Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The absorption of nutrients and disease resistance are two indispensable physiological processes in plants; however, it is still largely unknown whether there is cross-talk between their molecular signaling pathways. In this study, we identified the rice OsPT8 protein, which is a member of the phosphate transporters (PTs) Pht1 family and also plays a role in rice disease resistance. The transcriptional level of OsPT8 is suppressed after infection with rice pathogens and treatment with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Overexpression of OsPT8 suppresses rice disease resistance against the pathogens Magnaporthe oryzae and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Accordingly, the transcription level of resistance related genes, such as PAL and PBZ1, is inhibited in plants overexpressing OsPT8 (OsPT8-OX) after inoculation with these pathogens. In OsPT8-OX plants, PAMPs-triggered immunity (PTI) response genes, such as OsRac1 and SGT1, are suppressed during treatment with PAMPs chitin or flg22. Moreover, the typical response of PTI is suppressed after chitin or flg22 treatment. We also identified OsPT8 as an interactor of a rice mitogen-activated protein kinase BWMK1, which is a regulator of disease resistance. Under low phosphate (Pi) conditions, the OsPT8-OX plants display better agronomic traits than the control plants. However, the differences in development between OsPT8-OX and the control plants are reduced upon the increase of Pi concentration. These results demonstrate that OsPT8 regulates the transduction of Pi signaling for development and negatively regulates rice immunity.

Free full text 


Logo of scirepAboutEditorial BoardFor AuthorsScientific Reports
Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 5408.
Published online 2019 Apr 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41718-9
PMCID: PMC6443681
PMID: 30931952

The Rice Phosphate Transporter Protein OsPT8 Regulates Disease Resistance and Plant Growth

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

The absorption of nutrients and disease resistance are two indispensable physiological processes in plants; however, it is still largely unknown whether there is cross-talk between their molecular signaling pathways. In this study, we identified the rice OsPT8 protein, which is a member of the phosphate transporters (PTs) Pht1 family and also plays a role in rice disease resistance. The transcriptional level of OsPT8 is suppressed after infection with rice pathogens and treatment with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Overexpression of OsPT8 suppresses rice disease resistance against the pathogens Magnaporthe oryzae and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Accordingly, the transcription level of resistance related genes, such as PAL and PBZ1, is inhibited in plants overexpressing OsPT8 (OsPT8-OX) after inoculation with these pathogens. In OsPT8-OX plants, PAMPs-triggered immunity (PTI) response genes, such as OsRac1 and SGT1, are suppressed during treatment with PAMPs chitin or flg22. Moreover, the typical response of PTI is suppressed after chitin or flg22 treatment. We also identified OsPT8 as an interactor of a rice mitogen-activated protein kinase BWMK1, which is a regulator of disease resistance. Under low phosphate (Pi) conditions, the OsPT8-OX plants display better agronomic traits than the control plants. However, the differences in development between OsPT8-OX and the control plants are reduced upon the increase of Pi concentration. These results demonstrate that OsPT8 regulates the transduction of Pi signaling for development and negatively regulates rice immunity.

Introduction

The growth and breeding of super rice varieties with low fertilizer demand, strong disease resistance, good quality, and high-yield are restricted by nutrient acquisition and defense response. Phosphorus (Pi) is one of the major macronutrients for the normal growth and development of almost all living species and plays a key role in plant metabolic processes; it is involved in vital substance synthesis, energy transfer, and signal transduction1. Plants absorb inorganic phosphate principally from soil. Therefore, the concentration of available Pi in the soil mainly limits plant growth and development, and Pi absorption remains a problem in agriculture2.

The absorption and transfer of Pi in plants rely on Pi transporters (PTs), which are classified into four subfamilies from Pht1 to Pht43. The subcellular localization of the Pht1 subfamily is at the plasma membrane (PM), and there are 13 members (OsPT1-OsPT13) in the rice Pht1 subfamily4,5. For example, OsPT2 is a low-affinity PT that plays an important role in store Pi translocation in rice6. There is a Pi toxicity phenotype observed in transgenic rice overexpressing OsPT2 by excessive uptake of Pi7. Altered expression of OsPT4 affects the absorption and removal of Pi and also functions in the development of the embryo during the booting stage8. Contrary to OsPT2, OsPT8 is a high-affinity transporter for both Pi and arsenate, and OsPT8-OX plants tend to stockpile superfluous Pi involved in toxicity symptoms under high Pi conditions9,10.

