartholomew - Allentown PA.jpg no copyright notice
  21. File:2022 - Charles W. Rinn - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1920)
  22. File:2022 - Brighton C. Diefenderfer - Allentown (A.jpg
  23. File:2022 - Joseph S. Daddona - Allentown PA.jpg
  24. File:2022 - Alfred L. Reichenbach - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1920)
  25. File:2022 - James L. Schaadt- Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1924)
  26. File:2022 - Fred Ewing Lewis - Allentown PA.jpg circa 1920, we have a photo dated 1917
  27. File:2022 - Dr. Charles D. Schaeffer .- Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1923)
  28. File:2022 - Dr. Alfred J. Martin - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1896)
  29. File:2022 - Colonel Samuel D. Lehr - Allentown PA.jpg (died in 1915)
  30. File:2022 - William L. Heydt .- Allentown PA.jpg post 1989, needs VRT
  31. File:2022 - Roy C. Afflerbach - Allentown PA.jpg post 1989, needs VRT

Relevant discussion related to two of these these files can be found at User talk:King of Hearts#File:1969 - Lafyette Electronics - Allentown PA.jpg, User talk:Atwngirl#Own work photos and 2D copying. The primary issue is that these files are photos taken by the uploader of other photos hanging on some wall in the city hall of en:Allentown, Pennsylvania. Since these file's uploaded seem to be slavish reproductions of photos taken by someone other than the uploader, the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licenses the files were uploaded under don't seem correct since no new copyright would've been created for the photos taken by the uploader. The copyright status of the original photos themselves does matter, and it would be assumed that their respective copyright holders would be the person or persons who took them, unless they were a en:work for hire or their copyright was transferred to some other party. There's no information provided about the en:provenance of the original photos so there's no way to assess their copyright status. The uploader states they were given permission by Allentown mayor en:Matthew Tuerk, but it's not clear whether (1) the mayor has the authority to do such a thing or (2) this would be equivalent to the mayor giving his COM:CONSENT even if he does. So, it would seem that, at the very least, some sort of more formal VRT verification would be needed per item 1 of COM:VRT#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT? in order for Commons to keep these.

I've numbered the files to make them a bit easier to discuss. Three of the photos (Nos.4, 5 and 20) seem to be watermarked in one of their lower corners; this could be the name of the studio or person who took the photo, but I'm not sure. Some of them may have already entered into the public domain for one reason or another, and these probably just need to be relicensed with a more suitable license with {{Licensed-PD-Art}} being added as a wrapper for the photos. Those that aren't clearly PD, however, may need to be deleted if copyright holder's consent can't be verified. If the copyright holder for these is the Mayor of Allentown or the City of Allentown, one CONSENT email to VRT to cover all of the files would seem to be all that's needed. Finally, some of the files (Nos. 2, 6, 7, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19 and 22) might needed to be renamed if kept since it appears "(A" was typed by mistake when uploading the file instead of "PA". Any renaming should probably be non-contentious per #3 and #4 of COM:FNC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Those taken before 1989. Up until 1989 you still had to register for a copyright. Up until 1977 you had to display a copyright symbol and a year. Up until 1964, you had to register, then renew the copyright. I'm assuming these are the official portraits and were taken when they entered office. For post 1989, we would accept a VRT from the town clerk declaring "no known copyright restrictions" just like we accept the same from Flickr Commons from other jurisdictions. Changed the signed ones to the correct author, and mark the others as author=Anonymous, and change the licenses to the various correct ones for the original. --RAN (talk) 05:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • If any of the above can be verified to have been clearly taken before March 1, 1989, it might be OK to relicense them as PD and then replace the CC licenses for the photos with "Licensed-PD-Art". Since, however, there isn't really information about the provenance of any of the files in their respective descriptions, there's nothing really to go on other then assuming that they were taken during the subject of the photo's time in office. Perhaps en:Mayors of Allentown, Pennsylvania can help eliminate the obvious ones (i.e. the pre-1928 ones), but then again not all of the files listed above are being used in that article. Moreover, some of the files listed above also seem to have been uploaded more than once at different times by the same uploader under slightly different names (e.g. like File:2022 - Raymond B. Bracy - Allentown (A.jpg (No. 12) also uploaded as File:1969 - Ray B Bracy.jpg, and File:2022 - George F. Erich - Allentown PA.jpg also uploaded as File:1944 - George F Erich.jpg); this could help clarify things or it could just make more things to try and sort out. The uploader seems to have uploaded many files as "PD-ineligible-no notice" just because there's no visible copyright notice directly within the photos themselves even though copyright notices often appeared in borders or on the backs of photos, and photos in printed publications didn't necessarily need to be provided with separate individual copyright notices if they weren't part of an advertisement. Since the uploader tends to provide very little if any information at provided about the provenance of the photo, find the COM:EVID to verify the "no notice" claims has become rather hard. It's also hard to just assume good faith that the uploader's evaluation of each file's licensing is correct given all the file related notifications on their user talk page and the large number of the their uploads that have been deleted. Some of the pre-1963 "no notice" photos might've originally been protected by copyright, but are OK to be relicensed as {{PD-US-not renewed}}; once again, though, that is going to involve quite a bit of educated guessing given what little information has been provided about the provenance of each photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Atwngirl: I changed the license for one: File:2022 - Colonel Tilghman H. Good - Allentown (A.jpg and estimated correct dating. The uploader might want to create Wikidata entries for each person, and add "position_held=Mayor of Allentown, Pennsylvania" so that we get an update of the chart: wikidata:Talk:Q99627141. I started with Tilghman H. Good. I will work on more, but it is very time consuming. --RAN (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It looks like some of the early images were also published in "Historic Homes and Institutions and Genealogical and Personal Memoirs of the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania", a public domain book with biographies of prominent people of the Allentown area. The uploader used the versions displayed in City Hall which are better copies. The Morning Call newspaper of Allentown also displayed the same images when the mayor was elected. The Morning Call did not renew copyrights which takes us up to 1964, but we have contrast problem and a resolution problem. See: Category:Alfred John Yost to see multiple versions of the same image of varying quality. --RAN (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • I will strike out clearly pd ones too after I do the review, if it is ok with you. We can both look at ones that approach the copyright border where we will need a VRT from the township. --RAN (talk) 13:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • If some of the images are clearly PD (or at least can be reasonably assessed as such) and relicensed as such, then they should be OK to keep, shouldn't they? Since {{PD-US-not renewed}} doesn't include 1963 (at least I don't think it does), I'm not sure where the 1964 date is in reference too, but if anything published between January 1, 1928, and 1 Janaury 1963, can also be converted to PD, then that's a good thing in my opinion. I'm not sure what happens to images guesstimated to have been taken between January 1, 1963 and March 1, 1989. I believe publication and copyright registration stopped being requirements in 1978 but a notice was still required up to March 1989. Perhaps any images assumed to come from that period could possibly be {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but it's hard to really say so simply because there's no visible copyright notice on the front of the photo. Anything after March 1, 1989, probably needs VRT verification to be kept. Personally, I've got no problems with images being struck out since they're still there for others to see and assess. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have struck out some photos where the depicted person died more than 95 years ago. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let me know if you want to help with wikidata:Talk:Q99627141 to build the list of mayors, you just add position=Mayor_of at the person's entry, and the chart gets updated. Peek at one of the formatted ones to see. It took me forever to work on all the popes. --RAN (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Problematic ones are in bold and may require a VRT from Allentown, Pennsylvania town clerk. The images are on display in the city hall, an image of the new mayor is added each year, so we know images were "made public", but post 1989 images will still be copyrighted. --RAN (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • How are you assessing that photos taken between January 1, 1963, and March 1, 1989, are "PD-US-no notice"? Are you simply going by the file that was uploaded or have you find some of them being used in other print publication? I don't think it can be assumed that such photos are no notice just because there's no visible notice on the front of the photos themselves. Notices didn't always appear on the front of a photo during that error. Even in the case of those photos with visible watermark-like names of the photographer/studio that took the photo, I don't think it can be automatically assumed that they had no notice just from the front of the photo. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        • I called the clerks office and the person who answered the phone, not the municipal clerk, confirmed that images are on public display (publication in its legal meaning), and a new image is added when the new mayor is sworn into office. We can demand that they take the images down and scan the back, but I have not seen a commercial photographer add a copyright notice on the back, in any of the images that have been up for deletion in the past 10 years. In the cases where we demanded a scan of the back, there was never a hidden copyright notice. Where we have found a copyright symbol, they have been found on the front. See for example: Category:Bain copyright notice. For those from 1977 to 1989, they still required registration in the copyright database within 5 years. I have not see any of the names of the sitters, or the two names of the photographers we have identified. It is a shame that the images scanned from the local paper and the two books, are so highly compressed as jpgs, they are almost unusable. I also found a few errors, one person misidentified and a few errors in the dates served as mayor. I fixed in the Wikidata entries I created. --RAN (talk) 06:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
          • Once again, I do really appreciate your time and energy in helping to sort these files out. As long as any significant doubt about the licensing of a file is removed, it should be OK for Commons per COM:PCP. I'm not sure whether We can demand that they take the images down and scan the back, but I have not seen a commercial photographer add a copyright notice on the back was meant as snark or was a serious suggestion, but I don't think we need to go that far. If it was snark, then I think you'd be better off directing that at the uploader since they are the person who created this situation. FWIW, it's not just these files but many other files uploaded by the same user which have questionable licenisng that either need to be or are currently being sorted out; moreover, this seems to have been an issue brought up before by others based on all of the notifications posted on the uploader's user talk page, Anyway, if the clerk's office can send in a VRT consent email for the post-1989 photos, perhaps it would also be able to send one for the 1963-1989 photos as well just to support the "no-notice" claims. There are, after all, quite a number of photos uploaded by others to Commons from that same time period which provide a way (either by separately uploading their backs uploaded or by links) to more thoroughly verify any "no notice" claim; so, it's not all that unusual to ask about this form of verification. Finally, I'm assuming this edit to File:Joseph Samuel Daddona (1933-2004).jpg was just a mistake and you meant to relicense the photo as "PD-US-no notice" instead of "PD-US"; so, I changed the license to "PD-US-no notice". If it wasn't a mistake, then I don't see how the photo can be "PD-US", but I might be missing something. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not snark, sorry you took it that way, just an observation from a decade of image research, we loaded over 1,000 images from eBay over the years from various photographers and news agencies, and have been uploading the back for those that were up for deletion, where the nominator wanted to see the back. I am not aware of ever finding one, maybe somebody has. The ones we did find were on the front already in the image, and those images were deleted. You will probably find more mistakes, please make any needed changes, when you are working with multiple tabs opened it is easy to cut and paste to the wrong image, I worked all weekend on the project. It will take several editing passes to be error free. I like your use of the art template which gives a license for the original and the derivative. For the two mayors where we may delete the image, I found replacements from their high school yearbooks. I will look for their college yearbooks in the future, which will have a more adult looking face. I think the uploader volunteers at an archive, I suggested they get a Flickr Commons account where they can release material under "no known copyright restrictions". --RAN (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Mostly. Deleted two that require VRT. Kudos to RAN for his effort in sorting out these files. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Esther Povitsky 2015.jpg

