Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Thiopeptides are ribosomally biosynthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) that potently inhibit the growth of Gram-positive bacteria by targeting multiple steps in protein biosynthesis. The poor pharmacological properties of thiopeptides, particularly their low aqueous solubility, has hindered their development into clinically useful antibiotics. Antimicrobial activity screens of a library of Actinomycetota extracts led to discovery of the novel polyglycosylated thiopeptides persiathiacins A and B from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448. Persiathiacin A is active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and several Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, including drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates, and does not significantly affect the growth of ovarian cancer cells at concentrations up to 400 μM. Polyglycosylated thiopeptides are extremely rare and nothing is known about their biosynthesis. Sequencing and analysis of the Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 genome enabled identification of the putative persiathiacin biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC). A cytochrome P450 encoded by this gene cluster catalyzes the hydroxylation of nosiheptide in vitro and in vivo, consistent with the proposal that the cluster directs persiathiacin biosynthesis. Several genes in the cluster encode homologues of enzymes known to catalyze the assembly and attachment of deoxysugars during the biosynthesis of other classes of glycosylated natural products. One of these encodes a glycosyl transferase that was shown to catalyze attachment of a D-glucose residue to nosiheptide in vitro. The discovery of the persiathiacins and their BGC thus provides the basis for the development of biosynthetic engineering approaches to the creation of novel (poly)glycosylated thiopeptide derivatives with enhanced pharmacological properties.

Free full text 


Logo of acssdLink to Publisher's site
ACS Infectious Diseases
ACS Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 13; 10(9): 3378–3391.
Published online 2024 Aug 27. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00502
PMCID: PMC11406533
PMID: 39189814

Discovery and Biosynthesis of Persiathiacins: Unusual Polyglycosylated Thiopeptides Active Against Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0008.jpg

Thiopeptides are ribosomally biosynthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) that potently inhibit the growth of Gram-positive bacteria by targeting multiple steps in protein biosynthesis. The poor pharmacological properties of thiopeptides, particularly their low aqueous solubility, has hindered their development into clinically useful antibiotics. Antimicrobial activity screens of a library of Actinomycetota extracts led to discovery of the novel polyglycosylated thiopeptides persiathiacins A and B from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448. Persiathiacin A is active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and several Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains, including drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant clinical isolates, and does not significantly affect the growth of ovarian cancer cells at concentrations up to 400 μM. Polyglycosylated thiopeptides are extremely rare and nothing is known about their biosynthesis. Sequencing and analysis of the Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 genome enabled identification of the putative persiathiacin biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC). A cytochrome P450 encoded by this gene cluster catalyzes the hydroxylation of nosiheptide in vitro and in vivo, consistent with the proposal that the cluster directs persiathiacin biosynthesis. Several genes in the cluster encode homologues of enzymes known to catalyze the assembly and attachment of deoxysugars during the biosynthesis of other classes of glycosylated natural products. One of these encodes a glycosyl transferase that was shown to catalyze attachment of a D-glucose residue to nosiheptide in vitro. The discovery of the persiathiacins and their BGC thus provides the basis for the development of biosynthetic engineering approaches to the creation of novel (poly)glycosylated thiopeptide derivatives with enhanced pharmacological properties.

Keywords: RiPP, antibiotic, 6-deoxysugar, cytochrome P450, glycosyl transferase

Over the past decade, Mycobacterium tuberculosis has caused up to 20 million deaths worldwide.1 In 2020, 1.5 million people died from tuberculosis, including 214,000 coinfected with HIV,1 and it was a leading infectious killer worldwide, second only to COVID-19.1 Currently, 6–12 month multidrug regimens are prescribed to treat M. tuberculosis infections. However, due to difficulties with dosing, side effects, and the emergence of multi and extensively drug-resistant strains, more effective antibiotics must be developed to combat this critical-priority pathogen.2,3

Thiopeptide antibiotics are ribosomally biosynthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs). They are assembled from ribosomal peptide precursors via an extensive array of post-translational modifications catalyzed by a series of diverse enzymes.4,5 The precursor peptides consist of an N-terminal leader region that acts as a recognition motif for most of the post-translational modification enzymes and a C-terminal core region that is incorporated into the mature product(s).5,6 Common post-translational modifications of thiopeptides include azole formation via cyclodehydration/oxidation, dehydration of selected serine and threonine residues, and macrocyclization via [4 + 2] cycloaddition. Some thiopeptides are further modified via the introduction of additional macrocycles or the attachment of hydroxyl, methyl, indolyl, or quinaldyl substituents to the core peptide.713 Many thiopeptides possess potent activity against clinically relevant bacteria, in addition to antitumor and immunosuppressive properties.14 For instance, nosiheptide 1, nocathiacin I 2, and philipimycin 3, which are representative of “series e” thiopeptides, are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and/or clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis (Figure Figure11).1517 Despite their promising bioactivity, thiopeptides have failed to reach the clinic due to poor aqueous solubility and gastrointestinal absorption. Several strategies, including biosynthetic pathway engineering, analogue total synthesis, and semisynthetic modification, have been applied to produce analogues with improved pharmacological properties.18

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0001.jpg

Structures of nosiheptide 1, nocathiacin I 2, and philipimycin 3, which are examples of “series e” thiopeptide antibiotics.

Here, we report the discovery of the novel polyglycosylated thiopeptide antibiotics persiathiacins A and B, which are active against MRSA and drug-resistant M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. The persiathiacins are the first example of naturally occurring thiopeptides with a glycosylated hydroxypyridine and only the second example of antibiotics belonging to this class bearing a polyglycosylated hydroxythiazole. Glycosylation of the hydroxypyridine in nocathiacin has been reported to significantly improve aqueous solubility and, more generally, glycosylation is a widely used strategy for increasing the solubility and circulatory half-life of therapeutic peptides.1921 Thus, the discovery of the persiathiacins and the gene cluster directing their biosynthesis provides new opportunities for the development of biosynthetic engineering strategies for the creation of novel (poly)glycosylated thiopeptides with improved pharmacological properties.

Results and Discussion

Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Persiathiacins A and B

During a search for novel natural products with activity against MRSA, Actinomycetota isolated from various locations in Iran were screened for antibiotic production. An ethyl acetate extract of Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 was found to exhibit potent activity against MRSA. To identify the active metabolite(s), Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 was cultured on solid ISP2 medium for 7 days, followed by ethyl acetate extraction and fractionation by semipreparative HPLC. A molecular formula of C80H91N13O30S5 was established from positive ion mode HR-ESI-MS and NMR data for the metabolite purified from the MRSA-active fraction. The planar structure of this compound, which we named persiathiacin A 4, was elucidated using 1D and 2D NMR experiments (Figures Figures22 and S1, S3–S8, Table S1). Characteristic signals for amino acid α-protons at δH 4.21, 5.62, and 5.80, which correlated in HSQC spectra with α-carbon signals at δC 56.2, 48.6, and 48.7 and in COSY spectra with signals for exchangeable amide protons at δH 7.87, 7.89, and 8.24, indicated that the structure contains several amino acid residues. Four disubstituted thiazoles (including three bearing an acyl substituent at C4) and a tetrasubstituted pyridine were identified based on distinctive singlets due to protons attached to sp2-hybridized carbons in the 1H NMR spectrum, the chemical shifts of the signals for the directly connected carbon atoms, and HMBC correlations between these protons and neighboring carbons. A characteristic signal due to the sp2-hybridized methylene carbon of dehydroalanine (Dha) at δC 104.8, which showed HSQC correlations to two protons at δH 5.53 and 6.47, was also observed in the 13C NMR spectrum. This was further confirmed through 2J HMBC correlations between the methylene protons and the quaternary α-carbon of Dha at δC 133.5 and a 3J correlation to the carbonyl carbon at δC 166.5. Taken together, these data indicated that persiathiacin A has a thiopeptide core structure.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0002.jpg

(A) Planar structures of persiathiacins A 4 and B 5. (B) Summary of COSY and key HMBC correlations used to assign the planar structure of persiathiacins A 4 and B 5. (C) Summary of key ROESY correlations observed for persiathiacins A 4 and B 5.

