User talk:Briguy52748

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Zzyzx11 | Talk 21:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Gunnar Eberlein from German Wikipedia. I've just read your articles on Country History and I'm am impressed. That's really a lot of valuable information (I even started to import them into the German Country-Musik pages). I think I found a minor problem in the Grammy Awards paragraphs. It must be distinguished between the year of the Grammy nomination and the year of the presentation. The presentation takes place in February the following year, but the years normally refer to the nomination. That means your Grammy Awards texts are always one year shifted (You can verify this by comparing the information from various awards. They should be similar).

By the way, I have complete lists of all Grammy Awards (Country Music) and all Academy of Country Music in Wikipedia format. You can find these lists in the German Wikipedia under "Country-Musik" or I can mail them to you (send a mail to gunnar5499@hotmail.com) Regards, Gunnar 213.70.140.10 21:12, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation

I have been looking through the list of unwatched pages (available only to administrators) and found 1951 in country music and others. I see that you created this but were not watching it. You may want to go to your preferences and under the "editing" tab turn on "Add pages you edit to your watchlist". This will enable you to keep an eye out for any edits that are made to pages you create and help to revert vandalism. If you do decide to turn it on can you please drop me a note on my talk page so I can cut down my excessive watchlist (6000+). Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 18:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleveland steamer and school dinners

Where in the world does a cleveland steamer refer to a school dinner? I ask only because there is no mention of a cleveland steamer in the school dinner article. Then again, it was just today that I learned there is an actual company (Cleveland Range) that manufacturers a wide variety of steaming products known generically as "cleveland steamers". Silensor 21:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have NO FRIGGIN' IDEA (sorry for the caps, but ...), except that "hot lunch" is a synonym for school dinner and apparently also – to my horrifed surprise – synonymous for the sexual slang term. Honestly, you may want to contact the author of the "Cleveland steamer" article for a further explanation. All I know is when I typed "hot lunch" (a synonym for school dinner) in the search box, I get directed to this article on the sex act, not an article about school lunches. It sounds like an expert on the steaming product colloqually known as a "Cleveland steamer" may want to create an article on said product. [[Briguy52748 21:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)]], with a minor edit afterward.[reply]

Following the original reply, I have placed a comment on the Cleveland steamer talk page explaining the change. And not to worry; there is definitely no link to the "Cleveland steamer" article on the "school dinner" page. [[Briguy52748 21:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Update No. 2 — I have also placed a comment at the top of the page stating how "hot lunch" is used on this page, and that people wanting to go to the page about the school meal need to click on school dinner. [[Briguy52748 01:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

WikiProject Country Music

Hey, I noticed that you've edited quite a few articles about country music. Would you be interested in joining WikiProject Country Music? I also saw the list of years in country music that you've been working on. Once the wikiproject gets up and running, we can help expand those pages and link to them from articles. --TantalumTelluride 21:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure — [[Briguy52748 12:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Great! I'll add your name to the list of members. Be sure to put the discussion page on your watchlist. Thanks. --TantalumTelluride 21:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of Deal or No Deal episodes

Excellent work you did on the Deal or No Deal episode guide , after the massive clean-up with the addition of episode boxes It now has a very professional look to it, Thank You! Sirex98 22:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

Keep up the great work! --TantalumTelluride 20:47, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Country-music collaboration

You supported Hank Williams, which has been selected as WikiProject Country Music's next Collaboration. Please help improve this article to featured-article standards. --TantalumTelluride 15:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No dispute

Hi buddy. You mentioned me on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chuck_Cunningham_syndrome . Gee I never thought we had had any disputes? Maybe on jumping the shark where we discussed a few things, but I thought we were agreeing on stuff? I comented on something you added, questioning it, but I didn't delete or edit any of it. Anyway sorry if you thought I had any problems with your edits because I didn't; on that page at least I saw some of your comments and edits and agreed with many of them straight away. The one I had a query with I brought up on the talk page. Anyway no hassles. The Chuck Cunningham article got protected because a few days after the AfD, someone started a new article in its place. I initially liked that article and edited it a few times, but it quickly got out of hand, and with little in the way of reliable sources, ultimately I had to stand up and say it should be deleted if refs couldn't be provided. I don't think I actually voted delete on the AfD though, just stuck in a comment. Asa01 23:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if there was any confusion with the CCS debate article, and that's my fault. Just thought it was a little odd. You make a valid point about verifying items by external sources; perhaps we ALL - editors old and new - could use a little refresher on how to verify facts through external sources. :-) [[Briguy52748 00:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)]] (BTW - I also apologize if I thought you disagreed with my edits; I see now that you don't, so no problems).[reply]