Under Pi starvation conditions, plants adjust root architecture to maximize root superficial area by increasing the growth of lateral roots and root hairs to absorb Pi more effectively1113. According to report, PTs and some Pi signal transduction related genes are involved in regulating root architecture based on Pi concentration1416. For instance, compared with wild type plants, both the OsPT1-OX and OsPT1-RNAi plants can shorten root hairs under Pi-deficient conditions14. Similarly, the OsMYB2P-1 and OsARF16 also can regulate root architecture under Pi-starvation conditions, simultaneously influencing the expression level of PTs15,16.

The importance of phosphorus in the process of plant growth is unquestionable, but we still know little about the relationship between Pi absorb and disease resistance. An adequate supply of Pi is essential for crop growth and increases plant disease resistance17. In a previously described field trial, spraying 50 mM K2HPO4 increases rice yield by up to 32% and reduces neck blast caused by Magnaporthe oryzae (M. oryzae) by up to 42%18. However, the molecular mechanism of disease resistance enhanced by Pi treatment is still largely unknown. There are some genes that may function in both the Pi pathway and disease response such as AtPHT4;1 (also named ANTR1) which is a member of the Arabidopsis PHT4 family and localizes in leaf chloroplasts19. The dominant mutant of AtPHT4;1, pht4;1-1, is more susceptible to the virulent bacterium Pseudomonas syringae which is involved in SA-mediated plant defense20. Another study showed that AtPHT4;1 plays an important role in the defense response to pathogen infection and is regulated by a circadian clock protein CCA120,21. In addition, the activity of ATP-synthase is inhibited in the pht4;1-1 mutant, causing a dwarf phenotype with a lack of Pi22.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade plays important roles in plant growth and development, hormone signaling, and immunity23,24. A MAPK cascade usually consists of a MAP kinase (MAPK), a MAPK kinase (MAPKK) and a MAPKK kinase (MAPKKK) at least. There are 15 MAPK genes have been reported in rice25. BWMK1 was the first reported rice MAPK, which is activated by a fungal elicitor and can enhance plant disease resistance against pathogens26,27. Mechanism analysis showed that BWMK1 enhances plant disease resistance depending on direct phosphorylating and activating the transcription factor OsEREBP1 in transgenic tobacco26. Another rice MAPK, OsMAPK6, can be activated by a sphingolipid elicitor, and regulated by the active form of a small GTPase OsRac1, which is involved in rice development and immunity28. A chitin-mediated elicitor OsMKK4 activates the OsMAPK3/OsMAPK6 to influence the plant metabolism of defense response and regulate the activation of OsWRKY53 during pathogen infection29,30. As a node, OsMAPK6 links a ternary complex formed by RAR1, SGT1 and Hsp90 to the OsRac1-mediated defense complex, and effects R gene-induced disease response and is involved in the accumulation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS)28,3133.

To explore the possible functions of OsPT8 in cross-talk between plant defense responses and the Pi signaling pathway, we researched the underlying biological characteristics of OsPT8. In this study, we showed that OsPT8 regulates rice immunity, development and Pi transportation. Contrast with the wild type, the overexpression of OsPT8 transgenic plants exhibit more susceptible to the rice fungal and bacterial pathogens. During the inoculation of pathogens and treatment of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP), the transcriptional levels of some disease resistance-related genes (such as OsRac1) were repressed compared with wild type. We also found that OsPT8 physically interacts with BWMK1. Under low Pi concentrations, OsPT8-OX plants show better agronomic traits compared with wild type. These results indicate that OsPT8 is involved in regulating the transduction of Pi signaling for plant development and plant immunity.

Results

OsPT8 is involved in plant immunity

Although OsPT8 was reported that it functions on nutrient absorption and transport9,10, there remain unknowns about the signaling pathways of OsPT8. Therefore, to explore whether OsPT8 plays a role in rice disease resistance, we analyzed the OsPT8 transcript level by quantitative RT-PCR in wild-type rice Nipponbare (NPB) after inoculation with the rice fungal and bacterial pathogens M. oryzae and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). Compared with normal expression of OsPT8 at 0 hour post inoculation (hpi), inoculation with M. oryzae isolate 110-2 significantly suppresses the expression of OsPT8 at 48 hpi (Fig. 1A). Similarly, the transcription of OsPT8 was also inhibited after inoculation with Xoo strain PXO99 (Fig. 1A). Since PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) is the main component of plant innate immunity, we examined whether OsPT8 is involved in rice PTI. Punched the NPB leaf to disks and soaked them in the PAMPs chitin or flg22 solution to different time points (0, 3 and 6 h, respectively). Then, the results of the quantitative RT-PCR showed that the transcription level of OsPT8 was down-regulated at 3 and 6 hour post treatment (hpt) after both chitin and flg22 treatment (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that OsPT8 is involved in rice disease resistance and PTI.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Relative gene transcription of the OsPT8 in wild type (NPB) plants after rice pathogens inoculated or PAMPs treatment. (A) OsPT8 relative transcription levels in NPB after M. oryzae isolate 110-2 or Xoo strain PXO99 inoculation; (B) OsPT8 relative transcription levels in NPB after chitin or flg22 treatment. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 3), Significance was determined level at **P < 0.01 (n = 3) with a t-test.

