Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy/User:Marshallsumter Incident Article Fix-up Coordination Page
User:Marshallsumter seems to have abused the autopatroller right (which was removed per ANI discussion), and a number of his articles are under deletion for possible WP:OR/WP:SYNTH/WP:COPYVIO. There was also found to be high levels of unattributed WP:CWW. This category is a temporary category to aid in the process of vetting other articles and making sure they are not similarly compromised – even if not resulting in deletion, there is reason to believe they might have serious issues that need attention.
Articles replaced by redirects
[edit](For more, see also below at Articles restored or recreated after deletion.)
- Assembly of the transcription preinitiation complex – removed redundant material and created redirect to transcription preinitiation complex. Could also be deleted entirely. --- Medical geneticist (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Earthquake precursor - I have redirected this to Earthquake prediction. LadyofShalott 03:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Fair weather - I've redirected this to Weather. LadyofShalott 03:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- RNA polymerase II holoenzyme stability – created redirect to RNA polymerase II#holoenzyme stability, where most of the material was apparently copied from. Article could just as easily be deleted as it contained little additional information much of which was incorrect. Medical geneticist (talk) 02:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Tephra layer - redirected by Drmies to Tephra
- X-ray generation - redirected to X-ray
- Note that I've done a histpurge on all these redirects. T. Canens (talk) 22:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Past XfD
[edit]Past AfD's
[edit]- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract concept generator – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achieving sex integration – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur X-ray astronomy – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial gamma-ray source – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial source – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corona Australis 1 – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (anthropology) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (art) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (astronomy) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (disambiguation) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (economics) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (evolutionary biology) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (extinction) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (meteoroid) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (petrology) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (stars) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egalitarian mortality – No consensus, kept; later mass-deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EIF4E basal element – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explorational X-ray astronomy – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extrasolar X-ray source astrometry – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First X-ray source in Andromeda – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First X-ray source in Cancer – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First X-ray source in Hydrus – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First X-ray source in Pictor – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First X-ray source in Volans – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Focused promoter – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenland ice cores – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heterointegration – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of human ATPase genes – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the first X-ray source in a constellation – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metadefinition – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-polar ice core – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupational sex integration – first redirected to Occupational gender segregation, then speedy deleted by G8
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Origin of sex segregation (and merge to Sex segregation proposed) – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphate transistasis – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion and sex integration – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Repellor vehicle – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Searching for the first X-ray source per constellation – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex integration and ageism – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex integration and homosexuality – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex integration and patriarchy/matriarchy – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex-neutral skill – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single X-ray star – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar binary – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solitary A0V X-ray star – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Temporal distribution – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violence and sex integration – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-ray dark planet – deleted
