User:BD2412/Archive 043
Comic book character articles[edit]I think the consensus will be on your favor but I will keep it watched. BTW I was thinking these kind of articles maybe need a list or some kind of navigation template since there are being so many lately. Also just another heads up that I am thinking Draft:MJ (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and Ned from Spider-Man movies are worthy of articles if we can improve them too. Jhenderson 777 20:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles H. Reynolds has been accepted[edit] Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: David Martin (Kansas judge) has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)A barnstar for you![edit]
Draftification category status[edit]Hey BD, thanks for you work on the maintenance categorization of draftified pages (and all your other work, of course). Quick question: where do we stand on the automatic populating of Category:Content moved from mainspace to draftspace and its monthly subcats? My own view is that if we can't the drafts automatically tagged with the template, the template and the cats should be deleted. Pinging @Evad37: to see if he is working on adding it to his draftification script. Let me know, and thanks, UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: John F. Fontron has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)AFD closure[edit]Can you further explain how how you determined a consensus was reached at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Montgomery, Alabama, specifically about convincing arguments made with regard to Wikipedia:LISTN. You appear to be editorializing and drawing conclusions that were not made. Thanks.Djflem (talk) 07:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
You will note that what is quoted refers specifically to lists "titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs". The policy goes on to specifically say of "List of X of Y", such List of tallest buildings in Montgomery, Alabama: There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists and "Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability". In other words, List of tallest buildings in Montgomery, Alabama does not fail LIST:N and no one in the AFD demonstrated that it has. Several editors don't think it notable but those are just ILIKE OR IDONT statements, without any policy-based reasoning. There is no consensus. Therefore, the closure should be adjusted lacking a policy based argument as to why it should be deleted. I'm sorry, but a closer/administrator cannot create non-policy conditions, as you have done above with your question. Thanks Djflem (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
template[edit]BD2412, I hope you are doing well and I see you are (as usual) continuing to make more and more lawyer/judge articles, a thankless but important task! ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31 and I were working on a template but Chris accidentally made a new one (Template:Western classical music periods and eras), would you be able to delete it? Best - Aza24 (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Humble request[edit]Sir you have been taking care of edits really well. I just have a humble request. The page " Divya Agarwal " has been redirected and protected which is not fair. She is a well known personality. I want to create a new web page with appropriate details. Since you are a administrator , please either delete or remove protection from this page. Hope you understand. Thank you Rjidindiana (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
A7[edit]Hi, Please check this article, it's recreation of previously deleted artile made by globally locked user, also the same article was deleted from Arabic Wikipedia so many times and from Egyptian Wikipedia in so many name format 1 & 2 and other Wikipedia sites for using fake sources and self-published sites to promote a bare notability person. HitomiAkane (talk) 01:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection request[edit]Hi @BD2412:, I'm an WP:AFC reviewer, you deleted this article 7 months ago via AFD, According to reliable sources from google, now the notability has changed.The problem is that the article "K. Surendran (politician)" is create-protected.So I Request you please remove protection from this page.... Thanks-- Padavalam ► 15:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Schuyler W. Jackson has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Lloyd M. Kagey has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Aviam Soifer for deletion[edit] The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviam Soifer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paisarepa (talk) 03:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC) William J. Wertz[edit]William J. Wertz done. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry K. Allen has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Unfinished AfD nomination[edit]Wonder if you can help since you have much AfD experience. Unfortunately I have an issue that may cause a WP:SKCRIT or procedural close at AfD. An AfD nominator has nominated an article for deletion and then did not complete the process. I messaged the editor twice and the editor does not respond or return to complete the nomination. Lightburst (talk) 23:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Ray Sloan has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Sour grapes[edit] Hello, BD2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sour grapes". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC) Yay!![edit]See Talk:Robert_H._Boyle/GA1 - I would very much appreciate it if you would take the lead in the review. It's a good place to get your feet wet. Are you game? Atsme Talk 📧 17:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Thomas Holden (general)[edit] On 19 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Holden (general), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Major General Thomas Holden was twice elected to the Continental Congress, he did not seem to have taken up his seat? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Holden (general). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Holden (general)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. I think casebook and casebook method should remain separate[edit]Some of the details in each article would be an odd tangent in the other. For example, the traditional colors of casebook covers and the Socratic method as coupled with casebooks. --Coolcaesar (talk) 03:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC) GA nomination of Eric Chappelow[edit]Your GA nomination of Eric Chappelow[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eric Chappelow you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Eric Chappelow[edit]The article Eric Chappelow you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Eric Chappelow[edit]The article Eric Chappelow you nominated as a good article has passed
