Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Boron-nitrogen-containing heterocycles with extended conjugated π-systems such as polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines, hold the fascination of organic chemists due to their unique optoelectronic properties. However, the majority of polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines aggregate at high concentrations or in the solid-state, resulting in aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) of emission. This practical limitation poses significant challenges for polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines' use in many applications. Additionally, only a few solvatochromic polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines have been reported and they all display minimal solvatochromism. Therefore, the scope of available polycyclic 1,2-azaborines needs to be expanded to include those displaying fluorescence at high concentration and in the solid-state as well as those that exhibit significant changes in emission intensity in various solvents due to different polarities. To address the ACQ issue, we evaluate the effect of a pre-twisted molecular geometry on the optoelectronic properties of polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines. Specifically, three phenyl-substituted pyrrolidinone-fused 1,2-azaborines (PFAs) with similar structures and functionalized with diverse electronic moieties (-H, -NO2, -CN, referred to as PFA 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were experimentally and computationally studied. Interestingly, PFA 2 displays two distinct emission properties: 1) solvatochromism, in which its emission and quantum yields are tunable with respect to solvent polarity, and 2) fluorescence that can be completely "turned off" and "turned on" via aggregation-induced emission (AIE). This report provides the first example of a polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborine that displays both AIE and solvatochromism properties in a single BN-substituted backbone. According to time-dependent density function theory (TD-DFT) calculations, the fluorescence properties of PFA 2 can be explained by the presence of a low-lying n-π* charge transfer state inaccessible to PFA 1 or PFA 3. These findings will help in the design of future polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines that are solvatochromic and AIE-active as well as in understanding how molecular geometry affects these compounds' optoelectronic properties.

Free full text 


Logo of nihpaLink to Publisher's site
J Mater Chem C Mater. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2024 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as:
J Mater Chem C Mater. 2023 Oct 28; 11(40): 13740–13751.
Published online 2023 Sep 13. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3tc03278g
PMCID: PMC11160477
NIHMSID: NIHMS1932634
PMID: 38855717

Solvatochromic and Aggregation-Induced Emission Active Nitrophenyl-Substituted Pyrrolidinone-Fused-1,2-Azaborine with a Pre-Twisted Molecular Geometry

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Boron-nitrogen-containing heterocycles with extended conjugated π-systems such as polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines, hold the fascination of organic chemists due to their unique optoelectronic properties. However, the majority of polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines aggregate at high concentrations or in the solid-state, resulting in aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) of emission. This practical limitation poses significant challenges for polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines’ use in many applications. Additionally, only a few solvatochromic polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines have been reported and they all display minimal solvatochromism. Therefore, the scope of available polycyclic 1,2-azaborines needs to be expanded to include those displaying fluorescence at high concentration and in the solid-state as well as those that exhibit significant changes in emission intensity in various solvents due to different polarities. To address the ACQ issue, we evaluate the effect of a pre-twisted molecular geometry on the optoelectronic properties of polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines. Specifically, three phenyl-substituted pyrrolidinone-fused 1,2-azaborines (PFAs) with similar structures and functionalized with diverse electronic moieties (–H, –NO2, –CN, referred to as PFA 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were experimentally and computationally studied. Interestingly, PFA 2 displays two distinct emission properties: 1) solvatochromism, in which its emission and quantum yields are tunable with respect to solvent polarity, and 2) fluorescence that can be completely “turned off” and “turned on” via aggregation-induced emission (AIE). This report provides the first example of a polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborine that displays both AIE and solvatochromism properties in a single BN-substituted backbone. According to time-dependent density function theory (TD-DFT) calculations, the fluorescence properties of PFA 2 can be explained by the presence of a low-lying n-π* charge transfer state inaccessible to PFA 1 or PFA 3. These findings will help in the design of future polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines that are solvatochromic and AIE-active as well as in understanding how molecular geometry affects these compounds’ optoelectronic properties.

Graphical Abstract

First reported observation of aggregation-induced emission and solvatochromism in a polycyclic donoracceptor fluorophore with a BN-substitution.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0010.jpg

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been extensively studied for potential applications in optoelectrical devices13 due to their unique optical and electronic properties.47 In recent decades, researchers have incorporated various main group elements such as boron, nitrogen, phosphorus or sulfur into the structural backbone of PAHs to investigate their influence on the optical and electronic properties.812 In the late 1950s, Dewar and coworkers incorporated a three coordinated boron into the backbone of a PAH and reported the first singly boron-nitrogen (BN)-substituted aromatic compounds, the 9,10-dihydro-9-aza-10-boraphenanthrene system.13 These arene isosteres were constructed by replacing a HC=CH (or C=C) bond from a PAH with a HB-NH (or B-N) bond, respectively. Incorporation of a B-N bond into the structural backbone of PAHs has been known to preserve the non-flexible conjugated π-systems and induce modification of the electronic transition energies.1422

Despite a nearly seventy-year gap since Dewar reported the synthesis and characterization of the first singly BN-substituted aromatic compounds, polycyclic aromatic compounds containing the B-N bond have held the fascination of the organic chemistry community due to their potential use in materials23 and biomedical research.24 For example, in the past two decades, researchers have focused their efforts on improving electroluminescent (EL) devices2527 by pursuing BN-substituted polycyclic aromatic compounds that exhibit new and/or enhanced optical and electronic properties such as photochemical stability, tunable absorption and emission spectra, high molar absorption coefficient, high fluorescence quantum yields (QYs), and large Stokes shifts.25,2754 These enhanced photophysical properties of BN-substituted polycyclic compounds also make them ideal candidates for potential use in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs)5558 and organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs).34,5964 There is also an increasing demand for these functionalities in medicinal chemistry for biological molecular sensing/indicator applications.24,6567

