Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,606 in November to 11,657 on January 6th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 112 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,450 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
It is another year and time to wish all project members a Happy New Year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered January 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hi there, I mistakenly called it an en dash in the summary but the markup was actually needed to create a non-breaking space in order to keep the "2" and "cm" in the Cappuccino article connected. It prevents an automatic line break, meaning that it prevents the "2" from ending up at the end of a line, and "cm" only showing up on the next line. - Takeaway (talk) 13:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi DBAK, this site here [[1]] gives the grid ref SZ 211 938 as somewhere in Highcliffe. Which strictly speaking is in the borough of Christchurch, yes. However, I would expect the grid reference of a town to be around the town centre. To be honest I hadn't checked but I know the grid refs of listed buildings near the High Street to be typically SZ 150 ??? to SZ 160 ???. The grid reference for the Mayor's Parlour (old town hall) is SZ 15790 92835.--Ykraps (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Quite. Thanks for the reply. I screwed it up in a way I might be able to explain tomorrow morning after a nice coffee but not now. Sorry. Hint: bad parameter (I think ...), doesn't make it onto the page. I've reverted it - thanks for putting me right, good night and best wishes DBaK (talk) 01:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, this is a bit odd. If you look at the edit that introduced the SZ 211... grid ref, the location shown in the diff doesn't appear in the resultant article's infobox, rather a different (and reasonably accurate) one does. Is this because the infobox is {{Infobox settlement}} rather than {{Infobox UK place}}? (PS DBAK, I came here after reading your edit summary - I figured some personal talkpage chat must have occurred...) PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, that's odd indeed. I didn't look at the article, only the diff in history. I saw a figure beginning with 2 and reverted without further ado.--Ykraps (talk) 09:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Ha, yes, I sort of did the same thing the other way round! I didn't realize it was an invisible/unusable parameter (PCW is absolutely right), so I looked at the previous diff, saw a viable OS GR there, and wrongly assumed that it had been put there by that particular edit! Doh. Thanks for your cooperation and given that we have now spent several hours of high-quality wiki-time on it I think I will shut up right now! Cheers DBaK (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Possibly. I see that the redirect goes to History but then Caccia is not mentioned there anyway. Yes, maybe natural - at least it is accurate. But how this should/can settle in the long term I can't imagine - it is quite a can of worms. DBaK (talk) 18:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, brilliant, in fact I'm listening to it right now because I often use you as a reason to buy music. :) Lovely (trumpets are a bit quiet but hey) DBaK (talk) 18:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,657 last month to 11,759 on January 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 112 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,462 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered February 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
01:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bongwarrior
Thank you, DBAK. I wish that everyone was more like you. I knew that I sounded confrontational, I'm just exhausted with being ignored, neglected, and abused. Thank you for the support. I don't know how to retrieve the page, is it possible to do so? It's frustrating to have to do the citations again is all. Or how do I find the Google cache version, at least I can copy the bio from there. He deleted it before I even had a chance to get rejected / speedy deleted, and I have added many new citations. I'm hoping to get more support from reliable sources and I'm communicating with them now. Thanks again, you really stepped in at a great time. Chadpaul222 (talk) 22:30, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your explanation, it's the only decent answer I got so far! I just wanted to foloow up - if I understand right, that information should be published somewhere to be validated, but at the same time when I post it in Wikipedia it cannot be copy/paste. So it means that I should have the same content and 2 different versions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juli 88 (talk • contribs) 09:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,759 last month to 11,786 on February 26th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 113 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,470 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon
There is an edit-a-thon on the subject of Art+Feminism to be held at the Hepworth Wakefield on Sunday 8 March 2015. Any members who fit the criteria "Women and allies of all genders, including non-binary gender identities" in the Wakefield area who can get to the event would be welcome to participate. For more information and to sign-up see the event page.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered March 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
We’d like to invite you to participate in a study that aims to explore how WikiProject members coordinate activities of distributed group members to complete project goals. We are specifically seeking to talk to people who have been active in at least one WikiProject in their time in Wikipedia. Compensation will be provided to each participant in the form of a $10 Amazon gift card.
The purpose of this study is to better understanding the coordination practices of Wikipedians active within WikiProjects, and to explore the potential for tool-mediated coordination to improve those practices. Interviews will be semi-structured, and should last between 45-60 minutes. If you decide to participate, we will schedule an appointment for the online chat session. During the appointment you will be asked some basic questions about your experience interacting in WikiProjects, how that process has worked for you in the past and what ideas you might have to improve the future.
You must be over 18 years old, speak English, and you must currently be or have been at one time an active member of a WikiProject. The interview can be conducted over an audio chatting channel such as Skype or Google Hangouts, or via an instant messaging client. If you have questions about the research or are interested in participating, please contact Michael Gilbert at (206) 354-3741 or by email at mdg@uw.edu.
We cannot guarantee the confidentiality of information sent by email.
"It was widely believed he was not made First Sea Lord because his wife was Prime Minister Clement Attlee's sister-in-law and Attlee felt such an appointment could look like nepotism."
It seems First Sea Lord would have been the normal progression, so such an explanation would be necessary (though possibly unconvincing). I can't find a reference, and I am researching another theory. Do you know where I might find more information regarding contemporary opinion on this matter?Cjsdavis (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
If someone keeps adding back a long rambling personal unencyclopedic commentary on the the topic of an article, it amounts to vandalism, even if it is sincere and not ""I LIKE PIE!" The user had already had his addition removed by Cluebot, so he had received the very polite automated notice with explanations about adding references and verifiability. He simply added his essay back to the article. It included unencyclopedic content as well as some statements which I can't determine the accuracy of. I did not feel it was a good use of time to remove the worst parts and tag the remainder as needing references, so they would remain in the article indefinitely thus tagged. It is up to the editor to find a reliable source for the new encyclopedic content.If you wish to research the topic and find references to verify those statements which would contribute to the article, and remove the inappropriate parts, please feel free to restore the content with those improvement, in such a way that any parts written by the new editor are credited to him. Regards. Edison (talk) 13:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,786 last month to 11,807 on March 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 113 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,480 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Leeds Meet-up
Members are invited to a meet-up in Leeds on 12 April 2015 where you can meet other Wikipedians and discuss things. You can also have a meal and drink together. The meeting will be at 12:30 at The New Conservatory, The Albions, Albion Place, Leeds, LS1 6JL. If you are interested then you can find more details and sign-up at the meet-up page.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered April 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Just a quick message to say thanks for your support over the vandalism and two accounts accusations. It seems that Epm-84 isn't very fond of my attempts to try and improve the article! Your support is much appreciated - Coradia175 (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
It appears there is indeed a source - however it's a massive PDF document - but he hasn't stated what page the information can be found on which is as much use as a one legged chair. Whilst the information is referenced (right at the bottom of the table!) no other TOC articles list the unit capacity info - a fact he bizarrely seems to think is invalid - even though I've given him two perfectly sound examples
I've noticed he is the only contributor to that page to insist it is included - I'd have thought if it was as much as an issue he makes it out to be then it would have been included long before now. I'll take the information he's added back out again in a day or two - his argument the routes should be removed because he's made the class column looked cramped with the additional column is poor
I don't like his attitude to be honest and I'm considering speaking to an admin because he hasn't even had the decency to apologise for accusing me of vandalism. I'm not certain how it works but is it possible to say something under WP:OWN? My reasoning behind it is unless the capacity is listed he doesn't like it - yet no other contributors to the page have complained about the lack of its inclusion previously. He's claimed on at least two occasions that other users have commented for his edits for "adding useful information" but I can't see any comments on his talk page! - Coradia175 (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. I'm sorry that you are having this trouble still. I think his WP:OWN issues are only part of the picture. I am badly placed to advise you, but the best recommendation I can make is that you maybe either or both: (a) mention it to @Redrose64: who is an excellent admin AND a transport person; (b) raise it at WikiProject UK Railways which is a good place to try to get clarity on policy and what should and shouldn't be done across articles. Hope this helps, and best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
It appears another user has joined in on the debate about the Northern Rail fleetlist - but after checking the contributions of both users - I have a suspicion that Epm-84 (Contribs) and Hstudent (Contribs) are the same person. I understand from what you said earlier in that discussion that having two accounts is allowed - but surely using both of these accounts to make it look like more people support your argument isn't allowed? I'm not one for accusing people of things for no reason - but it does look a bit suspicious and if proven to be the case very hypocritical on his part for accusing me of using two accounts!
What do you think of it? I just thought it would be a sensible idea to get a second opinion from another user first before speaking to an administrator - just in case my suspicion about the situation proves to be wrong! Cheers - Coradia175 (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Oh dear - sounds like a mess. I think it's beyond my knowledge or expertise to comment, but yes, while having two accounts can be OK, using two accounts to game the system would be a big nono - I would take it straight to a sympathetic admin and just informally say "what do you think about this?" Sorry to not help more, and good luck DBaK (talk) 07:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Yeah - it was suspicious the moment I read it. Whilst I'm happy for people to disagree with me I think using two accounts to try and boost their side of the argument is not on - and I think anybody who is found to do this should be banned immediately. I've taken your advice and taken the situation to User:Mjroots who has helped me a few times in the past and given me useful advice. Thanks once again for your support - I'll let you know what happens! Cheers - Coradia175 (talk) 14:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, following on from you r undoing my edit on this, I'm not sure if this is the right place for Talk but I think the statement is relevant. As a company director myself, and with a mother who has dementia, I know that there are legal obligations that ust be fulfilled by a company director, and that these are not possible if one has dementia to the extent described in the report by the DPP on their justification for not prosecuting. As such, I think this is relevant information that should be on the page.
Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartcom (talk • contribs) 22:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tim and thanks very much for the note. I agree that it is both interesting and relevant, but I'm not sure that we can use it in the form in which you had it. I'm not even sure that WP:OR is exactly what I mean, but it's something like that. Would you mind if I (or you!) took it to the article's Talk page? I think we could probably find a way forward there. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,807 last month to 11,836 on April 28th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 114 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 58 out of a total number of 3,489 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Elections
With the general election and local elections taking place on 7 May there will be a large number of articles that will need to be updated with the election results when they are declared. Also there will be new articles needed for the election results and for newly elected MPs who we have no articles for. Would be good if these new articles could be tagged with the project banner if they are relevant to the area so that they can be tracked. Please keep an eye on the articles of any candidates so that they remain neutral and are not vandalised, as they will be popular pages at the moment.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered May 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks for that. Often when I've gone through an entire article and beefed it up, I need a day or two's rest and then look at it with a clear mind to spot little niggles. Bound to be a few other things lurking. I have a recent photo of what's left of the pier taken from the Palace Pier deck, but it's not very good quality. Ritchie333(talk)(cont)21:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
You're very very welcome: it's a pleasure to have helped. I've seen bits of its sad decline (the pier not the article) and I've watched the article with interest, and I am most appreciative of your brilliant editing spree there. Yes, I did wonder about a photo saying "this is it right now". I haven't been there a little while and I wonder how it now looks - even sadder, I suspect. Maybe if you put your photo in it might inspire someone to find something better ... ? Best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:58, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,836 last month to 11,889 on June 1st). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 115 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 59 out of a total number of 3,502 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
York Meet-up
Members are invited to a meet-up in York on 15 June 2015 where you can meet other Wikipedians and discuss things. You can also have a meal and drink together. The meeting will be at 12:30 at Your Bike Shed, 148/150 Micklegate, York, YO1 6JX. If you are interested then you can find more details and sign-up at the meet-up page.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered June 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Are you spying on me??