[edit]

Appears to be a screenshot, Flickr user may not be the copyright holder A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hey Cowen! When I Grow Up I'm Coming To Find You (4203929479).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Streets Of Brussels - There Are Many Missing Cats (4646199305).jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belfast City - Murals ( Shankill) (5702457714).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works " in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Villefranche et du Beaujolais.jpg

[edit]

ancienne adresse 31.32.211.1 09:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steifer Penis1.jpg

[edit]

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steifer Penis mit großer Eichel.jpg

[edit]

Poor quality per Commons:Nudity --ghouston (talk) 22:56, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steifer Penis mit großer Eichel.jpg

[edit]

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magdim Metshin Talking on iCups with Grandpa.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Solomon203 (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per above. Brianjd (talk) 08:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TBP POSTER small.jpg

[edit]

Likely not own work, copied from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7996170/. Malverna 12:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aleph Farms.logo.png

[edit]

Wrong logo, never been used עידו כ.ש. (talk) 18:22, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, but it is used now. Twice. Permission exists. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aleph Farms.logo.png

[edit]

Wrong file, company asked to erase עידו כ.ש. (talk) 12:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used at it:Aleph Farms and wikidata:Q73685564. Brianjd (talk) 08:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1533AndJ.jpg

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Satrap Hashemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Scope. Unused pictures of inactive user.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:حضرت صاحب.jpg

[edit]

Not own work, photo available on the internet HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مدرن پارت لوازم یدکی هیوندای و کیا.jpg

[edit]

Screenshot from webpage HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مدرن پارت.jpg

[edit]

Unused and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ModernPart.jpg

[edit]

Unused and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdullah Abo rabiah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of medals--see, for example, User:Elcobbola/Awards. Also likely COM:NOTHOST--uploaded as self-promotion for user's vanity page, no indication related competition(s) are notable

Эlcobbola talk 16:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penzance - tax avoidance sticker.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-womensmarch2018 Philly Philadelphia -MeToo (24935579427).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 17:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Idiocracy (30639266695).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Trump vs Kim (43730413891).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Two-faced Donald Trump (40763032091).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 17:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Berkeley 8 27 17-6836 (36747520791).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Women's march on wasington (Unsplash).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:02, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Григорян В.А..jpg

[edit]

Probable copyright violation. Looks like a promtiinal shot. Unlikely to be Uploaders own work as calimed. Does not qualify to be Public Domain. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by User:Yann. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Steven J Cyr, MD.pdf

[edit]

Biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ribordy watches custom watches forum award trophy.jpg

[edit]

Promotional, and the logo is probably copyrighted and pretty definitely above COM:TOO. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prods Oktor Skjærvø.jpg