In spite of the fact that heterocyclic chemists have made significant strides in the development of BN-substituted polycyclic compounds,68 a critical drawback of polycyclic aromatic systems partially substituted with a B-N bond, especially three-coordinate boron species, is that they tend to aggregate at high concentration or in the solid-state due to significant intermolecular π-π stacking interaction, which in turn results in emission quenching, i.e aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ).6975 This photophysical phenomenon poses significant challenges when working with systems that require the operating fluorescent compound to display high QYs at high concentration or in the solid-state such as in the construction of OLEDs and chemical sensors. To remedy this ACQ problem, researchers have taken diverse approaches over the years and have recently adopted the concept of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) which was first introduced by Tang in 2001.76 Since the introductory research on AIE by Tang, chemists have focused on developing new polycyclic aromatic chromophores with AIE features7782 but have given little attention to BN-substituted polycyclic aromatic compounds featuring AIE, especially three-coordinate boron species such as polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines, and as result these species are still scarce in the literature.83 In addition to the limited report of polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborines featuring AIE, only a handful of polycyclic 1,2-azaborine compounds have been reported to display minimal changes in their absorption wavelength and intensity of emission in solvents with different polarities, i.e. solvatochromism.84,85 The study of BN-substituted polycyclic compounds such as 1,2-azaborines exhibiting solvatochromism are essential because they can be used as sensors for solvent polarity.86,87

Tang reported in 2022 the first and only example of a polycyclic 1,2-azaborine that exhibits both ACQ and AIE properties in a single BN-substituted polycyclic backbone.69 Herein, we are reporting the first and only example of a polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborine that exhibits both AIE and solvatochromism properties in a single BN-substituted polycyclic backbone. This study will expand chemists’ understanding in overcoming the ACQ problem in BN-substituted aromatic compounds, specifically three-coordinate boron, and will extend the scope of solvatochromic polycyclic 1,2-azaborines and the exploration of their new properties and functions. In this report, we describe the design and synthesis of three phenyl-substituted pyrrolidinone-fused 1,2-azaborines (PFAs) derivatives with similar structures and functionalized with diverse electronic moieties (–H, –NO2, –CN, referred to as PFA 1, 2, and 3, respectively) containing a pre-twisted molecular structure (Figure 1). Previously reported PFA analogs, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines,14,15 are also included in this study to highlight the impact of intramolecular rotations and steric interactions within the PFA framework on the observed photophysical properties. This new molecular design results in marked effects of solvatochromism and switchable fluorescence that can be completely “turned off” and “turned on” via AIE in PFA 2. Although PFAs 1 and 3 show neither solvatochromism nor switchable fluorescence turn on and off via AIE, both are chemically stable with PFA 1 in particular displays unexpectedly high QYs in the solid-state when compared to its analog, benzo-azaborine, and is worth further investigation as a promising candidate for OLED construction.8894

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0001.jpg

The structures of PFA analogs and three new phenyl-substituted PFAs discussed in this work.

Results and discussion

Syntheses and structural characterization

The synthesis of three new phenyl-substituted PFAs was conducted via a one-pot base-catalyzed condensation reaction of phenyl-substituted isoindolinone derivatives with the appropriate o-formylarylboronic acids. The PFAs were prepared using modified procedures developed by Huggins and coworkers.14,15 The first phase of the synthetic scheme involves the synthesis of phenyl-substituted isoindolinones functionalized with diverse electronic moieties (–H, –NO2, –CN) via carbon-carbon bond formation using a Suzuki cross-coupling transition-metal-catalyzed reaction (Scheme 1). The esterification of 5-bromo-2-methylbenzoic acid with methanol (MeOH) is performed to make compound 4 in high yields, followed by a Suzuki cross-coupling reaction with phenylboronic acid pinacol esters with corresponding electronic moiety substituents (–H, –NO2, –CN) at the para- position to synthesize compounds 5–7 in good yields. Then, selective radical bromination of the aryl methyl group is carried out using N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) yielding both mono- and di-brominated isomers in nearly equal amount. The purified mono-brominated isomers 8–10 were then reacted with ammonia in MeOH to yield the phenyl-substituted isoindolinones 11–13 in high yields. The second phase of the synthetic scheme involves the synthesis of the new desired end-products, phenyl-substituted PFAs 1–3, which is conducted via a one-pot base-catalyzed condensation reaction of the conjugated phenyl-substituted isoindolinones with the appropriate o-formylarylboronic acids. The structures of previously unreported compounds 12, 13 and PFAs 1–3 were confirmed by 1H, 13C{1H}, 11B{1H} NMR spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and FT-IR (see ESI). 11B{1H} NMR spectrum for PFAs 1, 2 and 3 show a broad peak at 31.13, 30.39 and 29.64 ppm, respectively. The 11B{1H} resonance for PFAs 1, 2 and 3 corresponds to the boron atom bonded to a nitrogen atom and a hydroxyl group and are in line with previous reports of -N-B-OH π-bonding characteristics.14,15 Additional assignments were based on 2D NMR experiments, and the spectra are presented in the ESI. All compounds were stable under ambient conditions.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0009.jpg

Synthetic route to synthesize phenyl-substituted PFAs 1–3.

PFA 3 crystals of X-ray crystallography quality were obtained by the slow diffusion of petroleum ether (PE) into a saturated tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution at room temperature (21 °C). Figure 2 depicts the molecular structure of PFA 3 which displays a planar three-coordinate boron bonded to C, N, and O. The length of the B-N bond was measured to be 1.446 Å (Figure 2A) and agrees with the sp2 type B-N bond length previously reported for polycyclic 1,2-azaborine derivatives and borazine (1.44 Å).14,9597 An intramolecular hydrogen bond between the boron O-H and the C=O oxygen with a distance of 2.114 Å is also observed. Additionally, the molecular structure of PFA 3 confirms the attachment of a phenyl spacer to the core (benzo-azaborine) via carbon-carbon bond formation and the presence of the –CN group. As projected, the molecular structure of PFA 3 verifies the planarity of the core (benzo-azaborine) and shows rotation around the carbon-carbon bond of the biphenyl moiety with a torsion angle of 34.9° (Figure 2B).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0002.jpg

A) Molecular structure of PFA 3 displaying the B-N bond length (1.466 Å) and the ring angles around the boron atom [for all]C8N1B1 = 122.7° and [for all]C6C1B1 = 118.6°. B) Molecular structure of PFA 3 displaying the planarity of the core (benzo-azaborine) and the rotation of the biphenyl moiety with a torsion angle of 34.9°. A single molecule is represented using ORTEP thermal ellipsoids drawn at 50% position probability (gray: carbon, red: oxygen; blue: nitrogen; white: hydrogen; yellow: boron).