You changed almost everything I changed..
Why??
I'm just curios.. Cuz tho some of them are correct..
What's the matter? Shanti zxcv (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
No, I am not. You came to my attention because of your edits on one article so I checked your other edits - we do that quite often. Please see your Talk page, which is here: User talk:Shanti zxcv - I have already sent you a welcome message, a comment on your edits, and a recommendation as to how to get started editing. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you mean "pissed" as in (BrE) "pissed off", i.e. "annoyed", or "pissed" as in (BrE) "pissed": "drunk"??? :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 09:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,889 last month to 12,008 on June 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 115 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 59 out of a total number of 3,512 articles.
Currently we have thirty three Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered July 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Keith D keeps adding development squad me,bers to teh Hull City 1st team page. Factually incorrect and they should not be on there. That is why they keep being removed... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.172.38 (talk) 07:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Please elaborate...It might not have needed correcting, but the edit did make it easier on the eyes while reducing total byte size. If anything, a revert was unnecessary. It sould be noted Im not here to argue, Im just curious to hear more of your side of it, as this is the first time a "syntax edit" I've made (which are quite numerous) has been reverted. Thank you.
I knew there had to be a technical reason, I was taught not to write out numbers larger than 13, but I don't think it is a universal teaching. Also, I was unaware "per cent" was British, which makes sense since I just thought it was an archaic form, but the context (targeting?) is indeed primarily British concerned. You'd be suprised, some people type "don't" in place of "doesn't", sometimes I confuse local variance as errors. Also, I, in retrospect, agree that it does look better when started with a word as opposed to numerals.
Thank you for your reply, and for your contributions.
My curiosity had been awakened by this IPs edits in various places and then I saw your comment on their tp. Do you also see a trend there? If there is one, is it pro or contra? Thoughts? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:12, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Colney Hatch Park
Sorry, I kinda knew I was being sloppy as I wrote it, but couldn't summon the willpower to write what I perceived "nobody would read anyway" properly. Colney Hatch Park is the old name on the maps for New Southgate. of which I am resident. Have fixed it now. :)
Thanks for the note. This editor seems to think that describing Tom Jones as British rather than Welsh is appropriate, which IMO is about as crazy as you could possibly get. I was searching for a guideline about noting peoples' nationalities when I first encountered this fellow's edits, because I'm also pretty sure there is one, but I couldn't find it. I'm not sure if ANI would be very useful in this case because (a) I'm an admin and (b) the user seems to change IP's often. However if you want to make a note there, feel free. Graham8709:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
off the top of my head, I would say we should go by what Tom describes himself as, no?
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,008 last month to 12,031 on July 30th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 116 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,517 articles.
Currently we have thirty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered August 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,031 last month to 12,045 on August 26th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 116 is ahead of WP:GM who have 83. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,525 articles.
Currently we have thirty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered September 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Just wondering why, having asked me to discuss a drafting point on a talk page you immediately, and without explanation, delete my requested contribution to the discussion. I don't think WP etiquette encourages that, to be honest. – Tim riley talk14:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
The distant, vaguely rhythmical thudding which you can hear is my head meeting my desk. I make lots of mistakes but this one was multilayered and splendid in its complexity and stupidity. I now require tea. Excuse me. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Mr. Christopher Attlee is a nephew of Mr. C. R. Attlee. A clerk. Born February, 1915; educated at Shrewsbury and Corpus Christi College, Oxford. A member of the Clerical and Administrative Workers' Union, and secretary of the Orpington Labour Party. He was in the Colonial Administrative Service in the Soiomon Islands, 1940-42, and (he Australian Commonwealth Department of Labour, 1942-46. Member of British Institute of Management. ref. The Times House of Commons, 1951. Graemp (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,045 last month to 12,193 on September 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 119 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,532 articles.
Currently we have thirty five Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered October 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hello, DBaK, thank you for the warm welcome and helpful tips & links, much appreciated! As stated in the C2C talk page discussion, I am affiliated with the C2C book and based on what I've learnt about WP:COI so far, will limit my contributions in the future accordingly. Thank you for the hint. Best regards, Kmusc (talk) 00:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you so much Kmusc for this nice message; it's greatly appreciated. Sorry about the slow reply - real life caught up with me a bit. I will try to pop in to the C2C article and comment there. Many thanks for all this. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,193 last month to 12,209 on October 30th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 118 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,534 articles.
Currently we have thirty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered November 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
@Checkingfax:
Hello @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: I originally wanedt to just thank you for your recent edits on Michael Laucke. But then I started to read you user page and enjoyed it's frankness so much; you also have a great sense of humor! And you gave me some good laughs. In French (which I am), we say "un vrai tonique" about someone who has such a good effect. I never really know how to translate this, but I guess "a real pickup" is not a bad translation. I'm glad you stuck it out . So, thank you again for those few little corrections that no one saw. I'm amazed I missed, for example "seven-years-old" and other errors. Thank you kindly.
very best wishes, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, could you please check why we see two different applications to proper names such as Debagyan (an Armenian with Turkey citizenship) and Mumin (a Pomak and Greece citizen, without unconvenient script)? thanks and regards Manaviko (talk) 00:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm back. Sorry about the slow reply. As per Gareth's reply above, I'm sorry but I have no idea what we are talking about here. Are you on the right page? Please clarify. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,209 last month to 12,218 on November 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 118 is ahead of WP:GM who have 84. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,539 articles.
Currently we have thirty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
A Happy Christmas to all members of the project and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2015 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered December 2015 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks for taking out that the cn on this article. I had seen it months ago and meant to research it for a source, since I had heard that tidbit several times. But I got sidetracked and never got back to it. Now, I have to put some more work into that woeful article. But your correct delection of a long-standing cn tag was the impetus. I built what I did out of a revert of your edit, only as a show of gratitude that you brought my attention to it. Again, thanks. And anybody who is on the good side of The Welsh Buzzard can't be all bad. Onel5969TT me23:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Wow, that's great - well done for filling in that gap! I am just watching that very splendid and ludicrous film even as we speak ... what a hoot! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Here's some text and a date and a PS 17:32, 27 March 2003 (UTC) PS this is text after the date
Test 3 please leave alone
Here's some text and a date and a PS on the next line but not properly separated 17:32, 27 March 2003 (UTC)
PS this is text after the date 17:32, 27 March 2003 (UTC)
Test 4 please leave alone
Here's some text and a date and a PS separated onto the second line below 17:32, 27 March 2003 (UTC)
PS this is text after the date but in a new para 17:32, 27 March 2003 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,218 last month to 12,254 on January 4th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 120 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,559 articles.
Currently we have thirty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
A Happy New Year to all members of the project.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered January 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks! The video aired recently on Australian music video TV program rage, on a Countdown re-run from 1983, so it was in my mental list of wikipedia pages to update ;-) I'm about to add their Australian chart peaks to the discography section of the Heaven 17 page, too.Nqr9 (talk) 08:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
User page and talk page are move protected; if they switch from move vandalism to garden variety vandalism, let someone know and we can semi-protect for a while. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry I tagged that as a vandal edit. The edit you reverted was indeed a vandal edit, and the user was blocked for repeatedly adding this to the article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:31, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
nononono don't apologise, I'm sorry - that was a complete misclick from me! Thanks for picking it up so fast. Cheers DBaK (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,254 last month to 12,301 on January 31st). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 121 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 60 out of a total number of 3,563 articles.
Currently we have thirty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered February 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
In the future, you don't need to use MFD. You can put {{db-author}} on the page and any admin would likely delete it. Being talk pages, once the main page is deleted, WP:G8 is also applicable. Just advice as that would be faster. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 12,301 last month to 12,503 on 29 February). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 123 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 61 out of a total number of 3,580 articles.
Currently we have thirty nine Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2016 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered March 2016 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hello, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi DBaK. In regards to this I suppose they might be unicyclists but you gotta have strong tummy muscles to make those work :-) I am glad to see your name on my watchlist again so cheers and best wishes for your 2017. MarnetteD|Talk 23:27, 29 December 2016
(UTC)
Thanks for the very kind Christmas and New Year messages. And all the very best to friends and colleagues here too. DBaK (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Sort of, yes. Thanks for raising this. It seems perhaps a bit unfortunate to remove the whole image because of the objection to the logo, though I must say I have some sympathy with that objection: at the very best the logo in unnecessary, though I'm not quite sure I'd agree with the "paid ad" argument. Anyway, I have reverted that edit but suggested that the editor needs to do something better than simple deletion. I quite possibly don't have time/energy for much more but a discussion would be a start, and maybe someone else will find a more suitable image that shows the structure in the box without advertising a fizzy drink! Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
It seems fine now, whatever, after various interventions. I'm on a slow link and it's hard to see how it now looks but there seems to be an image of the structure (which I can't see right now!) and no logo, which seems fine to me. I won't be intervening again. Cheers DBaK (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Titchwell
Hi, I saw your comment and I'll fix it since I'm the main editor. Unfortunately I'm going to be away in Norfolk for a few days (and probably going to Titchwell!) I'll try to remember, but if I forget and nobody else does it, give me a nudge, cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me?19:29, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Just to let you know, your change to the article "Rape during the occupation of Germany" (here) was correct, but for the wrong reasons. Please see MOS:SPELL09 for future reference as to conventions used for numerals in the body text. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, thank you for reverting the unsourced updates of an IP user on Juan García Ábrego. Though it seemed like a vandalism edit, there are several sources (U.S. government ones) that claim he was born in La Paloma. He has two legal/official birth certificates from Matamoros, Mexico and La Paloma respectively, hence the confusion. Most sources maintain that he was born in Matamoros and his parents probably lied about his birth in Texas to register him as a U.S. citizen. The reason why he was extradited so quickly after he was arrested in Mexico was because the government used his U.S. citizenship to expel him from the country. I'll try to work on this later to have this info in the article. Thanks for your work so far! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Aha! Thanks for explaining. On seeing the progress of the edits and the lack of edit summary yes, I had assumed vandalism. I am glad you have your eyes on it too and I will leave it alone now and hope that good referencing will prevail! Cheers DBaK (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
You too. I've explained/apologized to the IP. Thanks so much for the information and the nice attitude! Cheers DBaK (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the attention, I had no idea there was a problem! And I'm sure I'd never have found out if you hadn't looked into it, I've never added the PastScape template myself. Sorry to steal your thunder, but I spotted something and it seems to be fixed now, if you want to check it out...? I switched "| postscript=" to "| mode=cs2" and added punctuation outside the template. I don't remember why right now, but I've found "| postscript=" useful before, I expect I'll remember why one day when I find I can't use it! Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 21:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Brilliant, thanks. I didn't quite get it and I wasn't clear that CS2 was in use, but I'm delighted that it has worked out. Cheers DBaK (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Gateshead lede
DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered I accidently signed in with another account on the Gateshead page.
Here is my reasoning for the reverting back to 'Gateshead lay in' on the Gateshead page, in case you think I'm in an edit war:
But before I give you my reasoning for taking down edit edit I'd like to use this source from en.oxforddictionaries.com. As you can see, according to this source, historic and historically
are used in different ways:
Quote: Historic and historical are used in slightly different ways. Historic means ‘famous or important in history’, as in a historic occasion, whereas historical means ‘concerning history or historical events’, as in historical evidence; thus a historic event is one that was very important, whereas a historical event is something that happened in the past.
So as you can clearly see from the above source, historic and historical have different uses...
The edit of the IP assumes 'historical' has the same use as 'historic'; this is not so, at least according to the above source.