[edit]

Not own work, see the watermark HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Herasat.jpg

[edit]

Logo with unknown age. It should be uploaded locally. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6621 (52559460654).jpg

[edit]

Per meta, copyright holder is Eric G. Gagnon @ TOBROOK

Also,

File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6761 (52559633900).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6754 (52559711403).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6751 (52559460329).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6746 (52559633975).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6743 (52558713992).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6742 (52559634040).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6709 (52559460059).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6682 (52559163526).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6678 (52559460484).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6669 (52559634145).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6663 (52559163606).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6658 (52559163636).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6654 (52559711683).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6634 (52558714152).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6628 (52559460109).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6982 (52559711168).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6975 (52558713737).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6925 (52559633790).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6875 (52558713767).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6855 (52559460184).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6844 (52559633840).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6835 (52559711363).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6802 (52559460214).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6792 (52559633700).jpg
File:22dec12-COP15-nature-culture-summit-6779 (52559633885).jpg

// sikander { talk } 🦖 20:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC) Files were undeleted as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:22dec19-COP15-Adoption-of-the-Kunming-Montreal-Framework-8881.jpg. —holly {chat} 17:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISLE Theater Company Logo.png

[edit]

old logo for ISLE Theater Company. A new one has already been uploaded Nammiller (talk) 23:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It should either be deleted or added underneath the new logo file. Battery32 (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we don’t delete logos within scope simply for being old. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISLE Theater Company 2.png

[edit]

old logo. A new one has already been uploaded Nammiller (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It is old and should be removed. Battery32 (talk) 23:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, we don’t delete logos within scope simply for being old. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tvchannellogos81175012131 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly above COM:TOO UK. Styling of cursive font to connect "I" "T" and, "V" can be seen as having artistic originality.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete and moved all these files locally at English Wikipedia and tag theses images as PD-ineligible-USOnly and Trademark, as these logos are PD only in the U.S. due to the artistic of the cursive font that cannot be PD in the UK. 180.254.162.86 01:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UNIES Cohort, Zambia.jpg

[edit]

Unless demonstrated otherwise, we should assume the people in the photograph are not notable and therefore that the photo is out of scope. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mount Rushmore.stl

[edit]

This file was released under a BY-NC-SA license, not a BY-SA license.[1] And before anyone says that it's public domain, I assure you that it is not an accurate representation of the actual Mount Rushmore Monument. It is in fact wildly inaccurate, to the point that it can only be considered an artistic interpretation of the original. It's disappointing that Scan the World included this in their collection, as it's clearly not an actual scan. Nosferattus (talk) 02:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Compoñentes da Fania All Stars.jpg

[edit]

Historical photo, Flickr user may not be the copyright holder. A proper license and permission is needed A1Cafel (talk) 07:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:G-40-01.jpg

[edit]

claim of own work watermark bottom right Geni (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Viaduc De Millau (160705245).jpeg

[edit]

No FoP in France. Architect Norman Foster is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 10:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Millau Viaduct, France (48826274838).jpg

[edit]

No FoP in France. Architect Norman Foster is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 10:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Panoramic-Millau - Flickr - tiseb.jpg

[edit]

No FoP in France. Architect Norman Foster is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011) 1

[edit]

No FOP in France.

Thesupermat (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commentaires

Ces photos présentent pour la plupart soit le pont vu de très loin (pour l'une ; éléments dans le paysage).. soit des éléments techniques et structurels (pas une sculpture ou une peinture décorative ou artistique, ni des photos prises de près montrant les boulons ou secrets de fabrication..) qui pourraient illustrer les articles de Wikipédia y afférents, et/ou le sujet de la photo est clairement un "chantier de construction" (ce n'est pas une oeuvre d'art terminée). Je pense que ces photos là (de loin et visiblement de chantier) peuvent être conservées.
Il n'y a pas de vue complète du pont, ou d'une partie de l'oeuvre achevée... (telle que voulue par l'architecte)...
Mais on pourrait juger que quelques photos sont trop proches de l'oeuvre finale imaginée par l'architecte, elles pourraient être supprimées ou conservées en attendant 70 ans après la mort de l'architecte (si commons existe encore alors) :

  • Pont de Térénez.JPG
  • Pont de Térénez 2013-08-28 2019.jpg

Sinon.. si l'on veut être plus royaliste que le roi.. tout supprimer, mais à ce compte, on va vider Wikipédia de ses illustrations être obligé - pour protéger le droit des designers et d'autres plasticiens créateurs - de supprimer toutes les photos de navires, avions, fusées, voitures et camions dont les dessinateurs/designers ne sont pas morts depuis plus de 70 ans (exemple : File:Festival automobile international 2011 - Mercedes CLS 350 - 02.jpg ou File:Festival automobile international 2011 - BMW Mille Miglia - 01.jpg et des dizaines ou centaines de milliers d'autres).
--F. Lamiot (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Effectivement, le manque de liberté de panorama est un problème en France. En attendant, ce type de fichier est régulièrement supprimé de Commons. Bonne fin de journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011) 2

[edit]

No FOP in France. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau for the eligibility of French bridges to be objects of French copyright. Also included are two images of the bridge during its final construction phases but have shown significant details (e.g. the towers).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Pont de Térénez (2011)

[edit]

The bridge was completed in 2011 by Charles Lavigne (1944–2005). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2076.

A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Pont sur la Loire 2008 01 29 002.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Pont sur la Loire 2008 05 05.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Pont sur la Loire 2008 06 03.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Viaduc du Chavanon2.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 10:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Проектный эскиз медали «За освобождение Украины».png

[edit]

It's a scanned image from the copyrighted book. Also accoding to {{PD-RU-exempt}} proposed official symbols and signs can be copyrighted. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asian boy.jpg

[edit]

looks inappropriate Jimmyasian (talk) 12:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boy asia.jpg

[edit]

please do delete this page,looks inappropriate too Jimmyasian (talk) 12:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Man nude.jpg

[edit]

The man on the image don't like that his image is online. Please delete this image. Etvdv (talk) 08:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question Which image? The image of the nude man or the image that's totally irrelevant to the title that you have gone back and forth about whether to substitute for it? What is depicted in the land-and-waterscape, and would you like that to be online? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I hope the image of the nude man can stay online. This with the see can be deleted. Thanks. (Etvdv (talk) 14:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete only the images with the sea and the unused nude man images. I changed my mind and will let my nude image online on Wikimedia. Thanks. Etvdv{{Etvdv (talk) 17:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]

 Comment Uploader is nominator. Uploader overwrote the file several times, as noted above, and added the file to Nudity. Brianjd (talk) 12:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The man on the image don't like that his image is online. Please delete both images. Etvdv (talk) 10:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I now sugar that the image with the nude man can stay online. Please delete all the unused images. The final image is this I Use now. It is my own image but I was not sugar that is was good for my imago. Now is that no problem. Please undelete my image. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etvdv (talk • contribs) 23:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I confirm my decision and sign this message. (Etvdv (talk) 14:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 09:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Man nude.jpg