Experimental photophysical properties

Absorption spectra

The relevant absorption properties for PFAs 1–3, along with analogs compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines, were investigated in various solvents with different polarities and hydrogen-bonding abilities to examine the impact of intramolecular rotations and steric interactions within the PFA framework on the observed photophysical properties (Table 1). PFAs 1–3 show strong absorption bands lying in the region of 380–385 nm in all solvents except for PFAs 2 and 3 in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). In DMSO, PFAs 2 and 3 show strong absorption bands in the region of 390 nm and 400 nm, respectively. Additionally, to fully comprehend the effect of the phenyl spacer on the optical properties of the PFAs, the frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) for 1–3 along with reference compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines and their energies involved in the electronic transition were studied theoretically by density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the level of B3LYP/6–311+G** (Figure 3). This level of theory was used to compare to past reported results that were calculated at the same level. The addition of a phenyl linker to benzo-azaborine, as for PFA 1, extends its π-conjugation, resulting in a red-shifted absorbance λmax in all solvents by an average of 10 nm. The DFT analysis from Figure 3 illustrates that increased π-conjugation of PFA 1 results in a reduction of the HOMO-LUMO gap by 0.10 eV, rationalizing the red-shift in absorbance seen for PFA 1 when compared to benzo-azaborine. Surprisingly, the addition of a phenyl spacer to nitrobenzo-azaborine, as for PFA 2, does not result in a similar red-shift in absorbance. Instead, PFA 2 has a similar absorbance to its analog nitrobenzo-azaborine, and DFT analysis shows a very similar HOMO-LUMO profile (Figure 3). We also observe similar absorbance λmax for PFAs 1 and 2 in all solvents except for DMSO, in which 2 exhibits a 15 nm red-shift in the absorbance λmax. Based on the generally similar absorbances of PFA 2 to PFA 1, it is evident that incorporation of the phenyl spacer to nitrobenzo-azaborine reduces the influence of the electron-accepting nature of the –NO2 group on the PFA core. To further understand the effect of the phenyl spacer on the electronic changes induced by electron-accepting substituents, the –CN group of PFA 3 was chosen for its comparable Hammett sigma para value (σp = 0.66) to –NO2p = 0.78).98 The absorbance λmax of PFAs 2 and 3 were identical in chloroform (CHCl3) and THF. However, DMSO induces a 10 nm blue-shifted absorbance accompanied by an increase in molar absorptivity for PFA 3. The absorbances and molar absorptivities for 3 also mirrored that of 1 in all solvents. The addition of the –CN group to PFA 1 reduces the energy of both HOMO and LUMO almost proportionately, resulting in an almost identical HOMO-LUMO gap for PFA 3 and PFA 1. Additionally, PFA 3 has a similar HOMO and LUMO electron density distribution to that of PFA 1, with electron density distributed primarily throughout the PFA core and minimal electron density on the phenyl spacer bearing the –CN group. Based on the comparable absorbances seen for PFAs 2 and 3, and their similar absorbances to PFA 1, we conclude that the addition of a phenyl spacer on Acceptor-π-Donor (A-π-D) PFAs results in a decoupling of the –NO2 and –CN groups from the PFA core due to the intramolecular rotation around the biphenyl moiety.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0003.jpg

Frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO), computed using B3LYP/6–311+G**, for PFAs 1–3 along with reference compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines and their corresponding electronic transition energies.

Table 1

Experimental UV-visible absorbance (λmax), molar absorption coefficient (ε), and solid-state excitation (λmax) data for PFAs 1–3 with reference compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines in various solvents.

CmpdsSolventsλmax (nm) In solution(ε)λmax (nm) Solid-State
Benzo-azaborine CHCl3375(1.8 × 104)389, 416
CH3OH372(3.2 × 104)
CH3CN371(2.0 × 104)
DMSO372(2.9 × 104)
THF370(1.4 × 104)

Nitrobenzo-azaborine CHCl3388(3.7 × 104)397, 424
CH3OH412(1.2 × 104)
CH3CN382(1.8 × 104)
DMSO404(2.4 × 104)
THF385(1.2 × 104)

1 CHCl3385(1.4 × 104)392, 414
CH3OH380(1.3 × 104)
CH3CN380(1.7 × 104)
DMSO385(2.4 × 104)
THF380(1.8 × 104)

2 CHCl3385(1.1 × 104)394, 420
CH3OH a a
CH3CN380(3.7 × 103)
DMSO400(9.6 × 103)
THF380(2.6 × 104)

3 CHCl3385(1.8 × 104)392, 416
CH3OH a a
CH3CN a a
DMSO390(2.3 × 104)
THF380(1.7 × 104)
aAbsorption and molar absorption coefficient could not be obtained due to low solubility in solvent.
bDielectric constant adapted from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 97th Edition (2016). CHCl3 = 4.81, CH3OH = 33.0, CH3CN = 36.64, DMSO = 47.24, THF = 7.52.

The solid-state excitations of the PFAs were also measured by drop-casting concentrated solutions of CHCl3 (Table 1). Due to aggregation in the solid-state, dual excitations are observed for all PFAs. Furthermore, all PFAs display red-shifted solid-state excitation λmax in comparison to being in solution due to solid-state π-π stacking interactions. PFAs 1, 3 and benzo-azaborines have almost identical solid-state excitation while the nitro-substituted PFAs, PFA 2 and nitrobenzo-azaborine, exhibit the most red-shifted solid-state excitation. These results demonstrate a solution trend in which extending π-conjugation via incorporation of a phenyl linker reduces the HOMO-LUMO gap and results in red-shifted absorbance λmax. We also observe a solid-state trend in which incorporation of a phenyl spacer on A-π-D PFAs results in blue-shifted absorbance λmax due to a decoupling of the electron-accepting –NO2 and –CN groups from the PFA core.