OsPT8 negatively regulates rice disease resistance

To further understand the biological functions of OsPT8, we made OsPT8 overexpression and RNAi transgenic plants with NPB background; the OsPT8 overexpression and RNAi transgenic plants were challenged with rice fungal and bacterial pathogens, respectively. After inoculation with M. oryzae isolate 110-2, the OsPT8 overexpressing plants showed severe disease symptoms with large lesions, while less disease lesions were observed in NPB plants at 7 days post infection (dpi) (Fig. 2A,B). Accordingly, the relative fungal biomass of the isolate in the inoculated leaves was significantly higher in the OsPT8 overexpressing plants than in NPB plants (Fig. 2C). Similarly, the OsPT8 overexpressing plants were also more susceptible to Xoo strain PXO99 compared with NPB; the lesion length caused by PXO99 was much longer in OsPT8 overexpressing plants than in NPB plants (Fig. 2D,E). However, the OsPT8 RNAi plants have the same disease resistance level as NPB plants when they are inoculated with M. oryzae and Xoo (Fig. S1A–C). These results indicate that OsPT8 negatively regulates plant disease resistance against both fungal and bacterial pathogens.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Disease phenotypes of the OsPT8-OX plants. (A) OsPT8 relative transcription levels in OsPT8-OX plants. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 3); (B) Disease phenotypes of the OsPT8-OX and wild-type (NPB) plants after spray inoculation with M. oryzae isolate 110-2 (Photographed at 7 DPI); (C) The relative fungal biomass of the OsPT8-OX and NPB plants after spray inoculation. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 3); (D) Disease phenotypes of the OsPT8-OX and NPB plants after inoculation with Xoo strain PXO99 (Photographed at 14 DPI); (E) Bacterial blight lesion length in the OsPT8-OX and NPB plants. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n > 15), Significance was determined level at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 with a t-test.

To determine the molecular pathway involving OsPT8 in the regulation of plant disease resistance, we compared the expression of pathogenesis related genes among OsPT8 overexpression, OsPT8 RNAi and NPB plants after inoculation with M. oryzae or Xoo. Under normal growth conditions, the transcript levels of the rice defense related genes PBZ1 and OsMAPK6 were suppressed in OsPT8 overexpression plants compared with NPB (Fig. 3A,B). When infected with M. oryzae, the expression levels of the PR genes, such as PBZ1, OsMAPK6, WRKY53 and OsNPR1, were obviously suppressed in OsPT8 overexpressing plants compared with NPB at 12 or 24 hpi (Fig. 3A–D). In addition, the expression patterns of the defense related genes OsRac1, PBZ1, SGT1 and PAL were analyzed in OsPT8 overexpressing plants and NPB after inoculation with Xoo. These four genes in OsPT8 overexpressing plants had much lower expression levels than those observed for NPB at 12 hpi (Fig. 3E–H). The transcript levels of the above defense-related genes showed no significant difference between OsPT8 RNAi plants and NPB after M. oryzae and Xoo inoculation (Fig. S2A–D). These data indicate that OsPT8 negatively regulates plant immunity through affecting pathogenesis-related genes.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig3_HTML.jpg

Defense-related genes transcription in the OsPT8-OX and wild type (NPB) plants after the rice blast pathogen M. oryzae or the bacterial blight pathogen Xoo inoculation. (AD) Time-course relative transcripttion levels of PBZ1, OsMAPK6, OsNPR1 and WRKY53 in OsPT8-OX and NPB plants after M. oryzae isolate 110-2 inoculation. (EH) Time-course relative transcription levels of OsRac1, PBZ1, SGT1 and PAL in OsPT8-OX and NPB plants after Xoo strain PXO99 inoculation. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 3), Significance was determined level at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 (n = 3) with a t-test.