Template:TPiR pricing games infobox

This template Template:TPiR pricing games infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) seems to have never been used. Do still plan to it, or if not could you tag it with a {{db-owner}}? Thanks! ~ trialsanderrors 10:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So tagged. Thought it might be something, but never got used for some reason, I dunno. [[Briguy52748 12:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

WikiProject Iowa

Hello, I noticed that you edited an article related to, or expressed interest in Iowa. Therefore, I was wondering if you would be interested in joining (proposed) WikiProject Iowa? If so, please add your name to "Interested Wikipedians" at Proposed WikiProject Iowa --Tim4christ17 03:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy Editing

go to these two links to help the argument over acceptable material for the family guy pages, both conversations are near the bottom of the page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Centralized_discussion/Television_episodes#Cultural_references_sections

and

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability#Verifiability_of_television_episodes

Grande13 23:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just noticed them and have added them to the "Whistle While Your Wife Works" pages. I just thought that the situation involving reverts was growing into an edit war (not a participant in, although I had done some cleanup and added several references before the edit war began) and thought temporary protection might be the appropriate solution (it's already been done to "Hell Comes to Quahog"). Appreciate your referring me to those pages, however! :-) [[Briguy52748 23:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Hopefully they can remain in some form, because that is basically what makes up the whole page and the only reason I visit this guide. Its one of the best around to find obscure references that are used, and you can easily click links to understand the true joke behind the idea Grande13 23:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Things seems to be fine now, as its acceptable now to put cultural references as long as its not just a retelling of the joke, so we probably should just let things be and see how they play out now, as there seems to be at least a temporary agreement to allow edits Grande13 00:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! [[Briguy52748 14:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)]][reply]

Jamie Hunter Cartwright

Thank you for your wonderful edit on Jamie Hunter Cartwright. May I just ask one question about the Matter of Faith episode? Had Jamie's father come before hand to help the people and failed? Then, Jamie tries later and fails. Ben then offers a helping hand and it works. The people are then happy with him? Am I getting this right? Just checking before I edit the article. Keep up your edits. If you are seriously enjoying creating pages about the Bonanza, you might want to consider creating a page for Sheriff Coffee; Virginia City, Nevada (a page where you might describe what the set looked like during the show); a page for the Ponderosa Ranch (Bonanza set) (there is one about the theme park...) and my list goes on. Again, thanks for the edits. ~Babygator23~

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Barry Darsow, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Orphaned fair use image messages – Feb. 2

Orphaned fair use image (Image:SWarinerIAmReady.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SWarinerIAmReady.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BAndersonStill.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BAndersonStill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:RobbinsGunfighterBallads.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RobbinsGunfighterBallads.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Each of the above three albums have now been added to an article (so far, the "Year in Country Music" series of articles, and will be added to other articles as time allows. Thanks!" [[Briguy52748 13:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

Orphaned fair use image messages – Feb. 15

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics5.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Idea for (year) in Country Music pages

I think I've got an idea for a standard on the "(year) in country music" pages. Where it lists the "Other major hits", why not establish a standard for "other major hits"? How about listing only Top 20 (maybe Top 25) unless the song is otherwise notable? (e. g. for 2003, "Hurt" can stay, since it was Cash's last song). By the way, I'm the one who's been adding the peaks after each individual song on said pages. TenPoundHammer 17:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TPH — Actually, that's the criteria I personally have been going by, and I think it's a great idea. Somebody else has been adding in new songs, some of which had not actually even entered the Billboard Hot Country Songs charts. Of course, I don't have time to sort through this all, but I guess I'll have to make time. As for other non-top 20 hits, I added "Hurt" because — even though it never placed in the Billboard Hot Country Singles & Tracks (as the chart was known in 2003) — it was well-known, won many awards and was a No. 1 best-seller. I'll discuss further criteria over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Country Music as I have time, but the suggestion you have is excellent and one I'll use (at least in some form). [[Briguy52748]]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:MatteaCollectionofHits.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MatteaCollectionofHits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlabamaPassItOnDown.jpg

