Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Chromogranin A (CHGA), a member of the granin family of proteins, has been an attractive therapeutic target and candidate biomarker for several cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory disorders. The prominence of CHGA stems from the pleiotropic roles of several bioactive peptides (e.g., catestatin, pancreastatin, vasostatins) generated by its proteolytic cleavage and by their wide anatomical distribution. These peptides are emerging as novel modulators of cardiometabolic diseases that are often linked to high blood cholesterol levels. However, their impact on cholesterol homeostasis is poorly understood. The dynamic nature of cholesterol and its multitudinous roles in almost every aspect of normal body function makes it an integral component of metabolic physiology. A tightly regulated coordination of cholesterol homeostasis is imperative for proper functioning of cellular and metabolic processes. The deregulation of cholesterol levels can result in several pathophysiological states. Although studies till date suggest regulatory roles for CHGA and its derived peptides on cholesterol levels, the mechanisms by which this is achieved still remain unclear. This review aims to aggregate and consolidate the available evidence linking CHGA with cholesterol homeostasis in health and disease. In addition, we also look at common molecular regulatory factors (viz., transcription factors and microRNAs) which could govern the expression of CHGA and genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis under basal and pathological conditions. In order to gain further insights into the pathways mediating cholesterol regulation by CHGA/its derived peptides, a few prospective signaling pathways are explored, which could act as primers for future studies.

Free full text 


Logo of cmlsLink to Publisher's site
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023 Sep; 80(9): 271.
Published online 2023 Aug 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-023-04908-3
PMCID: PMC11072126
PMID: 37642733

Chromogranin A and its derived peptides: potential regulators of cholesterol homeostasis

Associated Data

Data Citations

Abstract

Chromogranin A (CHGA), a member of the granin family of proteins, has been an attractive therapeutic target and candidate biomarker for several cardiovascular, neurological, and inflammatory disorders. The prominence of CHGA stems from the pleiotropic roles of several bioactive peptides (e.g., catestatin, pancreastatin, vasostatins) generated by its proteolytic cleavage and by their wide anatomical distribution. These peptides are emerging as novel modulators of cardiometabolic diseases that are often linked to high blood cholesterol levels. However, their impact on cholesterol homeostasis is poorly understood. The dynamic nature of cholesterol and its multitudinous roles in almost every aspect of normal body function makes it an integral component of metabolic physiology. A tightly regulated coordination of cholesterol homeostasis is imperative for proper functioning of cellular and metabolic processes. The deregulation of cholesterol levels can result in several pathophysiological states. Although studies till date suggest regulatory roles for CHGA and its derived peptides on cholesterol levels, the mechanisms by which this is achieved still remain unclear. This review aims to aggregate and consolidate the available evidence linking CHGA with cholesterol homeostasis in health and disease. In addition, we also look at common molecular regulatory factors (viz., transcription factors and microRNAs) which could govern the expression of CHGA and genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis under basal and pathological conditions. In order to gain further insights into the pathways mediating cholesterol regulation by CHGA/its derived peptides, a few prospective signaling pathways are explored, which could act as primers for future studies.

Keywords: Chromogranin A, Cholesterol, Signal transduction, Gene regulation, Bioactive peptides

Introduction

Chromogranin A (CHGA), belonging to the granin family of acidic, soluble glycoproteins stored in secretory granules and predominantly expressed in the neuroendocrine system, has garnered considerable attention owing to its multitude of physiological and pathophysiological roles [15]. At the intracellular level, CHGA plays a crucial role in the biogenesis of secretory vesicles [3, 68], binds with calcium [911], catecholamines and proteins involved in the regulatory secretory pathway [1214]. At the extracellular level, CHGA acts as a prohormone giving rise to a number of biologically active peptides by proteolytic cleavage [15]. In view of their pleiotropic roles in several aspects of cellular and metabolic physiology, the CHGA-derived peptides are attractive therapeutic/drug target molecules [1622].

A number of studies in the literature indicated that CHGA and some of its peptides might regulate circulating cholesterol levels, but any attempt to consolidate this link has not yet been made. Since cholesterol homeostasis is vital for various cellular/physiological processes, understanding the regulation of cholesterol by CHGA would have important implications for several aspects of metabolism. This review aims to dissect the link between CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis, with a focus on the CHGA-derived peptides catestatin (CST) [2326], pancreastatin (PST) [2730], vasostatins (VS-I and II) [3134]. We discuss studies which chronicle the interplay of CHGA and cholesterol pathways, roles of the CHGA-derived peptides in mediating cholesterol homeostasis in basal and cholesterol-dysregulated conditions. We also look at a few intersecting signaling cascades, which provide compelling evidence of the pathways through which CHGA/CHGA-derived peptides could govern cholesterol homeostasis.

Cholesterol: a multi-faceted sterol

Cholesterol has enthralled the scientific community since its isolation from gallstones in the eighteenth century, and a testament to its remarkable significance are the thirteen Nobel Prizes awarded to scientists who have worked extensively on elucidating the several aspects of cholesterol structure and biosynthesis [35]. Cholesterol plays pivotal roles in membrane biology, signal transduction and acts as a precursor to several classes of steroid hormones (progestogens, estrogens, androgens, glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids), oxysterols and bile acids [36]. The significance of cholesterol in physiology is further underscored by the numerous pathophysiological conditions which arise as a consequence of perturbed cholesterol homeostasis.

Cholesterol and membrane function

Glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids and cholesterol constitute the majority of the membrane bilayer, which not only help in stabilizing membrane proteins but also provide compatible environments in each organelle to facilitate their function. Cholesterol and sphingolipids are more enriched in the plasma membrane when compared to the Golgi and endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which renders the plasma membrane impermeable to the passage of small molecules [37, 38]. Although synthesized in the ER, the counter gradient accumulation of cholesterol in the plasma membrane involves specific transport between the different cellular membrane compartments at specific interfaces called membrane contact sites [39]. Cholesterol associates with the sphingolipid molecules in the membrane bilayer to form liquid-ordered microdomains called lipid rafts which regulate interactions between membrane components, thus altering the conformation of raft-associated proteins and consequently their activity, in addition to modulating membrane trafficking, signaling cascades and host–pathogen interactions [40, 41]. In addition, cholesterol modulates membrane rigidity and thickness [42, 43].

Role of cholesterol in signal transduction

Cholesterol seems to play roles in modulating channel receptors function such as the nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptor (nAChR), G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and tyrosine kinase signaling. Cholesterol also regulates Hedgehog signaling and influences membrane receptor function by either directly binding to the receptor and altering its conformation or indirectly by modifying the biophysical properties of the membrane [4446].

Cholesterol and the secretory pathway

The secretory pathway directs the synthesis, maintenance and release of secretory proteins in a constitutive or regulated manner, in response to secretagogues [47]. The journey of a secretory protein begins in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it is subjected to post-translational modifications. The ER also regulates the efficiency of secretion by modulating protein folding [48]. The protein is then transported through the three distinct sub-compartments of the Golgi apparatus (cis, medial and trans) to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), from where it is sorted to its proper destination, either the plasma membrane or the endosomal/lysosomal system [47]. Proteins could then either enter the constitutive pathway and travel to the plasma membrane or are stored in granules and released from the cell upon external stimuli (regulatory pathway). The acidic milieu of the TGN is believed to facilitate aggregation of the proteins destined for the regulatory pathway, which are then packed into immature secretory granules at the TGN. These granules bud off from the TGN and undergo maturation during their transport towards the cell periphery. The secretory material gets concentrated by ten to hundred folds along the pathway [4952].

Cholesterol plays crucial roles at various stages of the secretory pathway. It is an important constituent of the Golgi network and secretory vesicle membrane in endocrine/neuroendocrine cells (~ 25–65 mol%) [5356]. Cholesterol depletion impairs binding of the prohormones, sorting and packaging of proopiomelanocortin (POMC) into secretory vesicles at the TGN while elevation of cellular cholesterol levels promotes efficient formation of chromogranin B (CHGB)-containing granules at the TGN in AtT-20 cells. Moreover, cholesterol seems to play a role in the formation of both constitutive and regulated secretory vesicles [54, 57]. Cholesterol also affects the integrity of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor) clusters, thus modulating exocytic release [58]. Cholesterol was observed to have an effect on granule fusion kinetics and exocytic events in the neuroendocrine cell line PC12 as well [59]. Cholesterol, by its virtue of forming ordered microdomains with sphingolipids in the plasma membrane, is believed to be involved in defining exocytosis sites and may promote membrane fusion by regulating membrane curvature [60].

Cholesterol also plays key roles in granin-mediated effects on secretory granules. The binding of secretogranin III (SgIII) to chromogranin A (CHGA) is essential for its targeting to secretory granules [61]. Interestingly, SgIII requires cholesterol to bind to the membrane of secretory granules and anchors CHGA to the membrane, which then mediates condensation/aggregation of pro-hormones in the secretory granule [62]. Thus, formation of dense-core aggregate-containing secretory granules requires molecules which could interact with both cholesterol and the core aggregates. SgIII acts as a bridge between the core aggregate and the cholesterol-rich microdomains which facilitates crucial processes in secretory granule biogenesis [63].

Cholesterol homeostasis

Circulatory forms of cholesterol

Lipid metabolism is regulated by lipoproteins. These are macromolecular, heterogeneous complexes which shield insoluble lipids from the aqueous plasma. These are made up of an inner dense hydrophobic core of both free and esterified forms of cholesterol, triacylglycerides, and an outer layer of hydrophilic moieties of apolipoproteins, phospholipids and free cholesterol [64]. Based on size, density, lipid and protein composition, plasma lipoproteins can be divided into seven classes: chylomicrons, chylomicron remnants, VLDL (very low-density lipoprotein), IDL (intermediate-density lipoprotein), LDL (low-density lipoprotein), HDL (high-density lipoprotein) and Lp(a) (Lipoprotein (a)) (Table (Table1)1) [65, 66].

Table 1

Circulatory forms of cholesterol

LipoproteinSize (nm)Density (g/ml)Major lipidsMajor apolipoproteinsPathophysiological implications
Chylomicrons75–1200 < 0.930TriglyceridesApo B-48; Apo C-I, C-II, C-III; Apo E; Apo A-I, A-II, A-IV, A-VTransport of dietary triglycerides and cholesterol, pro-atherogenic
Chylomicron remnants30–800.930–1.006Triglycerides, CholesterolApo B-48, Apo EPro-atherogenic
VLDL30–800.930–1.006TriglyceridesApo B-100; Apo E; Apo C-I, C-II, C-III; Apo A-VPro-atherogenic
IDL25–351.006–1.019Triglycerides, CholesterolApo B-100, Apo E, Apo CPro-atherogenic
LDL18–251.019–1.063CholesterolApo B-100Hypertriglyceridemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, inflammation, pro-atherogenic
HDL5–121.063–1.210Cholesterol, PhospholipidsApo A-I, A-II, A-IV, A-V; Apo C-I, C-II, C-III; Apo EAnti-oxidant, antithrombotic, anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, antiatherogenic
Lp (a)~301.055–1.085CholesterolApo B-100; Apo (a)Pro-atherogenic

Cholesterol homeostasis involves several processes including biosynthesis, absorption, storage by the process of esterification, and degradation by efflux and conversion to bile, which are depicted schematically in Fig. 1.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Overview of cholesterol homeostasis. Cholesterol levels are maintained by a host of enzymes and proteins in a highly efficient and regulated manner via biosynthesis, storage, absorption, trafficking, efflux, and reverse cholesterol transport. These steps are well-coordinated among the liver, intestine, and macrophages, as depicted in the illustration. ABC ATP-binding cassette; SR-B1 scavenger receptor, class B type 1; ACAT acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase; HMGCR β-hydroxy β-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; HDL high-density lipoprotein; LDL low-density lipoprotein; LDLR LDL receptor; ERC endocytic recycling compartment; NPC1L1 niemann-pick C1-like 1; CE cholesteryl ester; CETP CE transfer protein; SQLE squalene epoxidase

Biosynthesis

Typically, all cells and tissues can synthesize cholesterol, but the major sites of synthesis are the liver, intestine and reproductive organs [67]. It is synthesized in the ER through a series of 30 enzymatic reactions. It all begins with the condensation of acetate molecules by successive reversible reactions to first form acetoacetyl-CoA, followed by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA). The subsequent reaction is the rate-limiting step of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, catalyzed by HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR), which reduces HMG-CoA to mevalonate. Further reactions, like condensation and cyclization, result in the formation of the cholesterol molecule [68]. The protein, which is considered as an important rate-limiting enzyme next to HMGCR, is squalene epoxidase (SQLE).

Absorption

Cholesterol uptake is regulated directly by NPC1L1 transporter (highly expressed in the apical surfaces of hepatocytes and enterocytes) and indirectly by LDL-receptor (LDLR, expressed in the basolateral surface of most cells) [69]. NPC1L1 is a glycosylated membrane protein, which is the primary moderator of cholesterol absorption. Under steady-state conditions, NPC1L1 resides in the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC) and upon cholesterol availability, it translocates to the plasma membrane. The N-terminal domain of NPC1L1 binds with cholesterol, which leads to a conformational change in the structure of the protein. This results in the dissociation of NPC1L1-bound cholesterol from the membrane to be packed within endocytic vesicles in a clathrin-dependent manner. These vesicles migrate towards the ERC, from where they reach the ER, by an unknown mechanism [69, 70]. The membrane glycoprotein LDLR binds with LDL from blood and this complex gets internalized via a clathrin-dependent endocytic pathway, involving ARH and DAB2 [71, 72]. Multiple LDL-LDLR-containing vesicles fuse together to form endosomes harbouring a pH of 6.5, leading to LDLR dissociation and return to the plasma membrane. The remaining LDL-containing vesicles fuse with the lysosomal compartment to undergo hydrolysis to yield cholesterol [35].

LDLR levels at the plasma membrane are regulated by the secretory serine protease PCSK9, which is highly expressed in liver and small intestine. Upon activation, it undergoes a conformational change which enables it to bind with the epidermal growth factor A (EGF-A) domain of LDLR [73]. The PCSK9-LDLR complex gets internalized via a clathrin-mediated process and gets transported to the endosomes and then to the lysosomes, where it gets eventually degraded. The acidic pH of endosomes facilitates the interaction of PCSK9 with the ligand-binding domain of LDLR, thereby disrupting the process of recycling back to the plasma membrane [69]. This negative regulation elevates plasma LDL levels leading to hypercholesterolemia, which recently led to the development of anti-PCSK9 therapies [74].

Storage

Accumulation of intracellular free cholesterol above physiological levels leads to cytotoxicity [75]. Hence, it is stored in the form of cytoplasmic lipid droplets by the process of esterification. This is mediated by the enzyme acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT), which is an ER membrane protein. Its two homologs, ACAT1 and ACAT2 are differentially expressed in mammals. The highest expression of ACAT1 is found in macrophages, while ACAT2 is mainly localized to hepatocytes and enterocytes in humans [76]. ACAT1 plays a major role in the formation of foam cells in macrophages, while ACAT2 is involved in cholesterol absorption. Both these isozymes work together in chylomicron and VLDL assembly/synthesis [77].

Trafficking

Intracellular cholesterol transport across various sub-cellular membranes takes place because of both de novo synthesis from ER and its uptake from extracellular milieu. It can involve both vesicular and non-vesicular pathways.

Once synthesized in the ER, cholesterol can be transported to the plasma membrane or different compartments with the help of specialized lipid-binding proteins. These include members of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein-related lipid transfer (START) domain family and oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP)-related proteins (ORPs) [78]. In humans, STARD1, STARD3 and STARD4 play an important role in cholesterol transport. In steroidogenic tissues, STARD1 transports cholesterol from outer to inner mitochondrial membrane. STARD3 facilitates transport from ER to endosomes, and then to plasma membrane, while STARD4 mediates non-vesicular transport from plasma membrane to ERC [79]. ORP2 is involved in assisting movement of lipids across lipid droplets [80]; ORP9L and OSBP1 are involved in sterol transfer between ER and Golgi [69, 81].