The following HMBC data showed that the core thiopeptide is very similar to that of the nocathiacins:22 a 3J correlation between the O-methyl protons (δH 3.78) and C3 (δC 158.7) of the O-methyl-dehydrothreonine (O-methyl-Dht) residue; 3J correlations between one of the methylene protons (δH 4.17) in the 3-alkoxymethyl substituent of the indole and C3 (δC 82.9) of the Glu residue, and between the C3 methine proton (δH 3.65) of the Glu residue and the methylene carbon (δC 65.9) of the indole 3-alkoxymethyl substituent; and a 3J correlation between an exchangeable hydroxyl group proton (δH 10.46) and C2 (δC 127.0) of the indole. The linkage of the 2-carboxyl group of the indole to the side chain of the serine residue was identified through the distinctive chemical shift of the signal due to the carbonyl carbon (δC 161.4), in comparison to those reported for nocathiacin I (161.1 ppm in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6) and nosiheptide (181.80 ppm in DMSO-d6), as well as the chemical shift of the signal for C3 of the Ser residue (δC 64.5), in comparison to the values reported for the corresponding carbon in nocathiacin I (63.3 ppm in DMSO-d6) and nosiheptide (29.5 ppm in DMSO-d6).22,23 A ROESY correlation between the protons attached to C4 and the NH of the 4-O-methyl-Dht residue established that it contains an E-configured double bond.

Studies of the solution conformation of nocathiacin I, indicate that the amide proton of the 4-O-methyl-Dht residue and the α-proton of the Thr residue, the amide proton and the γ-proton of the Glu residue, and the α- and γ-protons of the Glu residue, respectively, are in close spatial proximity.24 ROESY correlations between the corresponding protons in persiathiacin A are consistent with the Thr α-carbon and the stereocenters in the Glu residue having the same relative configurations as in nocathiacin I. Similarly, the splitting pattern of the signal for the less shielded of the diastereotopic C3 protons in the Ser residue, and a ROESY correlation between this proton and the Ser amide proton, indicate that the Ser α-carbon has the same relative configuration as in nocathiacin I. The only ambiguities are the relative stereochemistry of the β-carbon of the Thr residue and the absolute configuration of persiathiacin A. Given that persiathiacin A derives from a ribosomally biosynthesised precursor and there is a high degree of similarity between the persiathicin and nocathiacin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) (see below), it seems highly likely that the Thr residue has the l, rather than the l-allo, d, or d-allo, configuration, as reported for nocathiacin I.24

In addition to the resonances assigned to the core thiopeptide, four distinctive signals at δC 100.4, 101.1, 101.9, and 102.2, assignable to anomeric carbons, that correlate in the HSQC spectrum with anomeric proton resonances at δH 5.18, 4.43, 5.41, and 4.61, respectively, were observed. These indicated that the thiopeptide core is decorated with four glycosyl residues (sugars 1–4). Four independent coupled proton spin systems, indicative of four distinct 6-deoxysugars, were identified by analysis of the COSY and HMBC spectra, and 3JHH coupling constants (Figure Figure22 and Table S1). The HMBC spectrum was also used to identify the attachment site of each sugar and the locations of four O-methyl groups. A correlation between the anomeric proton of sugar 1 (δH 5.41) and C5 of thiazole 3 (δC 160.3) showed that sugar 1 is attached to C5 of thiazole 3. The positions of the O-methyl groups in sugar 1 were assigned based on 3-bond correlations between the protons of the methoxy groups and the carbons they are attached to. Thus, the protons in one of the O-methyl groups (δH 3.48) correlated with C2 (δC 76.0), while the protons in the other O-methyl group (δH 3.42) correlated with C3 (δC 80.1). HMBC correlations between the anomeric proton of sugar 2 (δH 4.61) and C4 of sugar 1 (δC 77.0), and between the C4 proton (δH 3.46) of sugar 1 and the anomeric carbon of sugar 2 (δC 102.2) established the connectivity between sugars 1 and 2. Similarly, HMBC correlations between the anomeric proton of sugar 3 (δH 4.43) and C4 of sugar 2 (δC 80.60) and between the C4 proton of sugar 2 (δH 3.08) and the anomeric carbon of sugar 3 (δC 101.1) showed that sugar 3 is attached to the C4 hydroxyl group of sugar 2. An HMBC correlation between the anomeric proton of sugar 4 (δH 5.18) and C3 of the pyridine (δC 149.0), in addition to a ROESY correlation between the C1 proton of sugar 4 and the C4 proton of the pyridine (δH 7.77), were consistent with the attachment of sugar 4 to the C3 hydroxyl group of the pyridine. Finally, HMBC correlations between the protons in one of the methoxy groups (δH 3.45) and C3 (δC 84.2) and the other methoxy group (δH 3.51) and C4 (δC 77.6) established the location of the O-methyl groups in sugar 4.

The signal due to the anomeric proton of sugar 1 is a broad singlet, suggesting it is the α-anomer, whereas the corresponding signals for sugars 2, 3, and 4 are doublets with 3JHH values of 9.0, 10.0, and 7.5 Hz, respectively, indicative of β-anomeric linkages. Moreover, these coupling constants indicate that the protons attached to C2 of sugars 2, 3, and 4 are all axial. ROESY correlations between the C1 proton and the C2 methoxy group, the C2 and C4 protons and the C3 methoxy group, and the C4 and C6 protons in sugar 1 are consistent with this being a 2,3-di-O-methyl-α-l-rhamnose, as reported for the corresponding sugar in the philipimycins.17 Similarly, ROESY correlations between the protons attached to C1 and C5, and C2 and C4 in sugar 2 suggests they are all axial, consistent with this being d-amecitose, as also observed in the philipimycins. Sugar 3 is assigned as d-olivose, based on ROESY correlations between the protons attached to C1 and C3, C1 and C5, and C2 and C4. Finally, 3JHH values of 7.5 and 10.0 Hz for the proton attached to C2, and ROESY correlations between the protons attached to C1 and C3, and C1 and C5, indicate that H1, H2, H3, and H5 in sugar 4 are all axial. Given that the persiathiacin BGC encodes only a single NDP-hexose 4-ketoreductase, which is required for the biosynthesis of d-amecitose and d-olivose (see below), both of which have an axial C4 proton, we propose that sugar 4 is a 3,4-di-O-methyl-6-deoxy-β-d-glucose residue.

In addition to persiathiacin A, a minor metabolite with a mass 16 Da greater than that of persiathiacin A was purified from the MRSA-active fractions of the Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 extract. The molecular formula of this metabolite was deduced to be C80H91N13O31S5 from positive ion mode HR-ESI-MS and NMR spectroscopic data, indicating that it is a persiathiacin A derivative containing an additional oxygen atom. The NMR spectroscopic data for this minor compound, which we named persiathiacin B 5, were almost identical to that for persiathiacin A, except for the proton and carbon resonances of sugar 2 (Figures S2 and S9–S14, Table S2). Detailed analysis of 1D and 2D NMR spectra indicated that the β-d-amicetose residue in persiathiacin A is replaced by β-d-olivose in persiathiacin B (Figure Figure22).

Identification and Analysis of the Putative Persiathiacin BGC

To identify the persiathiacin BGC, the genome of Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 was sequenced using single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing. A complete circular genome sequence consisting of 7,012,397 bp was obtained using this approach (GenBank accession number CP031087). Analysis of the sequence using antiSMASH identified 32 putative specialized metabolite BGCs (Table S3).25 Among these, a cluster containing 33 genes (cluster 11; Table S3), several of which encode homologues of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of other thiopeptides, was postulated to direct persiathiacin biosynthesis (Figure Figure33). Sequence comparisons showed that the products of perAperP have a significant degree of similarity to the proteins encoded by nosAnosP and nocAnocP in the nosiheptide and nocathiacin BGCs, respectively (Table S4). Homologues of five additional genes in the nocathiacin BGC (nocR and nocT–nocV), absent from the nosiheptide cluster, are present in the putative persiathiacin cluster (perR and perT–perV, respectively; Figure Figure33). Moreover, the putative persiathiacin BGC contains 12 genes (perS1–perS12) hypothesized to be responsible for the biosynthesis and attachment of four 6-deoxysugars to the thiopeptide core (Table S4).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0003.jpg

(A) Comparison of the nosiheptide (nos), nocathiacin (noc), and putative persiathiacin (per) biosynthetic gene clusters. Genes are colored as follows. Blue: thiazole formation; green: Ser/Thr dehydration; orange: DMIA formation and attachment; red: cytochromes P450; gray: 6-deoxysugar biosynthesis and attachment; brown: methyltransferases. (B) The biosynthesis of the thiopeptide core of the persiathiacins is proposed to commence with transcription and translation of perM to yield a precursor peptide comprised of an N-terminal leader peptide (LP) fused to a C-terminal core peptide (structure depicted). The core peptide undergoes a series of post-translational modifications catalyzed by several enzymes encoded by the persiathiacin biosynthetic gene cluster. See main text for further details.