I have tagged Image:AlabamaPassItOnDown.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 19:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional images tagged {{orphaned fairuse}} (boilerplate removed to save space):

Bigr Tex

Image:SmithsonianCtryCollection90.jpg

I have tagged Image:SmithsonianCtryCollection90.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional images tagged {{no rationale}} (boilerplate removed to save space):

Bigr Tex

Image:CampbellRhinestone.jpg

I have tagged Image:CampbellRhinestone.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 19:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TGSheppard3QtrLonely.jpg

I have tagged Image:TGSheppard3QtrLonely.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 19:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FargoCountry.jpg

I have tagged Image:FargoCountry.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 19:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DaveandSugar.jpg

I have tagged Image:DaveandSugar.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 20:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TGSheppardTG.jpg

I have tagged Image:TGSheppardTG.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 20:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GatlinNighttimeMagic.jpg

I have tagged Image:GatlinNighttimeMagic.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 20:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FargoDarkEyedLady.jpg

I have tagged Image:FargoDarkEyedLady.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 20:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RobbinsGunfighterBallads.jpg

I have tagged Image:RobbinsGunfighterBallads.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 23:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BAndersonStill.jpg

I have tagged Image:BAndersonStill.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Bigr Tex 23:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:AlabamaSongsofInspiration.jpg

I have tagged Image:AlabamaSongsofInspiration.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alabama20thCentury.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alabama20thCentury.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Alabama25thAnniv.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Alabama25thAnniv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaAllGoesSouth.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaAllGoesSouth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaAmericanFarewell.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaAmericanFarewell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaAmericanPride.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaAmericanPride.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaCheapSeats.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaCheapSeats.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaChristmas2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaChristmas2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaInPictures.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaInPictures.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaInTheMood.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaInTheMood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaJustUs.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaJustUs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaPartyLive.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaPartyLive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:AlabamaUltimate.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaUltimate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving?

Perhaps I'm asking this out of sheer laziness, and if I am I apologize, but where do I go to learn how to archive old comments? Thanks in advance. [[Briguy52748 15:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

WP:ARCHIVE. —Twigboy 05:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! [{Briguy52748 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

Kenny Rogers, Lady

You recently wikilined the song "Lady" on the page Kenny Rogers. You created two wikilinks, you shuld only have wikilinked one. I have removed the redundant wikilink. Take a look at WP:MOS#Wikilinks for info on wikilinks. I would also suggest taking a good look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style.--Tainter 02:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Country Weekly

Well, thanks to me, we finally have an article on Country Weekly. It's not much of an article yet, but I'm getting the word out just to let y'all know. Maybe you can help me expand it -- I can't find a lot of good sources out there. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 04:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a good start. It may be awhile before I can help with expansion (due to work committments), but if I get time and run across anything, I'll gladly put it in. [[Briguy52748 12:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

List of common situation comedy plots

Hi, I'm not sure if you know but this article is up for AfD here. I'm afraid I supported deletion, since this is too much original research for Wikipedia. However I do think it's an interesting topic. Are you aware of the TV Tropes Wiki, a site devoted to such things? the wub "?!" 20:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me. I guess I would have not even noticed it was gone if you hadn't said anything; I just would have let it go. I've moved on to better things anyways. [[Briguy52748 21:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

re: country and pop charts

Hey there, thanks for the note.... I responded as well. I think a separate article for these songs is a much better idea. This could leave room for other future articles that focus on different genres and charts... sticking all of that in the main Hot 100 article would definitely make it too lengthy. - eo 11:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CurrentSingles TFD

Hi, I have left a response on the TFD page for this template. To say the arguments for deletion are "I don't like it", is slightly disrespectful in my opinion, as there are some (at least somewhat) convincing responses. Dave101→talk 10:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dave101 — I have left a response on the talk page. Basically, I was referring to the two contribtors who said simply "not useful" and did not give any reasoning, which is an argument to avoid. The other "delete" remarks were fine and made sound arguments, so even though I disagree with them, I have no argument with them. Sorry if there was any confusion. [[Briguy52748 21:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

Ok that's fair enough. I thought you were referring to all the delete votes. I agree some haven't backed up their arguments. Dave101→talk 11:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Special Treat

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Special Treat, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. B. Wolterding 13:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StatlersBedofRoses.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:StatlersBedofRoses.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AlabamaChrstmas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaChrstmas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AlabamaEssential98.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaEssential98.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AlabamaGreatestHits.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaGreatestHits.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AlabamaGreatestHits3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaGreatestHits3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AlabamaTheEssential.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlabamaTheEssential.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Winslow