[edit]

with this photo I am threatened by spreading them everywhere with hate messages. Etvdv (talk) 08:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on? Why does the nominator/uploader keep changing their mind? What is with the nonsense in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude outdoor.jpg? Why is there (almost) an allegation of abuse in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Older nude man.jpg? And a suggestion of intimidation in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naturisme.jpg? Brianjd (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as before. --Krd 05:27, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Man nude.jpg

[edit]

Per previous DRs (no longer in use) and uploader’s request on their talk page. Brianjd (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Quebec People's Republic Official Flag.png

[edit]

Unused personal/fantasy flag, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LOGO-PARSAVESTA.png

[edit]

Out of project scope: Unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 15:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Consulta República Monarquía 2022 logo.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yaxeni oriquen.jpg

[edit]

Likely a photoshopped fake-image, this. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marina bay street circuit.png

[edit]

I have make another better file so i don't need this one. Hazim Fikri A. (talk) 04:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miiriliya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Scope, unused personal pictures of inactive user.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pishehvari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nunziapastore (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality pictures of Saro Grimani with poor EXIF data or his artwork, which is likely to be copyrighted. Biography is recently being added in some Wikipedia with questionable notability, poorly sourced.

—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 18:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexander Keith Marshall 1885.jpg

[edit]

If this is an 1885 picture by Henry Clay, it is presumably not "own work" by the uploader, who appears to be playing fast & loose with copyright on countless images. - David Biddulph (talk) 09:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Clearly in the public domain due to age. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:52, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: why?. --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:F541:B95:6F8:8E59 11:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No evidence of infringement, username matches EXIF. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

Copyright infrigement Frartn (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: already kept twice, we would really need a bit more explanation than just "copyright infringement" in this case which seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism. IP blocked for 1 month. --Achim55 (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Frartn: We warned you multiple times to stop filing false deletion requests, but you didn't. Also, you have failed to provide evidence that the file is a copyright violation whatsoever. To top it all off, you used to ip adress 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 to file these false deletion requests.

We have given you multiple chances to improve here and to provide evidence for your deletion request, but you blew them all. I will be reporting you and your IP address to the Wikimedia Commons admins for vandalism, false reporting, and block evasion. Angelgreat (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Vandalism. User:Frartn blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

delete this, please Frartn (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

[edit]

Net copyright violation. Where do you find your Admins? 181.43.7.29 18:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One time uploader. Did you ask him to obtain OTRS permission? 181.43.7.29 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David1386 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not released with CC license. Source: " © تمام حقوق پوشاک مجید محفوظ است . طراحی از اف تم"

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Фотография 2022 года (обновлено).jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deng studio.jpg

[edit]

Unsed logo (Commons:Scope) HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Максим Лаевский.jpg

[edit]

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escola La Lira Ampostina.jpg

[edit]

Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata means, that the image is previously published in Facebook. All previously published images must have evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kilerrhack(arshakiler) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal picture uploaded by inactive user. Commons:Scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CAP-Credit-logo-transparent.png

[edit]

Copyrighted logo by Municipality of Isfahan. Not 'own work'. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Keyhan software ux ui.jpg

[edit]

Unused screenshot from a software. (Both copyright violation and Commons:Scope) HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:12, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miratex Textile co. Logo.png

[edit]

Unused and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miyanka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is a similar case to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maiko irie 2017.jpg, involving someone who uploaded copyvio pics of Maiko Irie.

All five of this user's pics on Irie are unlikely to be their own work, since they have "User comments: Screenshot" in the metadata, indicating licence laundering, or are matched to older pictures, or both, and thus should be deleted per COM:PCP:

While the first one's match is on the Chinese-language D4DJ Fandom site where the pic says it's from Commons (and uploaded almost two months after this pic was), visual artifacts and metadata user comments indicate licence laundering. Can't find a match for the second one, but too professional to be own work. The third one is almost certainly from Da Vinci's February 2015 issue per here; and similarly the fourth one is likely a magazine scan with similar metadata (just a date of data generation and the User comments that say "Screenshot"). While the fifth one is the only pic to not have "User comments: Screenshot", it is the same as the first pic from this post from Irie's blog.

ミラP@Miraclepine 00:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maiko.m.jpg

[edit]

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miyanka, almost certainly not the uploader's own work, since the metadata is composed solely of the date of data generation and "User comments: Screenshot", and visual artifacts are visible. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:05, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dabrowki1.jpg

[edit]

low quality image Ivanbranco (talk) 13:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1407 rogalin 7.jpg

[edit]

low quality image of a bird nest Ivanbranco (talk) 13:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2022 FIFA World Cup, France vs. Poland - 04.jpg

[edit]

Doubtful that this is the work of Tasnim news. Published at higher res at https://www.rte.ie/sport/world-cup-2022/2022/1204/1339877-world-cup-2022-france-v-poland-updates/, all other photos from this match were from other agencies. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:50, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:لوگو صادق زارعی.png

[edit]

Unused logo for a person HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:روستای محمود آباد سفلی.jpg

[edit]

Not own work. Satellite imagery with unknown source HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fposter,medium,wall texture,product.jpg

[edit]

Distorted duplicate of File:Flag of Kazakhstan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fposter,medium,wall texture,product,750x1000.u2.jpg

[edit]

Distorted duplicate of File:Flag of Kazakhstan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag Kazakhstana.jpg

[edit]

Distorted duplicate of File:Flag of Kazakhstan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diccionario corto de los sueños 2022.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw rwxt. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:O-Ring sizing Body Piercing.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content * Pppery * it has begun... 20:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Codexbox1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These official recent-ish portraits of several Chinese politicians were uploaded as own works with CC licenses. I very much doubt that this is true. We'd need proper sources, verifiable dates, authors etc. to determine the copyright status of these images. If these are not provided, all these files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darkphantom007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, no evidence of a free license. No evidence that GODL applies from Twitter.

Yann (talk) 12:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:27, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karralina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from some fandom page, all need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacques François Difoum Ngokobi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user clearly doesn't understand what Wikimedia Commons is for or what a free license is.