Detailed sequence analysis of perA–perV and perS1–perS12 enabled us to propose a biosynthetic pathway for persiathiacins A and B (Figures Figures33 and and4).4). First, perM is transcribed and translated into a 49 amino acid (aa) precursor peptide, consisting of a 36 aa N-terminal LP fused to a 13 aa C-terminal core peptide with the sequence SCTTCECSCSCSS, which is fully consistent with the thiopeptide core structure of the persiathiacins deduced from the spectroscopic data.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0005.jpg

The enzymes encoded by perS1perS12 are proposed to be responsible for the biosynthesis and attachment of the 6-deoxysugars to the persiathiacin aglycone. (A) Proposed pathway for assembly of TDP-6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 8, TDP-α-d-olivose 10, and TDP-α-d-amicetose 12. (B) The glycosyltransferases encoded by perS4, perS6, persS8, and perS9 are proposed to decorate the persiathiacin core peptide with l-rhamnose, 6-deoxy-d-glucose, d-olivose, and d-amicetose (persiathiacin A 4), or l-rhamnose, 6-deoxy-d-glucose, and d-olivose (persiathiacin B 5). The methyltransferases encoded by perS3, perS5, and perS7 are hypothesized to O-methylate the l-rhamnose and 6-deoxy-d-glucose residues to produce the mature antibiotics. The timing of these transformations remains to be determined.

Cyclodehydration of the cysteine residues is proposed to be catalyzed by PerG and PerH, followed by dehydrogenation catalyzed by PerF to yield the five thiazoles in the persiathiacins.7 Putative dehydratases PerD and PerE are proposed to further modify the core peptide by catalyzing selective dehydration of Ser1, Ser10, Ser12, Ser13, and Thr4.

Four enzymes encoded by perI, perK, perL, and perN are proposed to be responsible for the production of 3,4-dimethylindolic acid (DMIA) from l-tryptophan and its attachment to the core peptide (Figures Figures33 and S15). PerL is a putative radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) enzyme that is homologous to NosL, which transforms l-tryptophan into 3-methyl-2-indolic acid (MIA) via unusual constitutional isomerization of a C–C bond.2634 In nosiheptide biosynthesis, the ATP-dependent NosI enzyme adenylates MIA and loads it onto the phosphopantetheine thiol of the acyl carrier protein (ACP) NosJ. NosK then transfers the MIA residue to Cys8 of the nosiheptide core peptide (Figure S15).3537 The persiathiacin and nocathiacin BGCs both lack nosJ homologues. Sequence comparisons of NosJ with PerI and PerK revealed similarity between NosJ and the C-terminus of PerK. Similarly, it has previously been noted that the C-terminus of NocK is homologous to NosJ.35 Thus, it appears that in persiathiacin and nocathiacin biosynthesis, the C-terminal ACP domains of PerK and NocK are loaded with MIA by PerI and NocI, respectively. The N-terminal domains of PerK and NocK then catalyze attachment of the MIA residue to Ser8 of the persiathiacin and nocathiacin core peptides, respectively (Figure S15). Subsequently, the putative radical SAM methylase PerN is proposed, by analogy with the well-characterized mechanism of NosN,35 to catalyze methylenation of C4 in the MIA residue. The resulting electrophilic intermediate is attacked by the Glu6 carboxylate to form an ester linkage.38 Finally, PerO, which has >50% sequence identity to NosO and NocO, is hypothesized to be responsible for formation of the macrocycle and pyridine in the persiathiacins via a [4 + 2] cycloaddition.39,40

Of the six putative cytochromes P450 (CYPs) encoded by the persiathiacin BGC, two (PerB and PerC) are homologous to NosB/NocB and NosC/NocC, which hydroxylate C3 of Glu6 and the pyridine, respectively.13 The CYPs encoded by perV, perU, and perT are similar in sequence to NocV, NocU, and NocT, respectively, encoded by the nocathiacin BGC. Genes encoding homologues of these enzymes are absent from the nosiheptide BGC. PerV is proposed to perform an analogous function to NocV—i.e., formation of the ether linkage between the indole and core peptide via a mechanism yet to be elucidated.41 Similarly, PerU is hypothesized to catalyze N-hydroxylation of the indole, by analogy with the proposed function of NocU.42 Comparison of the structures of persiathiacin A, nocathiacin I and nosiheptide (Figure Figure44) suggests the putative CYPs encoded by perT/nocT and methyltransferases encoded by perQ/nocQ catalyze hydroxylation and subsequent O-methylation of the dehydrobutyrine residue to form the corresponding O-methyl-Dht residue. The only CYP-encoding gene in the persiathiacin BGC that does not have a homologue in either the nosiheptide or nocathiacin BGCs is perX. Structural comparison of persiathiacin A with nocathiacin I and nosiheptide suggests that the enzyme encoded by this gene catalyzes hydroxylation of C5 in thiazole 3, to create the attachment site for the trisaccharide (Figure Figure55).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0004.jpg

Comparative analysis of the structures of nosiheptide 1, nocathiacin I 2, and persiathiacin A 4 and the functions of the CYPs encoded by their BGCs. Blue dashed boxes highlight hydroxyl groups proposed to be installed by homologous CYPs (NosB/NocB/PerB and NosC/NocC/PerC) encoded by all three BGCs. Red dashed circles highlight hydroxyl groups proposed to be introduced by CYPs (NocT/PerT, NocV/PerV, and NocU/PerU) encoded by the nocathiacin and persiathiacin BGCs, but not the nosiheptide BGC. A purple dashed circle highlights the hydroxyl group proposed to be introduced by the CYP encoded by perX, which is only present in the persiathiacin BGC.

The final enzyme proposed to be involved in the assembly of the thiopeptide core of the persiathiacins is PerA. This enzyme is homologous to NosA, which catalyzes dealkylative cleavage of the C-terminal Dha residue in nosiheptide biosynthesis, resulting in formation of the corresponding amide.43 PerA is proposed to catalyze an analogous reaction in persiathiacin biosynthesis (Figure Figure33).

The enzymes encoded by perS1perS12 are proposed to assemble the glycosyl residues and catalyze their attachment to the thiopeptide core of the persiathiacins. The biosynthesis of these 6-deoxysugars is proposed to commence with the conversion of thymine diphosphate (TDP)-α-d-glucose 6 to TDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 7 catalyzed by PerS2, which shows sequence similarity to TDP-glucose-4,6-dehydratases (Figure Figure44). At this point, the pathway appears to bifurcate. While PerS11, which is similar to TDP-hexose-4-ketoreductases, is proposed to catalyze the formation of TDP-6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 8 from TDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 7, PerS10 and PerS1, which are homologues of TDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-d-glucose-2,3-dehydratases and TDP-4-keto-6-deoxy-d-glucose-3-ketoreductases, respectively, are hypothesized to convert 7 to TDP-4-keto-2,6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 9. A further bifurcation then occurs. PerS11 catalyzes the conversion of TDP-4-keto-2,6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 9 to TDP-d-olivose 10, whereas PerS12, which is similar to TDP-4-keto-2,6-deoxy-d-glucose-3-dehydratases, converts 9 to TDP-4-keto-2,3,6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 11. Finally, PerS11 catalyzes the reduction of TDP-4-keto-2,3,6-deoxy-α-d-glucose 11 to TDP-d-amicetose 12. This analysis is consistent with the assignment of sugars 2, 3, and 4 as d-amicetose, d-olivose, and 3,4-di-O-methyl-6-deoxy-β-d-glucose, respectively, in persiathicin A 4, and the substitution of d-amicetose by a second d-olivose residue in persiathiacin B 5.

Philipimycin 3, which bears the highest degree of structural similarity among known thiopeptide antibiotics to the persiathiacins, is proposed to be decorated with d-amecitose and two O-methylated l-rhamnose derivatives.17 Moreover, no 6-deoxysugar biosynthetic genes, beyond those hypothesized to be involved in the assembly of TDP-d-amicetose, TDP-d-olivose, and TDP-6-deoxy-β-d-glucose, are present in the persiathiacin BGC (Figure Figure33 and Table S4). Because l-rhamnose is ubiquitously incorporated into bacterial cell surface carbohydrates,44 dedicated genes for TDP-l-rhamnose biosynthesis are invariably absent from rhamnosylated natural product BGCs. Taken together, these observations are consistent with the assignment of sugar 1 as an O-dimethylated l-rhamnose derivative. The deoxysugar residues contain a total of four methoxy groups (appended to C2 and C3 in sugar 1 and C3 and C4 in sugar 4), but only three putative O-methyltransferase-encoding genes (perS3, perS5, and perS7) are present in the persiathiacin BGC. It therefore appears that one of PerS3, PerS5, and PerS7 catalyzes the O-methylation of two distinct hydroxyl groups in the biosynthesis of one of these sugars.