Emission spectra

The relevant emission properties for PFAs 1–3 along with reference compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines, were studied in various solvents with different polarities and hydrogen-bonding abilities and are displayed in Table 2. The emission spectrum of PFA 2 in MeCN displays intriguing features with a very weak emission accompanied by two λmax at 447 nm and 656 nm. The QYs were very low and could not be quantified, as evidenced by the absence of visible emission from the vial containing 2 in MeCN (Figure 4A). The more intense emission λmax appears at 447 nm with a Stoke shift of 3945 cm−1 and the weak, red-shifted emission λmax shows up at 656 nm with a Stoke shift of 11,072 cm-1. The 447 nm emission λmax is similar to that of PFAs 1 and 3, which suggests that this emission occurs from a state common to all three PFAs. The weak, red-shifted emission λmax at 656 nm is expected to be due to an ICT state with complete charge separation within PFA 2 as depicted in the computed frontier molecular orbitals in Figure 3. Such a twisted charge-separated state is expected to be stabilized by higher polarity solvents such as MeCN, consistent with the broad, red-shifted spectrum with its emission λmax at 656 nm (Figure 4A). Such an ICT state is unique to PFA 2 in MeCN and results in a significant quenched fluorescence at λmax 447 nm, whereas the fluorescence of PFAs 1 and 3 is persistently visible. Despite also containing an electron-accepting group, the features of the emission spectra of PFA 3 show surprisingly similar emission λmax and Stokes shift to PFA 1 in all solvents except from MeOH (Table 2). This result suggests that the ICT state accessible for PFA 2 is energetically inaccessible in PFA 3. An increase in QYs is also observed for PFA 3 in MeCN in comparison to PFA 2 and the weak, red-shifted emission peak at 656 nm is absent (Figure 4A), both of which indicate that the presence of the –NO2 group is essential to produce the ICT process seen in PFA 2.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0004.jpg

Emission spectra of PFAs 1–3 in MeCN (A) and THF (B). Solutions were excited at their respective absorption maxima. The top panel illustrates pictures of PFAs 1–3 in MeCN (left) and in THF (right) under a 365 nm handheld UV-light lamp. Data points for 1 and 3 are essentially overlaid.

Table 2

Fluorescence data for PFAs 1–3 with reference compounds, benzo-azaborine and nitrobenzo-azaborine in various solvents and in the solid-state.

CmpdsSolventsλem (nm)F) In solutionStokes Shift (nm)Stokes Shift (cm−1)λem (nm) (ΦF) Solid-State
Benzo-azaborine CHCl34370.97623783465 (0.09)
CH3OH4300.94583625
CH3CN4321.00613806
DMSO4381.00664050
THF4341.00643986

Nitrobenzo-azaborine CHCl35210.061336580493 (0.005)
CH3OH b b n/an/a
CH3CN5630.0021818416
DMSO b b b b
THF5230.041386853

1 CHCl34430.77583400513 (0.32)
CH3OH4360.73563380
CH3CN4430.62633742
DMSO4490.81643702
THF4420.87623691

2 CHCl3 a a a a 476, 540 (0.01)
CH3OH a a a a
CH3CN447, 656 c 67, 2763945, 11072
DMSO b b b b
THF5240.011447230

3 CHCl34470.50623600465 (0.13)
CH3OH4700.94n/an/a
CH3CN4430.24n/an/a
DMSO4501.00603418
THF4421.00623690
aFluorescence could not be obtained due to low solubility.
bFluorescence was not observed in selected solvents.
cQuantum yields could not be obtained in selected solvents or in the solid-state.
dDielectric constant adapted from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 97th Edition (2016). CHCl3 = 4.81, CH3OH = 33.0, CH3CN = 36.64, DMSO = 47.24, THF = 7.52.

It is important to interpret the results in Figure 3 with caution, since the B3LYP functional notoriously overstabilizes charge transfer excitation energies, yielding artificially lower LUMOs.99 Therefore, we carried out DFT and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations using the CAM-B3LYP functional and 6–31+G* basis set.100 The CAM-B3LYP functional includes a long-range correction that removes the self-interaction error of B3LYP. The CAM-B3LYP optimized ground-state structures of PFAs 1-3 closely resemble each other, displaying the same degree of twisting of the terminal, substituted phenyl ring (Figure 6). In all three molecules, the torsional deformation of that ring is ca. 37° which is in good agreement with the biphenyl torsional angle measurement (35°) from the X-ray crystal structure of PFA 3. The TD-DFT calculations immediately reveal important differences in PFA 2 compared to PFAs 1 and 3. The natural transition orbitals (NTOs) reveal that PFAs 1 and 3 possess one excited state which is the locally excited state (S1). Whereas, PFA 2 has the same locally excited state (S1) as that observed in 1 and 3 and an additional, second excited state (S2) due to a prominent n-π* transition centered on the nitro-phenyl substituent (Figure 5).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0005.jpg

The NTO pairs with the highest weight in describing the S1 excitations in PFAs 1, 2, and 3. The S2 excitation is also shown for PFA 2.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0006.jpg

A diagram representing electronic states of PFAs 1, 2, and 3 schematically as harmonic potentials. The lower potential represents the ground state (S0). The black potentials above indicate the locally excited state, which corresponds to the S1 state for molecules 1, 2, and 3. The orange potential represents the n-π* S2 state of molecule 2. While the locally excited states have more planar excited state geometries for PFAs 1 and 3, the n-π* transition of PFA 2 results in an excited state that remains twisted or becomes slightly more twisted relative to the ground state. The vertical excitation and emission energies are indicated in eV and in nm for each molecule. The optimized lowest energy S0 and S1 states are shown below and above the energy diagram, respectively, with the torsional angle of the biphenyl moiety labeled.

As shown from the photophysical property sections, the optical properties of the PFA core (benzo-azaborine) and PFA 1 are independent of solvent polarity or hydrogen-bonding ability and show no solvatochromism. Therefore, any observed photophysical changes based on solvent effects should be directly attributed to a charge transfer state, which is much more sensitive to the solvent polarity due to its charge-separated character. The fluorescence properties for PFAs 1-3 were measured in THF, which is less polar than MeCN, to study their fluorescence solvatochromism and to determine whether the ICT process seen in PFA 2 is responsible for the fluorescence quenching in MeCN. Interestingly, we observed solvatochromism for PFA 2 in THF as a broad red-shift in emission λmax (from 447 nm to 524 nm) (Figure 4B), an increase in QYs, and a large Stokes shift of 7,230 cm−1 (Table 2); however, no significant changes were observed for PFAs 1 and 3 in THF.