At the talk page of this article. Flyer22 03:50, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:22, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ColumbiaCtryClassics5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MyHomeInAlabama.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MyHomeInAlabama.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Pure Love

A tag has been placed on Pure Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page you created, you may want to consult WP:Your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sunny910910 ^{(talk|Contributions)} 00:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pyramid (game show)

Regarding Pyramid (game show), that article is currently a mess. Do you think that you could help by trimming some of the cruft (we don't need to know about the joke Winner's Circle on the last ep of $20K, funny as it was) and re-adding some info on how the game is actually played? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on the rules section right now. It may be a little bit because of work commitments and other things I've got going on (hopefully not too long, though). I'll do my best. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 23:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)]] (P.S., I don't know if you're aware, but there's also a cleanup project going on with the Jeopardy! article, which apparently has similar issues).[reply]

AfD nomination of Number-one country hits of 2008 (USA)

I have nominated Number-one country hits of 2008 (USA), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number-one country hits of 2008 (USA). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:49, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Murray

Hello, Briguy52748! I noticed that you recently created the page for "Shadows in the Moonlight", to which I added the category I've been expanding lately, Billboard Hot Adult Contemporary Tracks #1 singles. I wanted to let you know that I just created a page for another of her songs, "Broken Hearted Me", which also went #1 AC as well as #1 Country, so I thought you might wish to add the succession box and any other info you have access to (I'm not quite that knowledgable yet...) I also have a question: my reference for the AC chart info has been Joel Whitburn's Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits, which lists beneath every song if it went to #1 on AC, Country or R&B. Anyway, his book shows 6 #1 AC hits for Murray: "Snowbird", "Danny's Song", "I Just Fall In Love Again", "Shadows...", "Broken...", and "Daydream Believer". It lists "A Love Song" and "You Won't See Me" as hitting the Top 40, but not as going to #1 AC. I noticed you created the page for "A Love Song" and wrote the part about it being her third #1 AC hit, but I'm not sure that's right. Were you going off the Anne Murray discography page? I don't know how to verify where those two songs peaked on the AC chart, I just tried billboard.com and it didn't help much. I thought I'd ask if you had a source that could verify that before I took anything out, since if the two songs didn't make #1 AC I don't want them to be added to the category I mentioned above. Sorry so long-winded - thanks! Zephyrnthesky (talk) 22:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyrnthesky — Thanks for the article. I did some re-writing, so don't be offended about the edits. I have added the succession box, and I'll share a few more details with you about that later (or just ask another editor who's schooled in succession boxes). [[Briguy52748 (talk) 12:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

Hello again, Briguy. Someday I'll get a source for the AC non-#1 hits (I think there's a Billboard book specializing in that). I edited "Broken Hearted Me" again and mentioned the Canadian chart positions from her discography page, but I'm not sure how to verify those either. I also changed 5th overall to 7th overall, since "Snowbird" and "Danny's Song" went #1 AC, and if you say overall, that implies all of the charts, not just Pop and Country. I hope that that's OK with everyone, including you. I'll learn succession boxes someday, but I had noticed that you were adding those to Country #1 songs, so I thought I'd let you know about my creation of the relevant page. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyrnthesky — I guess I was thinking of just country and Hot 100 charts; good point about including the AC No. 1s as well. If you're able to verify all-Billboard chart No. 1s, please by all means do. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

RE: Hogan

Thank you for the compliment, but the article is far from ready to be nominated. 1) The lead needs to be longer and a better summary of the overall article. 2) There are unsourced claims and citation needed tags. 3) Only a few of the references have been proven reliable by WP:RS. 4) It is still far too long and should be written more in summary style. Nikki311 16:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still thought I'd give you a pat on the shoulder. Looking forward to the forthcoming changes. I don't know how I can help out at this point (moreso because I don't really have time and was bummed out on the recent FAC debate on the SummerSlam (2003) article), but if I can at some point, I'll drop you a line and proceed from there. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

This FAC, which you commented on, has been restarted.