Vera (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SMT شرکت تولیدی سینک های گرانیتی اس ام تی.png

[edit]

Unused and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:لوگو چی تو وب.png

[edit]

Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sadiq.andjiri.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HORCSCT-thumb.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:City Technology College Logo.png

[edit]

Unused PNG version superspreaded by SVG file A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nom. @A1Cafel: The word is superseded. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 12:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ABS rules versus reliability based design of bulk carriers- a comparative analysis of ship design approaches (IA absrulesversusre1094511042).pdf

[edit]

2003 Master thesis, There is no indication that the Author was serveing US personell, or was federally funded. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A case study of acquisition reform- brigade combat team, the vanguard for army transformation (IA acasestudyofcqui1094510924).pdf

[edit]

No indication that author is serving (US) personell, or was federally funded. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A cause for concern? The spread of militant Islam in East Africa (IA acauseforconcern1094547820).pdf

[edit]

Copyright reserved by copyright owner, Also one author : Mlula, Moses B. is not serving US personell (Author is from Tanzania) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Accounting for uncertainty in a business case analysis for implementing advanced technology ordnance surveillance in a munitions management environment (IA accountingforunc1094510141).pdf

[edit]

Author is not serving US personell, Affiliation : Polish Air Force. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KC626266 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These flags are unsourced

Alexphangia Talk 15:45, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@KC626266: pls give me a source of these flags or it will be deleted. Alexphangia Talk 15:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help but notice that the flags of both non-English-speaking cities Phnom Penh and Vientane read "City of ..." in English, for some reason, and in the same typeface. This suggests to me that they're made up, yet the user has been adding them and others among these to Flags and coat of arms of national capitals here and to articles on English Wikipedia. Largoplazo (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KC626266 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

«Copyrighted Image» watermark.

Alexphangia Talk 08:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:NETCOPYVIO. Alexphangia Talk 08:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KC626266 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Largoplazo (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The user declared themselves the designer of this flag after inserting it into the English Wikipedia article en:Flag of Djibouti with this edit. I don't think this Wikipedia user is the designer of the actual flag of Djibouti City (the same user inserted this flag as well into en:Djibouti City), if it has one, and the same user is now blocked for a week for general vandalism (making stuff up, etc.) on English Wikipedia, so you aren't going to find a source for this piece of fiction. Largoplazo (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering whether, assuming all the above-nominated files are deleted as the outcome of these discussions, the three remaining files created by the same editor should not be considered outright to lack credibility as well: File:Flag of Algiers.png, File:Flag of Dushanbe.png, and File:Flag of Sukhumi.png. As with a number of the editor's other creations, they are nothing more than the cities' respective seals on a white background. Largoplazo (talk) 17:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's an IP currently spamming these flags on Wikipedia here. You've seen the uploads by KC262626, who must certainly be the same person or a related account. The IP has also added multiple flags from this previously blocked sockpuppet account, which makes me wonder if these two accounts are just more sockpuppets of the latter. It's hard to keep track of them all, but many of them are low-res versions of already present flags that they're just pointlessly adding without explanation, and some of the second user's uploads appear to be downright nonsense, like this and this. These uploads, along with the unnecessary two accounts, make me wonder if they're trolling. R Prazeres (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KC626266 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These newly created flags are still unsourced, give me the source, or it will be deleted.

Alexphangia Talk 17:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Médiation à but élévatrice.jpeg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: The name of the uploader is different than the one of the autor. Also, I see no trace of Creative Commons on the archive of her website https://web.archive.org/web/20141221113147/http://www.leadeligey.com/ or on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/leairisdeligey/ or the website of her school of fotography https://www.etpa.com/photographie/galeries/lea-deligey-ravaudeuse-de-souvenirs CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes really strange, @Blackripper75: do you have further information ? It still looks very much like a copyvio... — Koreller (talk) 07:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:No re-uploading

[edit]

Proposed merging it to {{Dont recreate}}. The content is mostly the same as don't recreate. Also, the latter one can cover not just files but also other namespace pages A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This template's content is not "mostly the same as don't recreate". While this template here says that it's not necessary to upload a file again just to alter its description, the other one is a warning to not recreate files that have been deleted. That is not the same thing. --Rosenzweig τ 00:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alden - 12x12 Mixed Media on Canvas by Fine Artist Rene Romero Schuler.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2603:3024:B0C:CD00:8CAB:5CFA:AB4E:98E5 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: permission not given

Converting to a regular DR because of ticket:2014022210012602 which should be checked. Achim55 (talk) 20:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This ticket handled by user:Ankry, seems to be OK. The paintings were painted and photographed by User:Reneschuler. So I see no merit in the "permission not given" rationale. --Jarekt (talk) 23:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ir-isfahan city council islamic mark.gif

[edit]

Copyrighted logos should be locally uploaded HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A comparative study of defense reforms in eastern European nations (IA acomparativestud1094510496).pdf

[edit]

This is not necessarily a work od US Gov as claimed, the author is form Singapore ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:X-ray diffraction and electron microscope studies of yttria stabilzed zirconia (YSZ) ceramic coatings exposed to vanadia. (IA xraydiffractione00kond).pdf

[edit]

Author is not US personell ( Affiliation: Hellenic Navy) , 1992 publication ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Benohight214

[edit]


All of these were uploaded between November 13 and 15 by Benohight214 and some were subsequently updated by Simsunman, all signs point to the latter being a sockpuppet of the former. However the meat of the matter is that the recordings are copyrighted. Multiple music recognition apps confirmed they are recordings by the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra, which are neither freely-licensed nor public domain. --Champion (Talk) 11:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some include music extracted from the Lorddaine YouTube channel, and many from YouTube videos. It also acknowledges that it should be deleted according to the Wikimedia policy, and I heard that it is necessary to check copyright separately in the country. Discussion is needed. Simsunman (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In some cases, the public uses the sound source of the orchestra chorus as an exception. Since they are more influential than other music sources, there is also a need for agreement on the issue. Although it is close to the copyright policy, it will be necessary to check whether it still meets the criteria for rapid deletion. Accept deletion if deletion is required in accordance with policy and guidelines. Simsunman (talk) 13:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the five sound sources mentioned are National Anthem of the Free State of Trieste.ogg, National Anthem of the Principality of Sealand.ogg, National anthem of the Yugoslavia.ogg, L'Aube Nouvelle (Instrumental).ogg, National Anthem of the Kingdom of Sardinia.ogg does not exist in the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra. This does not fall under the deletion criteria, so it will be re-uploaded even if it is deleted by quick deletion. Please understand. The above 5 sound sources do not fall under the copyright policy. Simsunman (talk) 13:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lists the ones that are not deletion criteria (not Slovak orchestral choruses).