LDLR internalizes extracellular cholesterol (with APOB or APOE proteins) which is transported to endosomes. Efflux from late endosomes is facilitated by the membrane spanning protein, NPC1 and the soluble protein NPC2. Two more proteins containing sterol-binding domains include MLN64 and ORP1, which bind to cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol, respectively; these proteins regulate membrane trafficking and subcellular distribution of late endosomes. Rab GTPases including Rab8, Rab11, Rab7 and Rab9 are also involved in this sterol-dependent endosomal transport system [76].

Efflux

The selective transport of cholesterol from peripheral tissues by HDL to liver for its excretion in the form of bile and feces is called “reverse cholesterol transport.” Most of the peripheral tissues cannot catabolize cholesterol and thus require special transporters for its efflux to the acceptor, HDL. The lipid-poor ApoA-I protein accepts cholesterol from both liver and macrophages via ABCA1 transporter. This is the nascent HDL particle. With the help of LCAT, it acquires cholesterol released from the ABCG1 transporter (highly expressed in macrophages) and via ABCG5 and ABCG8 (widely expressed in the luminal surface of intestine and bile duct). The resultant mature HDL can unload cholesterol back to the liver by two processes: SR-BI transporter (direct process); or CETP-mediated (indirect process) [69, 82].

Degradation

The formation of bile is the most important regulated process for the degradation of cholesterol which occurs via two pathways: classical pathway (neutral) and alterative (acidic pathway). The major enzymes catalyzing these pathways include the ER-specific enzyme cholesterol 7α hydroxylase (CYP7A1) for the neutral pathway and the mitochondria-specific sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A) for the acidic pathway [76].

Transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms regulating cholesterol homeostasis are depicted in Table Table22.

Table 2

Regulation of cholesterol homeostasis at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels

RegulatorPathwayTargetFunction of the targetMechanism of regulation
Transcriptional regulation
 SCAPBiosynthesisSREBP2Master transcriptional regulatorSCAP interacts with SREBP2 during sterol depletion for transcriptional activation of target gene [69]
 SREBP2AbsorptionNPC1L1Key mediator of cholesterol absorptionPositive regulation [69]
 LXRsEffluxABCA1, ABCG5, ABCG8Transporters for cholesterol effluxPositive regulation [69]
 IFN-γEsterificationACAT1Esterification enzymeActivation of P1 promoter of ACAT1 [69]
 EstrogenMetabolismLXRα/RXRαNuclear receptorSp1 mediated transcriptional activation [278]
 PPAR-α and PPAR-γEffluxABCA1Transporter for cholesterol effluxTranscriptional activation via LXRα [279]
 FXRHDL metabolismApoA-IMajor apolipoprotein in HDLDownregulation of ApoA-I promoter activity in the presence of bile or bile agonists [280]
 FOXO3Biosynthesis, AbsorptionSREBP2Master transcriptional regulatorDownregulation of Srebp2 and its target genes like PCSK9 [281]
 Nrf1EffluxLXRNuclear receptorDe-repression of LXR pathway in the presence of cholesterol [69]
Post-transcriptional regulation
 INSIGBiosynthesisSREBP2, HMGCRTranscriptional regulator; rate limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesisSCAP recruits INSIG during cholesterol repletion to retain SCAP-SREBP2-INSIG complex within ER; Sterol levels can induce binding of INSI-E3 ligase to HMGCR for its proteasomal degradation [69]
 Hsp90BiosynthesisSREBP2Master transcriptional regulatorProteolytic activation of SREBP2 by stabilizing the SCAP-SREBP2 complex in ER[69]
 AMPKBiosynthesisHMGCRRate limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesisAMPK blocks cholesterol biosynthesis [199]
 PP2ABiosynthesisAMPK, HMGCRKinase; rate limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesisDephosphorylation [282]
 IDOLAbsorptionLDLRReceptor for LDL, VLDLProteasomal degradation [69]
 PCSK9AbsorptionLDLRReceptor for LDL, VLDLLysosomal degradation [69]
 EstrogenDegradationCYP7A1Bile synthesisIncreased enzyme activity of CYP7A1 [278]

Perturbed cholesterol homeostasis: pathophysiological implications

Cardiovascular diseases

Aberrations in the cholesterol pathway trigger several metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurological disorders. The most prominent consequence of dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis is familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), which is characterized by elevations in blood cholesterol levels and increased incidence of myocardial infarctions (MI) [35]. Early studies delineated the predominant causative genetic region to span the LDLR locus, wherein mutations impairing LDLR function, thus impacting LDL uptake and turnover, were observed in FH patients [35, 83]. Subsequent studies documented mutations in the APOB, LDLRAP1, PCSK9, LIPA, ABCG5 and ABCG8 genes in FH patients [83, 84]. FH predisposes the individual to an enhanced risk (~ 3–13 times) of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [84].

Elevated plasma total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels, but also lower HDL cholesterol (HDL-c) levels, are major risk factors for CVDs [85]. Increased number of small LDL particles are associated with a higher risk of ischemic heart disease [86], whereas apo-B/apoA-I levels were observed to be a good predictor of MI risk [87]. Elevated non-HDL cholesterol levels were attributed to ~ 3.9 million global deaths from ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke in 2017 [88]. Moreover, multiple lines of evidence suggest involvement of disrupted cholesterol homeostasis in the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome [89], a key risk factor of CVDs.

Elucidation of the genetic basis of CAD and MI identified loci associated with LDL metabolism and other aspects of cholesterol homeostasis [9095]. Investigation of statins (HMGCR inhibitors), CETP inhibitors and PCSK9 inhibitors showed promising potential to improve cardiovascular outcomes [96].

Other diseases resulting from perturbation of cholesterol homeostasis include: the rare autosomal recessive sitosterolemia (defects in the ABCG5-ABCG8 locus characterized by high levels of plant sterols in the plasma and tissues, due to augmented intestinal absorption and diminished bile secretion, resulting in heightened risk for cardiovascular diseases, xanthomas and hematologic abnormalities [97]); autosomal recessive Tangier’s disease (genetic mutations in the cholesterol transporter ABCA1 resulting in neurological abnormalities, enlarged spleen and tonsils, deposition of cholesterol esters in reticuloendothelial cells and varying degrees of atherosclerosis [98]).

Neurological disorders

SNPs in the cholesterol homeostasis pathway are associated with several neurological/neurodegenerative diseases and inflammatory diseases which are depicted in Fig. 2. The brain accounts for a substantial proportion of the total cholesterol in humans and the salient roles of cholesterol in brain development and neuronal function are well known. The importance of cholesterol in the central nervous system is further underscored by findings of disrupted cholesterol homeostasis in several neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and autism spectrum disorders [99101]. Mutations in the NPC1 and NPC2 genes cause an autosomal recessive condition: Niemann-Pick type C disease, which is characterized by defects in cholesterol transport in the lysosomes and subsequent cell accumulation, resulting in neurodegeneration and hepatosplenomegaly [102]. Intriguingly, dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis is also suggested to play a role in mood disorders like anxiety, depression and suicidal behavior [103].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Pathophysiological implications of perturbed cholesterol homeostasis: Genetic associations of major cholesterol homeostasis genes with major CVDs, risk factors, neurological and inflammatory disorders obtained from the Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Portal (http://broadcvdi-old.org/), GWAS Catalog [320] (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) and GWAS Central [321] (www.gwascentral.org). Created using Phenogram tool [322]

Hepatic diseases

Several studies have demonstrated elevated free cholesterol levels, accumulation of hepatic cholesterol, presumably due to diminished efflux and catabolism, in addition to impaired esterification, in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The escalated cholesterol levels incite a strong inflammatory response in the liver cells, promoting fibrosis and liver damage [104, 105]. LIPA deficiency could result in the infantile-onset Wolman disease (WD) (characterized by build-up of lysosomal cholesteryl esters in several organs) and the adult-onset cholesteryl ester storage disease (CESD), an autosomal recessive condition characterized by accumulation of lysosomal cholesterol and triglycerides, with liver abnormalities, premature atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [106, 107].

COVID-19

Obesity has been documented as the second risk factor after age for severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the importance of lipid metabolism in the disease [108]. An accumulating body of evidence expound the role of cholesterol in the pathophysiology of the recent global pandemic, COVID-19. A reduction in total cholesterol (TC), HDL and LDL cholesterol levels were observed in a Wuhan COVID-19 patient cohort compared to controls with statistically significant decreases in the LDL and TC levels across increasing degrees of disease severity. These observations need however to be considered cautiously as these modifications may result from liver damage especially in severe and elderly patients. Moreover, LDL, HDL and TC levels negatively correlated with CRP, whereas LDL and TC levels exhibited significant negative correlations with IL-6 levels, suggesting an interplay of lipid metabolism and inflammatory cascades in the development of COVID-19 progression [109]. Interestingly, the levels of cholesterol, precursor sterols and the oxysterol 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OHC) are diminished in patients and 27-OHC exhibits antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2 [110]. Another retrospective study reported a lower risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients who were on statin medications, which could be attributed to the immunomodulatory properties of statins [111]. A comprehensive review by Schmidt et al. enumerates the salient features of statins and their enormous potential in devising therapeutic strategies [112]. Intriguingly, SREBP-2 and PCSK9 mRNA levels were enhanced in more severe COVID-19 cases. Moreover, SREBP-2 activity reflected the degree of disease severity and mediated the inflammatory responses in these patients, further corroborated by the suppression of inflammatory cytokines and the NLRP3 inflammasome expression in an infectious disease mouse model [113]. Of note, cholesterol modulated viral fusion by murine coronavirus [114], and a recent study demonstrated that cholesterol binds to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the HDL receptor SR-B1 facilitated viral entry [115]. Put together, these studies and others highlight the relevance of cholesterol homeostasis in COVID-19 and the need for more studies to enable development of appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Chromogranin A and its derived peptides

The tale of the chromaffin cells originated in the mid-nineteenth century with the discovery of catecholamine release from adrenomedullary cells, and subsequent breakthrough studies unearthed evidence of the localization of catecholamines and ATP in chromaffin granules, along with the granins, neuropeptides, biogenic amines, and growth factors [116]. The granins are acidic, heat-stable, soluble, calcium-binding proteins that help stabilize the contents of the granules to an osmotically inert form until discharge. The most prominent member of the granin family is CHGA, whose roles in secretory granule biogenesis and regulated secretory pathway are becoming understood. For instance, CHGA was recently shown to promote granule biogenesis through the interaction with the lipid phosphatidic acid at the Golgi leading to changes in membrane topology [117]. In addition, CHGA is also believed to regulate cytosolic calcium levels through their interactions with IP3R [118]. Chga−/− mice are hypertensive and exhibit a reduction in secretory granule number [119]. The physiological relevance of CHGA can be attributed to the presence of multiple dibasic sites which facilitate proteolytic processing resulting in the generation of several bioactive peptides with diverse autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine effects including VS-I and VS-II (human CHGA1-76, and CHGA1-115, respectively), vasodilators; PST (human CHGA250-301), a dysglycemic peptide; and CST (human CHGA352-372), a master regulator of cardiovascular functions with anti-hypertensive, cardioprotective and pro-insulinic effects [13, 120] (Fig. 3). The roles of these peptides in physiology and metabolism, except GE25, whose physiological significance is poorly understood, are listed in Table Table3.3. The roles of CST, PST and VS-I and VS-II in cholesterol homeostasis are discussed in greater detail in subsequent sections.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig3_HTML.jpg

A schematic representation of the human CHGA gene and derived peptides. This figure depicts the dibasic sites in the CHGA protein which undergo cleavage to give rise to several bioactive peptides, whose physiological significance is described in the text

Table 3

The multiple roles of chromogranin A-derived peptides

CHGA-derived peptideFunction
Pancreastatin (PST)

Inhibits glucose-stimulated insulin release [27]

Inhibits insulin-mediated glucose uptake [161, 283]

Pro-gluconeogenesis and pro-glycogenolysis [30, 284]

Pro-inflammatory [210]

Promotes insulin resistance [30, 210]

Catestatin (CST)

Catecholamine release inhibitory [285]

Anti-hypertensive [119]

Cardioprotective [286, 287]

Anti-adrenergic [234]

Vasodilatory [288]

Promotes insulin sensitivity [267]

Anti-inflammatory [267]

Anti-microbial [289291]

Vasostatins (VS-I and VS-II)

Vasoconstriction-inhibitory [32]

Anti-adrenergic [237]

Anti-inflammatory [141]

Cardioprotective [154, 292]

Anti-microbial [293]

Regulation of cell adhesion [294]

Parastatin (PRST)Inhibits parathyroid hormone secretion [295]
Serpinin

β-adrenergic agonist [239]

Cardioprotective [296]

Chromofungin

Anti-fungal [297]

Cardioprotective [298]

ChromacinAnti-microbial [299]
WE14

Modulates histamine release from mast cells [300]

Autoantigen for diabetogenic CD4+ T cells [301]

Chromogranin A: a potential master player in cholesterol homeostasis?

Microarray analysis of the adrenal glands of blood pressure high (BPH) mice exhibited ~ 1.5-fold and ~ 3.1-fold overexpression of Chga and Hmgcr respectively, suggesting enhanced catecholamine storage and dysregulated cholesterol metabolism in hypertensive mice [121]. Upregulation of both these genes in the hypertensive state suggests an interplay of these two pathways in hypertension: both genes could be under common regulatory mechanisms in the hypertensive state or CHGA and derived peptides could regulate Hmgcr expression or both. This seemingly causal link is reinforced by the observation that ~ 93% of the genes involved in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway are downregulated in the adrenal glands of Chga−/− mice whereas ~ 73% of the cholesterol biosynthesis genes are upregulated in the liver of these mice [122]. Consistently, the expression of Hmgcr is downregulated by ~ 2.6-fold in the adrenal glands while that is upregulated by ~ 1.6-fold in the liver with concomitant reduction of adrenal cholesterol and elevated hepatic cholesterol levels in Chga−/− mice. This finding strongly suggests the impact of CHGA and/or its derived peptides on cholesterol homeostasis in pathological conditions.

Furthermore, a closer look at the primary structure of the CHGA protein reveals the presence of several potential cholesterol-binding motifs which are found to occur in the transmembrane domains of receptors and ion channels [123, 124]. These motifs, which were discovered using the Fuzzpro application in the EMBOSS suite, are outlined in Fig. 4. Putative motifs were identified in the vasostatin/chromofungin region (45–54 aa) and the parastatin (391–401 aa) peptides, implicating potential roles for these peptides in cholesterol homeostasis. Interestingly, the motifs, especially the critical residues, are well-conserved across primates and artiodactylae, and to a lesser extent in the rodents. The presence of multiple cholesterol-binding motifs is a promising premise to propel elaborate investigations on the binding of cholesterol to CHGA and its functional ramifications.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig4_HTML.jpg

Cholesterol-binding motifs in the CHGA protein. Inspection of the CHGA protein sequence revealed the presence of cholesterol-binding motifs, viz., CARC and CRAC motifs, suggesting potential interactions of these regions with the cholesterol molecule, with far-reaching ramifications in their regulation

In this direction, we discuss studies which support the potential impact of CHGA-derived peptides on cholesterol levels in basal and pathological states below.

Correlations between the plasma/serum levels of CHGA-derived peptides and cholesterol in basal and pathophysiological conditions

Plasma CST levels were observed to be higher in untreated hypertensive patients when compared to controls, although the significance was lost upon adjustments for age, gender, height and weight. However, in hypertensive patients, CST levels correlated with age and HDL cholesterol. When the patients were stratified according to their HDL-c levels, plasma CST levels increased gradually with increasing HDL-c levels among groups. Interestingly, the group with the lowest range of HDL-c levels had a higher proportion of males, larger waist circumference and higher metabolic syndrome score, suggesting that CST impacts lipid and metabolic profiles in hypertension [125]. However, in male adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which is a major cause of secondary hypertension [126], serum CST levels were higher when compared to controls, and exhibited significant negative correlation with HDL-c [127]. Interestingly, plasma CST levels were lower in children with moderate-to-severe OSA, when compared to controls and children with mild OSA. No correlations between CST levels and cholesterol levels were observed in this cohort [128]. The difference in the trend observed in the OSA patients could reflect the effect of age and gender-related hormones, which could have an influence on circulating CST levels [127]. These studies also reflect the interplay between CST and cholesterol metabolism, which seems to be altered in different hypertensive contexts, thus implicating a multitude of factors mediating the CST-cholesterol pathway interaction.