My reasoning for the revert: My problems is the loose usage of the term historical in the lede when there are also other documents that are 'historical' as in they too have historical evidence.
So therefore, this is about equality of statement and neutrality of the lede. (Please note: I have no issue with the IP finding a place to put the term historically elsewhere in the document)
I believe we have three options if we want to reach a consensus:
1. We can leave the IP edit in, but this is clearly not equality of statement. The IP has gave a 'billing' and undue weight, to one statement over other statements. This leads to 'puffery' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Puffery and glitterballing.
This could also lead to edit wars as another statement could also use the billing historically and also claim validity.
2. We can prefix the term historically to every statement that has evidence it is historical example historically part of x, historically part of y, historically part of z... and so on.
This is equality of statement and neutral. However this is a repetitive use of the term historically, which is an annoyance.
3. We can use other descriptions without billing to keep the lede neutral.
I'm not that good at wiki. On the Gateshead talk page a couple of month ago I asked for some mediation and got none. Perhaps you could help.
Btw I completely agree that the statement Gateshead lay in County Durham is not good enough and it does not look like it is finished.
The lede of 'Gateshead lay in' is a small matter. I'd like to see a consensus.
What do you think the sentence should be?Barkleave09 (talk) 13:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello and thank you for the interesting message. I am not sure that I can be of much help to you here; I don't have strong enough feelings on the topic and it all seems to fall rather above my pay grade! I will try to have another look later. I think it should probably be oin the article's Talk page, and I wonder if there is some procedure - formal or otherwise - that should be invoked to get us towards an agreed consensus on that page? With best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi DBaK. Thanks for the compliment on my IP talk page. I used to have an account back in around 2005-7 but got tired of all the arguing with people who didn't appear to know anything about the subjects but thought they did, so I stopped editing articles and merely add information to talk pages for someone else to incorporate. I have read quite a bit on many and varied subjects over the years and so much of what I add is from memory, and as I cannot remember all the titles of the books I have read, I cannot in many cases provide references. That's why I only add to the talk pages.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,185 last month to 13,234 on 28th March). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,792 articles.
Currently we have forty four Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Place list
This month I would like members to focus their attention on the List of places in Yorkshire article. It would be good that each time you look at an article on a place in Yorkshire that you also check if it is in the list article. You can easily get to the list article from a place article if it uses the {{Infobox UK place}} template as there is a link at the bottom of the template. If it is not present then add the appropriate link to the list.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered April 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Reply
"Hello. I don't understand what's going on. You asked a question: I attempted to answer it and deal with your concerns and I asked you for some further information to help clarify those concerns. Now you appear to have decided to ignore me. It is perhaps a mistake or something but I am baffled as to what is going on. Would you care to explain, please, and perhaps put my mind at rest? Thanks and best wishes, DBaK (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)"
I guess this is the only way to give you an answer.
Yes I saw the changes and thanks for making them.
I may have used 'link' as a generic term. Don't worry.
hello, you've seen me before. On the topic of my edits to Liberty Elementary, I fully see your perspective and view which is quite clear but Is like to tell you that before, that article was a stub and had nothing. At least I added something, but as your wish, I will discontinue edits in that article.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,234 last month to 13,279 on 29th April). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,826 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Snap general election
In addition to the usual local elections,
with the calling of a snap general election there will be a lot of changes required to articles over the coming couple of months to update the candidates and results for these in articles. There may be a set of new articles required for new MPs elected this time.
We also need to keep an eye out for any bias in articles about those standing for the election and to keep strict ballot paper order for the election results tables in the constituency articles before the results are know. We all have our views on this but we must remain as neutral as possible.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered May 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Mistake revert?
Hey! I reverted your edit [2] which might have been done as a mistake. The editor who made the changes prior to your revert added a misleading edit summary. I've posted a soft-warning on the talk page of the editor so hopefully they stop doing that.
P.S. Throwback to when you "zapped" a mistake I made :D Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 21:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Wow, good catch, thanks! Yup fair point re the checking - I should practise what I preach. Cheers DBaK (talk) 07:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,279 last month to 13,303 on 2nd June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 62 out of a total number of 3,842 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 March 2017, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Snap general election
With the calling of a snap general election there will be a lot of changes required to articles over the coming month to update the candidates and results for these in articles. There may be a set of new articles required for new MPs elected this time.
We also need to keep an eye out for any bias in articles about those standing for the election and to keep strict ballot paper order for the election results tables in the constituency articles before the results are know. We all have our views on this but we must remain as neutral as possible.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered June 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,303 last month to 13,367 on 29 June). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 139 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 63 out of a total number of 3,856 articles.
Currently we have forty five Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 June 2017, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered July 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Sorry, I did not mean to offend. I was just trying to be more specific. I do not judge the content and quality of a book/graphic novel due to the nationality of the creators.
Again, sorry for the confusion it was not my intent to offend. I am new to this website and so not yet used to its settings/capabilities.
Thank you for reading. --Firenz1234 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I'm not to bothered about changing the article again and have no problems with the comic being American (which of course it is (as the comic company that funded the Watchmen series is DC (an American comic company))).
Thanks for replying so quickly, and is entirely my fault for forgetting to use the edit summary.
I've had a multitude of accounts but always forget the password but thought the edit summary was optional. (I will remember to fill it out in the future).
Thanks for your help.
Hey! This isn't related to any recent edit or anything, so it might seem "out of the blue". Thank you for your amazing contributions to Wikipedia and patience towards new editors (often giving them very helpful advice). And above all, keep up your splendid sense of humour (your last reply here is among my favourite replies of all time). It seems a bit weird saying this, as someone with far less edits than you (ahem... about 20,000 less), but I suppose a little bit of appreciation never goes astray... On a lighter note, I hope you didn't mind me stalking your archives. And for your troubles, I've placed this great image I came across to lighten up the rest of your day. Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 21:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your very kind comments. I really really appreciate your taking the time and trouble. And I love the cow! Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 22:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)(friendly) That reply is so ingenious that it should be shown here because linking to archives is not static.
The distant, vaguely rhythmical thudding which you can hear is my head meeting my desk. I make lots of mistakes but this one was multilayered and splendid in its complexity and stupidity. I now require tea. Excuse me. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 4:06 pm, 16 September 2015, Wednesday (1 year, 10 months, 13 days ago) (UTC+1)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,367 last month to 13,569 on 31 July). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 142 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 63 out of a total number of 3,873 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered August 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,569 last month to 13,606 on 1 September). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 142 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 63 out of a total number of 3,893 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered September 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks for uploading File:Cragside house and rock garden top left.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Oh God - the above fills me with foreboding! It's just the kind of thing which causes enthusiasm for this place to drain away. But- as you well know, having been around for substantially longer than I, it can be a great place to do some work. As to Cragside, it is an amazing house, with an incredible history, and it deserves an FA. I really like collaborations on Wikipedia and, if you're interested, I'd be delighted to work with you to try to achieve that. It would involve a considerable effort, and there's a deal of work required, but it's completely achievable. The house is well-sourced, and I've got quite a lot of them, though I will have to drag the Henrietta Heald out of the attic. I don't have the Ken Smith, do you? I should add two caveats - I have to finish Chartwell, which may provide some hints as to how we could proceed, and I've already suggested another collaboration to another editor. If he wants to take it up, that would take priority. Those aside, I'd be really excited to take it on, and to work with you to improve it. I am very flexible as to how we would work, and happy to take a lead from you. Let me know. I fully appreciate FA is not everybody's cup of tea and, if the idea doesn't appeal, just say. But "the fairy palace of a modern magician" does merit a Featured Article. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 20:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello KJP1 and apologies for the slow reply. I should start by saying that I am incredibly flattered that you would want to work with me: thank you for asking me. Whilst it is true that I have been around here about an internet century (first edit mid-September 2002), I do not think of myself as a very serious editor compared with some of my friends and contacts here, and I've never had any involvement with the rarified atmosphere of GA, FA or even INA (Important Northern Article). I tend more just to fiddle with things, correct the spelling of Middlesbrough, and argue about minutiae, in which arguments I seem to almost always end up getting it wrong. I am very very tempted to get seriously involved with the Cragside article but I do fear that it would all end in tears. To my sometimes-horror, sometimes-joy I am still working full-time and, it being the first week of September, I've just gone back to work. So whilst I can legitimately (honest!) find these few minutes to reply to you, I am generally short of time except in the holidays, when my brain turns to cottage cheese and I like to float in things, such as swimming pools and glasses or lakes of wine, or just unconnected thoughts. Being honest with myself and with you I can see that I would not really have the time to do a good job - or, in truth, much of a job at all - on an FA campaign for this important article.
So, I think I am going to have to say a very grateful and polite No Thank You, or at least for the time being. I am, though, intrigued by the subject and by the possibility of the article being further developed and improved. Perhaps the most immediate manifestation of this is that, as I did not have the Heald or Smith titles you mentioned, I've now bought them both and will at least be able to look at what you or others are using as sources. I'm pretty sure we will have some more sources at home but I have not had a proper look yet. I suppose what I am saying is that I will continue to watch the article, will be delighted to see it improve, and if I can help in some small way then I will - but not as a principal editor, or anything approaching it, in the foreseeable future, though retirement is, I am told, a different country. Thank you again for your most kind offer and I do hope that I can do better some other day. With all good wishes DBaK (talk) 10:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
DBaK, Absolutely no apology necessary. You're quite right - FA does require a significant commitment of time. I shall see how the other projects I've got on the go pan out and then, time permitting, will have a look at expanding Cragside. At that point, your input will be very much appreciated. With best regards. KJP1 (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
KJP1 - Yes I am, and yes it is. I did the "an hydraulic" thing after TR's comments - hope you don't mind! I've also commented at the Talk page. You, Sir, have done a fine fine job. Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
DBaK - Absolutely not, edit away. PR doesn't require that the article is completely stable, although FA does require there are no ongoing edit wars. And it could sit at PR for quite a while without generating much interest. Although I have high hopes for Cragside - its historical firsts and importance, as well as its architecture, should attract attention. As may Armstrong's fortune deriving from arms sales, of course! KJP1 (talk) 10:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
KJP1 - That's great, thank you very much for the clarification. And if I edit stupidly please just put me right. I am good at some things and NOT others ... and yes, I thinkhope it will attract attention in one way or another - super Neuschwanstein oop t'North AND evil arms creator - what a tasty offering! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 10:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and fourteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,606 last month to 13,649 on 30 September). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 142 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 64 out of a total number of 3,919 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered October 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and fifteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,649 last month to 13,682 on 31 October). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 145 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 65 out of a total number of 3,950 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered November 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hello, and I hope you are well. Our ship is launched, here, Wikipedia:Peer review/Cragside/archive1 and we can now anxiously wait to see how it fares. Shall we play the responses to comments by ear? The only important thing is that we do so promptly. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello KJP1, and thanks very much for this. I am fine, thanks, and hope that you are too. I agree on the playing by ear, and yes promptness is always a good thing. Gosh. I am very excited by all this, never having been involved in such a process. Thank you for inviting me in. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
I should have said, PR can be slow. If we don't get a bite or two shortly, I see if I can rustle up a couple of commentators. KJP1 (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to this, especially as I'm intending to take it to WP:FAC eventually. I'm waiting for Axell's 1977 book to arrive before I can finalise the content, but your help in clearing my infelicities is appreciated Jimfbleak - talk to me?16:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
The distance moved by the abbey in my original source was two miles, clearly an approximation. The current ref is to Historic England , which has 3.37 km, and I note that in an edit summary you suggest 3.2 km. Is there a case for changing from the HE figure? HE makes it obvious that the remaining ruined chapel is later than the abbey, not always made clear from other sources. I can't find a date as such for the chapel, although HE implies that it was built shortly after or during the move. Should I say that, just add "medieval" or leave completely undated? Jimfbleak - talk to me?07:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Jimfbleak - Interesting! Thanks for the note. On the distance, I suspected that EH's 3.37 might be an overexact conversion or two from ~2 miles back and forth a couple of times. I measured it very carefully on Google Earth but then I am not a reliable source, so it's some sort of OR perhaps! (Though replicable by all, so I am not sure where that leaves it. Still OR probably.)