Four genes (perS4, perS6, perS8, and perS9) encode putative glycosyltransferases, each of which is hypothesized to append one glycosyl residue to the thiopeptide core. Glycosyltransferases are known to possess broad substrate tolerance,45 explaining why small amounts of persiathiacin B 5, in which sugar 2 is d-olivose rather than d-amicetose, are produced in addition to persiathiacin A 4.

Given that (i) the core peptide sequence encoded by perM is in complete accord with the amino acid residues found in the thiopeptide core of persiathiacins A and B; (ii) the nocathiacins and persiathiacins have identical thiopeptide core structures, and the putative persiathiacin BGC encodes homologues of the full complement of enzymes needed to assemble the nocathiacin thiopeptide core from the precursor peptide; (iii) the persiathiacin BGC encodes an additional CYP (PerX) not found in the nocathiacin BGC, all the expected enzymes for assembly of the 6-deoxysugars in the persiathiacins, and four glycosyltransferases (compared to only one in the nocathiacin BGC), fully consistent with the tetraglycosylated structure of the persiathiacins; and (iv) the complete genome sequence of Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 does not contain any other gene clusters with a significant similarity to known thiopeptide BGCs, it is highly probable that the BGC we have identified directs persiathiacin biosynthesis. Notwithstanding this, we endeavored to experimentally verify this hypothesis.

PerX Catalyzes Hydroxylation of Nosiheptide

Due to a lack of genetic tools for the Actinokineospora genus, we were unable to obtain experimental evidence for the involvement of the nocathiacin-like BGC in Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 in persiathiacin assembly via targeted disruption of one of the putative biosynthetic genes. Instead, we decided to investigate the ability of the putative CYP PerX to hydroxylate thiopeptides. Recombinant His6-tagged PerX was overproduced in Escherichia coli and purified using nickel-affinity chromatography. The identity of the purified protein, including the presence of a haem prosthetic group, was confirmed by ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis (Figure S16). The purified protein was incubated with commercially available nosiheptide 1, spinach ferredoxin, spinach ferredoxin reductase, and NADPH at room temperature for 3 h. UHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis of the reaction mixture revealed a species with m/z = 1238.1493, corresponding to the [M + H]+ ion for a compound with the molecular formula C51H43N13O13S6 (calculated m/z = 1238.1500 for C51H44N13O13S6+) that was absent from a control reaction containing heat-inactivated enzyme. The molecular formula of this species is consistent with the insertion of an oxygen atom into the nosiheptide backbone (measured m/z = 1222.1542; calculated m/z = 1222.1551 for C51H44N13O12S6+) (Figure Figure66). These data indicate that PerX can hydroxylate substrate analogues with significant modifications to the persiathiacin/nocathiacin core thiopeptide structure, suggesting it may hold promise for development into a new tool for targeted thiopeptide structural modification.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0006.jpg

(A) Reaction catalyzed by purified recombinant PerX with nosiheptide 1, in the presence of spinach ferredoxin (Fd), spinach ferredoxin reductase (Fr) and NADPH. The proposed site of oxygen atom insertion, based on the assigned function of PerX in persiathiacin biosynthesis, is highlighted in red. (B) Extracted ion chromatograms at m/z = 1222.1551 and 1238.1500, corresponding to [M + H]+ for nosiheptide and its hydroxylated derivative, respectively, from UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS analyses of: culture extracts of S. actuosus ATCC25421 expressing perX under the control of the strong constitutive ermE* promoter (top chromatogram); nosiheptide 1 after incubation for 3 h with purified recombinant PerX, Fd, Fr, and NADPH (middle chromatogram); and nosiheptide 1 after incubation for 3 h with heat-denatured PerX, Fd, Fr and NADPH (bottom chromatogram).

In an attempt to obtain sufficient quantities of the oxygenated nosiheptide derivative for NMR spectroscopic analysis, perX was expressed under the control of the constitutive ermE* promoter in the nosiheptide producer Streptomyces actuosus ATCC25421. Although the same nosiheptide derivative as that produced in the in vitro experiments was observed in UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS analyses of extracts from this strain (Figure Figure66), it was not possible to isolate sufficient quantities of the compound for full characterization by NMR spectroscopy.

PerS4 Catalyzes Glycosylation of Nosiheptide

To further validate the involvement of the identified gene cluster in persiathiacin biosynthesis, we investigated the ability of the putative glycosyltransferase PerS4 to glycosylate thiopeptides. A homologue of PerS4 from Actinobacteria fastidiosa JCM3276 has recently been reported to rhamnosylate nosiheptide.46 Recombinant His6-tagged PerS4 was overproduced in E. coli and purified using nickel-affinity chromatography and its identity was confirmed by ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis (Figure S17). The purified protein was incubated with commercially available nosiheptide 1 and TDP-α-d-glucose at 30 °C for 12 h. UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis of the reaction mixture revealed a species with m/z = 1384.2092, corresponding to the [M + H]+ ion for a compound with the molecular formula C57H52N13O17S6 (calculated m/z = 1384.2079 for C57H53N13O17S6+) that was absent from a control reaction containing heat-inactivated enzyme. The molecular formula of this species is consistent with the attachment of a d-glucose residue to one of the hydroxyl groups in nosiheptide (Figure Figure77). Nosiheptide 1 contains the 3-hydroxypyridine moiety that is glycosylated with the dimethylated 6-deoxy-d-glucose derivative in the persiathiacins but lacks the hydroxylated thiazole that serves as the attachment site for the trisaccharide. We therefore tentatively conclude that PerS4 catalyzes transfer of the d-glucose residue to the hydroxypyridine moiety of nosiheptide (Figure Figure77), but further experiments will be required to confirm this.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is id4c00502_0007.jpg

(A) Reaction proposed to be catalyzed by purified recombinant PerS4 with nosiheptide 1 and TDP-α-d-glucose. (B) Extracted ion chromatograms at m/z = 1384.2080, corresponding to [M + H]+ for glycosylated nosiheptide, from UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS analyses of incubations of nosiheptide 1 with TDP-α-d-glucose and PerS4 (bottom) and a control reaction containing heat-inactivated PerS4. (C) Comparison of the simulated mass spectrum for C57H53N13O17S6+ (top) with the measured spectrum of the species eluting at 16.1 min, corresponding to glycosylated nosiheptide (bottom).

Biological Activity

Persiathiacin A was tested against the ESKAPE panel of pathogens by measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).47 Persiathiacin A showed potent activity against MRSA (MIC of 0.025 μg/mL) and moderate activity against Enterococcus faecium (MIC of 32 μg/mL). The compound was inactive against all Gram-negative bacteria in the panel up to clinically relevant MIC cutoffs (Table 1). As nocathiacin has been reported to be active against drug-susceptible and resistant clinical strains of M. tuberculosis,48,49 we evaluated the activity of persiathiacin A against several clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis using the resazurin microtiter assay.50 It was found to be active against all isolates tested, including the drug-susceptible strain H37Rv, four isoniazid-resistant strains, and strains CHUV80059744 and CHUV80037024 resistant to both isoniazid and rifampicin (Table 2). Persiathiacin A exhibited negligible toxicity toward the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line up to the maximum tested concentration of 400 μM (Figure S18).

Table 1

MIC Values (μg/mL) of Persiathiacin A Against ESKAPE Pathogens
ESKAPE pathogenpersiathiacin A
E. faecium32
S. aureus0.025
Klebsiella pneumoniae>64
Acinetobacter baumannii>64
Pseudomonas aeruginosa>64
Enterobacter sp.>64

Table 2

MIC Values (μg/mL) of Persiathiacin A, Rifampicin and Isoniazid Against M. tuberculosis Isolates
M. tuberculosismutationresistancepersiathiacin Arifampicinisoniazid
H37Rvnonenone3.60.00080.04
HUGMB6726inhAisoniazid3.70.00082.2
HUGMB3649inhAisoniazid3.90.0010.08
CHUV80045776katGisoniazid1.60.0012.5
HUGMI1020katGisoniazid1.70.0021.3
CHUV80059744rpoB and katGisoniazid, rifampicin2.214>10
CHUV80037024rpoB, katG, and inhAisoniazid, rifampicin3.1>10>10

The antibacterial activity of several thiopeptides is known to result from inhibition of ribosomal protein biosynthesis.5153 In the accompanying manuscript,54 we report an investigation of the mechanisms of action and resistance to persiathiacin A, revealing that, in common with other 26-membered macrocycle-containing thiopeptides, it inhibits translation elongation by targeting ribosomal protein L11.