Effects of genetic variations in the CHGA locus on cholesterol levels in basal and pathophysiological conditions

Although modest there is some evidence on the link between the variants in the CHGA locus and cholesterol levels. Figure 5 depicts the associations of several SNPs in the CHGA locus with total/HDL/LDL cholesterol levels from different genome-wide association studies. Most of the promoter SNPs seem to be associated with lower total cholesterol except for rs9658629 (A-1018 T) and rs9658638 (C-57 T), which seem to contribute to higher cholesterol levels. Interestingly, the A-1018 T and C-57 T variants exhibited enhanced affinities to the binding of the c-Rel transcription factor at basal and TNF-α induced conditions [129]. The subsequent alteration in the expression of CHGA could play roles in higher cholesterol levels.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig5_HTML.jpg

A synthesis plot depicting the SNPs in the CHGA locus associated with cholesterol levels in multiple populations. SNPs showing significant associations (p < 0.05) with cholesterol levels were mined from several GWAS studies (UK Biobank (http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank/), GLGC Exome Chip [323], GLGC GWAS [324], Biobank Japan GWAS [325]).SNP data from the 13 K Exome Sequence Analysis, EXTEND GWAS, METSIM GWAS, AMP T2D-GENES quantitative trait exome sequence analysis, Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study GWAS, GoDarts Illumina Infinium GWAS, Middle Eastern Qatari population WGS, GoDarts Affymetrix GWAS, Hoorn DCS 2019 and FinnMet Exome Sequence Analysis studies were obtained from the Common Metabolic Disease Knowledge Portal (Accessed on May 30, 2021) (https://hugeamp.org/). Linkage disequilibrium was analyzed in all the populations in the 1000Genomes database using Haploview. The SNPs are colored indicating different genic locations/peptides; green: promoter, red: intron, purple: vasostatin, blue: pancreastatin, yellow: serpinin, pink: 3’-UTR, black: others

SNPs in the vasostatin region exhibit associations with decreased HDL-c levels, while the PST variant rs9658664 (G297S) was associated with elevated HDL-c and ratio of total cholesterol to HDL levels (Fig. 5). Of note, carriers of this variant exhibited higher total cholesterol levels than the wild-type carriers in an Indian population [130]. Interestingly, two synonymous SNPs in the PST region seem to enhance the risk for higher LDL and total cholesterol (Fig. 5). A variant in the serpinin region appears to be associated with higher LDL cholesterol levels (Fig. 5), thus suggesting metabolic roles for this peptide, which are hitherto unknown.

As shown in Fig. 5, a few of the SNPs are in linkage disequilibrium (LD). Globally, the cholesterol-related SNPs in the CHGA region which exhibited strong LD are the promoter variants rs9658629 and rs9658638; the coding variant rs9658655 (E246D in the mature protein) and the intron variant rs9658656; and the intronic variants rs9658656 and rs4900163. Knowledge of SNPs in LD throws more light on the effect of the genetic architecture of the CHGA locus on cholesterol levels and could potentially aid in development of suitable screening strategies.

Roles of CHGA and its derived peptides in dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis conditions

CHGA levels are altered in several cardiovascular diseases and associated risk factors. CHGA levels are elevated in both essential and secondary hypertension [131, 132], while CST levels were diminished in normotensive offspring of hypertensive patients, suggesting that CST could act as an indicator of risk of developing hypertension [133]. The pathophysiological significance of CHGA is further underscored by the observation that Chga−/− mice are hypertensive and the administration of CST diminished blood pressure levels substantially [119]. Although there is a report of an elevation in PST levels after glucose-loading in hypertensive subjects (normoinsulinaemic/hyperinsulinaemic/glucose-intolerant), the role of PST in hypertension has not been explored properly [134]. PST levels are elevated in diabetes [28, 135137] and plasma CHGA levels were also observed to be higher in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients [138]. Moreover, the roles played by CHGA-derived peptides in different aspects of diabetes, such as glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, inflammation, etc., are well known, and discussed in subsequent sections.

Atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease

CHGA is expressed in the medial layer of coronary arteries from CAD and non-CAD subjects. CST is expressed in the endothelium and part of medial layer in non-CAD patients and higher expression was observed in the intima and atheromatous plaques in stenotic arteries from CAD patients. However, plasma CST levels were lower in CAD patients, and decreased with the increase in severity of vessel disease [139, 140]. CST was observed to play a protective role in atherosclerosis. In vitro, CST treatment exerted anti-inflammatory effects and suppressed foam cell formation induced by ox-LDL. Moreover, CST suppressed ACAT-1 expression and promoted ABCA1 expression in cultured macrophages [139], suggesting that CST could modulate cholesterol homeostasis in atherosclerotic conditions by downregulating cholesterol esterification and promoting efflux. Administration of CST in ApoE−/− mice, an animal model of atherosclerosis, diminished plaque size and reduced infiltration by immune cells. However, the mice treated with saline or CST did not exhibit any differences in the total cholesterol levels [139]. CST suppressed endothelial cell dysfunction, a hallmark feature of atherosclerosis, and the anti-inflammatory role of CST seemed to be mediated via ACE2 as evidenced by the mitigation of the anti-inflammatory effects of CST upon inhibition of ACE2. Remarkably, administration of DX600 (an ACE2 inhibitor) partially reversed the anti-atherogenic effects of CST in ApoE−/− mice [140], implying that CST exerts its protective effects via ACE2, and it would be interesting to see if this notion holds true in other pathological conditions involving the RAAS (Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System) pathway.

Like CST, plasma levels of VS-II were lower in CAD patients as compared to controls and diminished in diabetic CAD patients as opposed to non-diabetic CAD patients [141]. However, plasma VS-I and total CHGA levels were higher in diabetic patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis than non-diabetic patients, and they correlated with carotid artery maximum stenosis [142]. The expression of VS-I and VS-II in atherosclerotic arteries were observed to be lesser when compared to controls, while CHGA protein levels were higher in atherosclerotic aorta [141], raising the possibility of reduced processing of CHGA into its anti-inflammatory peptides in diseased conditions. Indeed, lower conversion of CHGA to CST was observed in heart failure [143], suggesting impaired proteolytic processing in pathological states. Both VS-I and VS-II exerted anti-adhesive and anti-inflammatory roles in human arterial endothelial cells [141], while VS-I administration ameliorated vascular inflammation/remodeling, macrophage infiltration and reduced the size of atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE−/− mice, though there were no differences in cholesterol levels. In addition, like CST, VS-I suppressed ox-LDL-induced foam cell formation by modulating the expression of ACAT-1 and ABCA1 in THP-1 monocyte-derived macrophages. Interestingly, VS-II repressed AngII-mediated migration of human aortic smooth muscle cells [144], suggesting that the anti-atherogenic effect of VS-I could involve the RAAS pathway, similar to CST. Future studies in this direction are required to delineate the link between CHGA/derived peptides and the RAAS pathway.

Studies suggest plasma CHGA levels to be a good prognostic marker in patients with MI and CAD, which exhibited association with higher long-term mortality and worse prognosis [145147]. However, the molecular mechanisms are yet to be investigated. There are inconsistent reports on plasma CST levels in CAD [148151], which make it difficult to draw solid conclusions, and these could be attributed to smaller sample size in most of these studies and different time points of plasma collection. However, higher plasma CST levels seem to be coincident with more severe outcomes and elevated LDL-c levels in MI patients [152, 153], suggesting that CST might have roles in regulating LDL-c levels in MI. Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and previous MI had lower levels of VS-II and HDL-cholesterol compared to healthy controls, and VS-II levels correlated positively with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), negatively with stage of HF and inflammatory markers (TNF-α and hsCRP). Moreover, VS-II had a cardio-protective effect and alleviated myocardial remodeling and inflammation in rats with ischemic heart failure. Interestingly, VS-II treatment led to an increase in the protein levels of ACE2 and decrease in the protein levels of ACE [154], further implicating the role of CHGA-derived peptides in modulation of the RAAS system in pathophysiological conditions.

Diabetes and insulin resistance

The association of diabetes with cardiovascular diseases is well established, with two- to three-fold higher incidence of cardiovascular complications in diabetics than the non-diabetic group [155]. As mentioned previously, dysregulated cholesterol homeostasis in metabolic diseases is a key risk factor in CVDs. In an interesting study, insulin stimulated the expression of Liver-X Receptor-α (LXRα), an important regulator of cholesterol metabolism in a time-dependent manner. Gene targeting studies using the LXRα/β−/−mice revealed downregulation in insulin-mediated induction of SREBP-1c, a key transcriptional regulator of cholesterol metabolism and many other lipogenic genes, thereby implying insulin’s effect on LXR-induced genes [156]. Insulin’s stimulatory role on SREBP-1c [157] expression could be annulled by PST, which downregulated SREBP-1c expression in Chga knockout mice [30].

The hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) has an important significance in diabetic cardiomyopathy, insulin resistance and β-cell failure [158, 159]. Interestingly, through HBP, hyperinsulinemia increased glucose flux and O-linked glycosylation of Sp1, which activated HMGCR and SREBP1 in mouse adipocytes [158]. Further, hyperinsulinemia due to increased HBP-mediated glycation resulted in dysregulation of F-actin which is essential for GLUT4 translocation [158, 160]. Of note, PST inhibited insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation in rat adipocytes [161] while CST treatment enabled GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane in rat cardiomyocytes by inducing Akt phosphorylation [162].

Common regulatory factors governing the expression of CHGA and genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis

This section focuses on common regulatory factors, viz. transcription factors (TF) and miRNAs, which govern the expression of both CHGA and genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis, in order to gain insights on the similar regulatory cues which could mediate their expression in different pathophysiological states.

Transcription factors

Many transcription factors that regulate CHGA expression under basal and pathophysiological conditions, viz., CREB, Sp1, Egr1, Olf/EBF, LEF1, COUP-II-TF, c-Rel [163175]; are observed to modulate the expression of several cholesterol homeostatic genes, and the major transcriptional regulators of cholesterol homeostasis, viz., SREBPs, LXRs and PPARs, as outlined in Table Table44.

Table 4

Role of transcription factors (TFs) that mediate CHGA expression and cholesterol homeostasis

CHGA-regulatory TFRole in cholesterol homoeostasis
CREB

Co-activator to regulate the transcription of HMGCR [302]

Perturbation of cholesterol homeostatic genes were observed in the brain of CREB/CREM mutant mice [303]

Sterol-independent regulatory element (SIRE) in LDLR promoter which exhibited interactions with CREB [304]

Co-regulates SREBP expression in transcriptional activation of major cholesterol homeostatic genes along with Sp1 [302, 305, 306]

Modulates hepatic lipid homeostasis by repressing PPARγ [307]

Egr1

Mediates transcriptional activation of LDLR promoter [308]

Egr1−/− mice exhibit diminished serum cholesterol levels and was observed to regulate several cholesterol biosynthetic genes in the liver [309]

Negative regulation of SREBP-1a transcriptional activation [310]

Sp1

Upregulates human LCAT promoter activity [311]

Modulates HMGCR, SQLE and sterol-mediated activation of Dhcr7 [312314]

Interplay among Sp1, SREBP, LXRα, NF-Y governs insulin-mediated hepatic activation of SREBP-1C [315]

COUP-TFII

Important for activation of CYP7A1 [316, 317]

Regulates LXR-mediated activation of genes involved in RCT in skeletal muscle cells [318]

Synergistically activates murine lipoprotein lipase promoter with PPAR[Latin small letter gamma]2/RXRα [319]

In order to understand the intersecting transcriptional regulatory factors in CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis, common motifs in the promoter regions of CHGA and the genes involved in various aspects of cholesterol homeostasis, such as biosynthesis, trafficking, storage and metabolism, were identified using the MEME Suite [176]. The putative transcription factors binding to these motifs were identified using in silico tools such as JASPAR [177], LASAGNA [178], PROMO [179] and P-Match [180]. Table Table55 lists the common motifs, their consensus sequences and the putative TFs that bind to them. In addition, Pscan [181] was used to identify the over-represented TF binding motifs in the promoters of CHGA and cholesterol homeostatic genes from the JASPAR and Transfac databases. A few of these TFs were also found to be harbored in cholesterol quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in the rat genome (Fig. 6), indicative of their roles in the maintenance of cholesterol levels. The interplay of these transcription factors indicates that similar interactions could also play significant roles in mediating the expression of CHGA and cholesterol homeostatic genes.

Table 5

List of common promoter motifs in the promoter region of CHGA and genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis*

Motif (MEME)Consensus sequencePutative TFs
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Figa_HTML.gifAATCCCAGCACTTTGElk-1, Evi-1, STATx, STAT3, Nkx3-1, Nkx3-2, MZF1, ZEB1, c-Ets, GATA2
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Figb_HTML.gifAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTZID, NFIC, ZNF354C, TEAD1
Enriched TF-binding sites (Pscan)
 TFZ-scoreP-valueBonferroni adjusted P- value
 COUP-TF4.38935.45E-060.0015
 HNF-44.207391.24E-050.0034
 HNF-4alpha13.935194.02E-050.0113
 Nr2f64.507113.16E-060.0018
 NFYA4.427124.64E-060.0026
 NFYB3.991623.20E-050.0185
 Rxra3.972773.43E-050.0198
 RXRB3.802496.94E-050.0401

*Motifs were identified in the promoters of CHGA and the genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis using the MEME program [176] and the putative transcription factors (TFs) binding to these motifs were predicted by four in silico tools (JASPAR [177], LASAGNA [178], PROMO [179] and P-Match [180]. TFs predicted by at least two tools are listed. In addition, enriched TF-binding sites in the promoters of CHGA and cholesterol homeostatic genes were analyzed using Pscan [181]. The Z-score, unadjusted P-values and Bonferroni adjusted P-values are shown. The genes involved in different aspects of cholesterol homeostasis in the KEGG and Reactome databases were considered

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig6_HTML.jpg

Schematic representation of cholesterol QTLs which harbor the predicted / experimentally validated TFs regulating CHGA and cholesterol homeostatic genes. The orange lines represent the TFs known to regulate CHGA expression or were predicted to bind to the motifs (Table (Table3)3) or by the Pscan tool. The boxes represent the serum/hepatic cholesterol QTLs in rats.

Source: Rat genome database (RGD)

miRNAs

Very little is known about the post-transcriptional regulation of CHGA. A polymorphism in the 3’-UTR of rat Chga (G + 174 T; G in normotensive WKY and T in the hypertensive SHR) altered the free energy for the binding of miR-22 to the Chga 3’-UTR, that is, miR-22 reduced the luciferase signal of the SHR 3’-UTR construct more than WKY. Administration of miR-22 antagomir in the SHR resulted in a decline in the blood pressure [182]. Similarly, the C + 87 T in the human CHGA 3’-UTR altered the affinity for miR-107, which was evident by greater inhibition of CHGA expression in constructs harboring the T allele as compared to the C allele. Moreover, miR-107 antagomir diminished blood pressure in mice [183].

Do these miRNAs have any role in cholesterol homeostasis? It was observed that cholesterol levels were higher in wild-type mice fed with high-fat (HF) diet than in miR-22 KO mice following the same diet, suggesting that miR-22 is linked to dyslipidemia [184]. QTL data from the Rat Genome Database showed that the Mir22 gene is localized in the rat serum cholesterol QTL Scl47 (LOD score: 3.6) in chromosome 10, suggesting key roles for miR-22 in cholesterol homeostasis.