Addendum a minute or two later: of course, what I mean is that I think I did it precisely. But we don't know exactly how precise is GE's measuring tool. Also, I measured from the chancel at Leiston to the centre of the Minsmere chapel ... but suppose that's a bad idea and HE are talking about site edge to edge, gate to gate, or dorter to dorter, or between the abbot's wine cellars?! (If Premonstratensians had them ... did they?) It can be less precise than I'd hoped, is what I suppose I am saying ...
One easy solution might be to go back to "about two miles", which I feel is a very correct concept and contains all the precision that anyone needs. It would convert to 3.2 km and maybe everyone would be happy. I am not sure that it matters, at all, if we say it is 2 or 2.1 miles or whatever ... that it moved ~2 miles is maybe all we need. If you want to stay precise then I think you should go back to the HE figure as it is more easily supported than my messing around with Google Earth! Maybe round it to 3.4 as I honestly think that the last tens of metres are irrelevant? But YMMV. Edit away, I won't object. You have done far too much work on this to have me arguing with you about 0.0x km distances and decimal points.
Sorry not to be more decisive with this. I keep trying to think what, if I were uninvolved, I would like to see in the perfect encyclopaedia entry, and I realize that I am not sure!
On the chapel date. Well, I think it would be good to acknowledge its suspected age, though I do see what you mean about HE hedging its bets a bit! Is it possible to get something in that uses the HE idea of the precinct and chapel being "retained" as a detached part of the main abbey ... with the implication, I think, that this "retention" was a contemporary decision/act? I think it is fair to recycle what HE have said on the date, though clearly we must be careful to go no further and draw their conclusions for them!
Thanks, any form of self measurement, even if reproducible, would be challenged at FAC as OR. I agree that "two miles" would be ideal, but we are required to give a conversion, so I think I'll have to stick with HE, but rounded off as you suggest. The "retained" in the HE chapel section I took to mean what is retained in the existing ruins from the original structure. The chapel is described as a later structure, and I'm not sure that it could have been part of the former abbey given that it is located in the nave of the church. I don't suppose a building within a building is impossible, but it seems unlikely. I think I'll settle for "medieval" and see what happens. I'll add the HE map as an EL, feel free to remove if you think it's unnecessary
The abbey would certainly have wine, if only for the eucharist, but I think probably to drink as well. The catholic church has never had the same problem with alcohol as the protestants. we are also talking about a time when it was common to drink weak beer even for breakfast because it was less dangerous than water... Jimfbleak - talk to me?12:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Response to your Comment
1. I've made multiple edits on five articles in the past few days. I went through them all one by one and could not find any of my edits having been changed at all, which is why I asked. It did not occur to me that I would have an alert appearing on my account now to tell me that he reverted an edit over a year ago. 2. MaterialScientist was able to speak for himself when he left me the message. I do not know what has befallen him since then that you now need to be his mouthpiece, but please extend my condolences to him/his loved ones. 3. If people's questions to other editors irritate you to the extent that you cannot resist the urge to be snarky, you could always consider minding your own business. Thanks and best wishes Lib2003 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
(by talk page stalker)@Lib2003: Please understand that uninvolved parties responding on talk pages is a product of our adhocracy. DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered was trying to help advance the conversation beyond your inability to recognize which edit was being referred to. Attacking him as if you were having a private conversation with Materialscientist is inappropriate. Further, since you're a new and inexperienced editor, I'd recommend assuming good faith and giving long-term editors the benefit of the doubt that they actually know better than you. You could learn something. Chris Troutman (talk)10:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I have a 40-odd page "Minsmere Scrapbook" pdf which is quite interesting, although apart from extracts from Axell, it's mostly not RS. email me if you would like a copy. I have a digital subscription to BB as well as print, but it's on pocketmags, so it's not transferable unfortunately. BB largely give open access, but not for the most recent four years. Jimfbleak - talk to me?15:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Your second bolded quote on your user page came to mind with this posting. It's interesting to see the prof's talk page before he blanked it too. Anyway, what I really came to say is that I'll probably write an article on Bert Axell next since I've obviously got plenty on his Minsmere days, and I've ordered his autobiography. I hadn't realised that he was consulted about major wetlands like the Doñana National Park and Mai Po Marshes. The latter is a great reserve, but slightly daunting because it's in the Frontier Closed Area and permit -only access is through a gate in a security fence. Jimfbleak - talk to me?14:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Gosh. There really are some, er, interesting people around on Wikipedia. I will look forward to seeing your work on Axell - that would be intriguing. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and sixteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,682 last month to 13,867 on 30 November). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 65 out of a total number of 3,985 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
A Happy Christmas to all members of the project and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2017 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered December 2017 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
All hands on deck! Man the pumps! Save the furniture! Thanks KJP1, I've had a go. You'd better pop in and check I have not broken too many things with my size 10 wellies. Cheers DBaK (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Also, pardon my French but this was a bl**dy awful time for me to realize that I don't fully understand the use of a "proper" referencing method such as that used in this article. (I've only been here 15 years ... very slow learner, and coward to boot.) Fortunately, I only had to copy a ref rather than create on so I may have got away with it. But, sheesh, I really ought to know this stuff as it badly inhibits my ability to participate in grown-up articles. Ho hum! DBaK (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
A grand job! Nothing for me to do. A long time ago, a very patient editor taught me sfn and now it's the only one I can use, having quite forgotten harv and being absolutely hopeless with the little Reference icon. It is actually very simple when one gets used to it. Practice being key, would you like to pick up Schrocat's comments when they come! Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Ha, thanks, and yes of course I would! So far I have only ever used the little automated toolbar thingy but its entire philosophy, or structure, or something, seems different from how we do it in say Cragside. So yes, I should learn to do it properly. :) DBaK (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Many thanks. Great responses to the PR comments and I hope you enjoyed it! I've made a couple of suggestions on my Talkpage as to possible ways to address Schrocat's outstanding points. See what you think. Then, I think we are good to go to FAC. If no particular time suits you better than any other, we should probably go while the iron's hot. We'll almost certainly get comments from Tim, Brian and Schrocat, and we shouldn't need many more to get it over the line. FAC can be, but isn't always, a little more brutal than the collegiate atmosphere of PR but that all adds to the fun! All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
KJP1 Thank you! Yes I have enjoyed it immensely, thank you. I've actioned (gah!) those Talkpage items - you'll see my notes there. And yes, please feel free to go whenever. A hot iron gathers no moss! Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
I think a footnote on inglenooks is an excellent idea. They are a little obscure and were rather a speciality of Our Norman. I'll go through Saint this evening and see what I can find. KJP1 (talk) 06:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Now, you've got me going mad on footnotes! Would you like to push it on to FAC before I add any more? The instructions are pretty straightforward, but give me a shout if you need anything. You'll need a little blurb to introduce it, either adapt the one I did for PR [3], or write your own. The key thing is to have a hook or two, to hopefully excite some interest. The first, the best, the most awful etc. We will also need to close the PR, which I can do if you'd prefer. Then, in an admirable habit picked up from Brian, I tend to drop notes on the Talkpages of PR contributors thanking them for their comments and giving them the link to the FAC. As to comments, like PR, it can be slow. But, as and when they arrive, we can divide up the responding as per the PR. It's been an absolute pleasure, and I'm so glad you've enjoyed it. If we make it, it will be very satisfying to get the house its little gold star. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks very much for that, KJP1; I would be honoured to take it to FAC. Just on the timing, I agree that quick is good but I might not manage it tonight; is that OK? Also, does the PR have to be closed before the FAC is started? I was just thinking about the timing of needing the FAC to exist before you can thank PR people ... or am I not getting it somewhere? Thanks! DBaK (talk) 21:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
No, whenever works for you, today, tomorrow, next week. And you are quite right. The order should be - close the PR - open the FAC - do the notes. Just shout if you need anything. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 06:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Ah, should have looked at the PR first. I see we've further comments from Harry and Ceoil. Which is great, and should help us enormously in getting the required number of Supports at FAC, but obviously we need to respond to those first, then close the PR etc. Either pick them up yourself, or I can do them, but not until later as I'm busy this morning. All the best, KJP1 (talk) 06:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks very much for both messages KJP1. I am chugging along with a few tasks today and have looked into the PR and article a bit so far but might not manage the extended session it deserves. I will try to get there more later but if you get there first please just go ahead. So far I have responded to HJ's points - I think my responses are mostly OK but I was less sure of one or two and would appreciate, as ever, your casting an eye over any of my more obvious stupidities! I must say that I had not really appreciated how much trouble people would go to. It is quite moving. And to think that when the NT first acquired Cragside for the nation I remember being not all that interested because my family were essentially Ruins Snobs and I couldn't really see the point in something that was just some house from my Granny's era! (ahem, if not her class, income bracket an ting!) Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 10:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi KJP1 - I guess you'll have seen the above. The update is that I am I think up to date on the PR, but I was not sure what to do with Ceoil's query about the lead image size. It's slightly ironical given this is the photo that triggered the current fun and games! So I wondered if you could please have a look - I am really unclear about the interaction between the lead pic, what's a good size, the infobox etc. I'm sure that you know this stuff inside out, but I certainly don't. My only other query is that it looks like Gerda is planning to review as well but has something else to do first. Your project and your call but I have a lot of time for Gerda and her work, and if she were able to help then great; presumably if it doesn't work timewise then we could still hope to see her at FAC? Please advise. Cheers DBaK (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Images aren't my strong point either and FAC can be picky on these things. But I've copied what Ceoil did here, Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral, and, provided people don't object to the layout, and that it displays alright on other devices, we should be ok. Re. Gerda, she can indeed provide useful input and I've no problem waiting. I'll let her know we plan to head to FAC next week, and ask for her comments there if she can't make the PR. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 16:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Brilliant, thanks very much. The larger pic looks nice (as does Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral!) and I absolutely approve of your nicking Ceoil's technique ... not broke >>> don't fix! It looks fine on my Wretched Young Persons' Mobile Telephonic Computing Device™ too. And great also re Gerda. Cheers! DBaK (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, it's all looking pretty good, and we've had some great input at PR. Very productive, Wiki at its best and quite the opposite of "a graveyard of creativity"! KJP1 (talk) 17:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
As ever with these things, closing the PR is a teensy bit more complicated than one would hope. But I think it's archived now, and the FAC looks splendidly set up. And our first support within 30 minutes! Way to go! Do you want me to drop notes on the PR contributor pages? KJP1 (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
oh yes, that would be great, thanks. I must confess that I thought the PR was already closed! I will go and look and see what formalities you had to undertake. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Will do. The PR Instructions give two templates that you need to put on the Article Talkpage, and the Article PR page. Once you place these, the former puts the Closed PR Notice on the Talkpage, and the latter tees up the bot to close the PR on the main PR page. I've done them both, but you'll want to know for your next PR! Now, off to see what NM says about the Magician image. We may have to replace it. KJP1 (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
No, fortunately we don't. Nikki's early Image Review is very helpful. We shall also need a Sources review, unless someone does one unsolicited. Brian B often obliges. As and when we do, we can go through the request process together. KJP1 (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
KJP1, thanks very much for all the above. I've done a little bit more at FAC, but am still a little strangled for time. And sleep. I'm about to leave you a note about the Krupps usage on your Talk page. Cheers DBaK (talk)
Well, six Supports and an Image Review within 24 hours of your posting it. Not bad for the over-modest DBK. Work doesn't permit me to do much tomorrow but I'll get to the rest of Tim's and Cassianto's comments on Saturday if you haven't got there before me. We do need a Sources review and I'll ask Brian if he can pick this up. Or we can apply through the normal channels. But it's looking pretty healthy. With sincere thanks and best regards. KJP1 (talk) 01:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Great, thanks very much for that, and yes re the pricing note. I too have a bit of a day on today, so I will be looking again at all this when I next have time, which is probably tomorrow. Thanks again, it's been very very interesting. Cheers DBaK (talk) 07:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
got a message from you but...