Conclusions

Despite their potent antibacterial activity, the development of thiopeptides into clinically useful antibiotics has been prevented by their poor pharmacological properties, particularly their low aqueous solubility. Glycosylation is a widely used strategy for increasing the solubility of therapeutic peptides. However, most naturally occurring thiopeptides are either unglycosylated, or have a single sugar attached to the γ-hydroxyl group of the modified Glu residue, limiting opportunities to create novel glycosylated derivatives of thiopeptides via biosynthetic engineering. The sole exception, prior to this work, was philipimycin A, which has a trisaccharide appended to the central thiazole. Although philipimycin A is a rare example of thiopeptide that is active in vivo,10 nothing is known about its biosynthesis.

The discovery and biosynthetic elucidation of thiopeptides with novel glycosylation patterns could provide a useful foundation for the creation of new polyglycosylated thiopeptide derivatives with greater aqueous solubility and enhanced therapeutic potential. Our discovery in this work of the polyglycosylated thiopeptides persiathiacins A and B from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448, and the gene cluster responsible for their biosynthesis, is therefore significant for several reasons. First, the persiathiacins are the first examples of naturally occurring thiopeptides with a sugar appended to the hydroxpyridine. Glycosylation of the hydroxypyridine in nocathician has been reported to significantly improve aqueous solubility.11 The identification of the persiathiacin BGC opens the path for the development of biosynthetic engineering approaches to the creation of novel thiopeptide derivatives bearing glycosylated hydroxypyridines, as indicated by our demonstration that PerS4 is able to append a glucose residue to nosiheptide. Second, the identification of the persiathiacin BGC reveals the molecular mechanism for attachment of a trisaccharide to the central thiazole of thiopeptides. The incorporation of different sugars into the trisaccharides appended to the central thiazoles of philipimycin A, persiathiacin A, and persiathiacin B suggests the glycosylation machinery is substrate tolerant. Thus, biosynthetic engineering could be used to create a range of thiopeptide analogues with various mono-, di- and trisaccharides attached to the central thiazole. Third, the observation that nocathiacin I, philipimycin A, and persiathiacin A all display strong activity against S. aureus and M. tuberculosis, despite their diverse glycosylation patterns, indicates that creation and biological evaluation of novel glycosylated thiopeptide derivatives may be a fruitful strategy for circumventing the historical problems that have prevented this class of antibiotics from progressing into clinical application.

Materials and Methods

General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were measured on an Optical Activity Ltd. AA-1000 millidegree autoranging polarimeter (589 nm). Specific rotations are given in units of 10–1 deg cm2 g–1. UV spectra were acquired on a PerkinElmer Lambda 35 UV/vis spectrophotometer. IR spectra were recorded on an Alpha Bruker Platinum ATR single reflection diamond ATR module. UHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analyses were performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC connected to a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) coupled to a Bruker MaXis IMPACT, or MaXis II mass spectrometers. Mobile phases consisted of water (A) and acetonitrile (B), each supplemented with 0.1% formic acid. A gradient of 5–100% B over 30 min was employed at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode with a scan range of 50–3000 m/z. Calibration was performed with 1 mM sodium formate through a loop injection of 20 μL at the start of each run. Persiathiacins A and B were dissolved in a mixture of CDCl3–CD3OD (9:1) for NMR spectroscopic analyses. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker 500 or 700 MHz spectrometers equipped with DCH and TCl cryoprobes, respectively, at 25 °C. The 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts were referenced to the solvent peaks at δH 7.26 and δC 77.16 for CDCl3. All HPLC and LC–MS experiments were performed with the MeCN–H2O gradient solvent system. Millipore Milli-Q H2O and HPLC grade solvents were used for chromatography.

Strain Isolation and Identification

Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 was isolated from mud sample collected from Bushehr, Iran. The sample was dried at 50 °C, ground to a powder and passed through a 2 mm sieve. Strains were isolated on solid Reasoner’s 2A medium55 after 3 weeks of incubation at 28 °C. Solid ISP2 medium was then used to purify the strains. Purified strains were preserved in 30% glycerol at −70 °C. To identify the strains, 16S rRNA genes were amplified using a set of universal primers (27F, 1100F, 1100R, 1525R). Amplified DNA obtained from the reactions was purified using a PCR purification kit (Roti-Prep PCR Purification). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the strains was BLASTed against the GenBank and EzTaxon databases.56

Production, Extraction, and HPLC Purification of Persiathiacins A and B

Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 was grown on solid ISP2 medium (4 g/L glucose, 4 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L malt extract, 2 g/L CaCO3, 15 g/L Bacto agar) for 7 days at 30 °C. The agar cultures were chopped and extracted with EtOAc. The extract was dried on a rotary evaporator and preadsorbed to C18-bonded silica, and then packed into a stainless steel HPLC guard cartridge (10 × 30 mm) attached to a semipreparative reverse-phase C18 Betasil column (21.2 × 150 mm). The column was eluted with 5% acetonitrile for 5 min, then a linear gradient from 5 to 100% acetonitrile was applied over 45 min, and the column was eluted for an additional 10 min with 100% acetonitrile. The flow rate was 9 mL/min. Sixty fractions were collected in 1 min increments over 60 min. Pure persiathiacin A was obtained in fraction 35. Persiathiacin B was purified from a mixture of persiathiacins A and B in fraction 34 using a reverse-phase C18 Betasil column (21.2 × 150 mm). Isocratic elution with 40% acetonitrile for 5 min followed by a linear gradient to 65% over 45 min was used to achieve separation of persiathiacin B (fraction 26) from persiathiacin A (fraction 28).

Persiathiacin A

Amorphous solid (19 mg); [α]D26 + 86 (c 0.05, CHCl3/MeOH (9:1)); UV (CHCl3/MeOH (9:1)) λmax (log ε) 231 (5.85), 278 (5.65), 353 (5.25) nm; IR νmax 3392, 2980, 1725, 1667, 1534, 1250, 1205, 1121, 1065, 751 cm–1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD (9:1)) and 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD (9:1)), see Table S1; HRESIMS m/z 1874.4638 [M + H]+ (calcd for C80H92N13O30S5, 1874.4671).

Persiathiacin B

Amorphous solid (1.8 mg); [α]D26 + 86 (c 0.05, CHCl3/MeOH (9:1)); UV (CHCl3/MeOH (9:1)) λmax (log ε) 232 (5.86), 275 (5.61), 353 (5.21) nm; IR νmax 3402, 2970, 1667, 1533, 1250, 1205, 1121, 1067, 1037, 751 cm–1; 1H NMR (700 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD (9:1)) and 13C NMR (175 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD (9:1)), see Table S2; HRESIMS m/z 1890.4611 [M + H]+ (calcd for C80H92N13O31S5, 1890.4620).

PacBio Library Preparation and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC2448. A SMRTbell template library was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA), following the Procedure & Checklist—Greater Than 10 kb Template Preparation. Briefly, for preparation of 15 kb libraries, 8 μg genomic DNA was sheared using g-tubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was end-repaired and ligated overnight to hairpin adapters by applying components from the DNA/Polymerase Binding Kit P6 (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Reactions were carried out according to the instructions of the manufacturer. BluePippin size-selection to greater than 4 kb was performed according to the manufactureŕs instructions (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA). Conditions for annealing of sequencing primers and binding of polymerase to purified SMRTbell template were assessed with the Calculator in RS Remote (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). SMRT sequencing was carried out on the PacBio RSII (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA), taking one 240 min movie for one SMRT cell using the P6 Chemistry. Sequencing resulted in 76,562 postfiltered reads with a mean read length of 10,180 bp.

Genome Assembly, Error Correction, and Annotation

SMRT cell data were assembled using the “RS_HGAP_Assembly.3” protocol included in SMRT Portal version 2.3.0 using default parameters. The assembly resulted in a single circular chromosome. Error correction was performed by a mapping of 7 million paired-end Illumina reads of 2 × 100 bp onto the genome using BWA (PMID 19451168)57 with subsequent variant and consensus calling using VarScan (PMID 22300766).58 A consensus concordance of QV60 could be confirmed for the genome. Finally, annotation was carried out using Prokka 1.8 (PMID 24642063).59 Prediction of specialised metabolite BGCs was made using antiSMASH v3.0 (Table S3). The putative persiathiacin biosynthetic gene cluster was subjected to detailed manual annotation via comparative sequence analysis (Table S4).