In order to identify the targets of miR-22 and miR-107 in cholesterol homeostasis, validated interactions of these two miRNAs with the genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis were mined from Mirpath [185] and miRWalk 2.0 [186], and indeed, several genes involved in the various aspects of cholesterol homeostasis appear to be under the regulation of miR-22 and miR-107 (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, in addition to these genes, the major regulators of cholesterol homeostasis, INSIG1, SCAP and PPARA seem to be modulated by these two miRNAs. Moreover, in silico prediction analysis of the miR-22 and miR-107 targets using the miRWalk 2.0 and RNAhybrid [187] tools reveal that LRP2, MVD and NSDHL are putative targets of these miRNAs, further underscoring the role of these miRNAs in cholesterol homeostasis.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig7_HTML.jpg

Common miRNAs regulating CHGA and cholesterol homeostatic genes. A Predicted and experimentally validated targets of miR-22 and miR-107 which are involved in cholesterol homeostasis. The genes enclosed in dotted-lined boxes indicate that they are predicted targets of the miRNA(s). B Potential regulation of CHGA by miRNAs which govern cholesterol homeostasis and their regulators. Red lines indicate repression, blue lines indicate activation and dotted lines indicate putative interactions obtained from in silico predictions

There is a vast body of literature which catalogue the involvement of miRNAs in cholesterol homeostasis. Figure 7B depicts the putative miRNAs involved in the maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis which could regulate CHGA expression at the post-transcriptional level. miR-148a modulated LDLR expression and cholesterol uptake in the liver. Moreover, elevated HDL-c levels were observed in mice treated with LNA (Locked Nucleic Acid) miR-148a, and a concomitant decrease in ABCA1 hepatic protein levels, implicating the role of miR-148a in mediating hepatic LDL-c clearance [188]. miR-10b expression was upregulated in the arterial walls with advanced atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE−/−mice, and downregulated macrophage ABCA1 expression in these mice. Moreover, free-cholesterol induced apoptotic macrophages (FC-AM) induced miR-10b expression [189]. A major player in the maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis, miR-33a, is encoded within the SREBF2 gene, and its expression is modulated by dietary cholesterol. The pathophysiological significance of miR-33a is further substantiated by its dysregulation in rodent models of hypercholesterolemia / atherosclerosis. Moreover, its role in regulating key genes involved in cholesterol transport and HDL metabolism is well-characterized [190193]. Notably, there is evidence of miR-33a targeting bile acid metabolism and secretion [194, 195] in addition to key metabolic players like AMPK [196], a significant modulator of cholesterol metabolism. An investigation of the aforementioned miRNAs in the concerted regulation of CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis would broaden our understanding of the post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of these genes for instance in conditions of perturbed cholesterol homeostasis.

Post-translational modifications

It has been well-established that post-translational modifications including O-glycosylation and phosphorylation play an important regulatory function in CHGA processing and in the potential interactions of the cleaved peptides [197]. For instance, glycans made of N-acetyl-galactosamine, galactose and sialic acid have been found on residues Thr163, Thr165, and Thr233 in the core domain of hCHGA present in urine samples [198]. On the same line, hCHGA phosphorylation in the middle and C-terminal part occur on residues Ser200, Ser253, and Ser315 [198]. It is thus likely that the O-glycosylation and phosphorylation of CHGA may affect the interaction of CHGA and fragments with cholesterol, but this obviously remains to be established experimentally.

Regulatory mechanisms of CST/PST/VS on cholesterol homeostasis: intersecting signaling cascades

Although several lines of evidence suggest that CHGA and its derived peptides exert their influence on cholesterol levels, the signaling pathway(s) through which this regulation is accomplished remains obscure. In this section, we discuss a few signaling cascades common to CHGA action and cholesterol homeostasis regulation which merit consideration for further studies (Fig. 8).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 18_2023_4908_Fig8_HTML.jpg

A plausible signaling network depicting regulation of cholesterol homeostasis by chromogranin-A-derived peptides (catestatin, pancreastatin and vasostatin) via different metabolic pathways. Abbreviations: AngII angiotensin II; RAAS renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system; iNOS inducible nitric oxide synthase; LXR liver-X-receptor; PPAR peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; GRP78 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein; AMPK, AMP activated protein kinase; mTORC1 mammalian target of rapamycin target 1; RXR retinoid-X-receptor; SREBP sterol-regulatory element-binding protein; SCAP, SREBP cleavage activating-protein; TLR4 Toll-like receptor 4; ACE2 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; cAMP cyclic adenosine mono phosphate; VCAM vascular cell adhesion molecule; ICAM intercellular cell adhesion molecule; AT1R angiotensin receptor, type 1; I/R ischemia/reperfusion

AMPK pathway

Adenosine monophosphate kinase (AMPK) is a cellular energy sensor which is activated by phosphorylation in response to altered AMP: ATP ratio, i.e., where ATP consumption exceeds ATP production, in conditions such as hypoxia, ischemia, heat shock, nutritional stress, etc. AMPK plays crucial roles in regulating glucose and lipid metabolism by direct action on metabolic enzymes or indirect transcriptional control of key regulators of these pathways. AMPK inactivates anabolic pathways like cholesterol, fatty acid, triglyceride, and protein synthesis; whereas it upregulates ATP-generating catabolic pathways like glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation [199202]. Phosphorylation of HMGCR by AMPK (at Ser 871 in rodents and Ser 872 in humans) inhibits its activity with a concomitant inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis [203205].

Leptin signaling

Interestingly, both CST and PST are known to modulate AMPK signaling. CST treatment of adipose tissue explants from Chga knockout (KO) mice stimulated phosphorylation of AMPK [206]. Moreover, leptin levels were higher and leptin signaling was depressed in Chga KO mice. CST treatment lowered plasma leptin levels and resensitized the leptin receptor [206]. However, CST enhanced AMPK signaling in concert with leptin in DIO mice and enhanced leptin-mediated AMPK phosphorylation in ob/ob mice, suggesting that other CHGA-derived peptides may downregulate CST-mediated AMPK signaling [206]. Leptin treatment lowered the LDL/HDL1 fraction in ob/ob mice and altered hepatic expression of a few genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis: downregulation of ACAT1 and HMGCR; upregulation of APOA1 [207]. SCAP, HMGCR, PLC, MAPK and PI3K were involved in the leptin-induced increase in cholesterol synthesis in control and hypercholesterolemic monocytes [208]. Injection of leptin into intestinal loops increased intestinal cholesterol levels and decreased plasma HDL cholesterol levels. Acute leptin treatment lowered plasma cholesterol levels in chow-fed mice while chronic leptin treatment diminished plasma cholesterol and elevated intestinal and hepatic cholesterol levels [209].

GRP78

Muscle and white adipose tissues of Chga KO-DIO mice exhibited reduced AMPK phosphorylation, but not the liver [210]. PST supplementation did not alter the pattern of AMPK phosphorylation in any of these tissues, suggesting that PST does not influence AMPK signaling. However, PSTi8 stimulated AMPK phosphorylation and augmented the ATP/AMP ratio in dexamethasone-treated hepatic cells and liver tissues of mice treated with dexamethasone (DEX). This stimulatory effect was observed to be mediated by enhancing the ATPase activity of GRP78, another known stimulator of AMPK signaling [211, 212]. Hepatic GRP78 expression was higher in Chga-KO mice as compared to the wild-type. Moreover, PST was observed to interact with GRP78 and inhibit its ATPase activity [213]; whereas the PST inhibitor, PSTi8 competed with PST to bind to GRP78 and enhanced its ATPase activity [214]. Glucose-related protein 78 (GRP78), also known as BiP/HSP5a, is a major player in the unfolded protein response (UPR) in response to ER stress [215]. ER stress enhanced SREBP-2 cleavage and expression of cholesterol biosynthetic genes [216, 217]. Of note, GRP78 ameliorates hepatic expression of ABCA1, ABCG5, ABCG8 and SR-BI and biliary cholesterol levels in db/db mice [218]. Of note, knocking down the CST precursor (CHGA) elevated GRP78 levels while CST treatment reduced GRP78 protein levels in cardiomyocytes during ER stress in ischemia/reperfusion injury [219].

These studies demonstrate the crosstalk among AMPK, GRP78 and leptin signaling in cholesterol homeostasis, and the impact of CST and PST on AMPK signaling via different pathways. An interesting line of study in this direction would be to validate the modulation of HMGCR expression/cholesterol homeostasis by CST/PST via AMPK in a leptin/GRP78 dependent/independent manner.

PPARα and PPAR[Latin small letter gamma] pathway

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily and plays salient roles in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis. These transcription factors heterodimerize with the retinoic acid receptor and regulate expression of several target genes. There are three forms of PPAR: PPARα, PPARδ and PPAR[Latin small letter gamma] [220, 221].

CST treatment elevated Pparα expression in the liver of Chga-KO mice while Ppar[Latin small letter gamma] levels were unaltered [206]. Although PST supplementation did not alter the expression levels of Pparα in Chga KO-DIO mice, PST treatment depressed insulin-mediated elevations in Ppar[Latin small letter gamma] and Pparα expression in cultured adipocytes, which was reversed by PSTi8 treatment [214]. Moreover, administration of PSTi8 reduced Ppar[Latin small letter gamma] and Pparα expression in DEX-treated mice [210, 211], thus modulating lipid and glucose homeostasis. It is evident from these reports that knowledge on the impact of CST/PST on PPAR[Latin small letter gamma] and PPARα remains incomplete and given the involvement of these factors in the maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis, more studies are required to delineate the mechanisms of CST/PST regulation of cholesterol metabolism via these transcription factors.

β-adrenergic signaling

The effects of catecholamines on fat and lipid metabolism are well known [222]. Although the exact molecular mechanisms of adrenergic signaling in cholesterol homeostasis are poorly understood, speculations are rife in literature. The β-adrenergic receptor agonist isoproterenol inhibited sterol synthesis while the β-adrenergic antagonist propranolol abolished the epinephrine-induced suppression of sterol synthesis in human mononuclear leukocytes [223, 224]. This effect seemed to be mediated by the β2 isoform. In addition, β2-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms exhibited associations with LDL cholesterol levels [225]. Several other studies have shown the beneficial action of β2 agonism by lowering LDL-c levels. These effects could be explained by the enhancing action of β2 receptors on intracellular cAMP levels [226]. Of note, cAMP is a regulator of LDLR and SR-BI expression [227, 228], promoted cholesterol efflux in macrophages [229], by modulating ABCA1 expression [230], stimulated cholesteryl ester hydrolysis and clearance [231]. Another speculation is the decline of LCAT activity by β-adrenergic receptor agonists, which could account for the increase in HDL content upon these treatments [232].

The role of CHGA-derived peptides in the modulation of β-adrenergic signaling is well-documented. CST abrogated the response to adrenergic stimulation in the frog heart [233] and rodent papillary muscles [234]. Notably, the G364S variant peptide exhibited diminished potency to generate NO levels and inhibit isoproterenol-stimulated activation of ERK due to altered interactions with the ADRB2 when compared with the wild-type [235]. The treatment of primary neonatal cardiomyocytes with β2 antagonist abolished the CST-induced cardioprotective effects [236]. Vasostatin was also observed to block isoproterenol-stimulated positive inotropy in the rodent heart [237, 238]. Recently, our group reported differential catecholamine secretion from neuronal cell lines expressing either PST or its naturally occurring variant PST-Ser [137]. Serpinin and pGlu-serpinin act as myocardial β1-adrenergic like agonists, and interestingly also upregulate cAMP levels in cardiac tissue extracts [239]. As the metabolic roles of serpinin are poorly understood, its putative action on cholesterol homeostasis via the adrenergic pathway would make a novel line of study.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor pathway

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) harbors a high affinity cholesterol-binding CARC motif, a well-established domain for several membrane receptors [240]. Cholesterol plays an important role in the homeostasis of nAChR levels, which not just affects its structure and dynamics, but also dictates its endocytic pathway upon internalization [241]. With cholesterol being a chief regulator of nAChR, the receptor itself regulates cholesterol homeostasis and several metabolic pathways.

Treatment of human placental villus trophoblastic cells with nicotine reduced the expression of cholesterol regulatory genes ABCA1, ABCG1, SR-B1, LXRα, LXRβ by stimulating nAChR [242]. Conversely, in another study, nicotine stimulated the expression of ABCA1 in THP-1 cells via nAChR [243]. As CST is a potent endogenous inhibitor of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor [244], it may be possible that it relays its effects on cholesterol homeostasis via nAChR pathway. However, it is essential to delineate the molecular mechanisms to depict a conclusion, considering the tissue-specific effects of nAChR. In ApoE−/− mice, nicotine treatment activated α7nAChR by exerting its effects via JAK2/STAT3 and Akt signaling pathways. This resulted in mast cell activation and release of proinflammatory cytokines, thereby leading to atherogenesis in ApoE−/− mice [245]. As previously mentioned, PST downregulates AKT phosphorylation, while CST upregulates Stat3 and AKT phosphorylation which converges these peptides to an interesting mechanism in atherogenesis via nAChR. In adipocytes, nicotine activated AMPK via nACHR7α by mediating ROS levels [246].

Akt signaling

An important signaling cascade involved in cell growth, survival and metabolism is the PI3K-Akt pathway, which has implications in glucose homeostasis, insulin signaling, lipid metabolism, etc. With respect to cholesterol homeostasis, Akt was found to negatively influence ABCA1 function by suppressing cholesterol efflux to ApoA-I via mTORC1 [247]. Akt was also observed to be involved in the ER-Golgi transport of the SREBP/SCAP, an important cholesterol regulator [248]. The association of Akt phosphorylation with ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury was observed to be cardioprotective [249]. Another line of evidence emerges from the unfolded protein response (UPR) which gets activated during I/R injury. UPR elevates the expression of ER chaperone Grp78 which protects cardiomyocytes from ROS accumulation by Akt activation [250].

The association of CHGA-derived peptides with Akt pathway is well established. CST stimulates Akt phosphorylation in rat cardiomyocytes against I/R injury [251]. It also reduces apoptosis of cardiomyocytes induced by oxidative stress during I/R injury by activating β-adrenergic receptor and increasing Akt phosphorylation along the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) pathway [236]. Pre-treatment of rat cardiomyocytes with CST was found to stimulate muscarinic acetylcholine M2 receptor and thus activate PI3K/Akt pathway. This resulted in reducing ER-stress-induced cell apoptosis under I/R conditions [219].

mTORC1 pathway

The mammalian target receptor complex 1 (mTORC1) can activate SREBPs at several steps like processing, trafficking, and transcription [252]. Insulin signaling activates mTOR (mTORC1) via Akt phosphorylation. The activated mTOR phosphorylates USP20, a deubiquitilase, which facilitates its interaction with the E3 ligase gp78, in order to stabilize HMGCR for cholesterol biosynthesis [253]. Thus, Akt phosphorylation becomes necessary for the mTOR pathway to stimulate HMGCR. Interestingly, PST treatment in Chga KO mice reduced Akt phosphorylation in hepatic tissues in the presence of insulin. Hence, PST might deregulate this mTOR pathway with its anti-insulin-like effects [30]. Opposing to this, CST’s activity on enhanced Akt phosphorylation, as cited in the previous section might probably restore and enhance HMGCR activity.

Inflammation

Inflammation is the protective response of our immune system against alarming stimuli like pathogens, oxidative stress, injury, toxins, etc. If this process gets dysregulated, it leads to a sustained hyperactive state of immune cells resulting in chronic inflammation, a common factor in several metabolic syndromes. The link between inflammation with cholesterol metabolism and homeostasis can be studied in metabolic disorders like dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, etc.

Acute phase responses

Inflammation triggers a series of local and distant systemic changes to maintain homeostasis, which comprise acute phase responses (APR). During this, the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, etc.) increase and changes in lipid metabolism are observed. These include increased serum triglyceride (TG) levels, decreased HDL cholesterol levels, changes in LDL oxidation, etc. [254]. In Hep 3B cells, TNF-α and IL-1 were found to decrease the levels of LXRα, RXRα, PPARα and PPARγ, including its target SREBP1c and CPT1α [255]. These genes are important regulators of several cholesterol homeostasis genes like HMGCR, ABCG5, ABCG8, ABCA1, CETP, cholesterol 7α hydroxylase, SR-BI, etc. [254, 256]. The downregulation of cholesterol transporters under inflammation could possibly explain the higher levels of intracellular cholesterol and lower serum ApoA-I and HDL. The role of CHGA and its peptides in lipid metabolism could be interpreted from the fact that the Chga KO mice showed augmented levels of both PPARγ and SREBP1c, whereas these levels were conversely reduced upon PST treatment. The same trend was observed with SREBP1c protein levels which were elevated in Chga KO mice but significantly reduced in the presence of PST [30].