OsPT8 regulates PAMP-triggered immunity in rice

To further analyze the function of OsPT8 on rice innate immunity, the OsPT8 overexpression, OsPT8 RNAi and NPB plants were treated with the PAMP elicitors (chitin and flg22) for PAMP-triggered immunity response detection. The quantitative RT-PCR revealed that the transcript level of the PTI pathway gene PAL was induced in both the OsPT8 overexpression lines and NPB plants when treated with chitin or flg22, but the PAL transcription level was much lower in OsPT8 overexpression plants compared with NPB (Fig. 4A). However, the expression of another PTI pathway gene, OsRac1, could not be induced by chitin or flg22 treatment in the OsPT8 overexpression plants, but it could be activated by chitin and flg22 in NPB plants. This result indicates that OsRac1 is also strongly suppressed in OsPT8 overexpression plants during chitin and flg22 treatment (Fig. 4B). In addition, in OsPT8 overexpressing plants the relative transcript level of the SGT1 gene was only 1/10 of the transcription level in NPB after treatment with flg22 (Fig. 4C). We also detected the transcription of PTI-related genes in OsPT8 RNAi plants after treatment with the two PAMP elicitors, and transcription of these genes was similar to the level determined in wide-type NPB, which showed a trend similar to the expression analyses observed in the investigations of inoculation and defense genes (Fig. S3A,B). These data indicate that OsPT8 regulates both chitin and flg22-triggered rice immunity.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig4_HTML.jpg

Defense-related genes transcription in the OsPT8-OX and wild type (NPB) plants after PAMPs chitin or flg22 treatment. (AC) Time-course relative transcription levels of PAL, OsRac1 and SGT1 in OsPT8-OX and NPB plants after chitin or flg22 treatment. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 3), Significance was determined level at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 (n = 3) with a t-test.

OsPT8 interacts with BWMK1

To further understand the functional mechanism of OsPT8 in plant defense responses, we aim to find out the interactor(s) of OsPT8. A system of yeast two hybrids (Y2H) was created to screen the interactional protein of OsPT8. We used OsPT8 as bait to screen the rice NPB cDNA library. Interestingly, we screened a MAPK protein BWMK1 interacting with OsPT8, and confirmed the interaction between BWMK1 and OsPT8 in the yeast cells (Fig. 5A). However, we did not observe an interaction between BWMK1 and OsPT2 which is homologue of OsPT8 in rice (Fig. 5A), suggested that the interaction between BWMK1 and OsPT8 in yeast is specific. In order to verify the reliability of this interaction in Y2H, a GST pull-down assay was applied to confirm the interaction between OsPT8 and BWMK1 (Fig. 5B). A firefly luciferase (LUC) complementation imaging (LCI) assay in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves was used to verify the interaction between OsPT8 and BWMK1. We observed strong LUC signal in the co-infiltration region of OsPT8-Cluc and BWMK1-Nluc vectors (Fig. 5C). The results showed that OsPT8 specifically interacts with BWMK1 both in vitro and in vivo.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig5_HTML.jpg

Interaction between OsPT8 and BWMK1. (A) OsPT8 interacts with BWMK1 in yeast. SD/-Leu-Trp-His medium containing 35 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3′AT) was used to test the interaction; (B) The in vitro GST pull-down assay confirms the interaction between OsPT8: MBP and BWMK1: GST. MBP was used as a negative control. The amounts of proteins were examined by Western immunoblot analysis with anti-MBP or anti-GST antibody. These blots were exposed on different gels; (C) LCI assay show that OsPT8 interacts with BWMK1 in N. benthamiana leaves. SGT1/RAR1 was positive control.OsPT8/EV and BWMK1/EV were negative controls.