Overproduction and Purification of PerX

The gene encoding PerX was PCR-amplified from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 gDNA using Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB) and primers 5′-GTGCCGCGCGGCAGCCATATGCTTCCCGAGCCGTACACCCCCGAGTTCT-3′ and 5′-TCGACGGAGCTCGAATTCTCATCGCGTCACCCGCAGCTCGGCCA-3′ (regions complementary to the gene sequence underlined). The linear pET28a (NEB) vector backbone was PCR-amplified with primers 5′-TGAGAATTCGAGCTCCGTCGACAAGCTTG-3′ and 5′-CATATGGCTGCCGCGCGGCAC-3′. PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel and bands were excised and purified with a GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific). Cloning of the pure insert into the NdeI/EcoRI restriction sites of the linear pET28a vector was accomplished by Gibson assembly following the manufacturer’s instructions (NEB). The resulting vector was used to transform E. coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen) and plated on LB agar containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL). Colonies were picked and grown overnight in liquid LB medium. Plasmids were isolated from the culture using a GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Thermo Scientific) and inserts were sequenced to verify their integrity. The correct pET28a plasmid containing perX was used to transform E. coli BL21(DE3) cells. A single colony was used to inoculate liquid LB medium (10 mL) containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL), which was incubated overnight at 37 °C and 180 rpm; this was then used to further inoculate liquid LB medium (1 L) containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL). The resulting culture was incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm until OD595 nm reached 0.6, then IPTG (0.5 mM) was added, and expression was continued overnight at 15 °C and 180 rpm. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000 rcf, 20 min, 4 °C) and resuspended in buffer (30 mM HEPES, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5) at 20 mL/L of growth medium, then lysed using sonication (Vibra-Cell Ultrasonic Liquid Processor; Sonics & Materials, Inc.). The lysate was centrifuged (30,000 rcf, 60 min, 4 °C) and the resulting supernatant was passed through a 0.45 μm filter (Sartorius). An ÄKTA pure FPLC (GE Healthcare) was used to purify PerX as follows. The supernatant was loaded onto a 1 mL HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare), which had been equilibrated with resuspension buffer (30 mM HEPES, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, pH 7.5). Proteins were eluted in a stepwise manner using increasing concentrations of imidazole (0–150 mM) in resuspension buffer. The presence of the protein of interest in the elution fractions was confirmed by SDS–PAGE. Fractions containing the pure protein were pooled and concentrated to ~100 μM using a 50 kDa MWCO Vivaspin centrifugal concentrator (Sartorius). Aliquots of 50 μL were snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at −80 °C until further use.

Hydroxylation of Nosiheptide by PerX

A 200 μL reaction mixture containing nosiheptide (100 μM), spinach ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase (0.1 U/mL), spinach ferredoxin (50 μg/mL), NADPH (1 mM), and PerX (10 μM) in Tris–HCl (25 mM, pH 8) was incubated at room temperature for 3 h. The reaction was terminated by adding 200 μL of methanol, and after separating the precipitate by centrifugation (16,000 rcf, 10 min) the supernatant was analyzed by UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-HRMS. For the negative control, PerX was inactivated by boiling at 100 °C for 15 min.

Expression of perX in the Nosiheptide-Producing Strain S. actuosus

perX was amplified from Actinokineospora sp. UTMC 2448 gDNA using Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB) and primers 5′-CAGCATATGGTGCTTCCCGAGCCGTAC-3′ and 5′-GACGAATTCTCATCGCGTCACCCGC-3′. The PCR product was digested with NdeI and EcoRI and cloned into the corresponding sites of pIB139 under the control of the ermE* constitutive promoter. The integrity of the construct was confirmed by sequencing and the resulting plasmid was used to transform E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 cells by electroporation. A mixture of apramycin (50 μg/mL), kanamycin (50 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (35 μg/mL) was used for selection on LB agar. The pIB139 vector containing perX was then introduced by conjugation into S. actuosus ATCC25421. The overnight culture was plated on SFM agar medium and overlaid with 1 mL of antibiotic solution mixture containing apramycin (50 μg/mL) and nalidixic acid (25 μg/mL). After 3 days, four colonies were picked and spread separately onto SFM agar medium containing apramycin (50 μg/mL) and nalidixic acid (25 μg/mL) and then further subcultured on five plates to produce spores. Spores from the resulting stocks were cultured in liquid medium containing corn steep liquor (10 g/L), soy flour (20 g/L), yeast extract (3 g/L), NaCl (4 g/L), KNO3 (0.2 g/L), CaCO3 (4 g/L), pH 7.0. Production of the hydroxylated nosiheptide derivative was confirmed by UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis.

Overproduction, Purification and Characterization of PerS4

The gene encoding PerS4 was synthesized and cloned into pET28a (+) by GenScript. The resulting C-terminal hexa-histidine fusion protein was overproduced in E. coli BL21(DE3) as described for PerX, except 0.4 mM IPTG was used and the culture was incubated at 15 °C for 16 h. The cells were lysed and the protein was purified from the cell lysate as described for PerX, except the cell lysate was suspended in 20 mM Tris–HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0 and the protein was eluted stepwise using increasing concentrations of imidazole buffer (20–300 mM).

200 μM of purified recombinant PerS4 was incubated with 150 μL of nosiheptide in DMSO (2.4 mg/mL), 150 μL of a solution of TDP-α-d-glucose, prepared from thymidine monophosphate (27 mM) and α-d-glucose-1-phosphate as described previously,50 in 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5, total volume 1 mL). After incubation at 30 °C for 12 h the reaction was quenched by the addition of an equal volume of methanol. The precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was analyzed by UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-HRMS.

MIC Assays Against M. tuberculosis

DMSO, glycerol, isoniazid, resazurin sodium salt, and rifampicin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Middlebrook 7H9 was purchased from Difco (USA) and albumin dextrose catalase from Chemie Brunschwig AG (Switzerland). The M. tuberculosis reference strain H37Rv was obtained from Institut Pasteur, Paris, and clinical specimens from patients were obtained from the Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV) and Geneva University Hospital (HUG).

The resazurin reduction microplate assay was performed as described previously.50 2-fold serial dilutions of each test compound were prepared in 96-well plates from 10 mg/mL stocks in DMSO. Frozen aliquots of replicating tubercule bacilli (reference strains and clinical isolates) were thawed and diluted to an OD600 of 0.0001 (3×104 cells/mL) and added to the plates to obtain a total volume of 100 μL. Plates were incubated for 6 days at 37 °C before adding resazurin (0.025% w/v to 1/10 of well volume). After overnight incubation, fluorescence of the resazurin metabolite resorufin was determined by excitation at 560 nm and emission at 590 nm, as measured by a TECAN infinite M200 microplate reader. The MIC was defined visually as the lowest concentration to prevent resazurin turnover from blue to pink and was confirmed by the level of measured fluorescence. MIC values were calculated using GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The experiment was performed twice, and all the compounds were tested in triplicate (total of six replicates).

Cytotoxicity Assays

Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of persiathiacin A was carried out using A2780 ovarian cancer cells, which were obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures. Cells were grown as adherent monolayers using Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640) supplemented with 10% v/v of fetal calf serum, 1% v/v of 2 mM glutamine and 1% v/v penicillin/streptomycin using a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Cultures were regularly passaged when achieving 70–80% confluence. For these experiments, cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 5000 cells/well and allowed to attach for 48 h in persiathiacin-free medium. Various concentrations of persiathiacin were added in concentrations of up to 400 μM. Working solutions were obtained by dilution with cell culture medium from a 5% v/v DMSO/RPMI stock. After 24 h of drug exposure, cells were washed, and fresh medium was replenished to allow for 72 h of recovery time. Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay. Formazan absorbance at 570 nm was recorded in a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader. In all cases, reported values were obtained as duplicates of triplicates in independent experiments with their associated standard deviations.

Acknowledgments

The Bruker MaXis Impact and MaXis II UHPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS instruments used in this research were funded by the BBSRC (BB/K002341/1 and BB/M017982/1, respectively, to G.L.C.). G.L.C. was the recipient of a Wolfson Research Merit Award from the Royal Society (WM130033). Y.D. was supported by a grant from the MRC (MR/N501839/1 to G.L.C.). We thank Ivan Prokes and Lijiang Song for assistance with recording NMR and UHPLC–ESI-Q-TOF-MS data, respectively. Simone Schrader and Nicole Heyer are thanked for excellent technical assistance for PacBio genome sequencing. Prof Hung Wen Liu is thanked for providing plasmids encoding the enzymes responsible for converting thymidine triphosphate and α-d-glucose-1-phosphate into TDP-α-d-glucose. Y.Z. thanks Dr. Munro Passmore for assistance with preparation of Figure 7.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00502.