I got the following email: "DisillusionedBitterA... left a message on your talk page.
View message DisillusionedBi... View changes
But clicking through both to my talk page and yours didn't get me to a message. Or am I misunderstanding something about how talk works? Andrew (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Andrew! No, it's all good. The system is using a slightly lazy shorthand for "Left a message or fiddled with in any other (possibly annoying) way", because what I actually did - with apologies for the uninvited intervention (tsk!!) - was to sort out your header levels a bit so that the page read more easily and the ToC worked properly. We don't normally edit others' Talk pages in this way but there were good reasons why I felt this was probably OK on balance. The clue to a bit of bafflement like this is often in the page history, so if you click the "History" tab while on your Talk page you while find you are looking at all the changes made to your page and then all will be clear. If the editor has left a useful edit summary - like wot I done - then you might get the whole picture in one; otherwise, you can click one of the "prev" items along at the left - this will show you a useful screen which makes clear (usually!) what has changed in that edit, thus.
I hope that this is helpful. Some time in the next few days there will, by the way, be a Grand Reveal in which I dramatically say hello to you IRL although it will be a lot less dramatic if you already know exactly who I am ... in which case, thank you for not IDing me as I sort of like my sort of anonymity. Cheers (and see you soon) DBaK (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Jimfbleak - Congratulations! That's great news, you've done a superb job, and I have greatly enjoyed my involvement. Well done and enjoy your well-earned break! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:02, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
As no good deed goes unpunished, we are alerting everyone who was kind enough to contribute to the peer review on Sullivan (I copied your comment from my talk page to the PR page) that Ssilvers and I now have the article up for FAC. If you have the time and inclination to look in, we shall be most grateful. Tim riley talk12:06, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Tim riley thank you! I am flattered by the request and will participate to the best of my limited abilities. I have a couple of minor ideas but no time right now to organize a proper response ... I will, somehow. On Good Deeds may I respectfully point out that I have, in fact, already been punished - I listened to Ivanhoe.Right through. There is or should be a UN Convention on this kind of thing! Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Well, you beat me hands down. I've had the Chandos recording since more or less its original date of issue, but have never quite managed to get through it all. You'd much better listen to Iolanthe, The Mikado or, if you want "serious" Sullivan the Irish Symphony, which is not quite Beethoven but is full of good tunes. Meanwhile I shall arrange for KJP1 to slap your wrists if you persist in running down your own abilities. I have seen quite a bit of your fine work, and there's no call for false modesty. No rush on the review, by the bye. You know how leisurely the FAC process can (rightly) be. Tim riley talk16:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your very kind comments and yes, Ivanhoe ... gosh. I do know and love several of the comic operas, thanks, having attended a school which did lovely joint productions with its sister school all through my teenage years, requiring the services of someone who played, or at least owned, a trumpet. What fun! (And gurls. I was most surprised.) I will most certainly give the Irish Symphony a try, thank you; I am starting from a Good Place in that after Ivanhoe things can only get better. With all good wishes DBaK (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
You see: I told you not to be so modest: quite apart from your other helpful points you have shown two novices how to use the inflation converter. Thank you, DBaK! Tim riley talk18:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
That's very kind of you, and it was a pleasure to help. I'm very surprised to find that I know more about a template than anyone here, but if so, how lovely! Thanks for asking me. With all good wishes DBaK (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.
The white snow and the cool breeze beckon a festive mood, And the sweet aroma wafting from eateries wreathes the mind. Lights, stars, colour and jollity abound 'round each bend, I wish you a happy holiday season, dear friend.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Editing can get tough and frustrating at times, but we've come a long way in this project and that is a grand achievement. Hope you have a good time this festive season! :) Jiten talk contribs23:44, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
got a message from you but...
I got the following email: "DisillusionedBitterA... left a message on your talk page.
View message DisillusionedBi... View changes
But clicking through both to my talk page and yours didn't get me to a message. Or am I misunderstanding something about how talk works? Andrew (talk) 14:31, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Andrew! No, it's all good. The system is using a slightly lazy shorthand for "Left a message or fiddled with in any other (possibly annoying) way", because what I actually did - with apologies for the uninvited intervention (tsk!!) - was to sort out your header levels a bit so that the page read more easily and the ToC worked properly. We don't normally edit others' Talk pages in this way but there were good reasons why I felt this was probably OK on balance. The clue to a bit of bafflement like this is often in the page history, so if you click the "History" tab while on your Talk page you will find you are looking at all the changes made to your page and then all will be clear. If the editor has left a useful edit summary - like wot I done - then you might get the whole picture in one; otherwise, you can click one of the "prev" items along at the left - this will show you a useful screen which makes clear (usually!) what has changed in that edit, thus.
I hope that this is helpful. Some time in the next few days there will, by the way, be a Grand Reveal in which I dramatically say hello to you IRL although it will be a lot less dramatic if you already know exactly who I am ... in which case, thank you for not IDing me as I sort of like my sort of anonymity. Cheers (and see you soon) DBaK (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Restored here temporarily from an archive. My reasoning for this is too boring to inflict on the community! DBaK (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Gosh, thanks KJP1. I am very mindful of how much of this work was yours! So, even bigger congratulations to you. But it is really great to hear and it is my first as co-nominator, so ... And oh yes: we must discuss red squirrels some time ... cheers DBaK (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
And now with its little Bronze star. Jubilations! Earns you the right to put a little copy on your userpage, should you so wish. Sorry about my confusing message - to me the text from the card from Davey2010 falls out of the textbox and into the text below. KJP1 (talk) 21:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Aha, I see. Weird. Thanks for the fix. I've tried to give it a bit more space with a dummy header and some dummy lines ... not a 100% success but maybe a bit clearer and will eventually resolve. Thanks again for your help! DBaK (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt, KJP1 - thank you very much for this. I must confess that, not having done this before, I am not quite sure what I am being asked. Do I suggest a specific date or a range; am I selecting from a particular period or set of possible dates then? ... and so on. Sorry - I know it must be very obvious once you know it but I'm not up to speed this time round! Cheers DBaK (talk) 12:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, DBaK, I should have said. You can simply ask Gerda for a date when you'd like the article to appear on the front page and, subject to other commitments, the length of the queue, other FA articles that want to appear on a specific date, e.g. an anniversary, the Front Page coordinators will seek to oblige. So, if there's nothing meaningful for Cragside, just choose a date pleasing to you. Re. Cragside, my only thought might be 9 February 2018, the date of the house's re-opening for the 2018 season. But that's not so major date that it really should be then. Choose your birthday or your wedding anniversary, unless those are months off! My only other thought, when articles appear on the front page they can, though don't always, attract quite a lot of attention, not all of it wanted. With my first, Tim advised me to spend all day hidden under the duvet, so upset might I be by the hordes of smutty-minded schoolboys wanting to deface W. Burges Esq.! So, perhaps a day when you're not too busy and can man the barricades, although actually lots of other helpful editors do this for you. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 17:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
I understand that there's not really a particular day, and will simply ask "any date", right? The watching is another service the cabal will do for you if you want to hide. PumpkinSky (founding member of the cabal) has this easy recipe: the day after TFA day, return the last clean version, adding only the few good edits that may have happened ;) - I think neither Tower House nor Monnow Bridge were too much of a burden, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, both, for all the information and advice. My thoughts are:
I have no significant date to tie it to in the near future, so there is no problem there.
9th February is a nice idea, and it's a Saturday so I might have some time to keep an eye on it; I would tend towards that date but
Not if you think it's too far ahead in terms of article decline, Gerda.
If you do think it's too late then from my PoV at least a weekend would be preferable, though I do note, thanks, your points about other watchers and the PS technique!
NB, 9 February is a Friday, [4], but we'll go for that Gerda, unless you think it's too long a wait, in which case take any date. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 07:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Oops, sorry. Awkward cove, Johnny Calendar! Yup all the above it totally fine from my PoV and I will happily go along with whatever works. Cheers, both. DBaK (talk) 11:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you - that's very kind of you! And all the very best to you and yours for 2018 too. With all good wishes, DBaK (talk) 01:04, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
I shall never surrender.
I shall fight you on the articles, I shall fight you on the talk pages, I shall fight you in the deep dark web, I shall fight you over the entire interweb...I shall never surrender. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.228.119 (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and seventeenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (down from 13,867 last month to 13,866 on 30 December). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 65 out of a total number of 3,984 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
A Happy New Year to all members of the project and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the past year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered January 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and eighteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,866 last month to 14,269 on 30 January 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 65 out of a total number of 4,019 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered February 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thank you for Cragsidethe beauty, ""the most dramatic Victorian mansion in the North of England”, and its equally dramatic 15,000-acre estate. The house is notable, too, for its technical innovations using water power, providing electric lighting and water-powered spits, dumb waiter, dishwasher and dinner gong"! - Here's a gong for the conductor at the end of the DYK section with whom I had the honour to sing in choir once, his last concert, and not forgotten, - I forgot which year, but remember that it was Good Friday, the theatre lights were hot, and he wanted to see us in white. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and nineteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (down from 14,269 last month to 13,993 on 27 February 2018), unsure why the numbers are dropping as there appears to be none removed from the categories. In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 66 out of a total number of 4,036 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 February 2018, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Census statistics
References to the Office for National Statistics census data used in a large number of articles are all now dead. The University of Durham have produced a replacement website, Nomis, that gives access to the 2011 census data. Template {{NOMIS2011}} has been created to enable this to be used in articles rather than use the URL directly as this could change and allow it to be modified centrally. There is no direct correlation between the old and new URLs so a BOT cannot be used to switch from one to the other. See the template documentation for further details of usage. It would be good if members could change articles over to use the new method of access for the 2011 census and check that the data is correct at the same time.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered March 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and twentieth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 13,993 last month to 14,013 on 7 April 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 66 out of a total number of 4,049 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 March 2018, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The April 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered April 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
23:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
(Redacted)
I suspect that my account has recently become severely compromised. So I'm sending you this pre-cleansed message where you can imagine what the original insults were. This should save the bother of all of that dramah-board and Admin stuff-and-nonsense, etc.
"Look here DBAK, you (Redacted), I've just about had enough of your pathetic (Redacted). It's about time you (Redacted) or else I'll be forced to (Redacted)."