Atherosclerosis

Atherosclerosis is associated with upregulation of adhesion molecules and recruitment of immune cells which takes up oxidized and modified lipids to form foam cells resulting in plaque formation. In a recent study, the vasoprotective roles of CST in atherosclerosis were studied. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), CST attenuated vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) and TNFα, which were upregulated by LPS. There was a significant reduction in oxidized LDL-induced foam cell formation associated with ABCA1 upregulation in macrophages and ACAT1 downregulation in human macrophages. CST administration in ApoE−/− mice retarded the atherosclerotic lesions by 40% in the entire surface area of aorta with reduced macrophage/monocyte infiltration [139]. PCSK9 inhibition was found to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism. It was also found that PCSK9 gene silencing suppressed atherosclerosis by decreasing vascular inflammation via TLR4/NFKB pathway in hyperlipidemia-induced ApoE−/− mice [257].

Toll-like receptor-mediated signaling

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are an important class of pattern recognition receptors that are highly expressed in monocytes. Both TLR2 and TLR4 were found to be elevated in the endothelium of atherosclerotic lesions [258] and are also implicated as potent inflammatory inducers in atherothrombotic diseases [259]. The potential role of CST as an anti-inflammatory molecule in atherothrombotic conditions could be deduced from a study in which CST treatment of human pulmonary artery endothelial cells (HPAECs) showed attenuated thrombin-induced endothelial inflammation by inhibiting TLR4-p38 signaling [260]. Interestingly, there exists a crosstalk between TLRs and LXR. Ligands for TLR3 and TLR4 have been reported to inhibit transcriptional activity of LXR via interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) [261]. Thus, CST could rescue anti-inflammatory role of LXR via ABCA1 [262] by inhibiting TLR4 signaling.

Insulin signaling

Cholesterol homeostasis and cholesterol efflux mediated by both ABCA1 and ABCG1 play critical roles in pancreatic β-cell function. Conditional knockout of both Abca1 and Abcg1 in mice resulted in impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, glucose intolerance, increased adipose tissue and systemic inflammation [263]. One of the consequences of metabolic inflammation is impaired Akt signaling leading to insulin resistance. As a result, downstream targets of Akt, FOXO, SREBP, GLUT4, etc., are also downregulated, which play major roles in glucose and lipid metabolism [264]. Interestingly, PST inhibits insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation in rat adipocytes [161]. This effect of PST is similar to the inflammatory cytokine TNFα which downregulates GLUT4 in mouse adipocytes [265]. In Chga KO mice, PST suppressed insulin signaling by downregulating Akt phosphorylation [266].

Involvement of iNos

The mRNA levels of the pro-inflammatory gene iNos were downregulated in the adipose tissue of Chga KO-DIO mice compared to WT-DIO, and supplementation of PST was observed to upregulate iNos levels [206]. CST downregulated Nos2 levels in monocytes and macrophages which infiltrated the liver in DIO mice [267]. Another study reported elevated levels of total cholesterol in iNOS-KO mice, in addition to increased hepatic cholesterol levels. Moreover, in these mice, genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis (hepatic HMGCR, SREBP-2, PPARα, PPARγ, LDLR, ABCG5, ABCG8) were upregulated compared to the wild-type mice [268]. These reports suggest the involvement of iNOS in the effects of PST/CST on cholesterol metabolism.

The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system

The putative effects of CHGA-derived peptides on RAAS have been discussed above. Remarkably, this pathway could also potentially act as a link between CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis, especially in the context of dysregulated cholesterol states. Impairment of the RAAS pathway has been implicated in atherosclerosis, ischemic disease, and congestive heart failure. It is fascinating to note that hypercholesterolemia regulates several components of the RAAS pathway [269272]. However, the RAAS pathway has also been observed to influence cholesterol homeostasis. AngII injection increased atherosclerotic lesion size in ApoE−/− mice, increased cholesterol biosynthesis in macrophages, which was reduced by treatment with ACE inhibitor or AT1 receptor antagonist or HMGCR inhibitor. AngII also elevated HMGCR expression [273]. AngII enhanced LDL oxidation and lipid peroxidation in macrophages [274]. AngII was found to bind to LDL and modified its oxidative and aggregation properties in addition to exhibiting enhanced uptake by the macrophage scavenger receptor [275]. AngII injection increased ox-LDL uptake by mouse peritoneal macrophages and human coronary artery endothelial cells, which could contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis [276, 277]. It would make an interesting study to see if the anti-atherogenic effects of CST/VS-I/VS-II are mediated by a shift to the protective axis of the RAAS pathway.

Conclusions and future perspectives

The salient roles of cholesterol in diverse aspects of physiology and metabolism makes it an indispensable molecule for normal body function. The wide spectrum of disorders arising as a consequence of perturbed cholesterol homeostasis and their high incidences in the general population calls for identification of novel regulators which can modulate the key aspects of cholesterol homeostasis. The pleiotropic nature of CHGA and its derived peptides makes them attractive candidates to investigate their potential as novel regulators of cholesterol homeostasis. Indeed, multiple studies suggest the involvement of CHGA/CST/PST/VS-I/VS-II in governing cholesterol levels in pathological conditions. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies also suggest the putative roles for the serpinin peptides in this regard, and the identification of putative cholesterol binding motifs in the CHGA protein further strengthens the CHGA-cholesterol link. The observation of common transcription factors and miRNAs suggest similar regulatory mechanisms in play which could dictate their expression in health and disease. The association between CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis is further compounded by several intersecting pathways, through which CHGA-derived peptides could potentially mediate cholesterol levels. Of note, there is substantial evidence supporting the involvement of the AMPK and the RAAS pathways in connecting CHGA and cholesterol homeostasis, which warrants further investigation. Studies focusing on the direct/indirect effects of CHGA and its derived peptides on cholesterol biosynthesis and/or on the expression of associated genes will also provide valuable insights into devising check points of cholesterol levels in pathophysiological conditions. This opens up exciting avenues for future studies, which could bridge the gap in our understanding of the dynamic field of cholesterol research and facilitate development of innovative therapeutic strategies to combat cholesterol deregulated conditions.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all the researchers who contributed to the areas of Chromogranin A and cholesterol research. All studies could not be cited due to space constraints. DRI and JV would like to thank Dr. Abrar Ali Khan (IIT Madras) for his valuable inputs.

Author contributions

DRI and JV performed literature search, data analysis and drafted the manuscript. ET and NV provided critical inputs and edited the manuscript. NRM conceptualized and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

NRM received research grants from the Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR25796/GET/119/98/2017; BT/PR23017/MED/30/1838/2017), Department of Science and Technology (SR/SO/HS-084/2013A) and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (37/1564/12-EMR-II), Government of India. DRI and JV are thankful to Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India for research fellowships. NV acknowledges support from the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR-19-CE44-0019 and ANR-22-CE44-0029).

Availability of data and material

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

The original online version of this article was revised: to update the entries in Table 1, 5th column heading is incorrect as “lipoproteins” and should have been reads as “apolipoproteins”. In entry Chylomicrons under the Pathophysiological implications column the term dietarytriglycerides should read as “dietary triglycerides”. In last entry LPA the value for size was incorrect as 30 and should have been reads as ~30.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dhanya R. Iyer and Janani Venkatraman have contributed equally to this article.

Change history

10/12/2023

Error in the Table 1 has been updated.

Change history

11/6/2023

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s00018-023-04990-7

Contributor Information

Nicolas Vitale, rf.artsinu@nelativ.

Nitish R. Mahapatra, ni.ca.mtii@artapahamn.