  • NMR data and spectra of persiathiacins A and B; proteins encoded by genes in the per BGC and their percentage identity to proteins of known function; comparative biosynthesis and attachment of MIA to the processed core peptides of nosiheptide, persiathiacin, and nocathiacin; Mass spectra of purified recombinant PerX and PerS4 (PDF)

Author Present Address

‡‡ S.T.C. Institut Pasteur, 25–28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75015 Paris, France; C.D.F. Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; D.Z. Faes Farma, Autonomia Etorbidea, 10, 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain; G.L.C. is a co-founder, paid consultant, and non-executive director of Erebagen Ltd

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

References

  • Global Tuberculosis Report; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2021.
  • Treatment of Tuberculosis: Guidelines, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, 2010. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Dashti Y.; Grkovic T.; Quinn R. J. Predicting natural product value, an exploration of anti-TB drug space. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31 (8), 990–998. 10.1039/C4NP00021H. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arnison P. G.; Bibb M. J.; Bierbaum G.; Bowers A. A.; Bugni T. S.; Bulaj G.; Camarero J. A.; Campopiano D. J.; Challis G. L.; Clardy J.; Cotter P. D.; Craik D. J.; Dawson M.; Dittmann E.; Donadio S.; Dorrestein P. C.; Entian K.-D.; Fischbach M. A.; Garavelli J. S.; Göransson U.; Gruber C. W.; Haft D. H.; Hemscheidt T. K.; Hertweck C.; Hill C.; Horswill A. R.; Jaspars M.; Kelly W. L.; Klinman J. P.; Kuipers O. P.; Link A. J.; Liu W.; Marahiel M. A.; Mitchell D. A.; Moll G. N.; Moore B. S.; Müller R.; Nair S. K.; Nes I. F.; Norris G. E.; Olivera B. M.; Onaka H.; Patchett M. L.; Piel J.; Reaney M. J. T.; Rebuffat S.; Ross R. P.; Sahl H.-G.; Schmidt E. W.; Selsted M. E.; Severinov K.; Shen B.; Sivonen K.; Smith L.; Stein T.; Süssmuth R. D.; Tagg J. R.; Tang G.-L.; Truman A. W.; Vederas J. C.; Walsh C. T.; Walton J. D.; Wenzel S. C.; Willey J. M.; van der Donk W. A. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30 (1), 108–160. 10.1039/C2NP20085F. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ortega M. A.; van der Donk W. New Insights into the Biosynthetic Logic of Ribosomally Synthesized and Post-translationally Modified Peptide Natural Products. Cell Chem. Biol. 2016, 23 (1), 31–44. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.11.012. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burkhart B. J.; Hudson G. A.; Dunbar K. L.; Mitchell D. A. A prevalent peptide-binding domain guides ribosomal natural product biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11 (8), 564–570. 10.1038/nchembio.1856. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li C.; Kelly W. L. Recent advances in thiopeptide antibiotic biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27 (2), 153–164. 10.1039/B922434C. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Q.; Liu W. Biosynthesis of thiopeptide antibiotics and their pathway engineering. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30 (2), 218–226. 10.1039/C2NP20107K. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson G. A.; Zhang Z.; Tietz J. I.; Mitchell D. A.; van der Donk W. A. In Vitro Biosynthesis of the Core Scaffold of the Thiopeptide Thiomuracin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (51), 16012–16015. 10.1021/jacs.5b10194. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Z.; Hudson G. A.; Mahanta N.; Tietz J. I.; van der Donk W. A.; Mitchell D. A. Biosynthetic Timing and Substrate Specificity for the Thiopeptide Thiomuracin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (48), 15511–15514. 10.1021/jacs.6b08987. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wever W. J.; Bogart J. W.; Bowers A. A. Identification of Pyridine Synthase Recognition Sequences Allows a Modular Solid-Phase Route to Thiopeptide Variants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (41), 13461–13464. 10.1021/jacs.6b05389. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bewley K. D.; Bennallack P. R.; Burlingame M. A.; Robison R. A.; Griffitts J. S.; Miller S. M. Capture of micrococcin biosynthetic intermediates reveals C-terminal processing as an obligatory step for in vivo maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016, 113 (44), 12450–12455. 10.1073/pnas.1612161113. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu W.; Xue Y.; Ma M.; Wang S.; Liu N.; Chen Y. Multiple oxidative routes towards the maturation of nosiheptide. ChemBioChem 2013, 14 (13), 1544–1547. 10.1002/cbic.201300427. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bagley M. C.; Dale J. W.; Merritt E. A.; Xiong X. Thiopeptide Antibiotics. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105 (2), 685–714. 10.1021/cr0300441. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haste N. M.; Thienphrapa W.; Tran D. N.; Loesgen S.; Sun P.; Nam S.-J.; Jensen P. R.; Fenical W.; Sakoulas G.; Nizet V.; Hensler M. E. Activity of the thiopeptide antibiotic nosiheptide against contemporary strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antibiot. 2012, 65 (12), 593–598. 10.1038/ja.2012.77. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pucci M. J.; Bronson J. J.; Barrett J. F.; DenBleyker K. L.; Discotto L. F.; Fung-Tomc J. C.; Ueda Y. Antimicrobial evaluation of nocathiacins, a thiazole peptide class of antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (10), 3697–3701. 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3697-3701.2004. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang C.; Occi J.; Masurekar P.; Barrett J. F.; Zink D. L.; Smith S.; Onishi R.; Ha S.; Salazar O.; Genilloud O.; Basilio A.; Vicente F.; Gill C.; Hickey E. J.; Dorso K.; Motyl M.; Singh S. B. Isolation, structure, and antibacterial activity of philipimycin, a thiazolyl peptide discovered from Actinoplanes philippinensis MA7347. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (36), 12102–12110. 10.1021/ja803183u. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Just-Baringo X.; Albericio F.; Álvarez M. Thiopeptide Engineering: A Multidisciplinary Effort towards Future Drugs. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (26), 6602–6616. 10.1002/anie.201307288. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li W.; Leet J. E.; Lam K. S.. Nocathiacin antibiotic derivatives prepared by microbial biotransformation. WO 014100, 2000.
  • Li Y.; Clark K. A.; Tan Z. Methods for engineering therapeutic peptides. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29 (7), 1074–1078. 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandrashekar C.; Hossain M. A.; Wade J. D. Chemical Glycosylation and Its Application to Glucose Homeostasis-Regulating Peptides. Front. Chem. 2021, 9 (222), 650025.10.3389/fchem.2021.650025. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leet J. E.; Li W.; Ax H. A.; Matson J. A.; Huang S.; Huang R.; Cantone J. L.; Drexler D.; Dalterio R. A.; Lam K. S. Nocathiacins, new thiazolyl peptide antibiotics from Nocardiasp. II. Isolation, characterization, and structure determination. J. Antibiot. 2003, 56 (3), 232–242. 10.7164/antibiotics.56.232. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mocek U.; Chen L. C.; Keller P. J.; Houck D. R.; Beale J. M.; Floss H. G. 1H and 13C NMR assignments of the thiopeptide antibiotic nosiheptide. J. Antibiot. 1989, 42 (11), 1643–1648. 10.7164/antibiotics.42.1643. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Constantine K. L.; Mueller L.; Huang S.; Abid S.; Lam K. S.; Li W.; Leet J. E. Conformation and absolute configuration of nocathiacin I determined by NMR spectroscopy and chiral capillary electrophoresis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (25), 7284–7285. 10.1021/ja026249t. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber T.; Blin K.; Duddela S.; Krug D.; Kim H. U.; Bruccoleri R.; Lee S. Y.; Fischbach M. A.; Müller R.; Wohlleben W.; Breitling R.; Takano E.; Medema M. H. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43 (W1), W237–W243. 10.1093/nar/gkv437. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Q.; Li Y.; Chen D.; Yu Y.; Duan L.; Shen B.; Liu W. Radical-mediated enzymatic carbon chain fragmentation-recombination. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7 (3), 154–160. 10.1038/nchembio.512. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolet Y.; Zeppieri L.; Amara P.; Fontecilla-Camps J. C. Crystal structure of tryptophan lyase (NosL): evidence for radical formation at the amino group of tryptophan. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (44), 11840–11844. 10.1002/anie.201407320. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ji X.; Li Y.; Ding W.; Zhang Q. Substrate-Tuned Catalysis of the Radical S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine Enzyme NosL Involved in Nosiheptide Biosynthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (31), 9021–9024. 10.1002/anie.201503976. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhandari D. M.; Xu H.; Nicolet Y.; Fontecilla-Camps J. C.; Begley T. P. Tryptophan Lyase (NosL): Mechanistic Insights from Substrate Analogues and Mutagenesis. Biochem 2015, 54 (31), 4767–4769. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00764. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ji X.; Li Y.; Jia Y.; Ding W.; Zhang Q. Mechanistic Insights into the Radical S-adenosyl-l-methionine Enzyme NosL From a Substrate Analogue and the Shunt Products. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (10), 3334–3337. 10.1002/anie.201509900. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sicoli G.; Mouesca J.-M.; Zeppieri L.; Amara P.; Martin L.; Barra A. L.; Fontecilla-Camps J. C.; Gambarelli S.; Nicolet Y. Fine-tuning of a radical-based reaction by radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine tryptophan lyase. Science 2016, 351 (6279), 1320–1323. 10.1126/science.aad8995. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ding W.; Ji X.; Li Y.; Zhang Q. Catalytic Promiscuity of the Radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine Enzyme NosL. Front. Chem. 2016, 4 (27), 27.10.3389/fchem.2016.00027. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhandari D. M.; Fedoseyenko D.; Begley T. P. Tryptophan Lyase (NosL): A Cornucopia of 5′-Deoxyadenosyl Radical Mediated Transformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (50), 16184–16187. 10.1021/jacs.6b06139. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qianzhu H.; Ji W.; Ji X.; Chu L.; Guo C.; Lu W.; Ding W.; Gao J.; Zhang Q. Reactivity of the nitrogen-centered tryptophanyl radical in the catalysis by the radical SAM enzyme NosL. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53 (2), 344–347. 10.1039/C6CC08869D. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Badding E. D.; Grove T. L.; Gadsby L. K.; LaMattina J. W.; Boal A. K.; Booker S. J. Rerouting the Pathway for the Biosynthesis of the Side Ring System of Nosiheptide: The Roles of NosI, NosJ, and NosK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (16), 5896–5905. 10.1021/jacs.7b01497. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ding W.; Ji W.; Wu Y.; Wu R.; Liu W.-Q.; Mo T.; Zhao J.; Ma X.; Zhang W.; Xu P.; Deng Z.; Tang B.; Yu Y.; Zhang Q. Biosynthesis of the nosiheptide indole side ring centers on a cryptic carrier protein NosJ. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1), 437.10.1038/s41467-017-00439-1. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Qiu Y.; Du Y.; Zhang F.; Liao R.; Zhou S.; Peng C.; Guo Y.; Liu W. Thiolation Protein-Based Transfer of Indolyl to a Ribosomally Synthesized Polythiazolyl Peptide Intermediate during the Biosynthesis of the Side-Ring System of Nosiheptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (50), 18186–18189. 10.1021/jacs.7b11367. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • LaMattina J. W.; Wang B.; Badding E. D.; Gadsby L. K.; Grove T. L.; Booker S. J. NosN, a Radical S-Adenosylmethionine Methylase, Catalyzes Both C1 Transfer and Formation of the Ester Linkage of the Side-Ring System during the Biosynthesis of Nosiheptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (48), 17438–17445. 10.1021/jacs.7b08492. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Y.; Duan L.; Zhang Q.; Liao R.; Ding Y.; Pan H.; Wendt-Pienkowski E.; Tang G.; Shen B.; Liu W. Nosiheptide biosynthesis featuring a unique indole side ring formation on the characteristic thiopeptide framework. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4 (10), 855–864. 10.1021/cb900133x. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ding Y.; Yu Y.; Pan H.; Guo H.; Li Y.; Liu W. Moving posttranslational modifications forward to biosynthesize the glycosylated thiopeptide nocathiacin I in Nocardia sp. ATCC202099. Mol. Biosyst. 2010, 6 (7), 1180–1185. 10.1039/c005121g. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bai X.; Guo H.; Chen D.; Yang Q.; Tao J.; Liu W. Isolation and structure determination of two new nosiheptide-type compounds provide insights into the function of the cytochrome P450 oxygenase NocV in nocathiacin biosynthesis. Org. Chem. Front. 2020, 7 (3), 584–589. 10.1039/C9QO01328H. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo H.; Bai X.; Yang Q.; Xue Y.; Chen D.; Tao J.; Liu W. NocU is a cytochrome P450 oxygenase catalyzing N-hydroxylation of the indolic moiety during the maturation of the thiopeptide antibiotics nocathiacins. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19 (38), 8338–8342. 10.1039/D1OB01284C. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Y.; Guo H.; Zhang Q.; Duan L.; Ding Y.; Liao R.; Lei C.; Shen B.; Liu W. NosA catalyzing carboxyl-terminal amide formation in nosiheptide maturation via an enamine dealkylation on the serine-extended precursor peptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132 (46), 16324–16326. 10.1021/ja106571g. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wagstaff B. A.; Zorzoli A.; Dorfmueller H. C. NDP-rhamnose biosynthesis and rhamnosyltransferases: building diverse glycoconjugates in nature. Biochem. J. 2021, 478 (4), 685–701. 10.1042/BCJ20200505. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thibodeaux C. J.; Melançon C. E.; Liu H.-W. Natural-product sugar biosynthesis and enzymatic glycodiversification. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (51), 9814–9859. 10.1002/anie.200801204. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Du Y.; Xia Y.; Wu L.; Chen L.; Rong J.; Fan J.; Chen Y.; Wu X. Selective biosynthesis of a rhamnosyl nosiheptide by a novel bacterial rhamnosyltransferase. Microb. Biotechnol. 2024, 17 (1), e1441210.1111/1751-7915.14412. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boucher H. W.; Talbot G. H.; Bradley J. S.; Edwards J. E.; Gilbert D.; Rice L. B.; Scheld M.; Spellberg B.; Bartlett J. Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48 (1), 1–12. 10.1086/595011. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pucci M. J.; Bronson J. J.; Barrett J. F.; DenBleyker K. L.; Discotto L. F.; Fung-Tomc J. C.; Ueda Y. Antimicrobial Evaluation of Nocathiacins, a Thiazole Peptide Class of Antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (10), 3697–3701. 10.1128/aac.48.10.3697-3701.2004. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh S. B.; Xu L.; Meinke P. T.; Kurepina N.; Kreiswirth B. N.; Olsen D. B.; Young K. Thiazomycin, nocathiacin and analogs show strong activity against clinical strains of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70 (5), 671–674. 10.1038/ja.2016.165. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin A.; Camacho M.; Portaels F.; Palomino J. C. Resazurin microtiter assay plate testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibilities to second-line drugs: rapid, simple, and inexpensive method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47 (11), 3616–3619. 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3616-3619.2003. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baumann S.; Schoof S.; Harkal S. D.; Arndt H. D. Mapping the binding site of thiopeptide antibiotics by proximity-induced covalent capture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (17), 5664–5666. 10.1021/ja710608w. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harms J. M.; Wilson D. N.; Schluenzen F.; Connell S. R.; Stachelhaus T.; Zaborowska Z.; Spahn C. M.; Fucini P. Translational regulation via L11: molecular switches on the ribosome turned on and off by thiostrepton and micrococcin. Mol. Cell 2008, 30 (1), 26–38. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.01.009. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walter J. D.; Hunter M.; Cobb M.; Traeger G.; Spiegel P. C. Thiostrepton inhibits stable 70S ribosome binding and ribosome-dependent GTPase activation of elongation factor G and elongation factor 4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (1), 360–370. 10.1093/nar/gkr623. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodgate J.; Salliss M. E.; Sumang F. A.; Belousoff M.; Ward A.; Challis G. L.; Zenkin N.; Errington J.; Dashti Y.. Mode of Action and Mechanisms of Resistance to the Unusual Polyglycosylated Thiopeptide Antibiotic Persiathiacin A. ACS Infect. Dis. submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
  • Reasoner D. J.; Geldreich E. E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49 (1), 1–7. 10.1128/aem.49.1.1-7.1985. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoon S.-H.; Ha S.-M.; Kwon S.; Lim J.; Kim Y.; Seo H.; Chun J. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67 (5), 1613–1617. 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li H.; Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (14), 1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koboldt D. C.; Zhang Q.; Larson D. E.; Shen D.; McLellan M. D.; Lin L.; Miller C. A.; Mardis E. R.; Ding L.; Wilson R. K. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2012, 22 (3), 568–576. 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30 (14), 2068–2069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (2)

Research Councils UK (1)

Royal Society (1)