Overexpression of OsPT8 in rice affects root and shoot growth

Since OsPT8 is a Pi transporter in rice, we analyzed the Pi absorption function of OsPT8. Plants were treated with different Pi concentrations while grown on hydroponics to determine the effect of root and shoot growth. We found that OsPT8 affected rice root and shoot growth (Fig. 6A). The root length of OsPT8-OX plants was shorter than NPB under conditions with low (0.015 mM KH2PO4), normal (0.3 mM KH2PO4), and high (1.5 mM KH2PO4) Pi concentrations (Fig. 6A,B). This suggests that the overexpression of OsPT8 enhances the ability of rice to absorb Pi, which is not necessary to elongate root length and root surface to absorb enough Pi for the OsPT8-OX plants growth. On the contrary, the shoot length of OsPT8-OX plants was longer than the NPB under low Pi conditions, while shoot length of OsPT8-OX plants was shorter than NPB under normal Pi and high Pi conditions (Fig. 6C). Therefore, it is possible that the overexpression of OsPT8 causes plants to absorb superfluous Pi under normal and high Pi conditions, which is toxic to plant growth, especially shoot growth. The OsPT8-RNAi plants show poor development under low Pi concentration condition, while once the Pi concentration is increased, the development of RNAi plants recovers to NPB level gradually (Fig. S4). Thus, we conclude that OsPT8 regulates plant root architecture through the Pi signaling pathway, and it also affects shoot development under different Pi concentrations.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 41598_2019_41718_Fig6_HTML.jpg

Growth phenotypes of the OsPT8-OX plants under different phosphate concentrations. (A) The phenotype of OsPT8-OX plants under different phosphate concentrations; (B), (C) The statistics data of root length and shoot length under different phosphate concentration. Error bars indicate the SD from three biological replicates (n = 9), Significance was determined level at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 with a t-test.

Discussion

The function of OsPT8 in the regulation of rice innate immunity

BWMK1 is required for rice innate immunity26,27,34. Overexpression of BWMK1 increases tobacco resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Phytophthora parasitica26. BWMK1 phosphorylates a transcription factor of the AP2/ERF family, OsEREBP1, which enhances plant disease resistance to Xoo and confers drought tolerance in OsEREBP1-OX transgenic rice26,27. Similarly, we found that the phosphate transporter OsPT8, as the interactor of BWMK1, functions in plant disease resistance and Pi signaling. Our results showed that the transcription level of OsPT8 decreases after infection with pathogens. Consistent with this finding, the line overexpressing OsPT8 is more susceptible to fungal and bacterial rice pathogens, such as M. oryzae and Xoo, and genes related to disease resistance are suppressed in OsPT8 overexpression plants before or after inoculation with pathogens compared with NPB. In addition, the PAMP-triggered immunity, a crucial component of plant innate immunity, is also significantly suppressed in OsPT8-overexpressing plants, and the transcription level of OsPT8 is suppressed after chitin and flg22 treatment. However, unlike the OsPT8 overexpression plants, there was no obvious difference between OsPT8 RNAi plants and NPB in some defense responses. These results indicate that OsPT8 functions as a negative regulator of rice innate immunity.

In addition, we found that several rice immunity related genes (OsRac1, OsMAPK6, SGT1 and WRKY53) in the OsRac1-mediated pathway were inhibited at the transcriptional level, indicating that OsPT8 directly or indirectly plays a role in this pathway. The interaction between OsPT8 and BWMK1 makes us realize that OsPT8 may be a point to link BWMK1 and OsRac1-mediated pathway. For the relationship between OsPT8 and BWMK1, we tend to propose a hypothesis that part of OsPT8 competitively binds to BWMK1 under the normal condition of plant growth. After pathogens infected, OsPT8 is down-regulated during pathogens infection, therefore, it releases BWMK1 to induce a series of downstream disease-related genes in the meantime. In the OsPT8-OX plants, the overmuch OsPT8 decreases the amounts of unbound BWMK1 and causes the suppression of the BWMK1-induced disease resistance. In the future, we need more research to explore the relationship between BWMK1 and OsRac1-mediated pathway to clarify the more detailed OsPT8-mediated plant disease resistance signaling network.

OsPT8 is a regulator of rice growth and development

OsPT8 can reallocate Pi from vegetative organs to reproductive organs35. The Pi toxicity phenotype is observed in OsPT8-OX plants under 0.3 Mm Pi9. In addition to Pi absorption, the overexpression of OsPT8 also facilitates the absorption of arsenate in rice and selenium in tobacco10,36. OsNLA1 is a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase that effects Pi homeostasis in rice by regulating the degradation of OsPT2 and OsPT837. A previous study has reported that OsPT proteins are involved in rice root development14. In this study, we found that the OsPT8-OX plants have shorter shoots compared with NPB plants in normal phosphorus (NP) and high phosphorus (HP) conditions, suggesting that there is Pi toxicity in OsPT8-OX plants grown under NP and HP conditions. In contrast, under low phosphorus (LP) conditions, the shoot length of OsPT8-OX plants was longer than the root length in NPB, and with the decrease of the Pi concentration, the shoot length of OsPT8-OX plants gradually increased. Therefore, along with the decrease of over absorption of Pi, the suppression of shoot growth in OsPT8-OX plants is remedied. Unlike the shoot length, the root length of NPB was always greater than the root length of OsPT8-OX plants under HP, NP, or LP conditions. We speculate that because of the enhancement of OsPT8-OX plants to absorb Pi, the plant tends to decrease root surface area when it possesses sufficient ability of Pi absorption.