While it may be tempting to assign this broad emission in THF to less solvent-stabilized ICT state, the computations in Figure 6 suggest the presence of a n-π* transition on the nitro-phenyl substituent may be important for the solvent-dependent absorbance and fluorescence properties of PFA 2. To observe if such n-π* transition is energetically accessible, we optimized the excited-state structures of PFAs 1-3 using TD-DFT and accounted for the solvent using a polarizable continuum model (PCM) to account for the dielectric environment of THF. The choice of THF in the calculation is to explain the unusual, broad experimental emission band appearing at λmax of 524 nm. We found that upon optimizing the excited state structure of PFA 2, the n-π* excited state (orange in Figure 6) decreases in energy and becomes lower in energy than the π-π* excited-state (black). The vertical emission energy computed at the TD-DFT level of theory with CAM-B3LYP/6–31+G* with a THF solvent model is 2.33 eV (526 nm), in very good agreement with the experimental emission wavelength observed in THF (524 nm). Therefore, we conclude that the fluorescence observed in THF is likely due to the presence of a unique n-π* state in PFA 2 that does not exist in PFA 1 and PFA 3. To check the results of the CAM-B3LYP calculations, we performed the same calculations at the wB97X-D level of theory101 and obtained quantitatively similar results (with state energies within 0.1 eV of the CAM-B3LYP results). This result suggests that the relative energies of PFA 2 strongly depend on the solvent polarity, causing strong solvatochromism, with emission being tunable by adjusting solvent polarity from MeCN to THF. It also indicates that the ICT state from PFA 2 in MeCN is responsible for the quenched fluorescence since the fluorescence is recovered in THF with no ICT band.

We were also interested to learn how the formation of aggregates will affect the fluorescence and ICT process of PFA 2 since its fluorescence is quenched in MeCN. We hypothesized that formation of aggregates by increasing fractions of water (fw) in MeCN solution will generate π-π stacking interaction among PFA 2 molecules, thus enhancing emission intensity, and red-shifting the fluorescence via J-aggregation. The fluorescence spectra of PFA 2 were measured in an MeCN/water mixture with varying volume fractions of water fw = 0 to 0.95 at 0.10 increments. When water is added, the emission at 656 nm, attributed to the ICT process, is weakened, and disappears at fw = 30 (Fig. 7A). The emission λmax at 447 nm starts to increase at fw= 60 due to formation of the aggregates and continues to intensify (Fig. 7B) and red-shifts with increasing fw. The formation of aggregates at fw= 0.60 is coincident with enhancement of the emission; therefore, PFA 2 is confirmed to exhibit aggregation-induced emission (AIE). The photograph in Figure 7A shows a green fluorescence is recovered upon the formation of aggregates. The red-shifting of emission from the aggregate sample (with monomer emission from ICT process disappearing and from the locally excited state moving from λem 447 nm to λem 470 nm), is a clear signature of J-aggregation facilitating delocalization of the excited energy over multiple PFA 2 chromophores. The tendency for the fluorescence to be recovered by the formation of PFA 2 aggregates suggests that aggregation stabilizes the locally excited π-π* state, making access to the n-π* state less energetically favorable. PFAs 1 and 3 were also examined for AIE and J-aggregation in MeCN/water by the same methods, but no evidence of AIE or J-aggregation for PFAs 1 and 3 was observed (see ESI).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0007.jpg

The top panel A) illustrates a picture of PFA 2 in MeCN (concentration = 10−4 M) with increasing fractions of water under a 365 nm handheld UV-light lamp. B) Emission spectra of PFA 2 in MeCN/water mixtures (0–95% water). C) Plot of fluorescence intensity of PFA 2 vs. % of water fraction (fw). D) Picture of nitrobenzo-azaborine in MeCN (concentration = 10−4 M) upon increasing the fraction of water under a 365 nm handheld UV-light lamp.

We also investigated the effect of the phenyl spacer on the AIE seen in PFA 2. We conducted identical experiments in MeCN/water solution for nitrobenzo-azaborine (analog with no phenyl spacer). Unexpectedly, the opposite effect was observed for nitrobenzo-azaborine when compared to PFA 2. The addition of water fractions to an MeCN solution of nitrobenzo-azaborine immediately quenches the ICT emission due to aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ) as displayed from the photograph in Fig. 7D. This observation suggests that the addition of a phenyl spacer to A-π-D nitro-substituted polycyclic aromatic 1,2-azaborine, nitrobenzo-azaborine, creating a pre-twisted molecular structure is necessary to generate AIE instead of ACQ. This result reinforces our hypothesis that the formation of aggregates quenches the ICT state and stabilizes the locally excited π-π* state for PFA 2.

The solid-state emission spectra of the PFAs were also investigated to get better insight into their intermolecular interactions (Figure 8). Due to π-π stacking interactions in the solid-state, the emission wavelengths of the PFAs were red-shifted when compared to being in solution (Table 2), except for nitrobenzo-azaborine and PFA 2 in MeCN due to the ICT process in solution. On average, the solid-state emission λmax for benzo-azaborine is red-shifted by 30 nm (435 nm to 465 nm) in comparison to the emission λmax in solution. The addition of a phenyl linker to benzo-azaborine which extends π-conjugation, as for PFA 1, results in higher QYs (from 0.09 to 0.32) and red-shifts the solid-state emission λmax by 48 nm when compared to benzo-azaborine. Importantly, an increase in solid-state QYs is a valuable feature for OLED development.8894 PFA 2 also exhibits a 70 nm red shift in solid-state emission λmax versus solution. Both nitrobenzo-azaborine and PFA 2 display significantly lower QYs than the other compounds due to intersystem crossing where addition of a –NO2 group to a fluorophore is known to decrease fluorescence.102 The emission λmax at 476 nm for PFA 2 in the solid-state can be attributed to a state that is localized on the PFA core and is common to all three PFAs. Conversely, the red-shifted emission λmax at 540 nm is due to distinct state that is unique to the –NO2 substitution. Varying the –NO2 group of 2 with a –CN group of 3 allows for analysis of the electronic effect of different electron-accepting moieties in the solid-state. On average, the solid-state emission λmax for PFA 3 is red-shifted by 15 nm (450 nm to 465 nm) in comparison to solution emissions. Unexpectedly, the solid-state emission of PFA 3 is identical to that of benzo-azaborine (no phenyl spacer) with similar QYs, regardless of the presence of an electron-accepting group. This result indicates that having dual emission wavelengths is unique to the compounds containing an –NO2 group since dual emission for PFA 3 was not observed, and only the core-localized excited state process was observed in the emission spectrum, consistent with the benzo-azaborine observations.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms-1932634-f0008.jpg