References

1. Taupenot L, Harper KL, O'Connor DT. The chromogranin-secretogranin family. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1134–1149. 10.1056/NEJMra021405. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Winkler H, Fischer-Colbrie R. The chromogranins A and B: the first 25 years and future perspectives. Neuroscience. 1992;49(3):497–528. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90222-N. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Bartolomucci A, et al. The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications. Endocr Rev. 2011;32(6):755–797. 10.1210/er.2010-0027. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Wiedenmann B, Huttner WB. Synaptophysin and chromogranins/secretogranins–widespread constituents of distinct types of neuroendocrine vesicles and new tools in tumor diagnosis. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1989;58(2):95–121. 10.1007/BF02890062. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Montero-Hadjadje M, et al. Chromogranins A and B and secretogranin II: evolutionary and functional aspects. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2008;192(2):309–324. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01806.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Kim T, et al. Chromogranin A, an "on/off" switch controlling dense-core secretory granule biogenesis. Cell. 2001;106(4):499–509. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00459-7. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Taupenot L, et al. Identification of a novel sorting determinant for the regulated pathway in the secretory protein chromogranin A. J Cell Sci. 2002;115(Pt 24):4827–4841. 10.1242/jcs.00140. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Tooze SA, Martens GJ, Huttner WB. Secretory granule biogenesis: rafting to the SNARE. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(3):116–122. 10.1016/S0962-8924(00)01907-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Videen JS, et al. Calcium and catecholamine interactions with adrenal chromogranins. comparison of driving forces in binding and aggregation. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(5):3066–3073. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50695-0. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Yoo SH. Identification of the Ca(2+)-dependent calmodulin-binding region of chromogranin A. Biochemistry. 1992;31(26):6134–6140. 10.1021/bi00141a025. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Mahapatra NR, et al. A dynamic pool of calcium in catecholamine storage vesicles. exploration in living cells by a novel vesicle-targeted chromogranin A-aequorin chimeric photoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(49):51107–51121. 10.1074/jbc.M408742200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Borges R, et al. Chromogranins as regulators of exocytosis. J Neurochem. 2010;114(2):335–343. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06786.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Pasqua T, et al. Impact of Chromogranin A deficiency on catecholamine storage, catecholamine granule morphology and chromaffin cell energy metabolism in vivo. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363(3):693–712. 10.1007/s00441-015-2316-3. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Díaz-Vera J, et al. Chromogranins A and B are key proteins in amine accumulation, but the catecholamine secretory pathway is conserved without them. FASEB J. 2012;26(1):430–438. 10.1096/fj.11-181941. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Mahata SK, Corti A. Chromogranin A and its fragments in cardiovascular, immunometabolic, and cancer regulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019;1455(1):34–58. 10.1111/nyas.14249. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Pasqua T, et al. Modulation of the coronary tone in the expanding scenario of Chromogranin-A and its derived peptides. Future Med Chem. 2019;11(12):1501–1511. 10.4155/fmc-2018-0585. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Muntjewerff EM, et al. Catestatin as a target for treatment of inflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2199. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02199. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Garg R, et al. Chromogranin A-derived peptides pancreastatin and catestatin: emerging therapeutic target for diabetes. Amino Acids. 2023;54(5):549. 10.1007/s00726-023-03252-x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Bozic J, et al. Catestatin as a biomarker of cardiovascular diseases: a clinical perspective. Biomedicines. 2021;9(12):1757. 10.3390/biomedicines9121757. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Bourebaba Y, et al. Catestatin peptide of chromogranin A as a potential new target for several risk factors management in the course of metabolic syndrome. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111113. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.111113. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Watanabe T. The emerging roles of chromogranins and derived polypeptides in atherosclerosis, diabetes, and coronary heart disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):6118. 10.3390/ijms22116118. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Jati S, et al. Catestatin: antimicrobial functions and potential therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(5):1550. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051550. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Mahata SK, et al. Novel autocrine feedback control of catecholamine release A discrete chromogranin a fragment is a noncompetitive nicotinic cholinergic antagonist. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(6):1623–1633. 10.1172/JCI119686. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Mahapatra NR. Catestatin is a novel endogenous peptide that regulates cardiac function and blood pressure. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;80(3):330–338. 10.1093/cvr/cvn155. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Mahata SK, et al. Catecholamine secretory vesicle stimulus-transcription coupling in vivo. demonstration by a novel transgenic promoter/photoprotein reporter and inhibition of secretion and transcription by the chromogranin A fragment catestatin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(34):32058–32067. 10.1074/jbc.M305545200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Mahata SK, et al. Catestatin: a multifunctional peptide from chromogranin A. Regul Pept. 2010;162(1–3):33–43. 10.1016/j.regpep.2010.01.006. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Tatemoto K, et al. Pancreastatin, a novel pancreatic peptide that inhibits insulin secretion. Nature. 1986;324(6096):476–478. 10.1038/324476a0. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. O'Connor DT, et al. Pancreastatin: multiple actions on human intermediary metabolism in vivo, variation in disease, and naturally occurring functional genetic polymorphism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(9):5414–5425. 10.1210/jc.2005-0408. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Sánchez-Margalet V, et al. Reprint of: Metabolic effects and mechanism of action of the chromogranin A-derived peptide pancreastatin. Regul Pept. 2010;165(1):71–77. 10.1016/j.regpep.2010.10.004. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Gayen JR, et al. A novel pathway of insulin sensitivity in chromogranin A null mice: a crucial role for pancreastatin in glucose homeostasis. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(42):28498–28509. 10.1074/jbc.M109.020636. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Tota B, et al. The chromogranin A-derived vasostatins: new players in the endocrine heart. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(14):1444–1451. 10.2174/092986708784567662. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Aardal S, Helle KB. The vasoinhibitory activity of bovine chromogranin A fragment (vasostatin) and its independence of extracellular calcium in isolated segments of human blood vessels. Regul Pept. 1992;41(1):9–18. 10.1016/0167-0115(92)90509-S. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Helle KB. The chromogranin A-derived peptides vasostatin-I and catestatin as regulatory peptides for cardiovascular functions. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;85(1):9–16. 10.1093/cvr/cvp266. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Fleming I. Vasostatin-2, angiogenesis and collateral function. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(19):1745. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad052. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 1986;232(4746):34–47. 10.1126/science.3513311. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Rezen T, et al. Interplay between cholesterol and drug metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1814(1):146–160. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.05.014. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Phair RD. Lipids and cholesterol as regulators of traffic in the endomembrane system. Annu Rev Biophys. 2010;39:559–578. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131357. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Bretscher MS, Munro S. Cholesterol and the Golgi apparatus. Science. 1993;261(5126):1280–1281. 10.1126/science.8362242. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Mesmin B, Antonny B. The counterflow transport of sterols and PI4P. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861(8(8 Pt B)):940–951. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.02.024. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Simons K, Ikonen E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature. 1997;387(6633):569–572. 10.1038/42408. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Sezgin E, et al. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(6):361–374. 10.1038/nrm.2017.16. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Byfield FJ, et al. Cholesterol depletion increases membrane stiffness of aortic endothelial cells. Biophys J. 2004;87(5):3336–3343. 10.1529/biophysj.104.040634. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Gondre-Lewis MC, et al. Abnormal sterols in cholesterol-deficiency diseases cause secretory granule malformation and decreased membrane curvature. J Cell Sci. 2006;119(Pt 9):1876–1885. 10.1242/jcs.02906. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Burger K, Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. Regulation of receptor function by cholesterol. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000;57(11):1577–1592. 10.1007/PL00000643. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Pucadyil TJ, Chattopadhyay A. Role of cholesterol in the function and organization of G-protein coupled receptors. Prog Lipid Res. 2006;45(4):295–333. 10.1016/j.plipres.2006.02.002. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Incardona JP, Eaton S. Cholesterol in signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12(2):193–203. 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00076-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Burgess TL, Kelly RB. Constitutive and regulated secretion of proteins. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1987;3:243–293. 10.1146/annurev.cb.03.110187.001331. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Braakman I, Bulleid NJ. Protein folding and modification in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:71–99. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062209-093836. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Halban PA, Irminger JC. Sorting and processing of secretory proteins. Biochem J. 1994;299(Pt 1):1–18. 10.1042/bj2990001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Tooze SA. Biogenesis of secretory granules in the trans-Golgi network of neuroendocrine and endocrine cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1404(1–2):231–244. 10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00059-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Arvan P, Castle D. Sorting and storage during secretory granule biogenesis: looking backward and looking forward. Biochem J. 1998;332(Pt 3):593–610. 10.1042/bj3320593. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Tanguy E, et al. Lipids implicated in the journey of a secretory granule: from biogenesis to fusion. J Neurochem. 2016;137(6):904–912. 10.1111/jnc.13577. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Westhead EW. Lipid composition and orientation in secretory vesicles. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;493:92–100. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb27186.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Dhanvantari S, Loh YP. Lipid raft association of carboxypeptidase E is necessary for its function as a regulated secretory pathway sorting receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(38):29887–29893. 10.1074/jbc.M005364200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Orci L, et al. Topology of morphologically detectable protein and cholesterol in membranes of polypeptide-secreting cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981;296(1080):47–54. 10.1098/rstb.1981.0170. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Wang R, et al. Molecular probes for sensing the cholesterol composition of subcellular organelle membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761(10):1169–1181. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.016. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Wang Y, Thiele C, Huttner WB. Cholesterol is required for the formation of regulated and constitutive secretory vesicles from the trans-Golgi Network. Traffic. 2000;1(12):952–962. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2000.011205.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Lang T, et al. SNAREs are concentrated in cholesterol-dependent clusters that define docking and fusion sites for exocytosis. EMBO J. 2001;20(9):2202–2213. 10.1093/emboj/20.9.2202. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Zhang J, et al. Roles of cholesterol in vesicle fusion and motion. Biophys J. 2009;97(5):1371–1380. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.025. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Ammar MR, et al. Lipids in regulated exocytosis: what are they doing? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2013;4:125. 10.3389/fendo.2013.00125. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Hosaka M, et al. Identification of a chromogranin A domain that mediates binding to secretogranin III and targeting to secretory granules in pituitary cells and pancreatic beta-cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(10):3388–3399. 10.1091/mbc.02-03-0040. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Hosaka M, et al. Secretogranin III binds to cholesterol in the secretory granule membrane as an adapter for chromogranin A. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(5):3627–3634. 10.1074/jbc.M310104200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Hosaka M, Watanabe T. Secretogranin III: a bridge between core hormone aggregates and the secretory granule membrane. Endocr J. 2010;57(4):275–286. 10.1507/endocrj.K10E-038. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Baumstark D, et al. (1)H NMR spectroscopy quantifies visibility of lipoproteins, subclasses, and lipids at varied temperatures and pressures. J Lipid Res. 2019;60(9):1516–1534. 10.1194/jlr.M092643. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Daniels TF, et al. Lipoproteins, cholesterol homeostasis and cardiac health. Int J Biol Sci. 2009;5(5):474–488. 10.7150/ijbs.5.474. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Feingold KR (2021) Introduction to Lipids and Lipoproteins, in Endotext, K.R. Feingold, et al., Editors. MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth, MA
67. Soliman GA. Dietary cholesterol and the lack of evidence in cardiovascular disease. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):780. 10.3390/nu10060780. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Afonso MS, et al. Molecular pathways underlying cholesterol homeostasis. Nutrients. 2018;10(6):760. 10.3390/nu10060760. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Luo J, Yang H, Song BL. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(4):225–245. 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Ge L, et al. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe acts by blocking the sterol-induced internalization of NPC1L1. Cell Metab. 2008;7(6):508–519. 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.04.001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Garcia CK, et al. Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia caused by mutations in a putative LDL receptor adaptor protein. Science. 2001;292(5520):1394–1398. 10.1126/science.1060458. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Morris SM, Cooper JA. Disabled-2 colocalizes with the LDLR in clathrin-coated pits and interacts with AP-2. Traffic. 2001;2(2):111–123. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.020206.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
73. Poirier S, et al. Dissection of the endogenous cellular pathways of PCSK9-induced low density lipoprotein receptor degradation: evidence for an intracellular route. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(42):28856–28864. 10.1074/jbc.M109.037085. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
74. Ahamad S, Bhat SA. Recent update on the development of PCSK9 inhibitors for hypercholesterolemia treatment. J Med Chem. 2022;65(23):15513–15539. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01290. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Tabas I. Consequences of cellular cholesterol accumulation: basic concepts and physiological implications. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(7):905–911. 10.1172/JCI0216452. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Ikonen E. Mechanisms for cellular cholesterol transport: defects and human disease. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(4):1237–1261. 10.1152/physrev.00022.2005. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Chang TY, et al. Roles of acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase-1 and -2. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12(3):289–296. 10.1097/00041433-200106000-00008. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. Arenas F, Garcia-Ruiz C, Fernandez-Checa JC. Intracellular cholesterol trafficking and impact in neurodegeneration. Front Mol Neurosci. 2017;10:382. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00382. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Litvinov DY, Savushkin EV, Dergunov AD. Intracellular and plasma membrane events in cholesterol transport and homeostasis. J Lipids. 2018;2018:3965054. 10.1155/2018/3965054. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
80. Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA. The diverse functions of oxysterol-binding proteins. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2010;26:157–177. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113334. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Ngo M, Ridgway ND. Oxysterol binding protein-related Protein 9 (ORP9) is a cholesterol transfer protein that regulates Golgi structure and function. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(5):1388–1399. 10.1091/mbc.e08-09-0905. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Rader DJ, et al. The role of reverse cholesterol transport in animals and humans and relationship to atherosclerosis. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(Suppl):S189–S194. 10.1194/jlr.R800088-JLR200. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
83. Soutar AK, Naoumova RP. Mechanisms of disease: genetic causes of familial hypercholesterolemia. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4(4):214–225. 10.1038/ncpcardio0836. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
84. Santos RD, et al. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: a consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(10):850–861. 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30041-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
85. Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
86. St-Pierre AC, et al. Comparison of various electrophoretic characteristics of LDL particles and their relationship to the risk of ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2001;104(19):2295–2299. 10.1161/hc4401.098490. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
87. Walldius G, et al. High apolipoprotein B, low apolipoprotein A-I, and improvement in the prediction of fatal myocardial infarction (AMORIS study): a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358(9298):2026–2033. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)07098-2. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Collaboration N.C.D.R.F Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol. Nature. 2020;582(7810):73–77. 10.1038/s41586-020-2338-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Taverne F, et al. Abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and cholesterol homeostasis. PharmaNutrition. 2013;1(4):130–136. 10.1016/j.phanu.2013.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
90. van der Harst P, Verweij N. Identification of 64 novel genetic loci provides an expanded view on the genetic architecture of coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(3):433–443. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312086. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Schunkert H, et al. Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(4):333–338. 10.1038/ng.784. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
92. Khera AV, Kathiresan S. Genetics of coronary artery disease: discovery, biology and clinical translation. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(6):331–344. 10.1038/nrg.2016.160. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
93. Do R, et al. Exome sequencing identifies rare LDLR and APOA5 alleles conferring risk for myocardial infarction. Nature. 2015;518(7537):102–106. 10.1038/nature13917. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
94. Erdmann J, et al. New susceptibility locus for coronary artery disease on chromosome 3q22.3. Nat Genet. 2009;41(3):280–282. 10.1038/ng.307. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
95. Myocardial Infarction Genetics et al. Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat Genet. 2009;41(3):334–341. 10.1038/ng.327. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
96. Bergheanu SC, Bodde MC, Jukema JW. Pathophysiology and treatment of atherosclerosis: current view and future perspective on lipoprotein modification treatment. Neth Heart J. 2017;25(4):231–242. 10.1007/s12471-017-0959-2. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
97. Escola-Gil JC, et al. Sitosterolemia: diagnosis, investigation, and management. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014;16(7):424. 10.1007/s11883-014-0424-2. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
98. Kolovou GD, et al. Tangier disease four decades of research: a reflection of the importance of HDL. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(7):771–782. 10.2174/092986706776055580. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
99. Bjorkhem I, Meaney S. Brain cholesterol: long secret life behind a barrier. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(5):806–815. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000120374.59826.1b. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
100. Anchisi L, et al. Cholesterol homeostasis: a key to prevent or slow down neurodegeneration. Front Physiol. 2012;3:486. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
101. Zhang J, Liu Q. Cholesterol metabolism and homeostasis in the brain. Protein Cell. 2015;6(4):254–264. 10.1007/s13238-014-0131-3. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Vanier MT. Niemann-Pick diseases. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1717–1721. 10.1016/B978-0-444-59565-2.00041-1. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Fiedorowicz JG, Haynes WG. Cholesterol, mood, and vascular health: Untangling the relationship: does low cholesterol predispose to depression and suicide, or vice versa? Curr Psychiatr. 2010;9(7):17-A. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
104. Arguello G, et al. Recent insights on the role of cholesterol in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(9):1765–1778. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.05.015. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Malhotra P, et al. Disturbances in cholesterol homeostasis and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020;7:467. 10.3389/fmed.2020.00467. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Bernstein DL, et al. Cholesteryl ester storage disease: review of the findings in 135 reported patients with an underdiagnosed disease. J Hepatol. 2013;58(6):1230–1243. 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.02.014. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Beaudet AL, et al. Cholesterol ester storage disease: clinical, biochemical, and pathological studies. J Pediatr. 1977;90(6):910–914. 10.1016/S0022-3476(77)80557-X. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. Dugail I, Amri EZ, Vitale N. High prevalence for obesity in severe COVID-19: possible links and perspectives towards patient stratification. Biochimie. 2020;179:257–265. 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.07.001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
109. Wei X, et al. Hypolipidemia is associated with the severity of COVID-19. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(3):297–304. 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.04.008. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
110. Marcello A, et al. The cholesterol metabolite 27-hydroxycholesterol inhibits SARS-CoV-2 and is markedly decreased in COVID-19 patients. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101682. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101682. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
111. Zhang XJ, et al. In-hospital use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of mortality among individuals with COVID-19. Cell Metab. 2020;32(2):176–187 e4. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.015. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
112. Schmidt NM, et al. Cholesterol-modifying drugs in COVID-19. Oxf Open Immunol. 2020;1(1):iqaa001. 10.1093/oxfimm/iqaa001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
113. Lee W, et al. COVID-19-activated SREBP2 disturbs cholesterol biosynthesis and leads to cytokine storm. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):186. 10.1038/s41392-020-00292-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
114. Cervin M, Anderson R. Modulation of coronavirus-mediated cell fusion by homeostatic control of cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. J Med Virol. 1991;35(2):142–149. 10.1002/jmv.1890350213. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
115. Wei C, et al. HDL-scavenger receptor B type 1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 entry. Nat Metab. 2020;2(12):1391–1400. 10.1038/s42255-020-00324-0. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
116. Alfred K., Das chromaffine Gewebe. 1902: Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch. p. 253–348.
117. Carmon O, et al. Chromogranin A preferential interaction with Golgi phosphatidic acid induces membrane deformation and contributes to secretory granule biogenesis. FASEB J. 2020;34(5):6769–6790. 10.1096/fj.202000074R. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
118. Yoo SH, Huh YH, Hur YS. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in chromaffin secretory granules and its relation to chromogranins. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;30(8):1155–1161. 10.1007/s10571-010-9564-2. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
