Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raquel “Ra” Brown
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 16:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Raquel “Ra” Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I know I'm going out on a limb here, but this subject doesn't appear to be remotely qualified for inclusion. Silverfish8088 (talk) 18:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, unfortunately, since her song here is fairly decent. Don't see the sources needed to meet WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as sadly no evidence of notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 06:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons I gave at Talk:Raquel “Ra” Brown. The article itself essentially says that she's a local fixture, and I didn't find anything elsewhere that elevates her beyond that or that goes beyond the same sort of routine notices as the sources cited in the article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.