User talk:Blahblah32blahblah

Chase Headley warning

Please, try and understand that what I am about to say is not personal. If you continue reverting (see WP:3RR), being uncivil (see WP:Civility), and owning (see WP:Own) on the Chase Headley article I will be forced to bring it to ANI. Again, I am not trying to create an issue. If we can nip this in the bud now, that is for the best. Thank you. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 04:06, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

The edits I did to Deolis Guerra, Carlos Gutierrez, Danny Valencia and the other players in the Twins' organization was based upon a recent discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 09:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I saw the discussion - everyone was against you. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was disagreement on whether or not there should be minor league awards in infoboxes. Everyone agreed on international awards and minor league teams. Read it agee, you'll see.--Johnny Spasm (talk) 11:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Gooden

I never saw his press conference. Is there a clip of it online?-DANO- (talk) 04:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bucks official web site.... where they also list the player numbers..... Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson is getting traded, so it frees up his number.-DANO- (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NBA rosters page

Can you do something so that the Portland and Utah rosters don't disappear everyday?-DANO- (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. Since you obviously haven't figure it out yet - there is nothing that can be done - the page just cant handle that many large templates. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 18:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop splitting hairs

you are splitting hair over the Berkman deal. The deal has been made and he's agreed to it. It's foolish and childish. Primus128 (talk) 02:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're completely missing the point. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 02:16, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		The Original Barnstar
		I like your bold approach to the NBA stats tables. Someone might get mad at you, but I agree that we're better off without the stats. We'll never be able to properly maintain those things. Zagalejo^^^ 05:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Sorry, I didn't realize I had removed the template at the Luke Jackson page. I was shuffling through some old revisions, and inadvertently did something along the way. Zagalejo^^^ 06:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mitch Moreland

I know MLB.com still lists Moreland as an OF on its roster, but this is due to his minor league games. His MLB games have him playing 40 games at 1st and only 7 in RF.

His MiLB position was mostly due to Texas always having more than one 1B player in each ofhis leagues. Chris Davis, Justin Smoak, Ryan Garko just to name a few. MLB Minors Red3biggs (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only way to settle position disputes is to go by how he is listed on the team official site. There are a number of player in each league that have problems like this... OF/IF... IF/DH... Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 02:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 19:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J.R. Smith and Renaldo Balkman

Please don't make any unsourced edits reflecting transactions that have not yet happened. NYCRuss ☎ 00:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It WAS announced Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 01:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And your verifiable and reliable source is? NYCRuss ☎ 01:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

www.knicks.com Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Now please inert the reference into the J.R. Smith page when you edit it. NYCRuss ☎ 01:17, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Thanks

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Curtis Granderson, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status.

This user helped promote Curtis Granderson to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Why are you deleting my editing. im not guessing, im looking it up on sources (Jdp123) (talk) 04:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well you're "sources" are crap - because you've yet to link one, and you were wrong on Youkilis. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 04:35, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well I dont know how to link and what did I do wrong with youkilis (Jdp123) (talk) 04:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And Lillibridge is in the active roster because he played (Jdp123) (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Feliciano

Good call on rewording that last line in the NY Yankees section. I had written that a while back when circumstances were much different. Only one problem, and I'll look too. The source that I had put there states that he is unlikely to pitch, so we should probably find a different source stating that he's on his rehab assignments and maybe called up in a couple weeks. Kjscotte34 (talk) 20:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cancel that, I found one! Thanks again! Kjscotte34 (talk) 20:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA Thanks

This user helped promote Jim Thome to good article status.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Jim Thome, which has recently become a GA. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Blahblah32blahblah

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dellin Betances may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[New York Yankees]] ({{mlby|2011}}, {{mlby|2013}}-present))

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kevin Barker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Barker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Barker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 13:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help a university student edit a wikipedia article about Chris Smith!

Hello!

I'm Dan. I go to Cornell University, and one of my assignments for my class is to improve a Wikipedia article. My group members chose Chris Smith (basketball, born 1987), as you can see on that article's talk page. One of the elements of the assignment is to have a meaningful interaction with a few Wikipedia members who have edited the page. Is it ok if we edit the page and message you for guidance? Would you mind adding that page to your watchlist (if it is not on there already!) so you can help us out with this project? It would be much appreciated!

-FingersInFood (talk) 03:44, 26 September 2013 (UTC) (talk) 03:40, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Deal (Seinfeld), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Truth and Siobhan Fallon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

The reason I had reverted your removal of MSG Network on the Mike Emrick page was that you failed to include any edit summary explaining why you had made the edit so there was no way for other editors to know your reasoning in doing so. In the future please include a summary when making such deletions to avoid such misunderstandings. Thanks. Centpacrr (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Free agents on NBA rosters

Just to clarify that the reason we've been keeping the free agents on the infoboxes (at least from my understanding) wasn't because they were on the official roster pages (those things are rarely up-to-date, anyway), but to make our job as editors easier: you can quickly keep track of free agents and given the FA tag, it isn't as if the average wiki reader will think that, for example, Wear, is with the Knicks. Plus, it's a good way to spot when less experienced editors than, for example, us, have been editing those pages before any kind of official release. I mean, if we have said resource, why not use it? At least until the offseason ends, then, we can remove them. Anyway, I wanna see what you think about this.Intruder007 (talk) 03:57, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was done because that's how the NBA handled them. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 19:39, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blahblah32blahblah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blahblah32blahblah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blahblah32blahblah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yankees Roster

First, and of most importance, thank you for the work you're doing on that! It's always nice to see others being on top of the transactions. Next time you fix it, would you mind doing an edit summary? I know it's not THAT big of a deal, but it helps. Thanks, and I hope that didn't come across in a bad "tone" -- I'm never sure how my message will be received! Have a good day! Kjscotte34 (talk) 17:53, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]