119. Mahapatra NR, et al. Hypertension from targeted ablation of chromogranin A can be rescued by the human ortholog. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1942–1952. 10.1172/JCI24354. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
120. Simon JP, Aunis D. Biochemistry of the chromogranin A protein family. Biochem J. 1989;262(1):1–13. 10.1042/bj2620001. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
121. Friese RS, et al. Common genetic mechanisms of blood pressure elevation in two independent rodent models of human essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(5 Pt 1):633–652. 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.11.037. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
122. Friese RS, et al. Global metabolic consequences of the chromogranin A-null model of hypertension: transcriptomic detection, pathway identification, and experimental verification. Physiol Genomics. 2010;40(3):195–207. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00164.2009. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
123. Fantini J, Barrantes FJ. How cholesterol interacts with membrane proteins: an exploration of cholesterol-binding sites including CRAC, CARC, and tilted domains. Front Physiol. 2013;4:31. 10.3389/fphys.2013.00031. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
124. Fantini J, et al. Molecular mechanisms of protein-cholesterol interactions in plasma membranes: functional distinction between topological (tilted) and consensus (CARC/CRAC) domains. Chem Phys Lipids. 2016;199:52–60. 10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2016.02.009. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
125. Durakoglugil ME, et al. The relationship of plasma catestatin concentrations with metabolic and vascular parameters in untreated hypertensive patients: influence on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15(7):577–585. 10.5152/akd.2014.5536. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
126. Dopp JM, Reichmuth KJ, Morgan BJ. Obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension: mechanisms, evaluation, and management. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2007;9(6):529–534. 10.1007/s11906-007-0095-2. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
127. Borovac JA, et al. Catestatin serum levels are increased in male patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2019;23(2):473–481. 10.1007/s11325-018-1703-x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
128. Kim J, et al. Leukocyte telomere length and plasma catestatin and myeloid-related protein 8/14 concentrations in children with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 2010;138(1):91–99. 10.1378/chest.09-2832. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
129. Subramanian L, et al. A haplotype variant of the human chromogranin A gene (CHGA) promoter increases CHGA expression and the risk for cardiometabolic disorders. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(34):13970–13985. 10.1074/jbc.M117.778134. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
130. Allu PK, et al. Naturally occurring variants of the dysglycemic peptide pancreastatin: differential potencies for multiple cellular functions and structure-function correlation. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(7):4455–4469. 10.1074/jbc.M113.520916. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
131. O'Connor DT. Plasma chromogranin A initial studies in human hypertension. Hypertension. 1985;7(3 Pt 2):I76–I79. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
132. Takiyyuddin MA, et al. Chromogranin A in human hypertension influence of heredity. Hypertension. 1995;26(1):213–220. 10.1161/01.HYP.26.1.213. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
133. O'Connor DT, et al. Early decline in the catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide catestatin in humans at genetic risk of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2002;20(7):1335–1345. 10.1097/00004872-200207000-00020. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
134. Sanchez-Margalet V, et al. Increased plasma pancreastatin-like immunoreactivity levels in non-obese patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13(2):251–258. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
135. Funakoshi A, et al. Elevated plasma levels of pancreastatin (PST) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) Regul Pept. 1990;30(2):159–164. 10.1016/0167-0115(90)90056-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
136. Sanchez-Margalet V, et al. Increased plasma pancreastatin-like levels in gestational diabetes: correlation with catecholamine levels. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(11):1951–1954. 10.2337/diacare.21.11.1951. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
137. Allu PKR, et al. Functional Gly297Ser variant of the physiological dysglycemic peptide pancreastatin is a novel risk factor for cardiometabolic disorders. Diabetes. 2022;71(3):538–553. 10.2337/db21-0289. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
138. Kogawa EM, et al. Salivary function impairment in type 2 Diabetes patients associated with concentration and genetic polymorphisms of chromogranin A. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(8):2083–2095. 10.1007/s00784-015-1705-z. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
139. Kojima M, et al. Catestatin prevents macrophage-driven atherosclerosis but not arterial injury-induced neointimal hyperplasia. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(1):182–194. 10.1160/TH17-05-0349. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
140. Chen Y, et al. Decreased circulating catestatin levels are associated with coronary artery disease: The emerging anti-inflammatory role. Atherosclerosis. 2019;281:78–88. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.12.025. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
141. Lu L, et al. Reduced serum levels of vasostatin-2, an anti-inflammatory peptide derived from chromogranin A, are associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(18):2297–2306. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs122. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
142. Bachetti T, et al. Plasma levels of vasostatin-1, a chromogranin A fragment, are associated with carotid artery maximum stenosis: a pilot study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:438–443. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.019. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
143. Ottesen AH, et al. Glycosylated chromogranin A in heart failure: implications for processing and cardiomyocyte calcium homeostasis. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(2):e003675. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003675. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
144. Sato Y, et al. Inhibitory effects of vasostatin-1 against atherogenesis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2018;132(23):2493–2507. 10.1042/CS20180451. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
145. Jansson AM, et al. Prognostic value of circulating chromogranin A levels in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(1):25–32. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn513. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
146. Estensen ME, et al. Prognostic value of plasma chromogranin A levels in patients with complicated myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2006;152(5):927 e1-6. 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.008. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
147. Omland T, Dickstein K, Syversen U. Association between plasma chromogranin a concentration and long-term mortality after myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2003;114(1):25–30. 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01425-0. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
148. Wang X, et al. Dramatic changes in catestatin are associated with hemodynamics in acute myocardial infarction. Biomarkers. 2011;16(4):372–377. 10.3109/1354750X.2011.578260. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
149. Meng L, et al. Plasma catestatin level in patients with acute myocardial infarction and its correlation with ventricular remodelling. Postgrad Med J. 2013;89(1050):193–196. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-131060. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
150. Liu L, et al. Plasma levels and potential roles of catestatin in patients with coronary heart disease. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2013;47(4):217–224. 10.3109/14017431.2013.794951. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
151. Xu W, et al. Plasma catestatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiology. 2017;136(3):164–169. 10.1159/000448987. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
152. Zhu D, et al. Catestatin-a novel predictor of left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44168. 10.1038/srep44168. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
153. Zhu D, et al. Correlation of plasma catestatin level and the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0122993. 10.1371/journal.pone.0122993. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
154. Pan WQ, et al. Association of decreased serum vasostatin-2 level with ischemic chronic heart failure and with MACE in 3-year follow-up: Vasostatin-2 prevents heart failure in myocardial infarction rats. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:1–11. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.065. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
155. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham study. Circulation. 1979;59(1):8–13. 10.1161/01.CIR.59.1.8. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
156. Tobin KA, et al. Liver X receptors as insulin-mediating factors in fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(12):10691–10697. 10.1074/jbc.M109771200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
157. Tian J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Insulin induction of SREBP-1c in rodent liver requires LXRalpha-C/EBPbeta complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(29):8182–8187. 10.1073/pnas.1608987113. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
158. Penque BA, et al. Hexosamine biosynthesis impairs insulin action via a cholesterolgenic response. Mol Endocrinol. 2013;27(3):536–547. 10.1210/me.2012-1213. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
159. McNulty PH. Hexosamine biosynthetic pathway flux and cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus focus on "impact of type 2 diabetes and aging on cardiomyocyte function and O-linked N-acetylglucosamine levels in the heart". Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2007;292(4):C1243-4. 10.1152/ajpcell.00521.2006. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
160. Bhonagiri P, et al. Evidence coupling increased hexosamine biosynthesis pathway activity to membrane cholesterol toxicity and cortical filamentous actin derangement contributing to cellular insulin resistance. Endocrinology. 2011;152(9):3373–3384. 10.1210/en.2011-1295. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
161. Gonzalez-Yanes C, Sanchez-Margalet V. Pancreastatin modulates insulin signaling in rat adipocytes: mechanisms of cross-talk. Diabetes. 2000;49(8):1288–1294. 10.2337/diabetes.49.8.1288. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
162. Gallo MP, et al. Catestatin induces glucose uptake and GLUT4 trafficking in adult rat cardiomyocytes. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2086109. 10.1155/2018/2086109. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
163. Wu H, et al. A functional cyclic AMP response element plays a crucial role in neuroendocrine cell type-specific expression of the secretory granule protein chromogranin A. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(1):568–578. 10.1172/JCI118069. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
164. Canaff L, et al. Analysis of molecular mechanisms controlling neuroendocrine cell specific transcription of the chromogranin A gene. Endocrinology. 1998;139(3):1184–1196. 10.1210/endo.139.3.5851. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
165. Tang K, et al. Stimulus-transcription coupling in pheochromocytoma cells. promoter region-specific activation of chromogranin a biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(45):28382–28390. 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28382. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
166. Taupenot L, et al. Peptidergic activation of transcription and secretion in chromaffin cells. Cis and trans signaling determinants of pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) J Clin Invest. 1998;101(4):863–876. 10.1172/JCI1129. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
167. Mahapatra NR, et al. Secretin activation of chromogranin A gene transcription. identification of the signaling pathways in cis and in trans. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(22):19986–19994. 10.1074/jbc.M207983200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
168. Mahata SK, et al. Neurotrophin activation of catecholamine storage vesicle protein gene expression: signaling to chromogranin a biosynthesis. Neuroscience. 1999;88(2):405–424. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00225-5. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
169. Plath T, et al. Interferon-alpha inhibits chromogranin A promoter activity in neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 1999;458(3):378–382. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01187-4. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
170. Hocker M, et al. Sp1 and CREB mediate gastrin-dependent regulation of chromogranin A promoter activity in gastric carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(51):34000–34007. 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34000. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
171. Raychowdhury R, et al. Interaction of early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1), specificity protein 1 (Sp1), and cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate response element binding protein (CREB) at a proximal response element is critical for gastrin-dependent activation of the chromogranin A promoter. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16(12):2802–2818. 10.1210/me.2001-0292. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
172. Persson P, et al. Olf/EBF proteins are expressed in neuroblastoma cells: potential regulators of the chromogranin A and SCG10 promoters. Int J Cancer. 2004;110(1):22–30. 10.1002/ijc.20092. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
173. Rao F, et al. Genetic variation within a metabolic motif in the chromogranin a promoter: pleiotropic influence on cardiometabolic risk traits in twins. Am J Hypertens. 2012;25(1):29–40. 10.1038/ajh.2011.163. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
174. Chiron S, et al. Proteomic analysis yields an unexpected trans-acting point in control of the human sympathochromaffin phenotype. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4(4):437–445. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.957886. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
175. Chen Y, et al. Common genetic variants in the chromogranin A promoter alter autonomic activity and blood pressure. Kidney Int. 2008;74(1):115–125. 10.1038/ki.2008.113. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
176. Bailey TL, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W202–W208. 10.1093/nar/gkp335. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
177. Fornes O, et al. JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D87–D92. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
178. Lee C, Huang CH. LASAGNA-Search: an integrated web tool for transcription factor binding site search and visualization. Biotechniques. 2013;54(3):141–153. 10.2144/000113999. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
179. Messeguer X, et al. PROMO: detection of known transcription regulatory elements using species-tailored searches. Bioinformatics. 2002;18(2):333–334. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.333. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
180. Chekmenev DS, Haid C, Kel AE. P-Match: transcription factor binding site search by combining patterns and weight matrices. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W432-7. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
181. Zambelli F, Pesole G, Pavesi G. Pscan: finding over-represented transcription factor binding site motifs in sequences from co-regulated or co-expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(6):W247–W252. 10.1093/nar/gkp464. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
182. Friese RS, et al. MicroRNA-22 and promoter motif polymorphisms at the Chga locus in genetic hypertension: functional and therapeutic implications for gene expression and the pathogenesis of hypertension. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(18):3624–3640. 10.1093/hmg/ddt213. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
183. Zhang K, et al. Molecular mechanism for hypertensive renal disease: differential regulation of chromogranin A expression at 3′-untranslated region polymorphism C+87T by MicroRNA-107. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(8):1816–1825. 10.1681/ASN.2014060537. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
184. Diniz GP, et al. Loss of microRNA-22 prevents high-fat diet induced dyslipidemia and increases energy expenditure without affecting cardiac hypertrophy. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017;131(24):2885–2900. 10.1042/CS20171368. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
185. Vlachos IS, et al. DIANA-miRPath v30: deciphering microRNA function with experimental support. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W460–W466. 10.1093/nar/gkv403. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
186. Dweep H, et al. miRWalk–database: prediction of possible miRNA binding sites by "walking" the genes of three genomes. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44(5):839–847. 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.05.002. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
187. Kruger J, Rehmsmeier M. RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Web Server issue):W451–W454. 10.1093/nar/gkl243. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
188. Goedeke L, et al. MicroRNA-148a regulates LDL receptor and ABCA1 expression to control circulating lipoprotein levels. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1280–1289. 10.1038/nm.3949. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
189. Wang D, et al. Apoptotic cell induction of miR-10b in macrophages contributes to advanced atherosclerosis progression in ApoE-/- mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(13):1794–1805. 10.1093/cvr/cvy132. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
190. Rayner KJ, et al. MiR-33 contributes to the regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Science. 2010;328(5985):1570–1573. 10.1126/science.1189862. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
191. Najafi-Shoushtari SH. MicroRNAs in cardiometabolic disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011;13(3):202–207. 10.1007/s11883-011-0179-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
192. Marquart TJ, et al. miR-33 links SREBP-2 induction to repression of sterol transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(27):12228–12232. 10.1073/pnas.1005191107. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
193. Price NL, et al. Genetic dissection of the impact of miR-33a and miR-33b during the progression of atherosclerosis. Cell Rep. 2017;21(5):1317–1330. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.023. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
194. Li T, et al. Regulation of cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis by the cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase/steroid response element-binding protein 2/microRNA-33a axis in mice. Hepatology. 2013;58(3):1111–1121. 10.1002/hep.26427. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
195. Allen RM, et al. miR-33 controls the expression of biliary transporters, and mediates statin- and diet-induced hepatotoxicity. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4(9):882–895. 10.1002/emmm.201201228. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
196. Davalos A, et al. miR-33a/b contribute to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism and insulin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(22):9232–9237. 10.1073/pnas.1102281108. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
197. Strub JM, et al. Phosphorylation and O-glycosylation sites of bovine chromogranin A from adrenal medullary chromaffin granules and their relationship with biological activities. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(18):11928–11936. 10.1074/jbc.272.18.11928. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
198. Gadroy P, et al. Phosphorylation and O-glycosylation sites of human chromogranin A (CGA79-439) from urine of patients with carcinoid tumors. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(51):34087–34097. 10.1074/jbc.273.51.34087. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
199. Motoshima H, et al. AMPK and cell proliferation–AMPK as a therapeutic target for atherosclerosis and cancer. J Physiol. 2006;574(Pt 1):63–71. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108324. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
200. Viollet B, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase in the regulation of hepatic energy metabolism: from physiology to therapeutic perspectives. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2009;196(1):81–98. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01970.x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
201. Ke R, et al. Mechanisms of AMPK in the maintenance of ATP balance during energy metabolism. Cell Biol Int. 2018;42(4):384–392. 10.1002/cbin.10915. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
202. Steinberg GR, Kemp BE. AMPK in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2009;89(3):1025–1078. 10.1152/physrev.00011.2008. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
203. Clarke PR, Hardie DG. Regulation of HMG-CoA reductase: identification of the site phosphorylated by the AMP-activated protein kinase in vitro and in intact rat liver. EMBO J. 1990;9(8):2439–2446. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07420.x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
204. Omkumar RV, Darnay BG, Rodwell VW. Modulation of Syrian hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity by phosphorylation. role of serine 871. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(9):6810–6814. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37448-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
205. Henin N, et al. Inhibition of fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis by stimulation of AMP-activated protein kinase. FASEB J. 1995;9(7):541–546. 10.1096/fasebj.9.7.7737463. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
206. Bandyopadhyay GK, et al. Catestatin (chromogranin A(352–372)) and novel effects on mobilization of fat from adipose tissue through regulation of adrenergic and leptin signaling. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(27):23141–23151. 10.1074/jbc.M111.335877. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
207. Prieur X, et al. Leptin regulates peripheral lipid metabolism primarily through central effects on food intake. Endocrinology. 2008;149(11):5432–5439. 10.1210/en.2008-0498. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
208. Kosztaczky B, et al. Leptin stimulates endogenous cholesterol synthesis in human monocytes: new role of an old player in atherosclerotic plaque formation. leptin-induced increase in cholesterol synthesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(9):1637–1645. 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.04.012. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
209. Iqbal J, et al. Leptin-mediated differential regulation of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in the intestine and liver affects plasma lipids. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(13):4101–4113. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011881. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
210. Bandyopadhyay GK, et al. Pancreastatin-dependent inflammatory signaling mediates obesity-induced insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2015;64(1):104–116. 10.2337/db13-1747. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
211. Gupta AP, et al. Pancreastatin inhibitor activates AMPK pathway via GRP78 and ameliorates dexamethasone induced fatty liver disease in C57BL/6 mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;116:108959. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108959. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
212. Cook KL, Clarke R. Heat shock 70 kDa protein 5/glucose-regulated protein 78 “AMP”ing up autophagy. Autophagy. 2012;8(12):1827–1829. 10.4161/auto.21765. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
213. Biswas N, et al. Discovery of a novel target for the dysglycemic chromogranin A fragment pancreastatin: interaction with the chaperone GRP78 to influence metabolism. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e84132. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084132. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
214. Hossain Z, et al. Discovery of pancreastatin inhibitor PSTi8 for the treatment of insulin resistance and diabetes: studies in rodent models of diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8715. 10.1038/s41598-018-27018-8. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
215. Casas C. GRP78 at the centre of the stage in cancer and neuroprotection. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:177. 10.3389/fnins.2017.00177. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
216. Werstuck GH, et al. Homocysteine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress causes dysregulation of the cholesterol and triglyceride biosynthetic pathways. J Clin Invest. 2001;107(10):1263–1273. 10.1172/JCI11596. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
217. Lee JN, Ye J. Proteolytic activation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein induced by cellular stress through depletion of Insig-1. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(43):45257–45265. 10.1074/jbc.M408235200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
218. Wang Y, et al. GRP78 rescues the ABCG5 ABCG8 sterol transporter in db/db mice. Metabolism. 2015;64(11):1435–1443. 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.08.005. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
219. Liao F, et al. Catestatin attenuates endoplasmic reticulum induced cell apoptosis by activation type 2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in cardiac ischemia/reperfusion. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16590. 10.1038/srep16590. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
220. Chinetti G, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): nuclear receptors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2000;49(10):497–505. 10.1007/s000110050622. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
221. Desvergne B, Wahli W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev. 1999;20(5):649–688. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
222. Smith U. Adrenergic control of lipid metabolism. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1983;672:41–44. 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1983.tb01612.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