Robert H. Boyle promoted to GA[edit]You were co-nom and deserve the recognition, too, so add the topicon File:Symbol support vote.svg - as your 2nd GA!! Congratulations!! It's quid quo pro time! REVDEL requested[edit]Could I trouble you, if you see fit, to WP:REVDEL this edit by User:TheMonk85 on User talk:JonathanAWaller? I have a thick skin, and don't at all mind being called a four-letter word. If that post had been on my talk page, I would never ask for action; but it's on someone else's. (As background, this stems from my having written John Waller (fight director). My reversion of his son's edits has attracted some opposition from him and from three WP:SPAs, which I've tried to address sympathetically. There is, of course, a world of difference between on the one hand using as source an obituary by an independent author for which you've supplied detail, and on the other adding your own otherwise-undocumented detail. I've posted links to five obituaries on the talk page of the WP article about my late father, three of which I discussed with their authors before publication; but I haven't touched the article itself since my very earliest days on WP, after I was pointed towards WP:COI.) Narky Blert (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry[edit]I accidentally reverted one of your edits while reverting some section blanking. I managed to restore it, though. Wikiffeine •‿• 11:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Disambig pages created with "R to disambiguation page" as edit summary?[edit]In doing WP:NPP, I see several disambiguation pages you've recently created with AWB, such as Senator McGarry, where the edit summary is {{R to disambiguation page}}. I assume AWB is misconfigured somehow (as it's not a redirect), you may want to fix it. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:31, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Frank McNamee (judge)[edit]Hello, BD2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank McNamee". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC) List of US pres. elec. results by state[edit]You forgot to fix Georgia in the south section. Also, could you update the analytical table? 68.101.113.185 (talk) 19:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Question[edit]Where on Village Pump do we call an RfC? I want a broader reach than what the article TP will generate. Atsme Talk 📧 23:05, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Not primarily about Draft:Theresa Greenfield[edit]I can't find where I made the comment to which you responded that maybe the Greenfield advocates think that whether she gets her own Wikipedia article may affect enough votes to change the outcome of the election, and therefore maybe even control of the US Senate. You said something to the effect that you think that outlook overstates the value of a Wikipedia article. I agree. I can't find that exchange. However, my follow-up comment is that maybe undisclosed paid editors likewise overstate the value of a Wikipedia article for their company. How much value really is there to a company to get its own article in Wikipedia when it has complete control over what it says on its own web site? How much value really is there to Greenfield in whether she has her own article in Wikipedia when she has complete control over her own web site? The amount of passion that is going into calling for a Greenfield article makes me think that her supporters really do think that it will decide the campaign. I agree with you that it almost certainly won't make that much difference. Neither will the article on Acme Widgets. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: William Easton Hutchinson has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Topic ban was lifted[edit]This is to let you know that the topic ban on User:MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken has been undone by User:C.Fred following discussion at this post on the Administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Heart (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Bad block[edit]Your 31 hour block of Mr rnddude was inappropriate. Paul August ☎ 00:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Error in a fix[edit]Please avoid fixing punctuation 'errors' in URLs. One of recent changes in Pieńsk Special:Diff/978921206 has split a correct URL
into
--CiaPan (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
K. Surendran[edit]So Draft:K. Surendran (politician) has been sitting in the AfC "under review" category for two months now. I'm unclear why it was left there for so long, but based on the reviewer comments on the submission as well as the general opinion when it was taken to DRV back in March, it seems like the draft has enough reliable sources at this point to be accepted and moved to mainspace. As the admin who closed out the last AfD and salted K. Surendran (politician), could you take a look and decide if it should be unsalted and accepted or not? (Also pinging @The9Man, Bkissin, and Gerald Waldo Luis as the previous AfC reviewers/commenters.) Nathan2055talk - contribs 00:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrownHairedGirl 2[edit]Just curious but were you going to finish off Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BrownHairedGirl 2? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:48, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:2 Days[edit]Hello, BD2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2 Days". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck███ 00:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
David Ray Griffin[edit]
Reliability of US website fonts for French capital accents[edit]Hi BD surely not WP:RS for purpose? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank McNamee (judge) has been accepted[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! DGG ( talk ) 02:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Boooo!!![edit]Happy Halloween! BTW, have you seen this article? Scroll down to the paragraph that begins The views expressed by various Wikipedians... Atsme 💬 📧 12:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
|