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-rays from Eridanus – deleted
Articles deleted without discussion
[edit]- 3U 0430+37
- 4U 1626-67
- A1BG
- Abell 1795
- Abell 2256
- Angiotensinogen core promoter element
- Aquila X-1
- Aquila XR-1
- Ara X-1
- Ara XR-1
- Arp 270
- Astronomical cosmic-ray source
- Astronomical gamma-ray source
- Astronomical infrared source
- Astronomical neutron source
- Astronomical source
- Astronomical ultraviolet source
- Astronomical visual source
- Astronomical X-number notation
- Astronomical X-ray source catalog
- Astronomical X-ray sources
- AT Microscopii
- Auroral X-rays
- AZ Cancri
- Balloons for X-ray astronomy
- Blanco 1
- Brown dwarf X-ray source
- Calibrated camera – speedy deleted as a copyvio
- Calibrated software
- Capping enzyme complex
- Celestial X-ray source
- Centaurus X-1
- Centaurus X-2
- Centaurus X-4
- Centaurus X-5
- Centaurus XR-1
- Centaurus XR-2
- Centaurus XR-3
- Centaurus XR-4
- Cepheus XR-1
- Charge polarization
- Charge separation
- Cometary globule
- Core promoter
- Coronal cloud
- Coronal star
- Crater X-1
- Cygnus Superbubble
- Cygnus X-2
- Cygnus X-4
- Cygnus X-6
- Cygnus X-7
- Cygnus XR-2
- Cygnus XR-3
- Cygnus XR-4
- Cygnus X-ray ring
- Degenerate nucleotide
- Diffuse X-ray background
- Dispersed promoter
- Distal promoter
- Distributive dynamo
- Downstream B recognition element
- Downstream core element
- Downstream promoter element
- Egalitarian mortality
- Electrosphere
- Electrostatic suspension
- ESRO 2B
- Fairall 9
- Follicular melanocyte
- Fossil stellar magnetic field - I have re-created this as a stub -84user (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- GAAC element
- GC box
- Genome surveillance complex
- Glucocorticoid responsive element
- GRB 970402
- H 2356-309
- Helikian
- Herbig–Bell catalog
- Hinotori (satellite)
- Hot intergalactic medium
- HR 1099
- HY box
- Hydra A
- Ice core brittle zone
- Index table for X-ray and gamma-ray sources
- Initiator element
- Intercosmos 24
- Intercosmos 26
- Interstellar magnetic field
- Io as an X-ray source – speedy deleted as a copyvio
- Kodaira 1
- Koronas-F
- Kosmos 428
- Lambda Orion X-1
- Large Magellanic Cloud X-2
- List of biochemical phosphate reactions
- List of Herbig–Bell emission-line stars
- List of human hair color genes
- List of solar X-ray astronomy satellites
- List of tephra layers
- Lockheed X-ray source
- Lockman Hole
- Lupus X-1
- Lupus XR-1
- Lyra XR-1
- Markarian 590
- Metal-responsive element
- Modulation collimator
- Motif ten element
- Natural electric field of the Earth
- Neutron-antineutron annihilation
- Nicotinamide riboside
- Non-polar ice cap
- Norma X-1
- Norma XR-1
- Norma XR-2
- Nova-like star
- Nucleoskeleton
- Nucleosol
- Occupational gender segregation
- Off-the-shelf component
- Ontological translator
- Ophiuchus X-1
- Ophiuchus X-2
- Ophiuchus XR-1
- Ophiuchus XR-2
- Orion–Eridanus Superbubble
- OSO 1
- OSO 2
- OSO 4
- OSO 5
- OSO 6
- OSO 8
- Phosphate homeostasis
- Phosphate reaction
- Phosphorus oxoacids
- Polar coronal hole
- Polarization voltage
- Prognoz 6
- Proton–antiproton annihilation
- Proximal promoter
- Radiative dynamo
- Religion and sex segregation
- Renland
- Ribonucleoside monophosphate
- Sagittarius X-1
- Sagittarius X-3
- Sagittarius X-4
- Sagittarius X-5
- Sagittarius X-6
- Sagittarius X-7
- Sagittarius XR-1
- Sagittarius XR-2
- Sagittarius XR-3
- Sagittarius XR-4
- Sagittarius XR-5
- Scorpius X-2
- Scorpius X-3
- Scorpius X-4
- Scorpius X-5
- Scorpius X-6
- Scorpius XR-2
- Scorpius XR-3
- Scorpius XR-4
- Scorpius XR-5
- Scorpius XR-6
- Sculptor Wall - now stubbed, a superstructure of galaxies -84user (talk) 18:01, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Scutum X-1
- Serpens Caput X-1
- Serpens X-1
- Serpens X-2
- Serpens XR-2
- Sex integration
- Shell dynamo
- Signe 3
- Siyeh Formation
- Solar antapex
- Solar surface fusion
- Solar X-ray astronomy
- Solrad 1
- Solrad 10
- Solrad 3
- Solrad 5B
- Solrad 6
- Solrad 7
- Solrad 8
- Solrad 9
- Sounding rocket X-ray astronomy
- Star-forming region
- Stellar active region
- Stellar surface fusion
- Structural phosphate
- Student Nitric Oxide Explorer - I got this one, creating shortly.--Cerejota (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Terrier Sandhawk
- Transcription start site
- Triangulum Australe X-1
- V 0332+53
- V Sagittae
- V-2 sounding rocket
- Vega as an X-ray source
- Vertikal
- Visibly dark X-ray source
- Weak-lined T Tauri star
- X core promoter element 1
- X-1 X-ray source
- X-ray dark star
- X-ray halo
- X-rays from lightning
- X-rays from the Moon
- YZ Canis Minoris
Comments
[edit]The following mass-deleted articles had comments on this page suggesting they might be worth keeping:
- ESRO 2B: prodded, but someone objected