If my prose, and another bloody country house, aren't too off-putting, this odd little Welsh castle is up for Peer Review, here Wikipedia:Peer review/St Donat's Castle/archive1. It does have rather an interesting story to tell. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated, as ever. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! Very glad you enjoyed it and it does have rather a tale to tell. Your edits at PR have much improved it. If I may, I'll drop you and Gareth a line when it goes to FAC. I just need to review the PR comments, as there are a few I've not actioned yet. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 10:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty first WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,013 last month to 14,047 on 29 April 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 85. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,053 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered May 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The cantata should be a FA some day, do you agree? But it seems tough enough to even get to GA these days, just look at BWV 60. BWV 183 is for tomorrow, that was easy ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Very likely, but I am pretty intimidated by all that stuff - especially in music! :) Go figure, as they say DBaK (talk) 21:51, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear DBK, after a short hiatus, St Donat's is now at FAC, above. If you had the inclination to revisit, your comments would be very much appreciated. KJP1 (talk) 09:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,047 last month to 14,087 on 31 May 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 146 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,072 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered June 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,087 last month to 14,255 on 30 June 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 147 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,076 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered July 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty fourth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,255 last month to 14,285 on 30 July 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 147 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,082 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Yorkshire Day
Happy Yorkshire Day to all our members. Thanks to all for looking after the Yorkshire articles that we support as a project. Would be good if more members would get involved in improving the articles and in fixing the various problems flagged on the articles.
There are also a number of articles suggested on the project's to-do list that need creating if you find the time to get them started.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered August 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hi DBaK, I've a favour to ask. The above is up for FAC, here, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sandringham House/archive1. As architecture, it's certainly not Cragside, but as the home of the last five English monarchs, and the scene of the deaths of two of them, it has some interest. It could do with a reviewer or two and if you had the time and inclination, it would be very much appreciated. With best regards. KJP1 (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear KJP1, thank you very much for asking me – I'm flattered. I will try to have a proper look at it. On a first scan it looks really great and I doubt that I will have much to offer, but if time permits I will give it a scrutiny. WIth all good wishes DBaK (talk) 08:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
And no necessity at all now, as I think it has the votes. But I'd be delighted if you did want to comment. KJP1 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
KJP1 sorry, aaaargh and sssshhhhhh ... I'm on it RIGHT NOW, literally. Big flap all round but watch this space - sorry and thanks! DBaK (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,285 last month to 14,298 on 28 August 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 147 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,102 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered September 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
09:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Trombone
I used an automated tool named Commonlinks. I have no feelings about the changes one way or another. Given your interest in that article, perhaps you could fix its errors: a failed verification, vague or ambiguous time, unsourced statements, and a need for references. Thanks. Vmavanti (talk) 23:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,298 last month to 14,388 on 29 September 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 148 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,114 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered October 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
20:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
The right thing
I see no reason for you to reproach yourself over the Wythy ANI; doing what you think is right is always a good thing. Likely he will be unblocked, and we'll see what happens then. Best wishes, Tony Holkham(Talk)14:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Cragside house and rock garden top left.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cragside house and rock garden top left.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Comment: actually, all the information required is quite clear or available – it's just not machine-readable. However, it was only uploaded in pursuit of a discussion about photos at Cragside and it is not in use anywhere, so it can just be deleted as proposed. There is literally no point in anyone putting in any effort on it, so it should go bye bye. Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Very much appreciate the comments. But don't let it get to you. In the overall scheme of things, it's minor. We've achieved more before, and will do again. The very best. KJP1 (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,388 last month to 14,424 on 30 October 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 148 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,130 articles.
Currently we have forty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered November 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
01:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Verdun
Greetings from Hull; thanks for your edit and thanks for the laugh when I read your user page, I know the feeling. ;O) Keith-264 (talk) 07:36, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Regarding this, your removal of the {{Humor}} template was certainly appropriate. The page is not a humor page or intended as one. If you look at its history, you'll see BilCat putting the tag on there and then snarkily "defending" his tag, because he doesn't like the content and/or the author. It was borderline vandalism, and definitely WP:POINTy. — AReaderOutThatawayt/c01:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
With the "debate-tone" and "convince the reader" material in it stripped out, it's actually the makings for an entire WP article on logical quotation or at least a comprehensive section at Quotation marks in English, as well as a long over-due rewrite of that article in general, with all its incorrect pronouncements about "American punctuation", "British English", etc. I've considered it for several years, but have experienced too much WP:DRAMA from nationalistic prescriptivists to relish the prospect. — AReaderOutThatawayt/c08:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The change in Titanic had to do with the numbers of passengers. There were about 2,200 passengers on board but then it says they had many less than the ship's capacity, and if you do the math it's 1000 people more. Onoufrios d (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm very sorry but I can't understand your point or make it fit with the numbers – which were referenced – already in the paragraph which you changed. Bumping the number up by 1000 because you did the maths sounds a bit like OR and inserts a different total into what seems to be referenced text. Can I respectfully ask that if you want to make this change, you take it to the article's Talk page? Thank you DBaK (talk) 23:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty eigth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,424 last month to 14,430 on 30 November 2018). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 148 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,131 articles.
Currently we have forty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
It is that time of year again so to wish all members a Happy Christmas. Just to remind members that there will be fewer of the regular members around over the festive period and that there are usually loads of new editors around using their new shiny devices to access the internet and try out some editing. Those who are around just keep an eye out for any vandalism and test edits that occur and revert as soon as possible.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2018 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered December 2018 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Hey, responding to your inquiry about UAA. I didn't see that the company actually had Limited in their name, which I just saw by reviewing the link to their website. With that info, I've just now blocked the account. Let me know if you have any other questions, ceranthor01:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Oh, that's great Ceranthor, thank you very much for the clarification! Like I said over there, it wasn't about any specific beef with this company – far from it – but just about trying to understand the process, so your comment is a great help. Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi @Ceranthor:, I just looked at the outcome of this (your discussion with DBaK happened after I'd logged off for the night). Sorry I didn't make it clear that the company had Ltd at the end of their name; that's almost always the case for UK-registered companies (even if they don't use the suffix in their marketing), so I thought it would have been obvious, but I'll be more explicit in future. Thanks DBaK for querying this. GirthSummit (blether)08:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for you share to RSPB Minsmere, mentioned in the nice intro "I'd long wanted to write an FA on this flagship RSPB reserve, but lacked sufficient sources. The site celebrated its 70th anniversary in 2017, leading to the publication of a major article in British Birds which, together with Bert Axell's book, purchased for the princely sum of 98p, gave me all that was necessary. Thanks to DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered for for fixing some of my less felicitous edits."! Will sing Jauchzet, frohlocket on Saturday!! Here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Comments too boring to put at the FAC ... I'm sorry I was late to this and that my comments are a bit woolly and rushed. I was going to try to do a thorough job but I have come to realize that death or senility would claim me before I finished it, so then I wasn't going to bother, and then I changed my mind again but still didn't have any more time so I've just ended up kind of hurling it all at the wall and hoping for the best. I've little confidence that all or most of my comments are correct or useful but I hoped that one or two might turn out worthwhile, and actually, very little harm is done by submitting remarks which turn out to be ignorable, so, I'm, like, hey. man! (More commas available on request.) Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 14:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
I can assure you that your comments are viewed as astute, helpful and are very gratefully received. Its extremely satisfying to see the article become more clear, concise and polished from input such as yours today. If you spot more issues, dont hesitate to add! Ceoil (talk) 17:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
That's so kind of you, Ceoil, thanks! I am delighted to have helped at all. I was absolutely intrigued, and am going to have to go and see one for real somewhere. Perhaps after I get my new specs! Cheers DBaK (talk) 19:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Believe me I get the sentiment expressed in your username, and not just in relation to this website. From your approach and editing, have always seen you as somebody who "gets it", but may be disillusioned at the continual need to fight back and explain basics modes of intellectual conduct. Ceoil (talk) 23:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello DBAK,
Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that
Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"
My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk18:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy and Prosperous New Year, Thanks for all your help and thanks for all your contributions to the 'pedia,
My dear chap, Martinevans123, how lovely to hear from you – as always – and many thanks for the seasonal greetings, which I heartily reciprocate! All the best to you and yours DBaK (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
Hello DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Chris Troutman (talk)17:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Why can't the Kevi Memes thing be put on? I don't run it but I think that everyone at the school would agree it is an important part to the culture at KEVI. Also do you go to kevi? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucaspaulsmith (talk • contribs) 20:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi there Lucaspaulsmith - I was out of this discussion for a while, sorry ... I assume that you're now up to date with it so I won't go over the same ground again. No, I don't go to your school - I'm a bit too old! Happy editing and all good wishes DBaK (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy holidays (we are still in the 12 days of Christmas, so not too late yet!)
Thanks Jam2ja for the comment. I will reply at your Talk page as we might both find it easier there. But till I get round to it, that's right, your personal experience is not welcome here without a reliable source, so I correctly deleted it, as would all other editors here, and I will continue to do so in the same circumstances. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Jam2ja – I removed your comments here. I've commented on your general situation at your Talk page. Please do not edit this page, that is, my Talk page, or indeed my User page, further. Thank you. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and twenty ninth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,430 last month to 14,488 on 5 January 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 148 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,138 articles.
Currently we have forty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
It is the start of another year so to wish all members a Happy New Year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered January 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
20:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Gwin poeth sbeislyd i chi ...
... gan yr hen Gymro; rwy'n gobeithio eich bod wedi cael gwyliau Nadolig gwych ac rwy'n dymuno 2019 heddychlon i chi! That is Welsh and translates to: Spicy hot wine for you from the old Welshman; I hope you have had a great Christmas holiday and I wish you a peaceful 2019! Thank you for your excellent work on the 'pedia.
Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Wikipedia, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:18, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi DBaK, I hope you are keeping well. I see you're off-Wiki for a few weeks - somewhere nice I hope - so this may miss you. I've been working on another collaboration with an editor who knows lots about plants. This is fortunate, as the subject is a garden. It's up for FAC, here, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sissinghurst Castle Garden/archive1. If you happen to pass by before it closes, your thoughts would be very much appreciated. KJP1 (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirtieth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,488 last month to 14,522 on 30 January 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,150 articles.
Currently we have forty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered February 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The sad thing is that 'composed of' is wrong, or, at the very least, thoroughly irregular (though that doesn't explain one particular contributor's attitude or actions: the poor man needs help, IMV) but Oxford have sold the pass by declaring it acceptable.
(I have to admit that I didn't see what you did there: please advise!)
Oops, thanks and sorry 86.130.154.59 for the slow reply. Yes, it's broken! It may well be a Humpty Dumpty job already ... I will watch with interest. I think that What I Did There was probably to deliberately deploy the disputed usage, for the sheer devilment. But hey. Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Thank you!
I just saw the message you left on my page and I would like to thank you for the helpful advice in terms of editing, etc. You are very kind. Lilliangish (talk) 00:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Just read your user page. I recognise much of what you write in the first section. I once used to do a lot of editing on WP until I got just too frustrated to the level that it al just seemed pointless to me. So I quit. And then I just couldn't resist myself to do some editing every once in a while, now with less drive, only because it's a kind of OCD: I can't resist myself to correct errors.
However, I found it refreshing to read the lightheartedness of someone so disillusioned, bitter and knackered. Cheers! Naamloze gebruiker (talk) 13:03, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Yup, absolutely Naamloze gebruiker, thank you – I'm absolutely clear that I am caught in/on some kind of terrible spiral here. I am just sometimes just a touch unclear about whether its overall direction is down or up! Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty first WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,522 last month to 14,683 on 27 February 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,161 articles.