OsPT8 is also involved in both auxin- and Pi-mediated growth signaling pathways: when OsARF16, a cross-talk factor between auxin and Pi-starvation pathways, is knocked out, rice roots become insensitive to auxin and Pi treatment, and the expression level of OsPT8 induced by Pi conditions is suppressed16. SGT1 is an OsRac1-mediated disease-resistance protein that reduced transcription in OsPT8-OX plants, which is also involved in the curling root phenotype by auxin-mediated pathways38. This study illuminated that OsPT8 functions as a cross talk regulator of plant innate immunity and plant growth signaling pathways.

Materials and Methods

Rice materials, growth, and transformation

The transgenic rice plants used in this study were developed from the Japonica cultivar Oryza sativa Nipponbare (NPB). After decortication, the rice seeds were germinated on 1/2 MS culture medium at 28 °C, 80% relative humidity (RH), and a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle.

pCAMBIA1301-OsPT8-OX and pFGC5941-OsPT8-RNAi were structured for OsPT8 transgenic rice by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Hydroponic experiments with different Pi concentrations

One-week-old rice seedlings were transferred from 1/2 MS culture medium to IRRI nutrient solution containing 1.25 mM NH4NO3, 0.35 mM K2SO4, 1 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 1 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 mM Na2SiO3·9H2O, 20 mM Fe-EDTA, 20 mM H3BO3, 9 mM MnCl2·4H2O, 0.32 mM CuSO4·5H2O, 0.77 mM ZnSO4·7H2O, and 0.39 mM Na2MoO4·2H2O, at pH 5.5. Three different concentrations (LP, NP or HP) of KH2PO4 (0.015, 0.3, or 1.5 mM) as the only Pi source were individually added to separate solution to assess the resulting phenotypes. The plants in the hydroponic experiments were cultivated at 28 °C, 80% relative humidity, and a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle. The nutrient solution was adjusted to pH 5.5 every day and refreshed every 3 d.

Inoculation with pathogens

To examine the resistance of plants to rice blast, 3-week-old rice seedlings were inoculated with M. oryzae isolate 110-2. The concentration of the spore suspension was 1.2 × 105 spores/mL with 0.05% Tween-20. The infected plants were kept in the dark for 24 h before they were moved to greenhouse with a day cycle of 12 h light/12 h dark. Inoculated leaves were sheared and photographed at 7–9 dpi. The DNA of M. oryzae biomass was determined using quantitative PCR39. The Xoo strain PXO99 was used in a leaf-clipping method to infect the rice plants at the mature stage40. The 24 h dark treatment was essential before transferring the plants to a normal photoperiod. The lesion length was measured at 14 dpi.

PAMPs treatment

Rice leaves were cut into pieces (1 cm2) and soaked in distilled water over night. Three pieces of each plant were placed into a 2.0 mL tube filled with 8 nM chitin or 100 nM flg22. The leaves were sampled at 0 h, 3 h and 6 h to analyze genes expression by quantitative RT-PCR.

RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from fresh rice tissue using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Appropriative RNA was treated with gDNA remover and cDNA synthesis kit (Trans one-step reverse transcription kit). Next, the cDNA was diluted for the 20 µL Trans qPCR system, then proceeded the real-time quantitative RT-PCR with a BioRAD CFX96 PCR amplifier. Three independent repeats were performed. The data were normalized with housekeeping gene ubiquitin.

Yeast two-hybrid assay

The Quick & Easy yeast transformation mix system from TaKaRa was used in these assays. Full-length CDS of OsPT8 and BWMK1 was individually inserted into the AD vector (pPC86) or the BD vector (pDBLeu) separately. The yeast strain Mav203 was used for co-transformation and screened by synthetic dextrose (SD) medium without Leu and Trp (SD-Leu-Trp). For the interaction screening, 1 μL of each dilution (10, 100, 1000 times) was grown on SD-Leu-Trp-His medium with 0 mM or 35 mM 3-amino-1,2,4,-triazole (3′AT).