These five are not recommended for copyright protection is recommended. Moreover, since it is not a sound source distributed as a choral song of the Slovak orchestra, it should be excluded from the deletion criteria. --Simsunman (talk) 13:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all File:National anthem of the Yugoslavia.ogg is by the Shin Nihon Philharmonic Orchestra according to Shazam and as far as I can see not released under a free license. I have no doubt the other files are also copyrighted. If you disagree, please show that they are released under a free license. Sjö (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of clarifications to Simsunman: If Lord Daine uploads copyrighted music to his Youtube channel that music is still copyrighted when you download it from there. It does not matter if the music is by the Slovak Radio Symphony Orchestra or by any other orchestra, artist or group, since as long it is not released under a free license we can not use it on Wikipedia. Also, there is no exception to copyright for choral works, as you seem to believe. Sjö (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know about that. Then why don't you mark the author or set the license as a license specified by Slovak radio Symphonyorchestra, not a free license? Since it is not a free distribution sound source, I suggest that you mark the author separately and set the license to suit the sound source. It is not known whether the five music sources mentioned among the songs are free licenses, but all of them are not extracted from slovak radio, but include those extracted from other YouTube channels, and some do not agree. --Simsunman (talk) 08:48, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If there is only a limited deletion standard within Wikipedia, we agree to delete in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, but we say that not all sound sources are Slovak Radio Symphony orchestra. I repeat, some of them were uploaded to other YouTube channels, so I couldn't check if it was a free license, but not all of them were composed by slovak radio Symphony orchestra as mentioned above. I am also aware of the choir's songs and understand that the deletion criteria are inevitable. Still, I think it should be necessary for all users to review the songs and delete them. It is limited to my position that only a few people disagree, and other sources agree to delete it under the pretext that there is an internal problem according to Wikimedia policy. I don't think it's right to just pop it in and delete it. --Simsunman (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 22:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Oskar Schlechtweg (Negativ Nr. 4520 B) Stadtmuseum Weimar Foto Juni 1899.jpg

[edit]

Datei ist eine nicht authorisierte 1:1 Kopie von der Website https://zeitsprung.weimar.jetzt/208/ Oskar Schlechtweg ist erst 1955 gestorben, daher sind seine Bilder erst 2025 gemeinfrei. Darüber hinaus ist die Publikation dieses Digitalisats nicht mit dem Stadtmuseum Weimar abgestimmt, welches die Rechte am Digitalisat hat. AlexanderRutz (talk) 21:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 22:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Basra Sport City

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Iraq. The stadium was completed in 2012 and designed by w:360 Architecture. COM:VRT permission for CC/PD licensing from 360 Architecture is required as the country does not grant freedom of panorama for free commercial uses of images of works of architecture and public art still under copyright protection.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Basra Sport City

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Iraq, buildings are considered copyrighted art.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+3 more images of the building

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 06:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaztie não é árabe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Fictional nation. (Map of the territory in question reveals that not only is this a native protection area, but also that the map assigns a considerable portion of Brazil to France.)

Enyavar (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sayed jilani.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Sayed2910 (talk) 03:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: F10. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kuaiwa (anachronistic drawing by Gospodar svemira).jpg

[edit]

Author's request Lycoris (talk) 03:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope of the project. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pm128 userimage.jpg

[edit]

useless, personal for my now delete profile page Vanished user 112742 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The same as before but Sam'd.png

[edit]

No EXIF, and the file description makes me suspicious of this uploader's trustworthiness. Neither of their other uploads have useful EXIFs, so maybe they should be nominated for deletion, too. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one file clearly with transmission code in EXIF data, Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 17:30, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DilutedHereticX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not the uploader's original photography, but pictures found on the internet. (eg. https://theancientwayoflife.tumblr.com/post/163432610220/bust-of-a-man-gordian-ii-date-ad-230, https://last-of-the-romans.tumblr.com/post/105612077350/leradr-julian-the-last-pagan-emperor-of-rome, and other talk page copyvio warnings for this user.)

Belbury (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted most per IronGargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20070511TheDodgeBrothersCultureShow2007.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Picture already on internet in 2009 according to TinEye. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

have permission to post from photographer AndyBangBang (talk) 11:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AndyBangBang: , Thank you for your answer. Do you have a proof of that? CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Uvea (1887-1958).svg

[edit]

Unused file SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Uvea (1887-1958).svg

[edit]

Per request of author SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd Any particular reason you want this deleted? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong year distablsihment. The colours have been abolished in 1974. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd: Use {{Move}} instead of {{Delete}}. A09 (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vertical CCD smear.jpg

[edit]

absolutely useless, i am not happy about having this profile. not used on any wiki page Vanished user 112742 (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IPod touch by pm128.jpg

[edit]

useless image, personal, not used on any wikipedia page Vanished user 112742 (talk) 22:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:British Passport 2020.png

[edit]

This self-made image is repeatedly linked as a true, accurate image of a en:British passport cover, without any verifiable source material, or permission from the copyright holder. (RM21 (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД СЕРГЕЯ 17.11.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД 17.11.2022 2.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EarlAthlone1940.jpg

[edit]

The uploader is not Yousuf Karsh, who died in 2002. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SSA1602-2020 (36).jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://sefiam1602.com/benefits/ Yann (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP, uploader has a history of copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beechcraft1.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Gyrostat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [2] Yann (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 14:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prometheus uni-bibliothek FFM.jpg

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artwork (artist died in 1967); see https://www.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/zentrale/50.html; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 14:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stip Media.png

[edit]

no permission protected logo no author given copyvio from https://stipmedia.nl Hoyanova (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:An abstract interactive graphics interface for the IBM-PC and Macintosh. (IA abstractinteract00kohs).pdf

[edit]

1988 Work, Author is not US personell, Affiliation listed as Taiwan Navy. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CharlotteBrandi C AnnikaWeertz.jpg

[edit]

Fehlerhafte Angabe zur Urheberin, Foto wird mit Einverständniserklärung neu hochgeladen Thilo Parg (talk) 20:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genau, das war Grund der Anfrage. Danke! NiCleTiRec (talk) 08:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:多様性の図（大人用）第５版.pdf

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Not very promotional, but educational value is unclear. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:多様性の図（子ども用）第５版.pdf

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Not very promotional, but educational value is unclear. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:29, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Apple Co-founder reacting to iCups by Magdim Metshin.png

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Solomon203 (talk) 10:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Invalid rationale, this is Steve Wozniak. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stalinsoviet.jpg

[edit]

No proof of copyright ownership. Mycranthebigman (talk) 17:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Certainly not the uploader's own work as claimed, no source / author, unclear copyright. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gadu Gadu.png

[edit]

This file IS NOT licensed under the CC0 license. Copyright owner only specifies that the file "can be used by media" (see: https://biuroprasowe.gg.pl/materialy-dla-mediow/) but it's still copyrighted. Pskosinski (talk) 02:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emser Therme Innenraum.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Werner von Basil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Urheber laut Metadaten ungleich Hochladender. Yann (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks fine. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Scott Chadwick 1.jpg

[edit]

Professional headshot with no exif, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image for help request.jpg

[edit]

Deletion requested by uploader, no more needed. Gatto bianco (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: COM:INUSE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Image for help request.jpg

[edit]

no more requested/needed 2001:B07:6442:8903:D050:8D27:402A:3808 16:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:'Magpie Salute' by Aspire. Penge London (36222905906).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Oxyman (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:FOP UK. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P artist (36222897126).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:GRAFFITIOxyman (talk) 22:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:FOP UK. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pm128s ebook.jpg

[edit]

useless picture bad angle not used on any wikipedia page Vanished user 112742 (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:St. Peter und Paul (Marburg)

[edit]

copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rekopis Hermaszewski.jpg

[edit]

copyvio: this is a handwritten note of gen. Hermaszewski. For sure the uploader is not the author. Masti (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SAKURAKO - Sky jumping simulator. (7053687599).jpg

[edit]