Solid-state emission spectra of PFAs 1–3 and reference compounds, benzo- and nitrobenzo-azaborines, as A-C and D-E, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we report the synthesis, characterization, experimental and computational analysis of three phenyl-substituted PFAs with similar structures and functionalized with diverse electronic moieties (–H, –NO2, –CN, referred to as PFA 1, 2, and 3, respectively) containing a pre-twisted molecular structure. This new molecular design results in fluorescence that can be completely “turned off” and “turned on” via aggregation-induced emission (AIE) in PFA 2 and solvatochromism. The absorption and emission of both PFAs 1 and 3 can largely be explained by a single π-π* state due to excitation largely localized on the PFA core. However, the photophysics of PFA 2 are complicated by the presence of the –NO2 group; in addition to a locally excited π-π*state on the PFA core, the spectral features of PFA 2 also indicate the presence of a low-lying n-π* state centered on the –NO2 group and ICT states that can red-shift and quench fluorescence. The relative energies of those states strongly depend on the solvent polarity, causing strong solvatochromism in PFA 2, with emission being tunable by adjusting solvent polarity from MeCN to THF. We hypothesize that the more polar MeCN stabilizes an ICT state with strongly red-shifted and weak fluorescence. However, the ICT is inaccessible in the less polar THF, such that the photophysics in THF are instead dominated by a low-lying n-π* state that fluoresces at around 524 nm. Increasing the volume fractions of poor solvents such as water into dilute MeCN solution of PFA 2 induces aggregation. The formation of aggregates in fw 0.60 coincides with enhancement of the emission through aggregation-induced emission (AIE). Aggregation stabilizes the locally excited PFA core π-π* state through J-aggregation relative to the n-π* state and quenched ICT states, thereby increasing the overall fluorescence intensity. Although PFAs 1 and 3 show neither solvatochromism nor switchable fluorescence via AIE, both are chemically stable, with PFA 1 displaying unexpectedly high QYs in the solid-state when compared to reference, benzo-azaborine, and should be further investigated as a promising candidate for the construction of OLEDs.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgements

We thank the Peach State Bridges to the Doctorate Program from Kennesaw State University (KSU) for fellowship support for A.D.C. and the Peach State Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) from KSU for support for R.M. We also thank Mentor Protégé Research Program from KSU for research funding. S.G. acknowledges National Science Foundation (NSF) XSEDE for computational resources through Research Allocation CHE180027. R.J.G. acknowledges the NSF Chemical Synthesis Program (CHE-2046544) for a Hamamatsu C11347-11 Quantaurus-QY Absolute PL Quantum Yield Spectrometer used for optical spectroscopic analyses. We thank NSF CHE MRI 1828078 and UA for the purchase of the single crystal X-Ray diffraction instrument.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental section: synthetic protocols, characterizations (1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, 11B{1H} NMR, High resolution mass spec, FT-IR spectra), UV-visible spectra of compounds 1–3 in various solvents, solid-state excitation spectra of compounds 1–3, benzo-azaborine and nitrobenzo-azaborine, emission spectra of compounds 1–3 in various solvents, solid-state emission spectra of compounds 1–3, benzo-azaborine and nitrobenzo-azaborine, and X-ray crystallographic data for PFA 3. CCDC 2272026. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI

Data availability

All the data have been included in the ESI.†

References

1. Watson MD, Fechtenkötter A and Müllen K, Chem. Rev, 2001, 101, 1267–1300. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Schmidt-Mende L, Fechtenkötter A, Müllen K, Moons E, Friend RH and MacKenzie JD, Science, 2001, 293, 1119–1122. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Wu J, Pisula W and Müllen K, Chem. Rev, 2007, 107, 718–747. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
4. Ding D, Liang J, Shi H, Kwok RTK, Gao M, Feng G, Yuan Y, Tang BZ and Liu B, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2, 231–238. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
5. Klikar M, Solanke P, Tydlitát J and Bureš F, Chem. Rec, 2016, 16, 1886–1905. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
6. Aigner W, Bienek O, Falcão BP, Ahmed SU, Wiggers H, Stutzmann M and Pereira RN, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 8042–8057. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
7. Jhulki S and Moorthy JN, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 8280–8325. [Google Scholar]
8. Stępień M, Gońka E, Żyła M and Sprutta N, Chem. Rev, 2017, 117, 3479–3716. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
9. Miao Q, Adv. Mater, 2014, 26, 5541–5549. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
10. Wang X-Y, Yao X, Narita A and Müllen K, Acc. Chem. Res, 2019, 52, 2491–2505. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
11. Dhbaibi K, Favereau L and Crassous J, Chem. Rev, 2019, 119, 8846–8953. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
12. Hirai M, Tanaka N, Sakai M and Yamaguchi S, Chem. Rev, 2019, 119, 8291–8331. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
13. Dewar MJS, Kubba VP and Pettit R, J. Chem. Soc, 1958, 3073–3076. [Google Scholar]
14. Saint-Louis CJ, Magill LL, Wilson JA, Schroeder AR, Harrell SE, Jackson NS, Trindell JA, Kim S, Fisch AR, Munro L, Catalano VJ, Webster CE, Vaughan PP, Molek KS, Schrock AK and Huggins MT, J. Org. Chem, 2016, 81, 10955–10963. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
15. Saint-Louis CJ, Shavnore RN, McClinton CDC, Wilson JA, Magill LL, Brown BM, Lamb RW, Webster CE, Schrock AK and Huggins MT, Org. Biomol. Chem, 2017, 15, 10172–10183. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
16. Liu Z and Marder TB, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed, 2008, 47, 242–244. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
17. Hollister KK, Molino A, Breiner G, Walley JE, Wentz KE, Conley AM, Dickie DA, Wilson DJD and Gilliard RJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2022, 144, 590–598. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
18. Hollister KK, Yang W, Mondol R, Wentz KE, Molino A, Kaur A, Dickie DA, Frenking G, Pan S, Wilson DJD and Gilliard RJ Jr., Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2022, 61, e202202516. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
19. Wentz KE, Molino A, Freeman LA, Dickie DA, Wilson DJD and Gilliard RJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2022, 144, 16276–16281. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
20. Wentz KE, Molino A, Freeman LA, Dickie DA, Wilson DJD and Gilliard RJ, Inorg. Chem, 2021, 60, 13941–13949. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
21. Xu C, Wakamiya A and Yamaguchi S, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2005, 127, 1638–1639. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
22. Saito S, Matsuo K and Yamaguchi S, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2012, 134, 9130–9133. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
23. Huang J and Li Y, Front. Chem, 2018, 6, 341. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
24. Zhao P, Nettleton DO, Karki RG, Zécri FJ and Liu S-Y, ChemMedChem, 2017, 12, 358–361. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
25. Wang S, Yang D-T, Lu J, Shimogawa H, Gong S, Wang X, Mellerup SK, Wakamiya A, Chang Y-L, Yang C and Lu Z-H, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2015, 54, 15074–15078. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
26. He Y-H, Xie F-M, Li H-Z, Zhang K, Shen Y, Ding F, Wang C-Y, Li Y-Q and Tang J-X, Mater. Chem. Front, 2023,7, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar]
27. Wang J-Y and Pei J, Chinese Chem. Lett, 2016, 27, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar]
28. Park IS, Numata M, Adachi C and Yasuda T, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 2015, 89, 375–377. [Google Scholar]
29. Zhang Y, Zhang D, Wei J, Liu Z, Lu Y and Duan L, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2019, 58, 16912–16917. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
30. Nakatsuka S, Yasuda N and Hatakeyama T, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2018, 140, 13562–13565. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
31. Wang X-Y, Zhuang F-D, Wang J-Y and Pei J, Chem. Commun, 2015, 51, 17532–17535. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
32. Hashimoto S, Ikuta T, Shiren K, Nakatsuka S, Ni J, Nakamura M and Hatakeyama T, Chem. Mater, 2014, 26, 6265–6271. [Google Scholar]
33. Zhang W, Zhang F, Tang R, Fu Y, Wang X, Zhuang X, He G and Feng X, Org. Lett, 2016, 18, 3618–3621. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
34. Li G, Zhao Y, Li J, Cao J, Zhu J, Sun XW and Zhang Q, J. Org. Chem, 2015, 80, 196–203. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
35. Wang X, Zhang F, Liu J, Tang R, Fu Y, Wu D, Xu Q, Zhuang X, He G and Feng X, Org. Lett, 2013, 15, 5714–5717. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
36. Yang X, Zhao P, Qu J and Liu R, Luminescence, 2015, 30, 592–599. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
37. Martínez Hardigree JF and Katz HE, Acc. Chem. Res, 2014, 47, 1369–1377. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
38. Wang X-Y, Lin H-R, Lei T, Yang D-C, Zhuang F-D, Wang J-Y, Yuan S-C and Pei J, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2013, 52, 3117–3120. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
39. Wang X, Liao Q, Li H, Bai S, Wu Y, Lu X, Hu H, Shi Q and Fu H, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2015, 137, 9289–9295. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
40. Shao A, Xie Y, Zhu S, Guo Z, Zhu S, Guo J, Shi P, James TD, Tian H and Zhu WH, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed, 2015, 54, 7275–7280. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
41. Arbaciauskiene E, Kazlauskas K, Miasojedovas A, Jursenas S, Jankauskas V, Holzer W, Getautis V and Sackus A, Synth. Met, 2010, 160, 490–498. [Google Scholar]
42. Wang X-Y, Zhuang F-D, Wang R-B, Wang X-C, Cao X-Y, Wang J-Y and Pei J, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2014, 136, 3764–3767. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
43. Zhong Z, Wang X-Y, Zhuang F-D, Ai N, Wang J, Wang J-Y, Pei J, Peng J and Cao Y, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 15420–15425. [Google Scholar]
44. Fu Y, Zhang K, Dmitrieva E, Liu F, Ma J, Weigand JJ, Popov AA, Berger R, Pisula W, Liu J and Feng X, Org. Lett, 2019, 21, 1354–1358. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
45. Fukagawa H, Oono T, Iwasaki Y, Hatakeyama T and Shimizu T, Mater. Chem. Front, 2018, 2, 704–709. [Google Scholar]
46. Qiang P, Sun Z, Wan M, Wang X, Thiruvengadam P, Bingi C, Wei W, Zhu W, Wu D and Zhang F, Org. Lett, 2019, 21, 4575–4579. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
47. Gao N, Cheng C, Yu C, Hao E, Wang S, Wang J, Wei Y, Mu X and Jiao L, Dalt. Trans, 2014, 43, 7121–7127. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
48. Wang X-Y, Zhuang F-D, Zhou X, Yang D-C, Wang J-Y and Pei J, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 8152–8161. [Google Scholar]
49. Hatakeyama T, Shiren K, Nakajima K, Nomura S, Nakatsuka S, Kinoshita K, Ni J, Ono Y and Ikuta T, Adv. Mater, 2016, 28, 2777–2781. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