GST pull-down

The full-length CDS of OsPT8 or BWMK1 gene was cloned into the pMAL-c4x or pGEX-6p-1 vector. Ten micrograms of OsPT8: MBP and 10 µg BWMK1: GST fusion protein was mixed together. And 60 µL of pre-rinsed glutathione sepharose beads (Promega) was co-incubated with the protein mixture for 4 h at 4 °C. The beads were then washed five times with 1 × TBST buffer. Finally, eluted protein from the beads and proceeded Western blot assay.

LCI Assay

The full-length BWMK1 fragment was fused to the N-terminus of the pCAMBIA-NLuc vector, and full-length OsPT8 fragment also were fused to the C-terminus of the pCAMBIA-CLuc vector. These two vectors, NLuc/CLuc empty vectors and p19 were co-infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves by Agrobacterium strain EHA105. The plants were kept at 26 °C (dark) for 48 h. The leaves were injected fluorescein potassium (cellgro) and photographed by Chemiluminescence imaging system (Bio-rad).

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672017, 30871335), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (2016JJ3071) and the Foundation of Hunan Provincial Education Department (15K063, 17C0769).

Author Contributions

Liangying Dai, Wei Li, Guoliang Wang and Xionglun Liu designed the experiments and provided technical support. Zheng Dong, Wei Li, Jing Liu, Lihua Li, Sujun Pan, Saijun Liu, Ling Liu and Jia Gao conducted the experiments and analyzed the dates. Zheng Dong, Wei Li and Liangying Dai wrote and revised the manuscript.

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Notes

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Zheng Dong and Wei Li contributed equally.

Contributor Information

Wei Li, moc.361@155053iewil.

Liangying Dai, ten.uanuh@yliad.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-41718-9.