This image is in scope (per my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sakurako Miki), but the inclusion of the image projected on the screen appears to be a copyright violation. Brianjd (talk) 12:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP in Japan except for buildings. (But, if there were, I wonder if the image would count as permanent if the simulator were permanent.) Brianjd (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benteng-van-den-bosch-tampak-atas-2.jpg

[edit]

No metadata. Isn't this the same photo that we just deleted for coming from a website that had no Creative Commons Copyleft notice but had specific copyright notices on several photos? Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nugroho, if this is really your own work, please go through the COM:VRT process, so that we can be sure we can use a pagebanner based on this image at en.wikivoyage. Terima kasih banyak. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was a different picture of the same building, if you mean File:Fort-Van-den-Bosch wikivoyage banner.jpg, which was a crop of (and cited as its source) the top image at https://phinemo.com/benteng-van-den-bosch-di-ngawi/ Belbury (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see, yes it is. And no metadata is not a deletion reason by itself. No matches on TinEye and the only match outside of Wikimedia on Google Images was this uncredited use later than the upload here.  I withdraw my nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1986PresidentialElectioninIdaho.png

[edit]

This image isn’t being used anymore TylerKutschbach (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not being used is not a rationle for deletion, sorry. --Missvain (talk) 17:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1986PresidentialElectioninIdaho.png

[edit]

I made a file of this map without the text and no black background. TylerKutschbach 23:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not the same. It's OK to have various styles. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1986PresidentialElectioninIdaho.png

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Idaho_Presidential_Election_Results_1968.svg Redudant, png and unused TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1968UnitedStatesPresidentialElectionInOklahoma.png

[edit]

This image isn’t being used anymore TylerKutschbach (talk) 21:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1968UnitedStatesPresidentialElectionInOklahoma.png

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oklahoma_Presidential_Election_Results_1968.svg redudnant, png and unnused TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД СЕРГЕЯ 17.11.222.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД МКС 68.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД СЕРГЕЯ 17.11.2222.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Дмитрий во время ВКД 17 ноября 2022 года..png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ВКД 17.11.2022.png

[edit]

NASA/Roskosmos shot in space, ISS maintrance. Not "Own work". Source? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This is one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons.
Etamni  18:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Agree with @Etamni above. Additionally, the criterion for no copyright states "It is a photographic or cinematic work that is not composite (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999." Clearly that's satisfied and I see nothing in the following section regarding possible copyright that would apply to the image. -- Follower of the Alpha & Omega (talk) 22:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saddam Kamel.jpg

[edit]

Poor image quality 2600:100C:A203:D720:B821:B02E:D399:E85A 09:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: yes, very poor, but in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saddam Kamel.jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This image was extracted from one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons. Etamni  19:06, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sajida Talfah (first wife of Saddam Hussein).jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This image was extracted from one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons. Etamni  19:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Qusayhossein.png

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This image was extracted from one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons. Etamni  19:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uday Hussein.jpg

[edit]

The image is not clear 2605:6001:E7DD:AC00:2094:A2A2:C05A:85E4 02:52, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:INUSE. Additionally, photo is one of only three public domain photos on Commons of the subject, and one of only two that feature only the subject. (The third photo is the Hussein family photo from which the image was extracted.) Etamni  13:36, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uday Hussein.jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for the same reasons as mentioned in a previous deletion request. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. The legal explanation for this is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons, where it is worded better than I would manage. :Etamni  18:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raghad Saddam Hussein.jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This image was extracted from one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons. Etamni  19:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rana Hussein.jpg

[edit]

Copyright term of Iraq is 50 years. If the image was published in the late 1980s then it is still copyrighted. Also no PD indication on the Iraqi State Television A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep.This image was extracted from one of very few public domain photos of this family. For the record, it appears that this deletion request was not made correctly. This image is NOT protected by copyright as the source of this image was the Iraqi News Agency, an organ of the defunct old regime. This is explained directly in the licensing section of the entry on Commons. Etamni  19:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per @Etamni. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 16:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam-family-Pre1995.jpg. —holly {chat} 22:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cabinet of Malaya, 1955.jpg

[edit]

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep due to COM:CROWN, British Malaya as territory of British during the publication. 白布飘扬 (talk) 07:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep insufficient evidence for deletion. RZuo (talk) 11:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tun VT Sambanthan.png

[edit]

Image still under copyright in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep due to COM:CROWN, British Malaya as British territory during the publication. 白布飘扬 (talk) 09:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mosaic mural in the entrance to the (W.) 9th Street PATH station (at 6th Avenue), Greenwich Village, New York City (23300594481).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; could not find any information about this artwork online. —holly {chat} 22:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ذرية مسلم بن عبدالله العقيلي الهاشمي القرشي مشجر رقم ٢.jpg

[edit]

لأرفاق الملف مره اخرى Fahmed 11:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:مخطط يوضح فرعين من بطون قريش بني هاشم و بني أمية فروع قبيلة قريش.png

[edit]

لارفاق الملف مره اخرى بتعديل افضل ومصادر Fahmed 11:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bar chart of inception years of units of Napoleonic wars.svg

[edit]

копия https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bar_chart_of_inception_years_of_units_of_Napoleonic_wars.png Иван Севастьянов (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2021 ISFAHAN FARMER ZAYANDEROD RIVER BASINE.webp

[edit]

Not a work by Fars News, Template:Fars does not apply. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A business of security- applying an economic model to human trafficking in Oregon (IA abusinessofsecur1094551632).pdf

[edit]

National Guard units are typically 'state' rather than federal, So I am querying if this is in fact PD-US-Gov to start with? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WSB ABC 2 Atlanta.png

[edit]

This logo is incorrect as the current WSB logo does not use the ABC logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainyshark03 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. We do not delete in-scope public domain logos simply for being out of date. Of historical relevance. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Delete. This logo is not of historical relevance and is not out of date. I was thinking about what the logo would look like should it have the 2021 ABC logo. This is not a real logo and has never been used. I got out of hand and designed what it would look like if it had the 2021 ABC logo. This is not a logo that is used by WSB or has been used in the past. SharpShark3 (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak delete. This appears to be under the threshold of originality of the United States, so copyright is not a concern. I agree with IronGargoyle that We do not delete in-scope public domain logos simply for being out of date, but I can't actually find any record of this logo having been used by the station even when reverse image searching on TinEye, Google Lens, and Yandex. The only prior use of this logo I can find is of Fandom and Fandom mirrors; the remainder of matches that come up lack the ABC mark. My vote is weak inasmuch as it can be disproven by a single instance of the use of this logo being discovered; if such an event were to occur, I would support keeping as in-scope. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader admits this is not real. —holly {chat} 23:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vertigo .5 Spirit.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by 2.38.141.80 as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 12:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, this comes from the Gillet website as they have this image with the exact same filename. However, the one currently on their site is smaller than the one uploaded here, which makes me think that the uploader may work for the company. If that's the case, then COM:VRT verification would be the way to go. Unfortunately, this user's only contributions (to here and to fr-WP) came in 2016. I've sent an email to the company at info@gilletvertigo.com. I gave them a week to respond, so if I haven't posted an update by 2024-05-11, then let's close this out as a copyvio. —holly {chat} 23:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I received a reply from the company declaring this is indeed a copyvio. Ordered a universal replace with File:HPIM4883.JPG. —holly {chat} 20:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MEN salle Au-delà 2.jpg