Currently we have forty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered March 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
00:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Cragside
Good to see you and hope you're well. This comes from an editor who appears to own Cragend Farm nearby, which has a number of Armstrong's buildings, including his interesting hydraulic silage plant. It was apparently a hopeless failure! But it may need to an article as it's Grade II*. Do you know it perchance, [5]? It looks quite well maintained. KJP1 (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello KJP1 and it's nice to hear from you too. No, I don't know it. We were up there over Easter but in the south of the county. We are back, more in the right area, in the summer and I might try to have a look and see if they have an open day or anything. I agree that it could be a good article but I'm sorry I don't know more about the topic, other than that it sounds fascinating! Cheers DBaK (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (down from 14,745 last month to 14,729 on 28 April 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 86. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,177 articles.
Currently we have forty seven Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The May 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered May 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty fourth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,729 last month to 14,757 on 28 May 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 67 out of a total number of 4,199 articles.
Currently we have forty eight Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The June 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered June 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,757 last month to 14,804 on 29 June 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,253 articles.
Currently we have forty nine Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The July 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered July 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,804 last month to 14,957 on 29 July 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 150 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,390 articles.
Currently we have fifty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 July 2019, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Images of England
The Images of England web site is to be decommissioned this month by Historic England. The text of the site entries has been available on the corresponding National Heritage List entry since that web site was created. The images are being transferred ahead of the decommissioning. As a result of this a BOT has changed all {{IoE}} templates to {{NHLE}} templates and translated the reference number according to a list provided by Historic England.
It would be good if members could check these, when they come across them, as I have spotted one with an incorrect translation. Some articles already had {{NHLE}} templates in them so the references may need to be combined. Other changes that may need to be performed are removal of template or text referring to the site as needing registration, changing the text "Images of England" or "IoE" to something more appropriate or may be even removing it if it is part of the description..
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The August 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered August 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
I removed the U5 speedy deletion tag from User:Moalusi Mphafudi because it was just a simple link to an Instagram account. Usually "not a webhost" tags are for things like blog posts, long autobiographies or pages devoted to fantasy football leagues, not a solitary link on a user page. LizRead!Talk!02:53, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
haha Britmax! Thanks. Nah, have a nice cup of tea and then back to the Edit Mill! (Or – yes – go do something nice! Depends on your options ...) Cheers DBaK (talk) 10:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Woo, nice, enjoy! I don't know that one so I shall (a) go and read the article now and (b) look forward to new information following your visit. Have a good day, cheers, DBaK (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,957 last month to 14,992 on 30 August 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 153 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,407 articles.
Currently we have fifty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 August 2019, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Wiki Loves Monuments
September is the time for the annual Wiki Loves Monuments competition to get quality photographs of listed buildings and scheduled monuments in the UK. It would be good if any members in the Yorkshire area got out and about taking images of any monuments or listed buildings that they find. There are still several entries on the various list articles without images and it would be best to prioritise these if you are in the right place. Details for this years competition can be found here. There are cash prises of up to £250 for the best images that are submitted.
If you are not in Yorkshire then you are still able to join in as the competition covers the whole of the UK, separate competitions are available for other areas of the world if you are not UK based.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The September 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered September 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
I had some mess up that made my list include words I already fixed, I got to letter C in the first list and then found that I had to create the list from scratch. lists after c should have lower rate of false positives. Uziel302 (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty eighth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 14,992 last month to 15,070 on 30 September 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 155 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,419 articles.
Currently we have fifty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 September 2019, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered October 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
10:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
It's been a minute
Hi there, nice to see you still on wikipedia. I was dropping in because I was looking through my talk page (been a while since I was really active here. 9 years actually. Apparently EXACTLY 9 years ago tomorrow, we were discussing seasonal differences re: ITG's conference in Australia. Apparently I caused a stink about something. I was only 13 then, and very bossy. So it was pretty funny for me now, honestly. Hopefully all's well with you! DS64(talk)03:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
DrStrangelove64 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Gosh, yes, it's been a while! I had forgotten that exchange and I was pleased to be reminded of it. If you did cause a stink, it was certainly not over that – you were super polite and civilized. Thanks for the cookie, and I hope you enjoy being back here. Nine years is quite a long time between 13 and 22 ... I mean, it sort of is between 53 and 62 too, but a bit less acutely so, if you see what I mean. I hope you are enjoying whatever you are doing now, and that it is all going very well indeed for you. Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much! I'm glad to hear that. It's good to be back. And things are going well. :) Yes, you're right. I know I'm a baby but it's pretty wild to think how much I've changed since then. Take care! DS64(talk)03:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Oh, sad news. Thank you for letting me know. But wow, that you heard that! How truly wonderful: an incredible memory. DBaK (talk) 22:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you probably don't recall, but we crossed paths last May over Coldfall Wood. I've a question for someone on your side of the Atlantic, and you came to mind. Have you ever heard of a comedy duo/tv band called "Bill and Benns"? (Bill Zorn and Jon Benns) I'm researching for an article on Zorn, an American folk singer, and keep finding vague references to him spending 20 years in England (roughly '70s and '80s) and that he and Benns were "popular", but I can't track down anything solid like dates or what exactly they did, so I thought I'd ask if you'd heard of them. Schazjmd(talk)23:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd – thanks for the message and yes, I do recall, absolutely. The tea/beer offer also still stands. I am terribly sorry but I do not remember these musicians. One of my neighbours, however, is a much more knowledgeable popular music fan than I – and even older too! – so when I next get the chance I will ask him and let you know anything useful he says. The librarian at my school is also closer to my age (the other teachers are all much closer to the kids' ages!) so I will ask her. Oh, and I've thought of a third person to try. Basically we need pub quiz music experts!
At the risk of stating the obvious and/or telling my granny how to suck eggs, I guess you are aware of the 1950s children's TV puppet show Flower Pot Men? It was on for years after first broadcast, so anyone using the names "Bill and Ben(ns)" would create enormous resonances in people's minds – easily as late as the 70s/80s. I wonder if your B&B musicians knew about or exploited this link? Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, Flower Pot Men really threw off my attempts to search on that string. Jon Benns is British so I bet he thought the name similarity would be clever (and any bit of edge can help in the entertainment industry). Please don't go to any trouble, but if you hear of anything, I'll owe you one! Schazjmd(talk)00:04, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for noticing my edit for the Monschau article. I'm a bit curious about the reversion as I cannot see it as an overedit: Vennbahn is not an everyday word, not a major geographic feature (compared to the Himalayas), not a commonly known location (maybe so in Europe but certainly not universally), nor the other situations given (common occupations, common units). I believe Monschau is a town along the Vennbahn, acting as a major access point to the bike trail, but there was not a single link to this in the article to enable further reading on what the Vennbahn is, hence my edit. The Vennbahn article has links to Monschau (potentially over edits), but unfortunately not the other direction. I would see it as no different from the other links to attractions in the two sentence above the Vennbahn one in the same section. Thanks.Slleong (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello Slleong and thank you for the nice message. I hope, though, that you realize that you’re already in serious breach of our behavioural norms for editors who’ve been reverted – it’s normal to start with insults then move swiftly onto legal threats, but I’ll overlook your error just this once. :)
Next, we should acknowledge that at least 50% of everything I do on Wikipedia is garbage! If only I could work out which 50% of my edits it is then I could leave them out and all would be great. So, if you’re a victim of my operating in the wrong half then I’m very sorry.
Looking at the edit itself, my understanding of WP:OVERLINK – no! – MOS:REPEATLINK (corrected to what I meant rather than what I said!) is that links are good but that we try not to repeat them too much so we don’t end up with a sea of blue. I do understand the point about not linking to the too-obvious (Bad Münder am Deister is a town with streets and shops etc), but this is not that – I do agree with you that the Vennbahn needs explaining and linking. Especially as it sounds so interesting! But, and maybe this is where I need to reread WP:OVERLINK – no! – MOS:REPEATLINK, I feel that it was already adequately linked in the Monschau article. It is linked from the fourth paragraph of History and from the second paragraph of Traffic. This latter is very close to where you wanted to insert a third link, which I thought might be excessive. Hence the reversion.
Now, if you see what I mean, then fine. But actually If you don’t see what I mean then that’s probably also fine. I’m trying to learn to walk away from conflict on Wikipedia as it never, ever does me any good. As a result, if you feel very strongly about the third link you are free to do as you wish without worrying about my edit-warring with you over it. I just thought you might like to understand my reasoning.
Sorry about the extended waffle. I’m having an intellectually slow morning while waiting for a roofer to show up and fix something. Happy editing, and thanks again for the polite and reasoned message. With all good wishes DBaK (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
PS Just changed it to reflect my realization that I meant MOS:REPEATLINK rather than WP:OVERLINK. Please forgive the elderly confusion. I feel as if I can stand by what I meant, but I wish I had given the right link in the first place! Ho hum. This is probably why I should not be allowed a computer. :( DBaK (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the very entertaining reply. I have to admit I'm guilty of not seeing the two active links for Vennbahn in the article, as I went straight for the tourist attractions section. I think I will take the no further action approach. I believe most people, like me, would have heard of Vennbahn first, before clicking to learn more about Monschau, in which case they would discover the Vennbahn active links when reading up more about the town. Cheers.Slleong (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundredth and thirty ninth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,079 last month to 15,112 on 30 October 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 155 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 69 out of a total number of 4,438 articles.
Currently we have fifty Yorkshire featured articles:
As of 28 October 2019, we have assessed 100% of all articles with a project banner.
(Some new and additional article talk pages may still require a banner however)
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
General Election
With the calling of a General Election will members keep an eye on the various Parliament constituency articles. Please check that the candidates are appropriately referenced and that they appear in alphabetical order by surname so that we do not show any bias to a particular party. It is also worth checking the settlement articles to see if they have the correct constituency shown.
There will also be all of the candidate articles to check to see if they have the appropriate term end details and text to show if they are standing or not at the election.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Delivered November 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
DBAK - thanks for the edits, and no, I will not be reverting them because it sort of makes sense. I have been working on the article for so long that I cannot see the wood for the trees, so it needs someone like you to come along and tidy it up. Thanks and regards! The joy of all things (talk) 09:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,112 last month to 15,231 on 29 November 2019). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 156 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,444 articles.
Currently we have fifty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
General Election
With the General Election continuing will members keep an eye on the various Parliament constituency articles. Please check that the candidates are appropriately referenced and that they appear in alphabetical order by surname so that we do not show any bias to a particular party. Once results are in then these will need updating in the constituency articles and the elected MPs reflected in the settlement articles.
Happy Christmas
Well it is that time of year again and time to wish all members of the project a Happy Christmas.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2019 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered December 2019 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well DBAK. MarnetteD|Talk23:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello DB&K, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing,7&6=thirteen (☎)20:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Christmas and the New Year
A pretty Selmer picc in B♭ or sometimes A.
I would like to thank friends and colleagues here for the lovely greetings, and wish everyone a Merry Christmas, Happy New Year and/or any other appropriate religious, cultural, seasonal, leisure-based or just plain nice time.
I don't seem to have a jolly Christmas picture to hand but here is a nice piccolo trumpet. Close to festive, I reckon. Enjoy.
This fine pooch would probably be saying Happy New Year if he was a big talker.
