Property talk:P682
Documentation
is involved in the biological process
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P682#Type Q8054, Q134219, Q420927, Q7187, Q84467700, Q22325163, Q189118, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P682#Target required claim P686, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
Mapping to RO
[edit]I believe the intent is that this intended to be used where the GO Consortium would use involved in. Note that the GOC is refining the set of relationships that can connect a gene product to a term (to track, follow this: https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/13). Crucially, it will distinguish when a gene product is truly involved in a process such as apoptosis vs when it is acting upstream of it. This will allow extraction of more precise gene sets. I can act as coordinator for Wikidata here. I suggest WD adopts the distinction too. I'm not sure whether this property should be mapped to the super-property or the more precise and useful involved-in. As an aside, I find the use of a noun phrase "biological process" for a property a bit odd.
For now I am wondering how best to map the current property to RO. I am thinking of making an RO ID property to RO:0002331 plus an equivalent property http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002331. Note that these are not strictly equivalent since the RO relation is more general and can apply, for example, to a traffic light that is involved-in the regulation of traffic. I have a related question here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P1628#Semantics_-_when_should_this_be_used? Cmungall (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Cmungall: Hi Chris, unfortunately the project link you give is a 404 (now) so the general question: what is the status of the project? --SCIdude (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)