References

1. Raghothama KG. Phosphate acquisition. Annual review of plant biology. 1999;50:665–693. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.665. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Veneklaas EJ, et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist. 2012;195:306–320. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Rausch C, Bucher M. Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport in plants. Planta. 2002;216:23–37. 10.1007/s00425-002-0921-3. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Goff SA, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) Science. 2002;296:92–100. 10.1126/science.1068275. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Nussaume L, et al. Phosphate Import in Plants: Focus on the PHT1 Transporters. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2011;2:83–83. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00083. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Ai P, et al. Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1; 2 and OsPht1; 6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. Plant Journal. 2009;57:798–809. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03726.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Liu F, et al. OsSPX1 suppresses the function of OsPHR2 in the regulation of expression of OsPT2 and phosphate homeostasis in shoots of rice. Plant Journal. 2010;62:508–517. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04170.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Zhang F, et al. Involvement of OsPht1; 4 in phosphate acquisition and mobilization facilitates embryo development in rice. Plant Journal. 2015;82:556–569. 10.1111/tpj.12804. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Jia H, et al. The Phosphate Transporter Gene OsPht1; 8 Is Involved in Phosphate Homeostasis in Rice. Plant Physiology. 2011;156:1164–1175. 10.1104/pp.111.175240. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Wu Z, Ren H, Mcgrath SP, Wu P, Zhao F. Investigating the contribution of the phosphate transport pathway to arsenic accumulation in rice. Plant Physiology. 2011;157:498–508. 10.1104/pp.111.178921. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Bates TR, Lynch JP. Stimulation of root hair elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana by low phosphorus availability. Plant Cell and Environment. 1996;19:529–538. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00386.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Williamson L, Ribrioux SP, Fitter AH, Leyser HM. Phosphate Availability Regulates Root System Architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2001;126:875–882. 10.1104/pp.126.2.875. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Lo´pezbucio J, Cruzramirez A, Herreraestrella L. The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6:280–287. 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00035-9. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Sun S, et al. A Constitutive Expressed Phosphate Transporter, OsPht1; 1, Modulates Phosphate Uptake and Translocation in Phosphate-Replete Rice. Plant Physiology. 2012;159:1571–1581. 10.1104/pp.112.196345. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Dai X, Wang Y, Yang A, Zhang W. OsMYB2P-1, an R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor, Is Involved in the Regulation of Phosphate-Starvation Responses and Root Architecture in Rice. Plant Physiology. 2012;159:169–183. 10.1104/pp.112.194217. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Shen C, et al. OsARF16, a transcription factor, is required for auxin and phosphate starvation response in rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Cell and Environment. 2013;36:607–620. 10.1111/pce.12001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Walters DR, Bingham IJ. Influence of nutrition on disease development caused by fungal pathogens: implications for plant disease control. Annals of Applied Biology. 2007;151:307–324. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00176.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Manandhar HK, Jorgensen HJ, Mathur SB, Smedegaardpetersen V. Resistance to rice blast induced by ferric chloride, di-potassium hydrogen phosphate and salicylic acid. Crop Protection. 1998;17:323–329. 10.1016/S0261-2194(98)00020-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Guo B, Irigoyen S, Fowler TB, Versaw WK. Differential expression and phylogenetic analysis suggest specialization of plastid-localized members of the PHT4 phosphate transporter family for photosynthetic and heterotrophic tissues. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2008;3:784–790. 10.4161/psb.3.10.6666. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Wang G, et al. Circadian Clock-Regulated Phosphate Transporter PHT4; 1 Plays an Important Role in Arabidopsis Defense. Molecular Plant. 2011;4:516–526. 10.1093/mp/ssr016. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Wang G, Zhang C, Battle SL, Lu H. The phosphate transporter PHT4; 1 is a salicylic acid regulator likely controlled by the circadian clock protein CCA1. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:701–701. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00083. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Karlsson PM, et al. The Arabidopsis thylakoid transporter PHT4; 1 influences phosphate availability for ATP synthesis and plant growth. Plant Journal. 2015;84:99–110. 10.1111/tpj.12962. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Pitzschke A, Schikora A, Hirt H. MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Current opinion in plant biology. 2009;12:421–426. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.06.008. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Xu J, Zhang S. Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in signaling plant growth and development. Trends in plant science. 2015;20:56–64. 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.10.001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Hamel LP, et al. Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends in plant science. 2006;11:192–198. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.007. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Cheong YH, et al. BWMK1, a Rice Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase, Locates in the Nucleus and Mediates Pathogenesis-Related Gene Expression by Activation of a Transcription Factor. Plant Physiology. 2003;132:1961–1972. 10.1104/pp.103.023176. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Koo SC, et al. OsBWMK1 mediates SA-dependent defense responses by activating the transcription factor OsWRKY33. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2009;387:365–370. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.026. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Lieberherr D, et al. A Sphingolipid Elicitor-Inducible Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Regulated by the Small GTPase OsRac1 and Heterotrimeric G-Protein in Rice. Plant Physiology. 2005;138:1644–1652. 10.1104/pp.104.057414. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Kishikaboshi M, et al. A rice fungal MAMP-responsive MAPK cascade regulates metabolic flow to antimicrobial metabolite synthesis. Plant Journal. 2010;63:599–612. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04264.x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Chujo T, et al. Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98737. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098737. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Azevedo C, et al. The RAR1 interactor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science. 2002;295:2073–2076. 10.1126/science.1067554. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Thao NP, et al. Rar1 and hsp90 form a complex with rac/rop gtpase and function in innate-immune responses in rice. Plant Cell. 2007;19:4035–4045. 10.1105/tpc.107.055517. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Nakashima A, et al. RACK1 Functions in Rice Innate Immunity by Interacting with the Rac1 Immune Complex. The Plant Cell. 2008;20:2265–2279. 10.1105/tpc.107.054395. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. He C, Fong SH, Yang D, Wang G. BWMK1, a Novel MAP Kinase Induced by Fungal Infection and Mechanical Wounding in Rice. Molecular Plant-microbe Interactions. 1999;12:1064–1073. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.12.1064. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Li Y, et al. Phosphate transporter OsPht1; 8 in rice plays an important role in phosphorus redistribution from source to sink organs and allocation between embryo and endosperm of seeds. Plant Science. 2015;230:23–32. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.001. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Song Z, et al. Overexpression of the phosphate transporter gene OsPT8, improves the Pi and selenium contents in Nicotiana tabacum. Environmental & Experimental Botany. 2017;137:158–165. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Yue W, et al. OsNLA1, a RING-type ubiquitin ligase, maintains phosphate homeostasis in Oryza sativa via degradation of phosphate transporters. Plant Journal. 2017;90:1040–1051. 10.1111/tpj.13516. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Wang Y, et al. OsRAR1 and OsSGT1 physically interact and function in rice basal disease resistance. Molecular plant-microbe interactions. 2008;21:294–303. 10.1094/MPMI-21-3-0294. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Kawano Y, et al. Activation of a Rac GTPase by the NLR Family Disease Resistance Protein Pit Plays a Critical Role in Rice Innate Immunity. Cell Host & Microbe. 2010;7:362–375. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.04.010. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Ono E, et al. Essential role of the small GTPase Rac in disease resistance of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98:759–764. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.759. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/64318793
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/64318793

Article citations


Go to all (21) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.