I wish all my friends and colleagues here, as well as anyone who just happens to have dropped in, the happiest of New Years. DBaK (talk) 13:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year! I saw your change of sex to gender on the blue tit, and I don't think it's correct. Animals have sexes, words have gender. I appreciate that for a variety of reasons that the two are increasingly treated as synonyms for humans to avoid upsetting people, but I can't imagine that blue tits are particularly exercised by the correct biological term being used. I won't revert, just something to consider. Cheers, Jimfbleak - talk to me?16:48, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Just because I saw this come up on my watchlist - in a zoological context, the common usage is almost invariably "sex" unless you are dealing with humans (or bonobos, if they are feeling frisky :). It's the kind of thing that journal editors will make sure to clarify before publication, because the general connotation of "gender" in the biological as well as the social sciences is "social construct", as opposed to reproductive function. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I further suspect that they are too busy something, to something something down or town or something yesno? Ah, the great days of Music That Was Absolute B*ll*cks! DBaK (talk) 10:25, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Yes, they may well have been typically too busy bonoboing around, to put anybody down, but we simply can't claim that this is what they were best known for. Maybe a RfC or two might help resolve this? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC) But you do get a higher class of tit in a British garden, I find.
Thanks very much for this. I am honestly not arguing anything about cats (in fact I think I am incapable of doing so, sorry!) and I don't honestly mind what you do, except that I still feel strongly that it can't really be right to put QEH in the Boarding School cat, just like that as it is really really not one, its long and interesting history notwithstanding. If you want to sort it out, please please do, and I would be happy to see you gain consensus on the Talk page, but I feel that without the sort of subcat thing you are talking about, it's just got to be wrong. But I am not up for a fistfight over it! If you revert me again I will leave it albeit grumpily. :) Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
PS I could have a go at it myself but would probably screw up ... I have history in this area. Would you like to be bribed with chocolate, beer etc?? DBaK (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,231 last month to 15,275 on 2 January 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 155 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,461 articles.
Currently we have fifty one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
Well it is the start of another year and time to wish all members of the project a Happy New Year and a big thank you for all the hard work on Yorkshire related articles during the past year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundredth and forty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 15,275 last month to 15,346 on 29 January 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 156 is ahead of WP:GM who have 87. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,467 articles.
Currently we have fifty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Brexit
Well by the time you read this Brexit will have happened and this is the tidy-up that needs doing this month. You can leave the constituency link in articles that use {{infobox UK place}} as the template will hide the field in the output. Those using other templates will need to be edited individually to remove/hide the information. There are also a number of articles that mention the fact in the text of the article and these will need editing to remove the information or show that it was only valid until 31 January 2020.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no further suggestions from the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,104 last month to 16,176 on 29 September 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 182 is ahead of WP:GM who have 89. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 68 out of a total number of 4,538 articles.
Currently we have fifty six Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Unreliable sources
Just a note about sources which have been decided are unreliable and should no longer be used on Wikipedia. The latest one is the Daily Mail and this is been removed at the moment. If this is used on any of the projects articles then please remove it and replace with a more reliable source. If another source cannot be found then the reference and the text it supports should be removed from the article or if you think that the information is important the text should be tagged as {{citation needed}}.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The October 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered October 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
22:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
The abbey and the money
Ouch, thanks for nailing that error! I've corrected it, and hopefully made it clearer where the figure come from. The conversion rate is in a new citation. The annual 1795 community income was 1.5 guineas times twelve, times sixteen nuns. The McLaughlan citation covers the 1.5 guinea pension per nun, but I have found another, less reliable citable source which gives the sum as one guinea. However, McLaughlan was a nun at Stanbrook -so hopefully her book is trustworthy. Whatever, the nuns in Woolton weren't in such dire poverty as they made themselves out to be (IMHO not in poverty at all). Further, I would like to find out who arranged the pension, and how. Thanks also for the kind remarks. (BTW, if you are interested in questions of what sort of enclosure the nuns had, there's a big confusion as to when they went into papal enclosure. They claim 1880 I understand, but teaching girls is a big no-no in papal enclosure. They were teaching up to 1918.) Shubimperatrix (talk) 09:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
What ho!
Thanks for that, and very good to hear from you again. Occasional visits to your page have suggested you’re more D, B and K than usual! I’ve found Wikipedia in lockdown rather strange. I thought it would offer opportunities to do some stuff on here, but actually I’ve written less than I have in years. The enthusiasm’s just drained away - not really sure why. Anyway, hope you are well IRL, which matters rather more. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
And What Ho! to you KJP1 too my dear chap. It is lovely to hear from you – thank you so much for writing. And thanks – specifically, thanks for the thanks for the thanks, if I have read this very complex diagram correctly. Seriously, I thanked you because I felt that you dealt with it so beautifully. I struggle all the time with stuff like that – so, yes, I am generally a bit D, B and K, and perhaps a touch more so at the moment than usually ... yes, you got that one right. Lockdown ... well, lockdown has been rather strange, personally and on here too. Yup. I was in a massive Wikisulk for quite a chunk of the period: I had a couple of run-ins with the higher levels of the Wikipedia food chain which were not massively successful or gratifying and did not leave me feeling that great about my involvement here. I should not/must not say any more but ... yeah. I know lots of editors go through this stuff, and deal with it in different ways. I am perhaps not at my best in dealing with it at present and I wonder if another break might be a good idea.
During-lockdown work was quite "interesting" – everything went online overnight and my work became all about videos and the web. I sort-of think I got through it OK but it had its moments – I seemed to work harder, perhaps, then than before. Then halfway through it all we decided to make a video, like absolutely everyone else in the world, and I accidentally became very, very involved, and that was another month of my life very thoroughly accounted for. I might send you a link if you are interested as it would look a bit self-promotional to put it on here. I am currently a bit post-surgical but getting there, and am planning on being back at work – actually physically there! – on Tuesday. Woo woo interesting,
So yes, I am sort of here and sort of not ... I am not quite sure what the future holds here (or, duh, anywhere!) ... we shall see how it goes. So great to hear from you, thanks again, cheers DBaK (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
May I recommend a stroll in a park to you two? Entrance on my talk ;) - Lovely to see you alive! - ... just notice: there's also a trumpet concerto, and it was live (pictured). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Ach schade, I was going to ask if there was a video! The Torelli is absolutely lovely. :) Must have been a lovely gig. DBaK (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Gerda Arendt – did this happen, or get cancelled, or is it still to happen? I have failed to find the page (sorry for my slow response). Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
What a lovely programme, thanks Gerda Arendt. I didn't know the Poulenc so I am listening to it right now. Did you know that Felix Apprahamian said that a tree near his house (which is near our house) should have a plaque on it as it had been wee'd on by Poulenc? His obit mentions the tree. :) DBaK (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I should love to see the video! Mail the link, or post on here. Having worked on, and enjoyed, Articles for Creation a while back, believe me there is nothing self-promotional which you could possibly post that this place hasn’t already seen - in spades! Take care. KJP1 (talk) 20:45, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Haha KJP1 and a good point re promotion! In order to try and keep my WP and RL personas a little separate, I have emailed you the link. What can I say? It was a labour of love, with all the good and bad that that could imply! I really hope you enjoy it, and if you do not I will refund the admission charge! Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No refund required - absolutely wonderful! The warmth and sense of togetherness, in our current, separated, world, was delightful. And, assuming my guess is right, you played an impressive array of instruments. From one who could barely pass muster on the triangle, and who was expelled from the choir when the music master said I had the most excruciating singing voice he’d ever heard, respect! KJP1 (talk) 22:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
KJP1 thank you so much, and I am sorry for the slow reply. I am so glad you enjoyed it. Yes, that was me ... I wasn't trying to make it into a DBaKFest but we are a brass-playing school so I thought I had better go all out on that! Plus, to be honest, I needed to fill in some gaps in the layout. (shhh) As for the singing: hmmm, yes ... I am nominally singing in it too, that is, you can see my lips move. However, as an act of kindness to the public I am, shall we say, somewhat distant in the mix. As for the ukulele, I can only apologize: it was a birthday present and I was vastly overexcited by it. Thanks again for your kind comments. It was basically about a month of my life fulltime so I am not in a hurry to repeat it, but it was an amazing experience! cheers DBaK (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty first WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,176 last month to 16,259 on 29 October 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 189 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 76 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,577 articles.
Currently we have fifty nine Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered November 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
... dedicated to the memory of those who died - thank you for the string teacher! Did you see my latest pic, with two violins in the foreground, and the one singing behind them is the first violin in the trumpet concerto ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty second WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,259 last month to 16,386 on 29 November 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 188 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 76 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,595 articles.
Currently we have sixty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
It is time to wish all members of the project a Happy Christmas. Though it will be a very different one this year because of the restrictions placed on us by the government because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Though there will be some relaxation of the rules for a 5-day period over the Christmas period it will not allow much of the usual festivities to take place. Hopefully the vaccination will be available early next year for the country to get back to some sort of normality.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2020 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered December 2020 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Can I just check, did you read my edit summary here? Does that not explain it? Maybe if you need to discuss it further then, in preference to here, that could be at the article's talk page where it will be subject to helpful scrutiny from others. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy Christmas
I wish a very heartfelt Happy Christmas and/or all other possible seasonal and cultural etc greetings to friends/colleagues/fellow-editors/casual passersby on here! DBaK (talk) 12:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
If angels sung a Savior’s birth, On that auspicious morn, We well may imitate their mirth, Now He again is born!
If stars in heav'n shone bright as day To light the manger throne, We should rejoice as well as they That love doth reign alone.
All Glory be to God on high, And to the earth be peace; Goodwill henceforth from heav'n to men Begin and never cease.
Seasons greetings. Hope you and yours are safe and well during this rather bleak period, though I think we will get through it. Best Ceoil (talk) 02:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much Ceoil for the very nice message and terrific, windowed, Saint. Same best wishes to you and yours and, yes, the hope of things starting to come round in 2021. Cheers DBaK (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
A quote from Gargantua and Pantagruel by Rabelais; it is taken from the manuscript of Jules Massenet's opera Panurge, in the composer's own hand. It is my greeting of choice for the new year, because it encourages us to live joyfully, and try not to take life too seriously...while quaffing whatever beverage we choose, naturally. This has been a challenging year, to say the least; I hope that 2021 may bring a fresh start, and better days ahead. May the new year bring you joy and peace...and many days of fruitful editing.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,386 last month to 16,434 on 29 December 2020). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 190 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 77 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,606 articles.
Currently we have sixty Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
It is time to wish all members of the project a Happy New Year. Hopefully with the availability of a couple of vaccines things should start to get back to normality soon. The last year has seen 35 of the project's articles promoted to GA, while 9 have been promoted to FA and a list has been promoted to FL. Many thanks to all those members who have been put in the hard work to get these articles to a higher status.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
20:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Trumpet
Hi DBaK,
Happy new year! I hope your holiday season and real life endeavors are going well. I'm drafting the Trumpet article here and I thought you might be interested. Any comments/criticisms are welcome, although I should note I only have a rough outline. Cheers, Ovinus (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty fourth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,434 last month to 16,522 on 29 January 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 190 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 79 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,640 articles.
Currently we have sixty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and fifty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 16,522 last month to 16,781 on 27 February 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 190 is ahead of WP:GM who have 88. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 79 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,643 articles.
Currently we have sixty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Thanks for spotting that. I'd cut and paste from another article that was being complained about! Hopefully it reads properly now. Bermicourt (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Bermicourt – you're very very welcome, and please feel free to delete my note on your Talk page as soon as you like, since it is not helping with anything now! Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Break
Maybe a bit of a break is a good idea. I will try to stay away a little while. See you soon (edit: or soonish), love to all DBaK (talk) 10:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
. So, thank you again for those few little corrections that no one saw. I'm amazed I missed, for example "seven-years-old" and other errors. Thank you kindly.
very best wishes, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
.jpg)
_(cropped).jpg)
_(14775718853).jpg)
.jpg)