223. Krone W, Muller-Wieland D, Greten H. Effects of adrenergic antihypertensive drugs on sterol synthesis in freshly isolated human mononuclear leukocytes. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985;7(6):1134–1137. 10.1097/00005344-198511000-00019. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
224. Krone W, et al. Stimulation of beta 2-adrenergic receptors suppresses sterol synthesis in human mononuclear leukocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;804(1):137–140. 10.1016/0167-4889(84)90108-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
225. Petrone A, et al. Association of beta2 adrenergic receptor polymorphisms and related haplotypes with triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol levels. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(1):94–100. 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201521. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
226. Davidson MH. Beta-2 Agonism: a potential therapeutic target for dyslipidemia. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(4):284. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.03.004. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
227. Holmes C, Middleton B. Cyclic AMP-mediated control of LDL receptor gene expression in human skin fibroblasts. Biochem Soc Trans. 1997;25(2):179S. 10.1042/bst025179s. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
228. Martin G, et al. Comparison of expression and regulation of the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI and the low-density lipoprotein receptor in human adrenocortical carcinoma NCI-H295 cells. Eur J Biochem. 1999;261(2):481–491. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00296.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
229. Smith JD, et al. Cyclic AMP induces apolipoprotein E binding activity and promotes cholesterol efflux from a macrophage cell line to apolipoprotein acceptors. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(48):30647–30655. 10.1074/jbc.271.48.30647. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
230. Oram JF, et al. ABCA1 is the cAMP-inducible apolipoprotein receptor that mediates cholesterol secretion from macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(44):34508–34511. 10.1074/jbc.M006738200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
231. Bernard DW, et al. cAMP stimulates cholesteryl ester clearance to high density lipoproteins in J7774 macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(2):710–716. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)35229-8. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
232. Sacks FM, Dzau VJ. Adrenergic effects on plasma lipoprotein metabolism. speculation on mechanisms of action. Am J Med. 1986;80(2A):71–81. 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90163-4. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
233. Mazza R, et al. Catestatin (chromogranin A344–364) is a novel cardiosuppressive agent: inhibition of isoproterenol and endothelin signaling in the frog heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295(1):H113–H122. 10.1152/ajpheart.00172.2008. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
234. Bassino E, et al. A novel catestatin-induced antiadrenergic mechanism triggered by the endothelial PI3K-eNOS pathway in the myocardium. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;91(4):617–624. 10.1093/cvr/cvr129. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
235. Kiranmayi M, et al. Catestatin Gly364Ser variant alters systemic blood pressure and the risk for hypertension in human populations via endothelial nitric oxide pathway. Hypertension. 2016;68(2):334–347. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.06568. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
236. Chu SY, et al. Catestatin in defense of oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis: a novel mechanism by activating the beta2 adrenergic receptor and PKB/Akt pathway in ischemic-reperfused myocardium. Peptides. 2020;123:170200. 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
237. Cerra MC, et al. Recombinant N-terminal fragments of chromogranin-A modulate cardiac function of the Langendorff-perfused rat heart. Basic Res Cardiol. 2006;101(1):43–52. 10.1007/s00395-005-0547-2. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
238. Gallo MP, et al. Endothelium-derived nitric oxide mediates the antiadrenergic effect of human vasostatin-1 in rat ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292(6):H2906–H2912. 10.1152/ajpheart.01253.2006. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
239. Tota B, et al. The novel chromogranin A-derived serpinin and pyroglutaminated serpinin peptides are positive cardiac beta-adrenergic-like inotropes. FASEB J. 2012;26(7):2888–2898. 10.1096/fj.11-201111. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
240. Di Scala C, et al. Relevance of CARC and CRAC cholesterol-recognition motifs in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and other membrane-bound receptors. Curr Top Membr. 2017;80:3–23. 10.1016/bs.ctm.2017.05.001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
241. Borroni V, Barrantes FJ. Cholesterol modulates the rate and mechanism of acetylcholine receptor internalization. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(19):17122–17132. 10.1074/jbc.M110.211870. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
242. Zhang G, et al. Placental mechanism of prenatal nicotine exposure-reduced blood cholesterol levels in female fetal rats. Toxicol Lett. 2018;296:31–38. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.07.022. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
243. Song W, et al. The implication of cigarette smoking and cessation on macrophage cholesterol efflux in coronary artery disease patients. J Lipid Res. 2015;56(3):682–691. 10.1194/jlr.P055491. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
244. Sahu BS, et al. Molecular interactions of the physiological anti-hypertensive peptide catestatin with the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(9):2323–2337. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
245. Wang C, et al. Nicotine accelerates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice by activating alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor on mast cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(1):53–65. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307264. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
246. Wu Y, et al. Activation of AMPKalpha2 in adipocytes is essential for nicotine-induced insulin resistance in vivo. Nat Med. 2015;21(4):373–382. 10.1038/nm.3826. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
247. Dong F, et al. Akt inhibition promotes ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux to ApoA-I through suppressing mTORC1. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e113789. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113789. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
248. Du X, et al. Involvement of Akt in ER-to-Golgi transport of SCAP/SREBP: a link between a key cell proliferative pathway and membrane synthesis. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(6):2735–2745. 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1094. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
249. Penna C, et al. Ischemia/reperfusion injury is increased and cardioprotection by a postconditioning protocol is lost as cardiac hypertrophy develops in nandrolone treated rats. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011;106(3):409–420. 10.1007/s00395-010-0143-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
250. Bi X, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78 protects heart from ischemia/reperfusion injury through Akt activation. Circ Res. 2018;122(11):1545–1554. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312641. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
251. Bassino E, et al. Catestatin exerts direct protective effects on rat cardiomyocytes undergoing ischemia/reperfusion by stimulating PI3K-Akt-GSK3beta pathway and preserving mitochondrial membrane potential. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0119790. 10.1371/journal.pone.0119790. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
252. Caron A, Richard D, Laplante M. The roles of mTOR complexes in lipid metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35:321–348. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034355. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
253. Lu XY, et al. Feeding induces cholesterol biosynthesis via the mTORC1-USP20-HMGCR axis. Nature. 2020;588(7838):479–484. 10.1038/s41586-020-2928-y. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
254. Esteve E, Ricart W, Fernandez-Real JM. Dyslipidemia and inflammation: an evolutionary conserved mechanism. Clin Nutr. 2005;24(1):16–31. 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.08.004. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
255. Kim MS, et al. Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 1 decrease RXRalpha, PPARalpha, PPARgamma, LXRalpha, and the coactivators SRC-1, PGC-1alpha, and PGC-1beta in liver cells. Metabolism. 2007;56(2):267–279. 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.10.007. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
256. Zimetti F, et al. Plasma cholesterol homeostasis, HDL remodeling and function during the acute phase reaction. J Lipid Res. 2017;58(10):2051–2060. 10.1194/jlr.P076463. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
257. Tang ZH, et al. New role of PCSK9 in atherosclerotic inflammation promotion involving the TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway. Atherosclerosis. 2017;262:113–122. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.04.023. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
258. Edfeldt K, et al. Expression of toll-like receptors in human atherosclerotic lesions: a possible pathway for plaque activation. Circulation. 2002;105(10):1158–1161. 10.1161/circ.105.10.1158. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
259. Zhou Y, et al. The role of toll-like receptors in atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2020;3(3):457–471. 10.1021/acsptsci.9b00100. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
260. Chen H, 2019. Catestatin prevents endothelial inflammation and promotes thrombus resolution in acute pulmonary embolism in mice. Biosci Rep. [CrossRef]
261. Fessler MB. Liver X receptor: crosstalk node for the signaling of lipid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and innate immunity. Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2008;3(2):75–81. 10.2174/157436208784223170. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
262. Ito A, et al. LXRs link metabolism to inflammation through Abca1-dependent regulation of membrane composition and TLR signaling. Elife. 2015;4:e08009. 10.7554/eLife.08009. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
263. Manandhar B, Cochran BJ, Rye KA. Role of high-density lipoproteins in cholesterol homeostasis and glycemic control. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(1):e013531. 10.1161/JAHA.119.013531. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
264. Huang X, et al. The PI3K/AKT pathway in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(11):1483–1496. 10.7150/ijbs.27173. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
265. Stephens JM, Lee J, Pilch PF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes is accompanied by a loss of insulin receptor substrate-1 and GLUT4 expression without a loss of insulin receptor-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(2):971–976. 10.1074/jbc.272.2.971. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
266. Valicherla GR, et al. Pancreastatin is an endogenous peptide that regulates glucose homeostasis. Physiol Genom. 2013;45(22):1060–1071. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00131.2013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
267. Ying W, et al. Catestatin inhibits obesity-induced macrophage infiltration and inflammation in the liver and suppresses hepatic glucose production leading to improved insulin sensitivity. Diabetes. 2018;67(5):841–848. 10.2337/db17-0788. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
268. Kanuri BN, et al. Altered glucose and lipid homeostasis in liver and adipose tissue pre-dispose inducible NOS knockout mice to insulin resistance. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41009. 10.1038/srep41009. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
269. Strehlow K, et al. Angiotensin AT1 receptor over-expression in hypercholesterolaemia. Ann Med. 2000;32(6):386–389. 10.3109/07853890008995944. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
270. Singh BM, Mehta JL. Interactions between the renin-angiotensin system and dyslipidemia: relevance in the therapy of hypertension and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(11):1296–1304. 10.1001/archinte.163.11.1296. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
271. Daugherty A, et al. Augmentation of the renin-angiotensin system by hypercholesterolemia promotes vascular diseases. Future Lipidol. 2008;3(6):625–636. 10.2217/17460875.3.6.625. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
272. Daugherty A, et al. Hypercholesterolemia stimulates angiotensin peptide synthesis and contributes to atherosclerosis through the AT1A receptor. Circulation. 2004;110(25):3849–3857. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150540.54220.C4. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
273. Keidar S, et al. Angiotensin II atherogenicity in apolipoprotein E deficient mice is associated with increased cellular cholesterol biosynthesis. Atherosclerosis. 1999;146(2):249–257. 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00145-8. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
274. Keidar S, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates macrophage-mediated oxidation of low density lipoproteins. Atherosclerosis. 1995;115(2):201–215. 10.1016/0021-9150(94)05514-J. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
275. Keidar S, Kaplan M, Aviram M. Angiotensin II-modified LDL is taken up by macrophages via the scavenger receptor, leading to cellular cholesterol accumulation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16(1):97–105. 10.1161/01.ATV.16.1.97. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
276. Keidar S, Attias J. Angiotensin II injection into mice increases the uptake of oxidized LDL by their macrophages via a proteoglycan-mediated pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;239(1):63–67. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7428. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
277. Li D, et al. Proapoptotic effects of ANG II in human coronary artery endothelial cells: role of AT1 receptor and PKC activation. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(3):H786–H792. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
278. Phelps T, et al. The influence of biological sex and sex hormones on bile acid synthesis and cholesterol homeostasis. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):52. 10.1186/s13293-019-0265-3. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
279. Chinetti G, et al. PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway. Nat Med. 2001;7(1):53–58. 10.1038/83348. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
280. Claudel T, et al. Bile acid-activated nuclear receptor FXR suppresses apolipoprotein A-I transcription via a negative FXR response element. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(7):961–971. 10.1172/JCI0214505. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
281. Tao R, et al. FoxO3 transcription factor and Sirt6 deacetylase regulate low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol homeostasis via control of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (Pcsk9) gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(41):29252–29259. 10.1074/jbc.M113.481473. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
282. Friesen JA, Rodwell VW. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductases. Genome Biol. 2004;5(11):248. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-11-248. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
283. Sanchez-Margalet V, Gonzalez-Yanes C. Pancreastatin inhibits insulin action in rat adipocytes. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(6):E1055–E1060. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
284. Sanchez V, Calvo JR, Goberna R. Glycogenolytic effect of pancreastatin in the rat. Biosci Rep. 1990;10(1):87–91. 10.1007/BF01116856. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
285. Mahata SK, et al. A novel, catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide from chromogranin A: autocrine control of nicotinic cholinergic-stimulated exocytosis. Adv Pharmacol. 1998;42:260–264. 10.1016/S1054-3589(08)60743-7. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
286. Angelone T, et al. The NO stimulator, catestatin, improves the frank-starling response in normotensive and hypertensive rat hearts. Nitric Oxide. 2015;50:10–19. 10.1016/j.niox.2015.07.004. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
287. Penna C, et al. Catestatin improves post-ischemic left ventricular function and decreases ischemia/reperfusion injury in heart. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;30(8):1171–1179. 10.1007/s10571-010-9598-5. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
288. Fung MM, et al. Direct vasoactive effects of the chromogranin A (CHGA) peptide catestatin in humans in vivo. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010;32(5):278–287. 10.3109/10641960903265246. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
289. Radek KA, et al. The neuroendocrine peptide catestatin is a cutaneous antimicrobial and induced in the skin after injury. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(6):1525–1534. 10.1038/sj.jid.5701225. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
290. Akaddar A, et al. Catestatin, an endogenous chromogranin A-derived peptide, inhibits in vitro growth of Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67(6):1005–1015. 10.1007/s00018-009-0235-8. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
291. Briolat J, et al. New antimicrobial activity for the catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide from chromogranin A. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62(3):377–385. 10.1007/s00018-004-4461-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
292. Cappello S, et al. Human recombinant chromogranin A-derived vasostatin-1 mimics preconditioning via an adenosine/nitric oxide signaling mechanism. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(1):H719–H727. 10.1152/ajpheart.01352.2006. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
293. Lugardon K, et al. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of vasostatin-1, the N-terminal fragment of chromogranin A. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(15):10745–10753. 10.1074/jbc.275.15.10745. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
294. Gasparri A et al (1997) Chromogranin A fragments modulate cell adhesion. Identification and characterization of a pro-adhesive domain. J Biol Chem 272(33):20835–20843 [Abstract]
295. Fasciotto BH, et al. Parastatin (porcine chromogranin A347–419), a novel chromogranin A-derived peptide, inhibits parathyroid cell secretion. Endocrinology. 1993;133(2):461–466. 10.1210/endo.133.2.8344192. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
296. Pasqua T, et al. pGlu-serpinin protects the normotensive and hypertensive heart from ischemic injury. J Endocrinol. 2015;227(3):167–178. 10.1530/JOE-15-0199. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
297. Lugardon K, et al. Structural and biological characterization of chromofungin, the antifungal chromogranin A-(47–66)-derived peptide. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(38):35875–35882. 10.1074/jbc.M104670200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
298. Filice E, et al. Chromofungin, CgA47-66-derived peptide, produces basal cardiac effects and postconditioning cardioprotective action during ischemia/reperfusion injury. Peptides. 2015;71:40–48. 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.06.013. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
299. Strub JM, et al. Antibacterial activity of glycosylated and phosphorylated chromogranin A-derived peptide 173–194 from bovine adrenal medullary chromaffin granules. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(45):28533–28540. 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28533. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
300. Curry WJ, et al. WE-14, a chromogranin a-derived neuropeptide. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;971:311–316. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04485.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
301. Stadinski BD, et al. Chromogranin A is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(3):225–231. 10.1038/ni.1844. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
302. Dooley KA, Bennett MK, Osborne TF. A critical role for cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) as a Co-activator in sterol-regulated transcription of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase promoter. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(9):5285–5291. 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5285. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
303. Lemberger T, et al. CREB has a context-dependent role in activity-regulated transcription and maintains neuronal cholesterol homeostasis. FASEB J. 2008;22(8):2872–2879. 10.1096/fj.08-107888. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
304. Liu J, et al. Identification of a novel sterol-independent regulatory element in the human low density lipoprotein receptor promoter. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(7):5214–5221. 10.1074/jbc.275.7.5214. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
305. Yieh L, Sanchez HB, Osborne TF. Domains of transcription factor Sp1 required for synergistic activation with sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 of low density lipoprotein receptor promoter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(13):6102–6106. 10.1073/pnas.92.13.6102. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
306. Sanchez HB, Yieh L, Osborne TF. Cooperation by sterol regulatory element-binding protein and Sp1 in sterol regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(3):1161–1169. 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1161. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
307. Herzig S, et al. CREB controls hepatic lipid metabolism through nuclear hormone receptor PPAR-gamma. Nature. 2003;426(6963):190–193. 10.1038/nature02110. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
308. Zhang F, et al. Specific interaction of Egr1 and c/EBPbeta leads to the transcriptional activation of the human low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(45):44246–44254. 10.1074/jbc.M305564200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
309. Gokey NG, et al. Early growth response 1 (Egr1) regulates cholesterol biosynthetic gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(34):29501–29510. 10.1074/jbc.M111.263509. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
310. Alvarez V, et al. The Sp1/Egr1-tandem repeat polymorphism in the 5-lipoxygenase gene promoter is not associated with late onset Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008;22(2):177–180. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181572046. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
311. Hoppe KL, Francone OL. Binding and functional effects of transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 on the proximal human lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase promoter. J Lipid Res. 1998;39(5):969–977. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)33864-5. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
312. Wu N, et al. Activation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase during high fat diet feeding. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832(10):1560–1568. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.04.024. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
313. Zhang C, et al. OSBPL2 deficiency upregulate SQLE expression increasing intracellular cholesterol and cholesteryl ester by AMPK/SP1 and SREBF2 signalling pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2019;383(2):111512. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111512. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
314. Kim JH, Lee JN, Paik YK. Cholesterol biosynthesis from lanosterol A concerted role for Sp1 and NF-Y-binding sites for sterol-mediated regulation of rat 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(21):18153–18160. 10.1074/jbc.M101661200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
315. Cagen LM, et al. Insulin activates the rat sterol-regulatory-element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) promoter through the combinatorial actions of SREBP, LXR, Sp-1 and NF-Y cis-acting elements. Biochem J. 2005;385(Pt 1):207–216. 10.1042/BJ20040162. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
316. Stroup D, Chiang JY. HNF4 and COUP-TFII interact to modulate transcription of the cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) J Lipid Res. 2000;41(1):1–11. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)32068-X. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
317. Yamazaki T, et al. The COUP-TFII variant lacking a DNA-binding domain inhibits the activation of the Cyp7a1 promoter through physical interaction with COUP-TFII. Biochem J. 2013;452(2):345–357. 10.1042/BJ20121200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
318. Myers SA, Wang SC, Muscat GE. The chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factors modulate genes and pathways involved in skeletal muscle cell metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(34):24149–24160. 10.1074/jbc.M601941200. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
319. Robinson CE, et al. A corepressor and chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter transcriptional factor proteins modulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2/retinoid X receptor alpha-activated transcription from the murine lipoprotein lipase promoter. Endocrinology. 1999;140(4):1586–1593. 10.1210/endo.140.4.6653. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
320. Buniello A, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1005–D1012. 10.1093/nar/gky1120. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
321. Beck T, Shorter T, Brookes AJ. GWAS Central: a comprehensive resource for the discovery and comparison of genotype and phenotype data from genome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D933–D940. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
322. Wolfe D, et al. Visualizing genomic information across chromosomes with PhenoGram. BioData Min. 2013;6(1):18. 10.1186/1756-0381-6-18. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
323. Lu X, et al. Exome chip meta-analysis identifies novel loci and East Asian-specific coding variants that contribute to lipid levels and coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2017;49(12):1722–1730. 10.1038/ng.3978. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
324. Willer CJ, et al. Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1274–1283. 10.1038/ng.2797. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
325. Kanai M, et al. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in the Japanese population links cell types to complex human diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(3):390–400. 10.1038/s41588-018-0047-6. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS are provided here courtesy of Springer

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/153432038
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/153432038

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (1)