50. Jeon SK, Jang HJ and Lee JY, Adv. Opt. Mater, 2019, 7, 1801462. [Google Scholar]
51. Han SH, Jeong JH, Yoo JW and Lee JY, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2019, 7, 3082–3089. [Google Scholar]
52. Oda S, Kawakami B, Kawasumi R, Okita R and Hatakeyama T, Org. Lett, 2019, 21, 9311–9314. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
53. Liang X, Yan Z-P, Han H-B, Wu Z-G, Zheng Y-X, Meng H, Zuo J-L and Huang W, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2018, 57, 11316–11320. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
54. Matsui K, Oda S, Yoshiura K, Nakajima K, Yasuda N and Hatakeyama T, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2018, 140, 1195–1198. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
55. Anthony JE, Facchetti A, Heeney M, Marder SR and Zhan X, Adv. Mater, 2010, 22, 3876–3892. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
56. Zhan X, Tan Z, Domercq B, An Z, Zhang X, Barlow S, Li Y, Zhu D, Kippelen B and Marder SR, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2007, 129, 7246–7247. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
57. Jung BJ, Tremblay NJ, Yeh M-L and Katz HE, Chem. Mater, 2011, 23, 568–582. [Google Scholar]
58. Jones BA, Ahrens MJ, Yoon M-H, Facchetti A, Marks TJ and Wasielewski MR, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2004, 43, 6363–6366. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
59. He S, Liu J, Yang G, Bin Z and You J, Mater. Horizons, 2022, 9, 2818–2823. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
60. Hoffmann J, Geffroy B, Jaques E, Hissler M and Staubitz A, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2021, 9, 14720–14729. [Google Scholar]
61. Turkoglu G, Cinar ME and Ozturk T, Molecules, 2017, 22, 1522. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
62. Naveen KR, Yang HI and Kwon JH, Commun. Chem, 2022, 5, 149. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
63. Ha JM, Hur SH, Pathak A, Jeong J-E and Woo HY, NPG Asia Mater., 2021, 13, 53. [Google Scholar]
64. Mellerup SK and Wang S, Trends Chem., 2019, 1, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
65. Ito H, Yumura K and Saigo K, Org. Lett, 2010, 12, 3386–3389. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
66. Lee H, Fischer M, Shoichet BK and Liu S-Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2016, 138, 12021–12024. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
67. Liu L, Marwitz AJV, Matthews BW and Liu S-Y, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2009, 48, 6817–6819. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
68. Campbell PG, V Marwitz AJ and Liu SY, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed, 2012, 51, 6074–6092. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
69. Huang H, Liu L, Wang J, Zhou Y, Hu H, Ye X, Liu G, Xu Z, Xu H, Yang W, Wang Y, Peng Y, Yang P, Sun J, Yan P, Cao X and Tang BZ, Chem. Sci, 2022, 13, 3129–3139. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
70. Chen Y, Chen W, Qiao Y, Lu X and Zhou G, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2020, 59, 7122–7130. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
71. Zhang C, Zhang L, Sun C, Sun W and Liu X, Org. Lett, 2019, 21, 3476–3480. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
72. Zhang Y, Zhang C, Guo Y, Ye J, Zhen B, Chen Y and Liu X, J. Org. Chem, 2021, 86, 6322–6330. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
73. Zi L, Zhang J, Li C, Qu Y, Zhen B, Liu X and Zhang L, Org. Lett, 2020, 22, 1499–1503. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
74. Li C, Liu Y, Sun Z, Zhang J, Liu M, Zhang C, Zhang Q, Wang H and Liu X, Org. Lett, 2018, 20, 2806–2810. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
75. Zhang Q, Sun Z, Zhang L, Li M, Zi L, Liu Z, Zhen B, Sun W and Liu X, J. Org. Chem, 2020, 85, 7877–7883. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
76. Luo J, Xie Z, Lam JWY, Cheng L, Tang BZ, Chen H, Qiu C, Kwok HS, Zhan X and Liu Y, Chem. Commun, 2001, 18, 1740–1741. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
77. Suzuki S, Sasaki S, Sairi AS, Iwai R, Tang BZ and Konishi G, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2020, 59, 9856–9867. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
78. Dormán G, Nakamura H, Pulsipher A and Prestwich GD, Chem. Rev, 2016, 116, 15284–15398. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
79. Würthner F, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2020, 59, 14192–14196. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
80. Liao P, Huang J, Yan Y and Tang BZ, Mater. Chem. Front, 2021, 5, 6693–6717. [Google Scholar]
81. Wang H, Zhao E, Lam JWY and Tang BZ, Mater. Today, 2015, 18, 365–377. [Google Scholar]
82. Ye F, Shen C, Guan J, Liu Y, Wang X, Wang J, Cong M, Wang W, Zhang T, Zou B, Zheng J and Ma Y, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2022, 10, 3560–3566. [Google Scholar]
83. Wan W-M, Tian D, Jing Y-N, Zhang X-Y, Wu W, Ren H and Bao H-L, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed, 2018, 57, 15510–15516. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
84. V Marwitz AJ, Lamm AN, Zakharov LN, Vasiliu M, Dixon DA and Liu S-Y, Chem. Sci, 2012, 3, 825–829. [Google Scholar]
85. Taniguchi T and Yamaguchi S, Organometallics, 2010, 29, 5732–5735. [Google Scholar]
86. Kundu A, Karthikeyan S, Sagara Y, Moon D and Anthony SP, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2018, 20, 27385–27393. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
87. Wiethaus G, Toldo JM, da Silveira Santos F, da Costa Duarte R, Gonçalves PFB and Rodembusch FS, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2019, 21, 4408–4420. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
88. Kagatikar S and Sunil D, J. Mater. Sci, 2022, 57, 105–139. [Google Scholar]
89. Xiao L, Chen Z, Qu B, Luo J, Kong S, Gong Q and Kido J, Adv. Mater, 2011, 23, 926–952. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
90. Sasabe H and Kido J, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2013, 1, 1699–1707. [Google Scholar]
91. Fan C and Yang C, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2014, 43, 6439–6469. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
92. Murawski C, Leo K and Gather MC, Adv. Mater, 2013, 25, 6801–6827. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
93. Schmidbauer S, Hohenleutner A and König B, Adv. Mater, 2013, 25, 2114–2129. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
94. Chen Y and Ma D, J. Mater. Chem, 2012, 22, 18718–18734. [Google Scholar]
95. Blanksby SJ and Ellison GB, Acc Chem Res, 2003, 36, 255–263. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
96. Grant DJ and Dixon DA, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2006, 110, 12955–12962. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
97. Sugie M, Takeo H and Matsumura C, Chem. Phys. Lett, 1979, 64, 573–575. [Google Scholar]
98. Hansch C, Leo A and Taft RW, Chem. Rev, 1991, 91, 165–195. [Google Scholar]
99. Dreuw A and Head-Gordon M, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2004, 126, 4007–4016. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
100. Yanai T, Tew DP and Handy NC, Chem. Phys. Lett, 2004, 393, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
101. Chai J-D and Head-Gordon M, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 2008, 10, 6615–6620. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
102. Sadowski B, Kaliszewska M, Poronik YM, Czichy M, Janasik P, Banasiewicz M, Mierzwa D, Gadomski W, Lohrey TD, Clark JA, Łapkowski M, Kozankiewicz B, Vullev VI, Sobolewski AL, Piatkowski P and Gryko DT, Chem. Sci, 2021, 12, 14039–14049. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


This article has not been cited yet.

Impact metrics

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/154452498
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/154452498

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Kennesaw State University

    NIGMS NIH HHS (1)

    National Science Foundation (4)