Talk:Regi (Pokémon)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regi (Pokémon) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Regi" Pokémon – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Pokémon Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Video games: Nintendo / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Anime and manga Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sextet category

This article is about a group of six. But it's generally known it to be a quintet (formerly a trio). But I guess that's just a fandom convention, not anything official I guess. Web-julio (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given this discusses a group of six, and not just the five other Regi standalone, I'd argue sextet is more fitting. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regi or Regis

This may be a stupid question, but is the plural of Regi not Regis? -- MystiiFlareon2 (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've always heard "Regis". Landfish7 (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MystiiFlareon2 wanted to run through the sources before I responded. While the sources cited use a mix of "Regi," "Regis," "Legendary Titans," and "Legendary Giants," it seems the sources predominantly use "Regis" when referring to them as a group, though usage is not 100%. They seem to use Regi when referring to a singular member or when referring to them in isolation, so the title should be fine, but I'll change the text contents to plurals to match the sources. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]