- Ribonucleoside monophosphate: reviewed, no significant problems. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Student Nitric Oxide Explorer: Article is a keeper, with the topic notable and the prose okay. Binksternet (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2011 (UTC) - I have userfyed it to my name space and are working on it...--Cerejota (talk) 08:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Transcription start site: Really important article but needs attention. --- Medical geneticist (talk) 00:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Would you be interested in starting this one from scratch? I'd certainly help out. If not it'll be on my ToDo list and I will get round to it soon (hopefully) Jebus989✰ 13:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I could help out, but it would be a shame to have to start from scratch. The original article really wasn't that badly damaged by Marshallsumter and in fact had been edited by a number of other editors if I recall correctly. It may have gotten swept up in the net along with the other bad articles that were created. If it were up to me I would restore and then mercilessly chop -- much easier as an editor than having to come up with an article from scratch! --- Medical geneticist (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm usually the opposite—I'd prefer to work from scratch so that I know everything is correct and referenced properly. But if you say the article was not too bad (I'm sure I saw it, if not edited it) I'll ask to have it userfied unless you wish to do this? then fix it up and move it to the mainspace Jebus989✰ 15:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am afraid that I don't have the technical know-how to resurrect an article. But if you let me know where to find it I can help clean it up. --- Medical geneticist (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I'm usually the opposite—I'd prefer to work from scratch so that I know everything is correct and referenced properly. But if you say the article was not too bad (I'm sure I saw it, if not edited it) I'll ask to have it userfied unless you wish to do this? then fix it up and move it to the mainspace Jebus989✰ 15:26, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- I could help out, but it would be a shame to have to start from scratch. The original article really wasn't that badly damaged by Marshallsumter and in fact had been edited by a number of other editors if I recall correctly. It may have gotten swept up in the net along with the other bad articles that were created. If it were up to me I would restore and then mercilessly chop -- much easier as an editor than having to come up with an article from scratch! --- Medical geneticist (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
- Would you be interested in starting this one from scratch? I'd certainly help out. If not it'll be on my ToDo list and I will get round to it soon (hopefully) Jebus989✰ 13:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Articles restored or recreated after deletion
[edit]- Abell 2147 – entirely rewritten
- Fossil stellar magnetic field - now a referenced stub -84user (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- Gamma-ray generation – now redirects to Gamma ray#Gamma ray production
- Inhibitory peptide – now redirects to Enzyme inhibitor
- List of V-2 launches in the United States – now redirects to List of V-2 test launches#Launches of captured V-2 rockets in the USA after 1945
- Oligoester – recreated as a stub
- Orion–Eridanus Superbubble - recreated as a stub from AfC
- Perinuclear space – now redirects to Nuclear envelope
- Propulsion system – now redirects to Vehicle propulsion
- Riboside – recreated as a stub
- Sculptor Wall - recreated as a stub
- Star fission – now redirects to Star
- Stellar X-ray astronomy – now redirects to X-ray astronomy#Stellar X-ray astronomy
- TD-1A – entirely rewritten
Articles userfied
[edit]Images
[edit]A number of astronomical articles use(d) images on Commons which have copyvio issues. If those images are needed, it might be best to (a) upload them on Wikipedia as "fair use" or (b) pursue proper permission via OTRS. -- 202.124.75.234 (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Restoring articles
[edit]List of solar X-ray astronomy satellites doesn't appear to me to have any fatal problems: it's a simple list (so no copyright problems), it covers a single notable subject in a coherent fashion, and it should be possible to find sources for all the entries. Does anyone see problems that I'm missing? --Carnildo (talk) 23:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Unlinking bad
[edit]I think we should discourage editors from unlinking some of the redlinks resulting from this mass deletion. I have already reverted two unlinks but as I noticed several other redlinks have been unlinked could the community decide what the consensus is for me to revert most of the unlinks I see connected to this affair? -84user (talk) 18:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- WP:REDLINK , but many editors I have encountered actively remove redlinks because they are "ugly", or they think any kind of redlinking is tantamount to vandalism (!??) (that might be a result of the tag {{cleanup red links}} giving them the idea that redlinks are bad) ... no idea what could be done about it. 70.24.247.61 (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Further requests for cleanup
[edit]- AZ Cancri appeared at WT:AST for cleanup in July 2014