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SummerSlam (2003).S_RX 18:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I'm sorry that such was the outcome. Really, I feel bad that there was such infighting and all that, and I admit I got defensive in trying to defend my oppose vote. Hopefully, this time there will be a better outcome, regardless of whether it becomes a featured article. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

AfD nomination of List of number-one country hits (United States)

I have nominated List of number-one country hits (United States), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of number-one country hits (United States). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:TenPoundHammer/Country

PLEASE help me in my drive to improve country music articles. I'm begging you. I seem to be the only editor who gives a rip about country music; most of the country articles are crap. You can find more info here. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Country Music

Do you get the feeling that the country music wikiproject is kind of dead? I've seen no activity there for months now. I'm almost tempted to MFD it, seeing as the founder and several other major contributors are no longer editing. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TenPoundHammer — I think you're jumping the gun a little here with the MFD temptation. Sure, there hasn't been too much activity lately (regretably), and part of that is my fault. But please be patient and new articles will be added again. Some of us are busy and others just haven't thought of any good articles to add lately. Keep the faith — we will add articles again in time. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 12:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

Shane McMahon

He is relevant because for he is now involved in the story line of the WWE and he overturned the decision of Mike Adamle to suspend CM Punk, now please tell me how that is not relevant. Thanks and Happy Editing.

Hairy Perry 13:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see anything on the Vince McMahon talk page about this incident, why don't you send me a link to this discussion. You told me to look there and I did, but there was nothing there about the incident. Thanks and Happy Editing.

Hairy Perry 13:29, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the Vince McMahon talk page for the response, and where future relevant discussion should take place. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)]] (P.S. — nothing was there earlier, and I apologize since I truly had thought there was something there beforehand; my remarks are there now).[reply]

Country wikiproject

"There is still a great deal of work to do on articles." Then how come nobody's doing it? 70+ editors, and not a single one can ever be arsed? I've asked many people many times for help, and besides stub creation and three or four pictures, I've gotten nowhere. Out of all the editors on this project, I seem to be a.) the only one who actually writes and copy edits country music articles regularly, and b.) the only one who's contributed to a GA related to country (of which there are a whopping three). Yes, it can be useful, but it's never really gone anywhere. It's a permanently stalled project for which nobody seems to care except you and me, and I think few would miss it if it were deleted or merged into the main music wikiproject. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TenPoundHammer — please calm down. I am sure there are people out there who care about this project. I myself rarely seem to have time to edit country music-related articles; it surely is not because I don't care. I am going to continue to do my best for hte good of WikiPedia and the project, assuming it remains active and even if it doesn't That is why I decided to unblank the page. Until such time that the project is permanently disbanded, it should remain that way; others still may be interested in joining the group. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

Meh. No matter who I ask, all I get is "shut up, country f@#(*$ing sucks" or "do it yourself, dip#@$*(~!". At least on IRC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, could you please help me recruit new members that will, you know, actually do something instead of letting the project stagnate even further? I have no idea where to start because no one ever touches the country music articles outside of five or six editors and IPs. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered going to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Music page? If you don't, I surely will. I'm sure if one of us asks the right way, we could get people to contribute to some of our articles. I'm positive there is interest. Just give me some time to think about how to do it. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)]][reply]

I have. The first time I got no response whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Album categories

I've noticed that many albums are categorized by producer. One category that I find particularly useless is Category:Albums produced by Richard Landis since he has zero notability per WP:N (no sources found). We've been trying to establish how to improve the tree of albums-by-producer categories, and whether or not a red link producer should have a category. You can voice your opinion here if you want, and at the CfD for Landis' category. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brooks & Dunn

The article on Brooks & Dunn is horrible. Care to help me clean it up? It needs a major, major expansion. I'm trying to get as many editors as I can to help clean up this article. Drop me a line if you want to help, and if you need to know what to add. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chevrolet Bel Air

Hello- I have started uploading Stock Bel Air factory photos in the article. More to come with a complete revision in a few days. I read the article talk page yesterday after starting work on the article. Your request for stock images is from last year... I registered only a few months ago and will be doing more work like this on other auto articles. Check my user page for progress. RegardsVegavairbob (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the photos have been added.Vegavairbob (talk) 18:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added stock photos for Bel Air, Impala and El Camino articlesVegavairbob (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notify You

I thought I'd notify you that I've responded to you on Talk:WWE Raw regarding the Commercial Free Raw. Afkatk (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laura (What's He Got That I Ain't Got)

This song's gotten around, hasn't it? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bonus round

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bonus round, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus round. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I appreciate knowing, but I usually am puzzled when I receive messages like this. Usually, I could care less if an article I have been involved with editing is afd'ed. That's just me. In any case, FWIW, I've been considering adding a couple of sources to this article, so give me time to get them and properly source some of the statements, the article can be salvaged. Bear in mind I have not read the afd reasoning as I type this, so you'll likely see a response from me there. Thanks! [[Briguy52748 (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2009 (UTC)]][reply]

ibid

Just a suggestion: ibid is probably not a good sourcing method on wikipedia, as sources can be added between your existing sources easily and people probably won't change the ibids.

