An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 (1960), is a 5-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that an interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the Constitution.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 (1960), is a 5-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that an interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the Constitution. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 29327016 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 20530 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1056716724 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-01 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 1960 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case
  • De Veau v. Braisted, (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Brennan (en)
dbp:courtlistener
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-06-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 1960 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Douglas (en)
dbp:findlaw
dbp:fullname
  • De Veau v. Braisted (en)
dbp:googlescholar
dbp:holding
  • An interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder under Article One of the Constitution (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Warren, Black (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Clark, Whittaker, Stewart (en)
dbp:justia
dbp:lawsapplied
  • National Labor Relations Act; Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act; 14th Amendment; U.S. Constitution Article One, Section 10; U.S. Constitution, Article Four, Section 1 (en)
dbp:litigants
  • De Veau v. Braisted (en)
dbp:loc
dbp:majority
  • Frankfurter (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Harlan (en)
dbp:oyez
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 172800.0
dbp:prior
  • 17280.0
dbp:uspage
  • 144 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 363 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • De Veau v. Braisted, 363 U.S. 144 (1960), is a 5-to-3 ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States that an interstate compact restricting convicted felons from holding union office is not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act or the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, does not violate the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, and is not an ex post facto law or bill of attainder in violation of Article One, Section 10 of the Constitution. (en)
rdfs:label
  • De Veau v. Braisted (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • De Veau v. Braisted (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License