[edit]

Après discussion avec la direction du Musée d'ethnographie, il nous semble plus simple de retirer cette image que d'obtenir chaque autorisation nécessaire à son maintien en ligne. Zygene (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mussklprozz: You added the VRT ticket for another file provided by this museum. Is that ticket applicable to this image as well? Thanks. —holly {chat} 16:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. The museum have explicitly excluded this image in their last message within the ticket. Mussklprozz (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 16:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badge on England Shirt.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Logo Yann (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While the photograph itself is freely licensed, it is a derivative work of a copyrighted crest. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Q: When does a logo stop being a derivate work? For example, is it acceptable to show it on a shirt if it is not the main focus of the photograph? – Jberkel (talk) 14:23, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jberkel It would probably be acceptable, provided that the copyrighted work was also not the focus of the description or the context where the photo was used. See COM:DM. Brianjd (talk) 08:14, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Brianjd Thanks. On Wiktionary, my goal was to explain the origin of the term Three Lions, but it looks like it's impossible to show the logo because it is necessarily the focus of that entry. Perhaps the coat of arms the crest is based on could be used instead. – Jberkel (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, assuming that the coat of arms is public domain. (And this whole discussion assumes that the crest is copyrighted. I am just taking everyone else’s word for it. I have no knowledge of the origin of this crest.) Brianjd (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Jberkel. Brianjd (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per above: title and framing both draw attention to copyrighted and presumably non-free logo (in fact, the logo takes up most of the image). Brianjd (talk) 08:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsure if this is {{PD-Indonesia}} as this might not be an actual government work but this is definitely not under a cc license.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the uploader definitely put wrong license... it should be {{PD-IDGov}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 03:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There shall be no infringement of Copyright for: Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature;

.
Some of listed file above already use {{PD-IDGov}} license. So I don't think there is any issue. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just a question though, are the squadron logos the work of the government or the work of a personnel who did not release the rights to the government? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IMO squadron logo must be discussed at least internally within its squadron, so it also may fall to {{PD-IDNoCopyright}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 04:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is my concern, we can't keep files that may be PD. It must be PD or an own work with a CC license. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless squadron logo still constitute as state emblems so it's still fall s under {{PD-IDGov}}. {{PD-IDNoCopyright}} can also applies if the discussion result or regulation can be found. 05:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ckfasdf (talk • contribs) 05:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to this link, it was mentioned that Chief of Staff of the Air Force authorized logo of new air force unit (including squadron) to be used, similar case can be found on Army unit. If it was naval unit, there is the regulation that explicitly mentioned naval unit logo should be authorized to be used by Chief of Staff of the Navy Decree. So, as I mentioned earlier, Indonesian armed forces logos is falls under {{PD-IDGov}}. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: I believe that understand commons licensing policy by now, so... kindly please replace author and license of all the image above. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: Still waiting for you to change the author and licensing of the above images. Please add the source as well, thanks. —holly {chat} 22:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and further remark by Minorax: “we can't keep files that may be PD. It must be PD or an own work with a CC license.” None of the files I checked provided a link to the source. Uploader did not respond to requests to add sources and correct the licensing. So there is no evidence per COM:EVID these images can be licensed with one of the licenses acceptable on Commons. Therefore, all images must be deleted, including those which were crossed out from the list, as these were originally also uploaded by the same uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 09:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See above. Not CC license and even if PD, a source should be provided.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See above. While uploads made on 31 Dec has a source, the license is still inaccurate.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

see above, bogus cc license

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atara123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at source

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:10, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Minorax: I disagree, the uploaded has learned his lesson and now he put source on all his recently uploaded image. Although all his image source is from official Instagram account of each respective unit.
to @Atara123: . Although official Instagram account maybe acceptable, it would be better if the source comes from official website. For example for Skadik 201,202,203 and 204, source from https://simandik.id/ would be better. Ckfasdf (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ckfasdf: Wings and Squadrons do not have their own websites. And Kodiklatau also doesn't upload the subordinate units logo on its website. So I thought the instagram profile link was enough. Atara123 (talk) 02:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Atara123: It may be difficult to show that the image is {{PD-IDGov}} if you take it from Instagram. Kindly please replace the source if possible.Ckfasdf (talk) 13:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, although a link to Instagram has been provided, this does not show per COM:EVID that these logo's are available with a free license. Therefore the images must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:37, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/usembassykl Flickr images needing human review

[edit]

While these images were from the US embassy, it's cropped to show a photo in the background, which is likely not the work of the embassy, and we are not sure whether they entered PD or not

A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdul Hamid MB Johor.png appears to be from the 1930s and would be PD in Malaysia as an government created work (Malaysia is publication + 50 for government created works. It would be PD in the US and not restored by URAA since it was published before 1946 so  Keep for that. Abzeronow (talk) 16:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abdullah Jaafar MB Johor.png is from the 1920s and was likely published in 1923. It would be public domain in Malaysia and the US so  Keep on that. Abzeronow (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abdul Ajib MB Johor.png is from the 1980s. It is not public domain yet in Malaysia and not in the US either. File:Abdul Ghani MB Johor.png is later than that, possibly in the 1990s.  Delete both of those. Abzeronow (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mustapha Jaafar MB Johor.png is from the late 1920s/early 1930s. File:Ungku Abdul Aziz MB Johor.png is very likely from the late 1930s.  Keep as being PD in both Malaysia and the US. Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hasni MB Johor.png could be from the past couple of years. Definitely too recent to be public domain.  Delete Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as per Abzeronow.--Iphoneuser88 (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Regarding the older images that might be in PD as Abzeronow suggests, we would need evidence per COM:EVID that these images have been published more then 50 years ago. This evidence is missing, so these images have to be deleted as well. --Ellywa (talk) 09:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Biểu diễn quân sự tại Triển lãm Quân sự quốc tế 2022.png

[edit]

Viet Nam Defence 2022 was held 8 ~ 10 December 2022 (Thursday – Saturday) at Gia Lam Airport, Hanoi, Vietnam. The Show ONLY opened for specialized and trade visitor on the first 2 days and opened public on the last day of the exhibition. This photo may not be the original photo. Hey Shwarzenegger (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request and was active at the time – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera Guanta.PNG

[edit]

The colors on this flag are off/wrong, and there are two SVG files depicting the same flag: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Guanta_Municipality_(Anzoategui).svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bandera_de_Guanta.svg Piexter (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. @Piexter: you could consider to add {{Fact disputed}} to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. --Ellywa (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/12/12&oldid=765709775"