What you should do is use the tag: [Ref name=Whatever]John Smith, Title...[/Ref] and then in the future use simply [Ref name=Whatever/]. This will achieve the multiple-cite style for wikipedia (oh, and use <> brackets, not [] as I just did for display purposes). Thanks for the cites!TheHYPO (talk) 14:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I thought about it. Wasn't sure what to do and I didn't go to the help page. Thanks for the hint. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 17:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)]][reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Any Number

I have nominated Any Number, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Any Number. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Barker's Bargain Bar

I have nominated Barker's Bargain Bar, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barker's Bargain Bar. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bonkers (pricing game)

I have nominated Bonkers (pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonkers (pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:29, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bonus Game

I have nominated Bonus Game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus Game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bullseye (active pricing game)

I have nominated Bullseye (active pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullseye (active pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:43, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Card Game (pricing game)

I have nominated Card Game (pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Card Game (pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing Game AFD's

Please feel free to contribute your input on this and related AFD's: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Game Sottolacqua (talk) 20:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Price Is Right (U.S. game show) Merge Proposals

I've proposed editing and merging One Bid, Showcase Showdown and The Showcase into the respective sections of The Price Is Right (U.S. game show). Please feel free to comment here. Sottolacqua (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Price Is Right list of pricing games

Thanks for your contributions to building the descriptions on the List of Pricing Games page. Keep 'em coming! JTRH (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I think the only active game left is Stack the Deck. Do you want to take a shot at it? The rules are complicated enough that I'm not sure how to summarize it briefly. Also, do you think the retired games are worth writing descriptions of, or should we just leave a list of names? JTRH (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me think about the retired games list. Also, still thinking about Stack the Deck. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)]][reply]

I just moved over and edited down the description of Stack the Deck from the existing article. That's it for the active games. The more I think about it, the more I think simply listing the names of the retired games is enough. JTRH (talk) 00:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of post-Ellen American television episodes with LGBT themes. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Check-Out

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Check-Out. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check-Out. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Add 'em Up

I have nominated Add 'em Up, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Add 'em Up. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 21:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Brady Bunch

Thanks for your help on the episode summaries on the List of The Brady Bunch episodes! I have been working to get this to FL, but have not seen the episodes in ages. I am trying to use two books as sources: Bradymania and Growing Up Brady (written by Barry Williams). However, Bradymania only has 2 sentence summaries, and while Growing Up Brady has more fleshed out summaries, they tend to be snarky and focus more on Barry's character and his behind-the-scenes memories. Funny enough, I have found that some of these summaries are actually contradictory to each other! I do not have access to the actual episodes, so any help you can give is very greatly appreciated! Jrh7925 (talk) 02:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And, I might point out, not all of Barry Williams' summaries are accurate. As an avid Brady fan many years ago, I actually memorized most of these episodes and I knew that by watching them and then comparing them to "Growing Up Brady," my recollections were more accurate (for instance, one episode saw Barry's character, Greg, buy a junked 1956 Chevrolet convertible, whereas in "GUB," he said it was a Volkswagen!). In any case, thanks for the compliment, and I'll continue to try to help out as I get time. Please remember, though, that I don't want these summaries to get too long, or else that might work against WP:FL nomination. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 03:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)]][reply]

Hmmm... maybe I will go out and get the DVD set, just to rewatch these episodes. As for length, I 100% agree. My goal has been between three and four strong sentences per episode, not counting guest stars and notes. I will continue to flesh out based on the books (also to keep the FL from not going stale), but please, please correct anything that I may write wrong (no obligation, obviously!) Jrh7925 (talk) 04:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Check Game

I have nominated Check Game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Game (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:35, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Shower Game

I have nominated Shower Game, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shower Game. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of On the Spot (pricing game)

I have nominated On the Spot (pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the Spot (pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Joker (pricing game)

