User talk:Web-julio

Stop adding Category:Lithuanian bisexual people to articles where it clearly does not belong

You are adding this category, which you yourself created a few minutes ago, to articles of people where (1) they are not Lithuanian, (2) they are not bisexual, or (3) it is WP:NONDEFINING.

Please stop. If you continue, I will report you to administrators. Softlavender (talk) 05:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Softlavender no need to be aggressive when all I'm doing is categorizing according to the category family tree. All of them were bisexuals, please fact-check again. Anyways, they are still in both category trees, so something is already wrong about their categories. Web-julio (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

If you are so unskilled at categorizing, then please stop using HotCat. Softlavender (talk) 05:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

You don't seem to be understanding the situation. Do you know how WP:PETSCAN work?

Sorry, I mistakenly categorized wrong, but you don't seem to be wanting to solve the problem I brought here. Web-julio (talk) 05:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

The problem is your adding a blatantly incorrect category to articles, including BLPs. If you are so unskilled at categorizing, then please stop relying on WP:PETSCAN. Softlavender (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Karl Maria Kertbeny

added links pointing to Double and Sexual

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Maitê Proença

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maitê Proença, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Can you drop the C from the RM

It look like he just goes by "Rahim Redcar", so you can drop the C from the RM proposal to avoid any ambiguity, since no one has voted in favor of the C (yet) and it doesn't appear in any recent RS. Raladic (talk) 05:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay I will. Web-julio (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Yup like that, thanks :) Raladic (talk) 05:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of September 31

Hello, Web-julio,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, September 31, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of April 31

Hello, Web-julio,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, April 31, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey, it looks like I was wrong about the CSD here. Sorry about cluttering up your talk page. I still think the redirect should not exist though. The reasoning given on the target page is "Java (specifically the java.util.Calendar class) allows dates such as February 0 (= January 31) and April 31 (= March 1)." The problem is that Java seems to accept any number there and so 366th of April 1991, turns out to be 30th March 1992 according to Java. Like BusterD says below, don't let this deter you from editing or creating redirects. Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of November 31

Hello, Web-julio,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, November 31, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

No big deal, but now you know

When you find yourself responding to admin action of any kind, I invite you to consider the acting administrator as a resource. I like to think wikipedians act as impartially as possible, but often we find ourselves opposed on the merits, sometimes vividly. Wikipedia sysops are trusted to use advanced permissions, not to correct our fellows. In this case you were right, and I'm happy to be called on it. If I were asked directly, I would have seen my error, agreed you were right, and I'd thank you for calling me on it. So, be direct. I'd prefer it. It's quicker. I consider such notices a personal favor, especially when I disagree with the notice (how would I see there's a spider on my back, anyway?).

As you get a few thousand more edits under your belt, you'll realize most wikipedians will react the same way. We're a far more collaborative community than we see in consensus measuring processes, especially when you look at wikiprojects and the article review/improvement systems they facilitate.

Nice to meet you, no hard feelings, and don't cease editing boldly. Smart people often disagree. This is a good thing. Just keep it civil, make arguments in good faith, and if I'm wrong, call me on it. I'm counting on you. BusterD (talk) 02:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)