I have nominated Joker (pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joker (pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Triple Play (pricing game)

I have nominated Triple Play (pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Play (pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Now....or Then

I have nominated Now....or Then, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now....or Then. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 1 Right Price

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1 Right Price. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Right Price. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signs song lyrics

Hi there! I saw your recent edit to the article Signs (Five Man Electrical Band song). Well I think it's well written, and for the most part a straight-forward description of the lyrics, the parts remarking on social change and the protagonist "being a hippie" do not, to the best of my knowledge, derive from the lyrics. I was wondering if you have a particular source you're working from, or if it's just your interpretation. As it happens, I would agree with the interpretation, but that really doesn't matter. Wikipedia generally prohibits adding our own interpretations. Ideally, anyone should be able to go to some book or article or something, and verify what is written. Please comment. Thanks. —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 22:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I might have a comment later about where the "hippie," etc. comments come from, so hang on for now. And yes, for the record, I'm aware of the WP:OR (although I think the policy you're thinking of might better fit Neutral point of view). [[Briguy52748 (talk) 02:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)]][reply]

AfD nomination of Telephone Game

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Telephone Game. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telephone Game. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Balance Game (1980s)

I have nominated Balance Game (1980s), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balance Game (1980s). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:43, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Bullseye (retired pricing game)

I have nominated Bullseye (retired pricing game), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullseye (retired pricing game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cover Up (pricing game)

The article Cover Up (pricing game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since November 2007

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. feydey (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Cover Up (pricing game)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Cover Up (pricing game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cover Up (pricing game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Most Expensive

I have nominated Most Expensive, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Most Expensive. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:46, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Double Digits

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Double Digits. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Digits. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Double Bullseye and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Double Bullseye, Buy or Sell, Clearance Sale. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Bullseye for Double Bullseye, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buy or Sell for Buy or Sell, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clearance Sale for Clearance Sale. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Trader Bob

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Trader Bob. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trader Bob. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fortune Hunter and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Fortune Hunter, Give or Keep, Hurdles (pricing game), It's Optional. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortune Hunter for Fortune Hunter, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Give or Keep for Give or Keep, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurdles (pricing game) for Hurdles (pricing game), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Optional for It's Optional. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Make Your Mark

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Make Your Mark. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Your Mark. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Double Prices

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Double Prices. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Prices. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Windup gag"

Hello, I have created a Talk discussion regarding your use of the phrase "windup gag" in two Wikipedia articles. YLee (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Mystery of Chimney Rock

I have nominated The Mystery of Chimney Rock, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mystery of Chimney Rock. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 22:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Richey

Don't forget to fill in the background field in the infobox when you use {{Infobox musical artist}}. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Christian Crusaders

I have nominated Christian Crusaders, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Crusaders. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:20, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Travis Tritt

More than four years ago, you asked whether someone would ever make Travis Tritt into a GA. I just wanted to let you know I'm working on it right now. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Lookin' for Love"

Did you write the original article here?:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lookin'_for_Love

If so, thank you as I’ve always loved this song. It seems to have a fascinating story behind it and to that effect I left a talk page note (the first and only one thus far) regarding it and asking if you could possibly elaborate on it and/or clarify certain matters. If so, I’d be appreciative as I find it most interesting.

Best regards,HistoryBuff14 (talk) 23:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Thanks for the reply. I made a follow-up if you're interested. Best regards.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Combat (Atari 2600)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 22:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This notice surprises me. It's been quite a while -- six years -- since I created my first article. I didn't even remember creating this article, and had assumed it had been deleted a long long time ago ... which wouldn't have bothered me, as there already was an article covering the Atari 2600 game Combat and I had been unaware of the other article's existance. Thanks anyway for the message. (And for the record, no, I do not do test edits.)[[Briguy52748 (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)]][reply]

Incidentally, I'd like to know when the article "Combat (Atari 2600)" was created, if it's possible to provide that information. Thanks. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)]][reply]

Big Rock, Iowa

Hey Briguy, Thanks for your addition here to Big Rock, Iowa. Nice to see some well-sourced content being added! :) Firsfron of Ronchester 22:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sounds of the '90s (Time-Life Music)

The article Sounds of the '90s (Time-Life Music) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable compilation album series from Time-Life music. no reliable sources, no signifant coverage. fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 21:53, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of It Takes Two: Classic Duets (Time-Life Music)

The article It Takes Two: Classic Duets (Time-Life Music) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album has zero notability, failing to receive any coverage in reliable sources. WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not sure why you think all these Time-Life albums are notable. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Briguy52748! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1974 in country music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to When the Sun Goes Down

1982 in country music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Because of You

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for Mar 2

Hi. When you recently edited Calamus-Wheatland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clinton County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image in your sandbox

Hi there. Per the policies on the usage of non-free images on Wikipedia, non-free images are not allowed on pages outside of the article namespace. The radio station logo in your sandbox is copyrighted, so I had to remove it. I'm sorry for editing your page without your consent, I know people get upset over this, and I want to make sure you know that this isn't personal. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for letting me know. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)]][reply]

"Lookin' for Love"

You might recall that about a year and a half ago I inquired about the information in your article concerning the country music hit “Lookin’ for Love.” I asked if you might elaborate and explain certain assertions that did not seem credible to me. You were kind enough to respond but couldn’t at that time provide any answers.

I don’t know if you are aware of this, but subsequently two of the song’s three co-writers apparently found the article on their own (I never did email Mr. Morrison as I indicated I had intended to at the time) and made corrections and additions, which I thought most considerate of them. I made a brief addendum to my last post on the talk page if you’d care to read it.

Thanks again for being the original author of the article and getting the ball rolling. I have appreciated this country music gem ever since I first heard it and am therefore most interested in its history! Best regardsHistoryBuff14 (talk) 23:31, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joe Stampley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carl Smith

Just Good Ol' Boys (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carl Smith

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to wikiFeed

Hi Briguy52748,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! RachulAdmas (talk) 20:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Don't Wait on Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Don Reid

WFXN (AM) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to WLLR

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Have You Ever Been Lonely?, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bob Ferguson and Welcome To My World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2010s in music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Red (album) and The Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Merchandise based on Jeopardy! may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of its own. [[Pressman Toy Corporation]] first marketed several versions in the mid-to-late 1980s (including a version with electric signal devices and scoring consoles, released in 1987, and a "

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I'll Hold You in My Heart (Till I Can Hold You in My Arms), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmie Rodgers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2007 in radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to WKBF

2012 in radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to WMT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1976 in radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Middle of the road

1984 in radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Middle of the road

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Need You may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

"'''Need You'''" is a 1967 single by [[Sonny James]]. The single went to number one on the ''[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]'' [[Hot Country Songs|Hot Country Singles]] chart where it spent

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited How to Be a Country Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of television actors who died during production may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of why; starting with the season's last six episodes of Season 3, the character of John Wilson ([[Gale Gordon]] as George's brother is introduced and will remain for the rest of the series' run.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1950s in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hank Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hee Haw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CMT

Tall Dark Stranger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CMT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rings of Gold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Country Sunshine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1980 in radio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WDLM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Your Tender Loving Care (song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

reach No. 1, and there was also [[Santa Looked a Lot Like Daddy|a Christmas single]] in the streak), Billboard chart statistician Joel Whitburn has disregarded all non-No. 1 duets, B-side releases

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Jack Tunney

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jack Tunney, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ernesttubb8756

I see user ‎User:Ernesttubb8756 has been adding info on Moon Mullican's chart success on 'years in' that doesn't appear in my Billboard book by Joel Whitburn. I asked him for his source, but he hasn't responded. Do you have chart info, or is there a better source? Wondering if these should be removed... Smarkflea (talk) 19:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Briguy52748. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of United States history (1990–present)

Thanks. I was attempting to finish undoing vandalism (the previous attempt had left something dangling). Evidently I must have hit the wrong button and instead re-instated the original vandalism. Oops. Tarl N. (discuss) 21:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Your Hit Parade (Time-Life Music)

The article Your Hit Parade (Time-Life Music) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mail-order series with no significant discussion in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Briguy52748. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Briguy52748. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of years in country music

The article List of years in country music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced for almost two years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 176.5 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WaMac Conference

I removed Central DeWitt. Do you know if the East/West split is being re-aligned? RickH86 (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as donethingvis available, this page will be updated. Briguy52748 (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radio Daze: Pop Hits of the 80s

The article Radio Daze: Pop Hits of the 80s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 00:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Contemporary Country

The article Contemporary Country has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mail order album series that has not received significant coverage in any reliable sources. Fails WP:NALBUMS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:52, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]